patrick.net

"REMDESIVIR WRONGFUL DEATH LANDMARK LAWSUIT FILED AGAINST THREE HOSPITALS IN FRESNO CALIF"
TruthforHealth.org, posted September 9, 2021
https://rumble.com/v1jcyh3-remdesivir-wrongful-death-landmark-lawsuit-filed-against-three-hospitals-in.html

This same video is also available at:
https://rumble.com/v1jl35e-dr.-mccullough-speaks-in-fresno-at-the-remdesivir-lawsuit-conference-min-53.html

DAN WATKINS: Well good morning. Thanks for having us today. I'm Dan Watkins, [gesturing towards his colleague at the podium] Michael Hamilton.[1] Michael's going to speak to you in a minute. But I am very, very pleased to announce that this morning we filed 3 complaints on behalf of 14 Fresno area families who lost loved ones at the hands of those health care providers who used remdesivir to treat covid. The remdesivir killed their loved ones and we're filing a lawsuit to seek redress for those wrongs.

The three hospitals that we filed against are Clovis Community Medical Center, Community Regional Medical Center, and St. Agnes Medical Center. There are several healthcare providers, individuals associated with the care that are also going to be named in lawsuits, have not been yet. And we're doing that to make sure they're held accountable for what they did.

[murmur from several voices in audience]

WOMAN'S VOICE: Thank you.

DAN WATKINS: The claims are based in two basic concepts. Pretty simple stuff. But very, very egregious and fundamentally wrong.

Medical deception. Deception of the patient who becomes a decedent. Deception of the loved ones who need to have the information to make informed decisions.

And then we have beyond that, we have actual unconsented to medical care. Unbelievable in this society, in this day and age with the trusted health care industry that's supposed to be doing these types of things.

The 4 causes of action are the same in each complaint. We have fraudulent concealment, elder abuse, where the case might be for the age of the decedent, medical malpractice, and battery. And not simple battery where they didn't get consent. Actual unconsented to treatment that was not consented to battery.

We allege the defendants had information they intentionally did not provide to decedents or their family members. Information about the dangerous nature of remdesivir, its history, its lack of effectiveness in prior use.[2] Information that would have changed the decisions of those people in the hospitals had they been told.

Information was held from from the patients and from their family members regarding safe and effective methods of treatments for covid, safe over time, no problems with the care, very efficacious. We're going to hear all about that from our esteemed panel of experts here in a minute. They intentionally withheld that information.

And in some cases they intentionally provided remdesivir over the objections of the decedent and their family members. And that is not an exaggeration. We have evidence of it, eyewitness testimony and other testimony, excuse me, other evidence, that will be presented.

Beyond that, they administered this care and did all of this stuff for financial incentives provided to them by the state and others. They withheld effective means of treatment to run remdesivir as the only solution because of the financial incentives provided to them.

WOMAN'S VOICE: Yes.

DAN WATKINS: You'll hear more about that from our speakers, especially Michael. Again, there's no exaggeration to these complaints. This is what happened. Medically deceived patients, their loved ones deceived, unconsented to medical care provided. It's crazy. But that's the day and age we live in now. So someone's got to stand up and push back, and that's what Michael and I are trying to do.

WOMAN'S VOICE: Yes.

[sustained applause and loud cheering]

9:15
DAN WATKINS: We're going to work our tail off to hold these defendants accountable. And we're doing it in the hopes that this lawsuit will spark filing of many others. Because there health care professionals in facilities across the country doing this.

WOMAN'S VOICE: Yes.

DAN WATKINS: Good people are dying because of remdesivir. And they know it's not effective and they continue to do it. So we hope to spark additional lawsuits, not just in this state, but across the country.

9:44
Fundamentally, personal autonomy is a right that we all have. Personal autonomy in medical decisions, and that's really what's at issue here. Right? And the result of that, loss of that today, over the past is, all these loved ones are gone. They did not need to die.

I'm going to turn it over to Michael Hamilton here in a second, but I want to take a minute to thank our experts. We've got people coming from all over the country to speak to you today to tell you about why this lawsuit needed to be filed, the problems with remdesivir, the efficacy of really safe and effective other means of treatment. We've got Dr. Ardis, Dr. Lindsay, Dr. Farella, and Dr. McCullough [3] are going to speak to you and give you all the information you need to know why—

VOICE: Woo!

DAN WATKINS: — these lawsuits —

VOICE: Woo!

DAN WATKINS: — are being filed.

[sustained applause and loud cheering]

It's really, really important that we understand the powerhouse team that's here. This is not just some quackery, like it's being put out on your radio stations here. This is a wrong that needs to be corrected. And these experts [inaudible] they will tell you the information you need to know.

I want to thank also before we finish here, before I finish, Truth for Health Foundation.[4] They recently committed to significant financial support for this lawsuit. They have—

[sustained applause and loud cheering]

— doctor, Dr. Lee Vliet[5] and I are working together on several of the lawsuits. Dr. Lee Vliet and Mr. Hamilton here have agreed to work together on some other types of lawsuits. The foundation is coming to bat and they're going to work hard for you here locally, and hopefully across the state. So if you get a minute, please get up there, Truth for Health Foundation dot org. Check them out. See what they do. They, they support and fight for human rights and civil rights across the country. So [inaudible] this type of stuff, and they're helping the military, all kinds of great things, but they came to play today. We just got word, significant financial contribution to these lawsuits. So I want to thank them.

And that leads me to my last point. That's from God, by the way.

[audience murmurs, yes]

Dr. Vliet is an amazing, god-fearing woman, and she sees the calling and the need to help. And she rallied and got it from her foundation. And God has been working here. It is not me, it is not Michael, it is not the [inaudible] that will win this case. It will be God. And we will fight for Him—

WOMAN'S VOICE: Amen.

DAN WATKINS: — because I know you are God-fearing people. And we need Him back in this fight. We need to put Him at the fore, follow His lead. And that's what we're going to do. And with that, Michael Hamilton.

Truth for Health Foundation Legal Strategist Michael Hamilton on the Fresno Remdesivir Lawsuits
"REMDESIVIR WRONGFUL DEATH LANDMARK LAWSUIT FILED AGAINST THREE HOSPITALS IN FRESNO CALIF"
[National Press Conference, September 7, 2022]
https://rumble.com/v1jcyh3-remdesivir-wrongful-death-landmark-lawsuit-filed-against-three-hospitals-in.html
This same video is also available at:
https://rumble.com/v1jl35e-dr.-mccullough-speaks-in-fresno-at-the-remdesivir-lawsuit-conference-min-53.html

MICHAEL HAMILTON: So ladies and gentlemen, I guess by way of introduction I will tell you that I serve as the Truth for Health[1] Litigation Director, um, I'm sorry, Strategist, helping with the strategy for the legal cases that are going on around the country.

Truth for Health Foundation has been sounding the alarm on remdesivir[2] for several years now. I am, I can't tell you how thankful I am to be surrounded by men and women of courage. [He takes a microphone]. How thankful I am to be surrounded by men and women of courage.

We have people all over the country, there's a great evil being done. People are being butchered like cattle in hospitals all over the country. I have— my phone is exploding with cries for help from every state you can imagine every day all through the day. I got several texts just sitting here. Someone saying, I saw, what are you doing in California, can you help me?

But it takes courage for these plaintiffs to stand up. It's so devastating to families to know that their loved one was tortured to death. That's what's happening, folks. They're being tortured to death for money. And many families are so devastated that they just, they, they can't take a followup
step into this fight.

Our plaintiffs are men and women of courage. Our doctors are men and women of courage. Our experts, they have much to lose. Dan and I, targets are painted on us. We're going against, against a great evil.

[murmur from audience]

But our God is greater than evil.

[applause and cheering]

The fight against evil was won at the foot of the cross. But we have work to do here and now. An amazing team, not just our experts, but all of the folks that have helped bring this together
and it's something that as Dan said, only God could have orchestrated.

So we are in this fight. The fight— I want to speak just for a moment to the financial incentives in California. The charge— what I'm going to speak about is the average charge rate for 3 categories of covid victims.Now sometimes people who are killed by remdesivir don't have covid. Sometimes they're killed because they came to the hospital and the hospital needed some money. They tell them they have covid pneumonia, whatever that is, and I'll let the experts speak to that, and then they put them on these remdesivir protocols, they take them away from their loved ones, and they murder them.

Now if you treat someone as an outpatient and you give them something that's going to help them and send them home, average charge rate in California is 3,200 dollars. If you bring them into the hospital and you treat them as a noncomplex covid patient, the average charge rate is 111,000 dollars.

[murmur from audience]

However, if you treat them as a complex covid patient, which means you have to either intubate them or put them in intensive— what's the word I'm looking for?

WOMAN'S VOICE: ICU.

MICHAEL HAMILTON: Yeah, ICU, intensive care. If do either one of those things. by definition they become complex, and the average charge rate is 450,000 dollars.

[audience exclamations]

On top of that, they get a bonus from the government, a code, that allows them to charge a 20% extra on the entire hospital stay, which the roughly 450,000 dollars is an extra 90,000 dollars.

So you can see why there's a great incentive not to just give them something that works and send them home, but to actually bring them in, find a way to intubate them, call that a complex case, and now you have 500,000 dollars instead of 3,200 dollars. That's a tremendous financial incentive. And it's not the only one. There are more. And more than we expect to find in discovery.[3]

I mean, on the face of it, it looks like murder for money.

[audience murmurs]

And it's happening in hospitals all around the country, and the protocol is almost exactly the same. There is very little variation.

I'm proud to be surrounded by men and women of faith in this fight in Fresno, California. As Dan said, we're going to— our goal is to put a stop to this. First here. And when we do, we will watch the dominoes begin to fall around the country.

WOMAN'S VOICE: Thank you.

MICHAEL HAMILTON: This fight in Fresno is going to be the shot that resonates around the world.

Gail Seiler on How She Escaped Hospital Imprisonment

WethePatriotsUSA.org/faithful-freedom
by Teryn Gregson
September 28, 2022
https://rumble.com/v1lna9b-woman-escapes-hospital-holocaust-husband-breaks-her-out-ep.-33.html

TERYN GREGSON: The person we're interviewing today is a bad a#s. There's really no other way to put it. You know I don't like to curse on this show but Gail Seiler is a hero. She broke out of imprisonment, really, in a hospital. There's no other way to put it. They wouldn't give her water, nutrition, they wouldn't give her a different doctor when she requested it, they wouldn't let her leave. Her husband broke into the hospital, basically, and took her out, bypassed the police. This is an incredible story. And it's amazing because she survived. And so many stories that we have told on this podcast, so many people that you have heard over the past couple of years, have not survived their incidences in the hospital. For example, Scott Schara, his daughter Grace, we had him tell her story on episode 22[1]of this podcast, and you know, she is no longer with us. So we are so, so happy that Gail is, and we're happy that she's telling her story and she's doing some incredible work with the Former Feds Freedom Foundation. They have a Covid Humanity Betrayal Memory Project[2] where they give victims and survivors a voice, they document their stories and help find attorneys that hold these hospitals accountable.

Gail said that since she's started to tell her story she's had thousands of people reach out about how they have had similar instances where their family members have not made it. She's had politicians reach out to her, wondering how we prevent this. We have to hear Gail's story.

And first before we do that I want to encourage you to consider making a one time recurring donation to We the Patriots USA, a nonprofit 501c organization who is working to help victims, help people like Gail. We've helped Alisa Campau[3] who was not being allowed to get a kidney transplant because she didn't have the covid shot, Bill [inaudible] who was denied Ivermectin, they just recently filed his appeal against Walmart. These are big cases, that we can have some big impact with and her group, the Former Feds Freedom Foundation, is also doing fantastic work. So let's dive in to Gail's incredible story. ...

TERYN GREGSON: It's almost been a year since this happened to you. Why have you now started to share your story? What prompted you to do so?

GAIL SEILER: Well, so when I first, um, when I first, when my husband pretty much stormed the ICU with my daughter and got me out, it took quite a while for me to recover. It took me longer to recover from the hospital abuse and neglect than it did from covid quite frankly, and so the first couple months that's what that was dedicated to. But I did tell my story initially to Crusader Radio and His Glory TV because His Glory TV actually had connected with my daughter to help while I was in the hospital, to help advocate, get her in contact with people. So we did do an interview there.

But I think now there's more people willing to hear it. At the time, there were very few stories coming out. I can remember when we started the Covid Humanity Betrayal Memory Project with Former Feds, I hooked up with Former Feds I think it was in February of this year and you know, initially there was I think like 10 stories out there. And now there's hundreds and hundreds of stories, and hundreds in the queue to be told that our interviewers are working through.

So you know initially, I was like, me and my husband and my daughter said, nobody's going to believe this crazy story we have, this crazy hospital experience we had. I mean, it's like, because you know, something out of a sci fi movie.

TERYN GREGSON: It is.

GAIL SEILER: And even today you know there were people that were right there with us in the beginning and I have to double-check with them, I'm like, they tried to kill me right? And they're like, oh yeah, they tried to murder you dead.

So it's because it's a wild story. And so. But now I think people are accepting those stories, they're starting to see more and more of them. You know, they can ignore 10 people talking about a horrible hospital experience or death, and especially you know the stories where the loved one doesn't make it, the person's child or the person's husband or wife. There's a bit of a pat on the head, you know, misplaced grief, you know, the doctors tried to do everything they can, and they kind of gaslight. And sometimes people don't know that they're gaslighting the victim. They're just, you know, misplaced grief, they didn't really try to kill your— But when you have a lot of survivor stories coming out, they can't, you know, it gives credibility to those stories, right? Because the family has the view outside looking in, what they went through. But people like me and many other survivors that have come forward since the Epoch Times article[4] broke, they have the view from the inside. They know what's being said, I know from my own experience, the doctors and the nurses knew what they were doing. They absolutely know what they were doing. There's no doubt about it in my mind.

"Remdesivir! Interview With Nurse Michelle Gershman"
CDMedia Published October 20, 2022
https://rumble.com/v1ou4du-remdesivir-interview-with-nurse-michelle-gershman.html

RUMBLE PAGE DESCRIPTION: "American Conversations Host Christine Dolan continues the interviews about remdesivir. In late November 2021, Fresno, California nurse Michelle Gershman lost her mother after being admitted to St. Agnes hospital. Michelle tells the heart-wrenching story about how she and her mother both told the hospital not to put her on remdesivir. The doctor claimed it was "protocol" only after Michelle discovered that the family and patient's demands were intentionally ignored."

MICHELLE GERSHMAN, RN: I took her to St. Agnes, she walked in there. They put her on 2 liters of oxygen and her oxygen went from 85% to 92%. So I said, OK good. I felt like I'd put her in the right place. And I told her, you just need oxygen. I said, when I dropped her off, make sure you tell them you do not want remdesivir and you don't want to go on a ventilator. You just need oxygen and some fluids. And so she said OK. And she walked in there. And then I talked—

CHRISTINE DOLAN: At that point in time you were not allowed to accompany your mother inside the hospital, correct?

MICHELLE GERSHMAN, RN: Correct. They said there's no visitors. And thinking about it now, if they had told my mom, by admitting you to the hospital, you're going to have absolutely no visitors, we're going to throw you in a back room to suffocate and die, we're going to bombard your body with all these medications and stick needles in you all day long and wake you up while you're sleeping, my mom would have said, hell no, I'm going home. I'll take my chances. But they didn't tell her anything like that. They just brought her in.

CHRISTINE DOLAN: Did you know that that was happening in the hospitals in Fresno at that time, since you are a nurse?

MICHELLE GERSHMAN, RN: No. I didn't know they would be so evil, robotic, barbaric. No, I did not know they were going to treat my mom like that.

CHRISTINE DOLAN: So you weren't working at the hospital, you were working at, you were not in the covid unit, the ICU, or the ER at that time?

MICHELLE GERSHMAN, RN: Not at this time. Because when covid started around March of 2020, I worked on the covid floor for about 6 months, and the [?] floor. And then November, somewhere around there, of 2020, I transferred to the post-partum unit. So by November 2020 covid had not gotten that bad yet. So with the entire year that I was on post-partum with the babies I'm not really sure what was happening on the covid floor anymore because I had already transferred.

CHRISTINE DOLAN: Alright. And when this happened to your mom, this was November 2021, right?

MICHELLE GERSHMAN, RN: Correct.

CHRISTINE DOLAN: OK so. So your mom gets in there. You're talking to her by phone. Are you talking to anybody else that's on the floor at the time? The head nurse at the nursing station? The doctor?

MICHELLE GERSHMAN, RN: No, not really because she was in the emergency room and I didn't—- I knew they were probably busy. So I was talking to my mom, she was coherent, I felt like she was OK, she was just getting oxygen.

My mom was a very bold, redhead woman that, I knew she, you know, she's loud and she'll tell them. And if I tell her, make sure you don't take this medication, she'll tell them. And they, so I was just talking to her, I wasn't really talking to the doctor. And then—

CHRISTINE DOLAN: But your mother confirmed to you that she did tell them that she did not want to be put on a ventilator, did not want to be put on remdesivir?

MICHELLE GERSHMAN, RN: Yes, because I asked her later that night, on the 15th, I said, did you tell them you do not want remdesivir? She said, yes I told them and they looked at me like I'm crazy. I said, well that's OK, they can look at you like you're crazy, but don't let them give it to you.

CHRISTINE DOLAN: Right.

MICHELLE GERSHMAN, RN: She said OK. And then she went to sleep that night, I'm assuming. And then I found out when I read the medical records that on November 16th at 2 in the morning they gave her remdesivir.

CHRISTINE DOLAN: So she may have been asleep and they may have, and they have woken her up, and she's in a doze, they're just giving her shot, and she's thinking it's another IV change or something like that.

MICHELLE GERSHMAN, RN: Yes, exactly. And then the next day she said, everybody in here's wearing masks, it's really hard to know what anybody's talking about. And so they did tell her, we're giving you remdesivir and she's you know, half asleep, she probably didn't understand. And so you know that was the first dose. And so--

CHRISTINE DOLAN: Pardon me for interrupting, Michelle. When did you find out that your mom had been given remdesivir? At what point?

MICHELLE GERSHMAN, RN: On day 4. Because the first three days, my mom was responding to my calls, she was answering the phone, she was texting me back. She said, Oh, I'm feeling better. I thought she was getting better. And I thought she was getting better. I thought she was getting better. I thought, OK I put her in the right place, they're going to help her and send her home. And then on day 4, she stopped answering my calls and she wasn't texting me back. And I started panicking because I know my mom. I talk to her every day. For the entire last year, that I, you know, she'd come over every day, she was really involved with my kids. And so she didn't answer my calls.

So I started panicking. And I called at 2 pm and I got a hold of the doctor, and I said, why isn't she answering my calls? And the doctor said, oh, she has covid, she's tired. And I said, well, what are you giving her? And then she named off these medications, and she said remdesivir. And I said, why are you giving her that? She told you not to give that to her. And she said, Oh, it's covid protocol, that's what we're giving everybody with covid. And I said, do not give her another dose of that! She told you not to give it to her. And she said, well, she got her last dose today. And so I knew after that--

CHRISTINE DOLAN: So your mom had for 4 or 5 days?

MICHELLE GERSHMAN, RN: Yeah. She'd had 5 by this point.

CHRISTINE DOLAN: Is that the norm, that people are given 5 days of remdesivir?

MICHELLE GERSHMAN, RN: Right so, 5 days, and then if they aren't better, they give them another 5 days, which by that point they're dead. So. Pretty much.

And so I didn't know that much about remdesivir yet. I just know that my mom does not tolerate medications very well at all. And I had been hearing a couple of things about, you know, this antiviral that's not really helping, and so I told her, don't take it, not really realizing that it's straight poison.

And so that night when I got off the phone with the doctor, my heart sank. I felt disgusted. I felt like, I knew I'm going to lose my mom. She's going to die because they gave her that medication. They poisoned her.

And so the next 10 days was complete agony for me, because I kept calling, and I wanted to get information on my mom, and she was not really, she was declining. She would answer my calls but wouldn't able to talk very much because she was short of breath and then also sleeping more, so and not really texting me back anymore.

And so the next couple of days I kept calling to get information about her, and everybody I talked to, they would say, oh, she's getting better! You know, we're checking on her, her oxygen's fine! It was so robotic, that they would just say, she's getting better. They kept saying, oh, she'll be home in a couple days. You know, she's resting.

And then if they didn't say that, they would just not want to give me information. They just treated me like I was a burden, like they don't want me asking about my mother. And none of them, I feel like none of them have any compassion. They have no sense of put yourself in somebody else's shoes. Like, if that were your mother, you would be trying to do anything to save her life! And I would have done anything for my mother.

I was begging to come in every day, especially after day 4. I'm like, she needs me there. I can watch her oxygen. I can help her with the machines, you know, bring her things, or have my husband send me things upstairs, because I'm like, I can stay in the room, I don't have to leave so I don't expose anybody else. And every time I asked, I asked every single day, I kept bugging them, I asked to talk to the House Supervisor and they didn't want to send me to the House Sup, they said, no, you need to go through the Floor Supervisor first. And every time I asked, they said, no, I'm sorry, it's policy, we don't allow any visitors. And I kept saying, my mom could die, like, she needs me there! And they did not care.

CHRISTINE DOLAN: So eventually you were allowed to come in, but only for a short period of time.

MICHELLE GERSHMAN, RN: Correct.

CHRISTINE DOLAN: That was towards the end.

MICHELLE GERSHMAN, RN: Yes. So they have this weird thing with their visitor policy, if the patient gets to the point where there's no return, that they're going to die, they finally will let you in. So I don't know why they have to wait so long,. because if they had let me in in the beginning, I could have potentially saved her life. I would have advocated for her, and I would have been able to monitor her machines. I told them I'm an RN, I worked the covid floor, I can help her, and if I'm there, I can improve your patent outcomes. And they did not care.

Whistleblower: Hospitals Killed ‘Many, Many Thousands’ of Covid Patients

A medical professional has blown the whistle and warned the public that “many, many thousands” of Covid patients were killed by hospitals during the pandemic and not by the virus, as officially claimed.

The whistleblower, respiratory therapist Mark Bishofsky, has gone on the record to state that COVID-19 patients died because they were killed by hospital protocols.

Respiratory therapists diagnose, treat, and manage conditions that affect the lungs, according to the Cleveland Clinic.

Bishofsky revealed that patients didn’t die from Covid.

However, thousands of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 were killed when they were put on ventilators and denied treatment with ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine or even vitamin D, Bishofsky told CHD.TV.

Bishofsky revealed that he was aware of “many, many thousands” of people who were killed by hospitals but simply listed as “Covid deaths.” ...

“Many, many thousands of patients died because of this rush to early intubation and not allowing early treatment with medications like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine or even vitamin D — they wouldn’t even give these patients vitamin D,” he said.

“They just wanted to intubate them and put them on remdesivir.”

Patients were being intubated “when they were needing as little as three liters of oxygen,” according to Bishofsky.

The medical expert said he’d never seen that before in his 25 years of practice.

“That’s so little oxygen to the point where if you took the patient off of it, they’re gonna be fine,” he said.

“But there was this rush to intubate these patients.”

Bishofsky tried to convince doctors that “this wasn’t the right thing to do.” ...

In the first week of the pandemic, the doctors at Bishofsky’s hospital successfully used hydroxychloroquine to treat Covid patients.

“We had extremely good outcomes,” he said.

However, the sentiment regarding hydroxychloroquine suddenly changed when it became the target of a media smear campaign after President Donald Trump touted the benefits of the drug.

Almost immediately after, an “absolutely bogus” study came out in The Lancet on hydroxychloroquine, Bishofsky said.

“The doctors would cite that,” he noted.

At the end of his tenure at the hospital, Bishofsky told its medical director:

“You know, this whole early intubation thing was completely hideous.” ...

One of the saddest aspects of the hospital protocol was how COVID-19 patients were isolated from their family members.

“These patients wanted to see family more than anything,” he said.

“Perhaps they’d been there two or three weeks.

“They’re afraid. They’re sick. They just want to see somebody they love.”

In this month’s open thread, I’ll share my thoughts on a question many have asked me since Trump and RFK Jr. won the election and an actual window has been created to change healthcare policies in America—what could be done to increase the survival rates in our hospitals and how can you protect a loved one that’s hospitalized?

This question, in turn, is a reflection of a sobering realization many had throughout COVID-19—what many of us believed about our hospitals was utterly incorrect, and rather than help patients, hospitals effectively functioned like assembly lines that ran disastrous protocols (e.g., remdesivir), denied patients access to their loved ones and refused to use alternative therapies (e.g., ivermectin) even when it was known the patients were expected to die otherwise.

For example, during COVID-19, one travel nurse who was assigned to a New York hospital with one of the highest death tolls in the nation realized something very wrong was happening throughout the hospital and decided to covertly record her colleagues and become a whistleblower

Within her testimony, one particular recording she made was particularly illuminating as a doctor perfectly illustrated the dysfunctional mentality that has infected our medical system by stating he was unwilling to try any alternative therapy (which had some evidence behind it) for patients he knew would otherwise die.

Much of this in turn, was due to a series of standardized treatment protocols being created for COVID-19, which heavily financially incentivized remdesivir and then ventilator care while simultaneously avoiding an effective off-patent treatment for COVID-19. Despite remdesivir actually increasing the death rate from COVID-19, hospital administrators still pushed their doctors to use it (and retaliated against those who did not follow the NIH COVID protocols) because of how powerful the financial incentives were for doing so.

Note: the NIH COVID treatment panel continued to make remdesivir the standard of care for COVID-19 and forbid alternative therapies (e.g., ivermectin) even as a mountain of evidence piled up that argued against it. This was due to Anthony Fauci appointing the committee and selecting chairs that had direct financial ties to Remdesivir’s manufacturer—an issue that sadly holds true for many other committees which create the guidelines that dictate medical care in the United States (e.g., in a previous article I showed how America’s cholesterol guidelines were authored by individuals taking money from statin manufacturers and that the conclusions those panels reached were the exact opposite of an independent one which evaluated the same data).

Overall, the remarkable illustration of this corruption was the fact that families eventually began suing hospitals to allow the use of ivermectin for a relative who was expected to die even after being subjected to Fauci’s hospital COVID protocols. Remarkably, because there was so much money on the line, the hospitals chose to fight these lawsuits in court rather than just give ivermectin to the patients. In turn, of the 80 lawsuits filed by lawyer Ralph Lorigo, in 40 the judge sided with the family, and in 40 with the hospital, and of those, in the 40 where patients received ivermectin, 38 survived, whereas of the 40 who did not, 2 survived—in essence making suing a hospital arguably the most effective medical intervention in history. Yet, rather than take this data into consideration, the profit-focused hospitals banded together to develop an effective apparatus to dismiss further lawsuits. ...

Journalist Jacqui Deevoy Reported From The Frontlines On Sadistic Crimes Against The Elderly And Vulnerable On The Covid Death Pathway. Now She Reminds Us Why We Must Never Forget Or Forgive

She’s Submitted Proof Of Mass Culling To Over 100 Mainstream Editors And Staff Writers; They Failed To Publish Her Work, and Some Even Ghosted Her.

Forgive And Forget?

Are we prepared to forgive the crimes against humanity perpetrated over the last four and a half years?

Are we ready to forget the evil that was foisted upon us and used to control us?

Journalist and filmmaker Jacqui Deevoy says ‘absolutely not’.




Over the last four and a half years, I was drawn into the dark world of care homes and the crimes being perpetrated by our government and media against care home residents and their families.

The ‘no visitors’ policy was never a law and the fact that the government website always quietly stated that visits should be facilitated whenever possible, care home managers followed what the TV told them and locked down, some as far back as February 2020. Then that was it - elderly residents locked in and their friends and families locked out. Care home horror stories started to emerge: I investigated and penned several. Remember this? https://dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9023539/Shocking-moment-dementia-stricken-removed-window-visit-daughter-begs-carers.html… And this? https://dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9304591/Woman-reveals-told-waving-father-80-care-home-window-illegal.html… (The gentleman in this article - Attilio Criscuo - sadly passed away in September, a mere 18 months after its publication. RIP, Attilio.)

We are never going to forget how much suffering the government - and those that did their bidding - imposed upon our elderly in care homes and hospitals. Neglected, imprisoned, deprived from seeing loved ones, thinking they’d been abandoned, many not getting the treatment they needed, unnecessarily and dangerously jabbed with a toxic experimental injection, many euthanised with morphine and Midazolam (as used in the US to execute Death Row criminals) all under the guise of treatment for an illness that’s never been proven to exist.

The Covid Death Pathway, I called it. For that’s what it was. Thousands were callously killed on end of life ‘care’ programmes and their deaths were written off as ‘Covid’ deaths. (I offered stories on this obvious and deliberate misattribution of death to Covid to a few newspapers - along with stories of vaccine death and injury and proof that the so-called pandemic was a hoax - but all such pitches were rejected.)

They want us to forget stories like this: https://dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9027457/Officer-refused-visit-dying-mum-care-home-able-recognise-him.html… They want us to forget that they ever published stories like this: https://dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-8785349/Care-home-nurse-sacked-claiming-pandemic-hoax-insists-shes-seen-no-evidence-cornavirus.html… I had to push hard to get stories like this one into the mainstream press: https://telegraph.co.uk/family/life/incensed-dads-care-home-shutting/… - stories about my dad, stuck in a locked down care home for 10 months, but freed as soon as I threatened to take them to court for false imprisonment and violation of human rights. https://telegraph.co.uk/family/life/sprung-dad-care-home/… And now it’s being suggested that we just forget all about it and move on. Yes, they lied - about pretty much everything - but, hey, that’s all in the past and it’s important to let bygones be bygones. Really?

My dad was never the same after being deprived of visits, hugs, kisses and cuddles. He could not understand why we were only permitted to speak through a closed window and he was permanently perplexed as to why he was being punished. When I got him home, he was an echo of his former self: he had become fearful, depressed, anxious and paranoid. He started self-harming, he had suicidal thoughts and was suffering from a clear case of survivor’s guilt, his joy at being free overshadowed by worry about the people he’d left behind. That miserable stint in the home had caused him to lose the will to live and, exactly a year after his homecoming, he died when a paramedic injected him with a too-high dose of a drug he’d never had before. https://telegraph.co.uk/christmas/2020/11/23/caring-dad-home-hard-know-done-right-thing/…

I told The Telegraph what had happened to my dad. The editor I deal with there didn’t even offer any condolences - she just said that sort of story wasn’t really her department and gave me the email address of an editor who she thought might be interested. I emailed this other editor three times but got no reply.

And what about Captain Tom? HE was allowed visitors and he even popped off on holiday with Cliff Richard, while our elderly relatives died alone and had ‘rule of six’ funerals held for them. Just unbelievable. https://davidicke.com/2021/02/03/rip-to-sir-tom-moore-who-died-surrounded-by-his-family-but-tough-luck-to-the-rest-of-the-elderly-who-died-alone/…

All told, I’ve contacted over 100 editors and staff writers on U.K. newspapers and magazines since 2021.

In one email, I informed them all that their refusal to publish my story made them complicit in the ongoing Midazolam murders and that they all had blood on their hands.