Comments 1 - 4 of 4 Search these comments
He likes to use burner phones” – information only an insider with access to highly sensitive information would state.
Intrepid undercover (under covers?) citizen journalist James O’Keefe has done it again. Yesterday he broke a massive new exposé story, perhaps second only to the story that derailed Project Veritas, of the amorous gay Pfizer VP explaining how the pharma giant experiments with illegal gain of function research all the time. This time, James and his citizen volunteer journalist catfished a CIA agent.
https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1785782393414029738
Evidencing the new story’s top-tier billing, within hours of its drop yesterday afternoon, standout U.S. Representative Matt Gaetz (R-Fl.) had already letter-bombed the House Weaponization Committee, strongly requesting investigation of the claims made in James’ video.
As an aside: How useless is the corporate media complex? When was the last time you remember any significant news story breaking in corporate media that led to prompt Congressional investigation?
Not only that, but the CIA’s press spokesman — I bet you never even knew the Agency had one — called O’Keefe last night and delivered a statement making two points: it swore the Agency never, ever acts with bias, not ever. And, more to the point, it confirmed Amjad was — with the implied emphasis on immediate past tense — was a CIA contractor. Now unemployed.
OMG’s latest clip featured a chatty, love-struck, wine-drunk, middle-aged man on an Internet date. His name is Amjad Anton Fseisi — if that’s his real name — and he not only boasted of being a CIA agent, but even whipped out his official Agency ID badge upon request. You can watch the whole OMG video, but if you’re in a hurry, here’s the gist of what he said:
Amjad officially works for Raytheon as a ‘contractor’ but really works for the CIA. This is a classic dodge used by the Agency to skirt Congressional oversight.
The aging lothario currently works — sorry, worked — in the CIA’s Chinese Mission Center.
He has been passed around various U.S. intelligence agencies since 2008, and while cheerfully babbling about undermining the former President, bragged about holding a top-rated security clearance: TS/SCI.
Getting to the bad stuff, Amjad happily prattled about an informal CIA policy, observed in the Agency up through two consecutive CIA directors, to deliberately mislead President Trump by withholding key information and critical details.
He called Trump a “f-ing idiot,” claimed Trump never deserved to get real intelligence details because Trump would just give them away (translation: President Trump would actually use the information).
Without providing details, Amjad claimed Trump gave away — that is he, Amjad, the genius, felt it was a bad trade — classified information to Russian President Putin.
Amjad said he was 100% sure that Trump is a Russian asset but admitted there’s no evidence.
He said “of course” the CIA is still constantly watching Trump, even specifically mentioning Trump’s ex-wife (Marla Maples?) as being under surveillance.
Ironically, while on a random internet date with a stranger, he gloated about how well he was trained to leave a “low social media footprint.”
There’s so much I could say about this! First, the CIA is obviously totally unafraid of undercover reporters at this point, and why shouldn’t it be? Second, at least we have citizen journalists willing to do this kind of work since corporate media is about as useful as an already squeezed lemon. But most important, the video slapped a face and a name on other claims being made about the sold-out, biased intelligence Agency.
And what does this say about how susceptible CIA agents are to enemy catfishing? Sheesh. I blame DEI hiring.
Last month, independent journalists and “Twitter files” veterans Michael Shellenberger and Matt Taibbi published a shocking Substack describing a very interesting narrative about how the Russia-collusion hoax was created by US intelligence agencies. In the story, the journos claimed that anonymous Agency sources told them how the CIA bootstrapped Trump’s wiretapping into a gloss of legality.
Here’s how the scheme allegedly worked. In 2015, the CIA had a problem. It couldn’t investigate a presidential candidate without really good cause, not legally. But then, after a late night of energy-drink fueled brainstorming … Eureka! An idea! They did it; they finally figured out a way to do that which must not be done.
The CIA asked foreign intelligence agencies to do their dirty work! So simple. After all, foreign intelligence agencies aren’t tied down with rules against investigating American presidential candidates. It’s practically obligatory for them anyways. Just get us something we can work with.
The foreign intelligences agencies, good little doggies, dished up a document dump of stinky, anti-Trump bull excrement. The delighted spooks at the CIA whisked its ‘newfound’, totally fake and procured dirt — good cause! — right down the hall to their law enforcement cousins at the FBI. And the rest, as they say, was history. Alleged history, anyway.
But it may not stay secret history forever. Remember Trump’s copy of the Crossfire-Hurricane binder? It is still floating around out there somewhere, driving the security state totally insane. Shellenberger is all over the Lost Binder story, too. Last month, he claimed the documents in the binder describe exactly how the CIA pulled off its massively-illegal scheme to trap a President.
You will recall, as Shellenberger did, CNN’s astounding limited hangout about the missing binder published last December 15th — a stratospheric story about a lost, triple-top-secret, double-classified binder containing documents CNN said proved Russian meddling in the 2015 election.
At the time, I wrote at length about CNN’s CIA hangout. CNN has never followed up on its salacious story, not one single time. One and done.
What I’m getting at is: CNN didn’t run the missing binder story, not really. CNN was just the straw man, the beard, as they say. It was obviously the CIA’s story, and they used CNN to run it for their own reasons, probably to blunt criticism in case that awful binder ever shows up someday, as seems likely.
It appears the CIA owns CNN. Yawn.
I will perhaps be accused of over-dramatizing my conclusion, but to me, what all this amounts to is a rogue intelligence agency hell-bent on becoming a government unto itself. The new OMG video is walking, talking verification of the growing body of evidence suggesting the CIA is totally out of control.
How to regain control of the CIA is a different, thornier question.
Great job, OMG citizen journalists, who aren’t owned by the CIA.
Video at the link (too big for Pat.net)
https://twitter.com/optimatessuck/status/1785799422258896899
A plant? A major bust? Some jackass pulling a date's rope? You decide.