patrick.net

His party sponsors Hindu genocide by Muslims in India even after country partition even today!
UK witnessing the glimpse of their own medicine.

"Top police officer" says it's my fault that the UK is revolting against the government.

Remember when journalists use to scrutinize those leading us?

Not anymore, they're all literally spokespeople for them.

Luckily independent journalists are the only ones the people watch and trust now.

When members of nation claim to be a sovereign, independent boss-bitch of a nation while simultaneously being en thrall to a colonialist past that ended 70 years ago.

Despite months of protests, riots, and arson of migrant facilities, the Irish have not yet succeeded in throwing off the globalist yoke.

But now those Troubles have spread to England. The riots of the English started with a bang, and have already spread and intensified, with new protests popping up all over the country. I wouldn’t recommend anyone attend, I’m sure some of them are traps, for the British police excel at kettling operations; moreover, no mercy is to be expected from an enemy regime.

Things could easily spin out of control. What if one or more of the state’s client groups, probably Muslims of various kinds, shows up at a rally, and a riot breaks out between the protected class and the angry natives? The police would have a hard time retreating from the Muslims while siccing the hounds and the tear gas on the natives. On second thought the police probably wouldn’t have any trouble doing that at all, as the police tend to be controlled by lesbian harridans who DEI’d their ways up the promotional ladder, and whose professional duty it is to hate white males. So, the police might well just openly side with the invaders.

Especially considering that many of the police are invaders.

The responses to the slaughter from both mainstream British media, liberal commentators, and ordinary people remind us that there is a serious divide between the two irreconcilable worlds inhabited by people today. One silver lining of tragedy is always this: that it makes it clear where everyone’s loyalties truly lie.

The Guardian for example calls the murderer a “boy” even though a 17-year-old is physically a grown man, and is in no way comparable to a child. Pictures are consistently shared of the murderer as a child in order to somehow increase sympathy for the monster. Their thinly veiled rhetorical ploy at making the murderer seem as much a child as the ones he slaughtered, are not merely in bad taste, but they make us question why would a sane person want to sympathize with a murderer in this way? Further investigation reveals that the murderer was legally a British man, yes, but also a Rwandan immigrant named Axel Rudakubana. He was suspended in school for brandishing a knife at school and stating “this country needs a genocide”. He is the child of parents whom we can impute, emigrated Rwanda due to the genocide. There is mounting evidence that the murder was racially motivated, as a hatred for whites. But whether or not it was, the response from the British media and liberal upper middle class, reveals that because the victims were native British white girls, they do not have any right to sympathy. At some point we must admit that the anti-white narrative consistently taught in every mainstream British institution has made the lives of innocent children expendable simply because they are white.

A violent riot broke out in Manchester subsequent to the news of the murder in which people pelted and assaulted the police with bricks and rocks. On Wednesday July 31st, crowds of protestors marched on Downing street in London throwing flares and shouting “Rule Britannia”, “save our kids” and “stop the boats”. Angry liberals and news sources described these demonstrations as dangerous far-right extremists “weaponizing the tragic deaths of those innocent children”. The real story the institution will not report, is that this murder was not a random isolated incident. It is but one incident in an endless pattern of mass violence that has begun to plague not only the UK, but all of Europe over the last 5-10 years. To describe a population getting angry that their children are being murdered with impunity while the government does nothing to prevent it as “weaponizing”, is a crass and hideous way to frame justified outrage.

Britain’s madness is one in which truth and reality are dangled before the natives on a piece of string attached to a rod and forever being snatched away by the ruling class with the words “Oh no, you almost had it!” In contrast, at other times, the rod is used as a lash to scour the backs of unruly plebs who speak out of turn.

Every social situation runs against one’s intuition and common sense. Lies are heaped upon lies to create an infinitely flexible, ever-shifting morass of bewilderment and incomprehension.

After a week of unrest following the murder of three young girls by the son of Rwandan refugees, Keir Starmer took to the podium at Number 10 Downing Street to address the nation. Hearing Starmer speak, you could have been forgiven for thinking that the three young girls had been swept away by a large wave while paddling or that perhaps a roof had collapsed on them or they’d been sucked up by a hurricane. In actual fact, they’d been stabbed to death in a targeted and premeditated act of savagery for reasons as yet unknown. But the nudge units and applied psychology specialists do not like talk of the perpetrator’s identity or motivations...

The liberals picked up on the fact that the perpetrator was born in Cardiff to Rwandan parents. Therefore, he wasn’t an immigrant but a Welshman. Yet, allowing somebody to claim they’re “as British as you” via bureaucratic mandate is only to fall back on a previously established lie that the native population had no say in or control over. Furthermore, once the passport and paperwork have been filed, it is quite literally a crime to argue that an in-group and an out-group exist unless it is to the benefit of the minority group, such as recognising that they face discrimination. ...

Needless to say, in this process, the concept of Welsh as an identity and distinct people has been scraped clean of all meaning and coherence. Religion, history, and ethnicity are merely distant add-ons to the form that matters: bureaucratic procedure. Within such a flimsy construction, the multicultural project takes to the air, and we swiftly run into the next dollop of delusion. Having established that everyone from everywhere is the same if the paperwork is in order, the liberal intelligentsia and their water carriers can relativise any unpleasantness: a crime is simply a crime. To suggest that inter-ethnic crime is worse or that racial animosity may be a motive is to suggest difference and is therefore racist - unless the victim is a protected class, such as Stephen Lawrence, in which case it will become seared into the national consciousness and politicised for decades. ...

The Government and institutions demand that we simultaneously see no difference and no groups while codifying into law that not only do groups exist, but some are more equal than others. Working-class white people from places such as Hartlepool intuitively feel that something is profoundly sinister and simply wrong about all of this, but intuition is merely written off as prejudice. The police intuitively understand that dealing with a protected group carries with it a vastly increased risk of work-out sessions at the HR department and their mortgage being placed in jeopardy, and it shows in their policing. ...




... The entire monolithic structure rests on a giant balloon propped up by dry, pointed little sticks on a lake of thin ice. Don’t look down; you may not like what you see, and if a few little white girls fall over the side, don’t worry about it; keep looking ahead and blaming the officially designated, safe group to hate: working-class white people.