« First « Previous Comments 32 - 71 of 129 Next » Last » Search these comments
1968 ReDUX - put up the garden chairs, pop the popcorn, and enjoy the decline.
stereotomy says
1968 ReDUX - put up the garden chairs, pop the popcorn, and enjoy the decline.
You may find the event to be boringly peaceful. The leaders of the various protest groups have already been threatened not to make a scene. The media will not report any small skirmishes that may appear, nor if anyone like Pelosi or Clinton gets booed or heckled.
These guys already showed up at the Lahaina DEW Massacre to guard the perimeters
It started. They have someone speaking. But the seats are almost empty because the hamasholes outside are blocking the buses:
DemocratsAreTotallyFucked says
It started. They have someone speaking. But the seats are almost empty because the hamasholes outside are blocking the buses:
Maybe the well informed are afraid to attend. I don't think I would go to that thing even if I were a dazed and confused KommieKunt.
They have a high batshit crazy success rate, anyway.
Ceffer says
They have a high batshit crazy success rate, anyway.
She has a Medicare for All sign, yet demands that the government stay out of her Healthcare.
Patrick ^^^^ here is a perfect example of IRREVERSIBLE brain damage right there. No 'saving' these ppl. We can only isolate them. I vote to put then in camps in Alaska. Work them on logging or mining.
If you’ve managed to avoid all the gushing media reports about last night’s buzzword-loaded but calorically empty speeches at the DNC in Chicago, you missed nothing. A series of far-left speakers pandered to the party’s partisan activists, including the vegetative Big Guy, there to get his 10%. The speakers studiously avoided every single issue regular people care about: the economy, the border, Ukraine, Iran, Israel, and barely even mentioned Gaza. Maskless, they repeatedly retconned the pandemic, bizarrely claiming to have fought lockdowns and mandates. ...
In contrast to most other corporate media reports, Politico observed we’ve been here before. Kamala’s “2020 presidential primary run similarly started on a high note,” the article admitted, “before her campaign devolved into a slog.”
Politico reminded readers of Kamala’s 2020 problems, like her see-sawing message, a “lack of crisp deliveries” of her policy positions, and her “uneven performances on the stump.”
Inside the Convention, Kamala Harris was advertised as the next best idea the Democrats ever had. They got the idea to coup the party’s elected nominee after a night of scheming and hard drinking with some Ukrainian oligarchs, fresh off the Nordstream bombing. (Around 2am, the conspirators had first voted to replace Biden with an animatronic donkey, but some more votes unexpectedly came in while Nancy was in the bathroom, so Kamala won by a nose.)
The real race starts in three days, as soon as the Convention ends. Politico pointed out that Kamala still must bridge the Israel-Palestine divide (protestors outside the Democratic border wall called her “Killer Kamala”). She must face reporters, currently relegated to a tent outside the Convention hall, who are still waiting to ask her some questions. And her recently unveiled economic plan landed flatter than a French crepe.
A few other cracks appeared in the Democrats’ color revolution. For instance, the AP ran a story yesterday headlined, “Democrats approve a platform that mentions Biden's 'second term' despite his making way for Harris.” Last night, Democrat delegates unanimously approved the 2024 party platform. The problem was, nobody edited it since early July, before they yeeted Joe. So the official 2024 Democrat Party Platform describes Joe Biden, not Kamala Harris, as the nominee.
In fact, the 92-page document mentions Biden nearly 300 times, compared to only a couple dozen references to Harris. Walz’s name is entirely missing.
It’s almost like the platform doesn’t matter, and it was all just for show. Or maybe they’re leaving room for a last-minute replacement.
Does this seem like merely a minor oversight, a forgotten formality? Or is it more serious evidence of a lack of attention to detail, Democrats moving too fast, and a leadership vacuum? What else might they be forgetting?
Does this seem like merely a minor oversight, a forgotten formality? Or is it more serious evidence of a lack of attention to detail, Democrats moving too fast, and a leadership vacuum? What else might they be forgetting?
« First « Previous Comments 32 - 71 of 129 Next » Last » Search these comments
Of course, it's two whole days before that and there is already crap going on before hand (see comments).