« First « Previous Comments 60 - 99 of 114 Next » Last » Search these comments
WookieMan says
I'll eat my words. Trump will win MN, WI, MI and PA. Even just 2 he wins. Call it sexist, no one is ready for a woman
PA and WI he is likely a favorite now. Back to a tie on Polymarkets, Vance delivered!
Likely young votes as I think people are sick of geezer running the show as they die off. Walz and Kamala are both old.
WookieMan says
Likely young votes as I think people are sick of geezer running the show as they die off. Walz and Kamala are both old.
1) Trump is old.
2) Seniors outvote young voters 4:1. In some areas, much much higher.
He would have been a great choice in 2016 if Trump didn't run
He was still in diapers then, lol.
The first and only debate between Vice Presidential candidates JD Vance and Tim Walz wrapped last night and it was glorious.
Aside from Tim Walz looking like a deer in headlights, JD Vance mopped the floor with him, leading to some embarrassing moments from Tampon Tim, some of which were predictably self-inflicted.
I was determined to make sure that Tim Walz’s failures, lies, and fumbles were exposed for all to see.
To start it off, I highlighted how JD Vance crushed Walz over the fact that under Donald Trump, there were no new wars, Israel wasn’t under attack, and Russia wasn’t invading Ukraine.
Yet under Kamala, who has been in office for 3.5 years, various armed conflicts have sprung up around the globe.
Next, when Walz attempted to attack JD Vance over Springfield, Ohio, the moderators stepped in to help Walz and “fact-check” JD. However, JD Vance called out the moderators for their fake “fact-check, crushing both NBC and Walz in one fell swoop.
This is when Walz started to completely fall apart. He was asked whether or not he was in China during the Tiananmen Square protest (NEWSFLASH: He wasn’t).
As he fumbled through his non-answer, I swiftly exposed the fact that it was reported that Tim Walz was in Nebraska at the time, not in China. ...
Yet, one of the biggest moments of the debate I exposed was when Tim Walz said “I’ve become friends with school shooters.”
You heard that right…
Tim Walz actually said that he had become friends with school shooters. I made sure to carefully document this quote through a collection of clips, memes, and graphics so that the radical Left will never forget who they nominated as Vice President.
As long as Tim Walz continues to lie to the nation, I will be there to expose him at every turn. The mainstream media will do everything in their power to cover for Tampon Tim and Cackling Kamala. With your support, I won’t let them drive their fake narrative down the throats of the American people.
Let’s keep spreading the truth together!
-Chaya Raichik
There was one objective for JD Vance last night: introduce himself to American voters who only know him through the media they follow. They’ve heard he was “weird.” They’ve seen memes where he called women “childless cat ladies.” They’ve seen one picture after another demonizing, mocking, and attempting to invent a cartoon character of their version of JD Vance. In other words, they’ve dehumanized him.
Well, they all have dripping, icky, rotten egg on their faces today after JD Vance’s masterful debate performance, one that will easily make and define his political career and go down as one of the all-time best debate performances in history.
So yeah, the Democrats should probably be very worried about JD Vance, not just for this election but for the MAGA of the future. Trump chose wisely.
Vance has learned a thing or two from battling a hostile press. Walz has avoided them and it showed last night. He did what Biden did - he stared with a terrified look on his face as Vance spoke.
But for Vance, there isn’t a nasty question he hasn’t already had to answer at least ten times. If you’ve been watching his press conferences as I have, you already know he can handle them. He was born to do this. You can tell when he’s about to give a really good answer because he blinks very slowly to show he’s tolerating their terrible question as he locks and loads.
But it wasn’t so much how he batted the moderators around — always a fun thing to watch — but how he directed his message straight at us, those watching at home. Did he change any minds? He might have, especially among women voters who have only seen the media’s caricature of him.
The phony focus groups that they aired immediately afterwards in an attempt to do damage control showed the debate made them more likely to vote for Walz but I don’t believe that.
What mattered most was that JD Vance showed up as the guy so many people know, not the guy the legacy press has been lying about all year.
As I ruminated on some of the things that bothered me that Vance didn’t mention, I realized just how adept he was at keeping the focus on the issues. For instance, Tim Walz had one good moment when he mentioned the 2020 election and January 6th. JD Vance sidestepped answering the question.
At first, I thought he should have hit back on that. He should have brought up Tim Walz’s failure to protect Minneapolis. He should have brought up the violence all through that Summer. And he should have defended the protesters on January 6th. That’s what I would have done.
That is their best selling point on the Left and will be one of the key issues for undecideds - that voters will punish Trump for that. And it’s best to let voters decide whether they thought Trump was out of line to protect the election. But we’ve gotten a massive thumb on the scale with the DOJ going after Trump, not to mention the phony January 6th show trial.
But I didn’t think Trump was entirely out of line. Some of what he said wasn’t true, but he had a right to protest the unfair treatment of him before, during, and after his presidency, as did his supporters. That’s what we do in America. We get mad, and we protest. They allow that only from one side. And it’s wrong.
Our government did not have the right to turn it into a “Reichstag Fire” to grant themselves absolute power.
I could go on and on about January 6th, but I think Vance left it alone because he didn’t want to give the media any sound bites, energy, or juice that might distract from everything else he was saying. And that impressed me all the more.
Unfortunately for Trump, he showed up in his debate with Kamala Harris as the guy the media said he was. Trump is easily triggered, as anyone would be considering, but that’s what gave Harris the upper hand. Vance decided not to give that to Walz.
I was thinking about JD Vance and Trump, and I realized that Vance now has the father figure in his life that he never really had growing up. His affection for Trump showed through last night and always does. He has such a forgiving heart, which America needs right now.
I’m glad the public had a chance to see the real JD Vance, even though they all have a new favorite word to use to try to diminish some of his power, “slick.” JD Vance wasn’t “slick,” but the word went out, and the machine gobbled it up. ...
Very few people are left undecided in this election, and I am skeptical that the VP debate truly moved the needle for any significant number of people. At this point in the cycle, the people who are going to vote for Trump are going to vote for him, and the people who aren't are not. The same goes for Harris. Something drastic would have to happen for any significant swing in the votes.
It is a shame that this debate mattered very little because it is the best one we have had in the past eight years.
It is a shame that this debate mattered very little because it is the best one we have had in the past eight years.
A negligible 1% of voters who tuned into the debate said it had changed their mind about whom to vote for, with Harris and Trump supporters equally unlikely to view the event as decisive.
A negligible 1% of voters who tuned into the debate said it had changed their mind about whom to vote for, with Harris and Trump supporters equally unlikely to view the event as decisive.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/02/politics/election-poll-walz-vance-debate/index.html
Not negligible if they're black.
you get even 5% of blacks to vote Trump in urban areas it's for sure over.
During Tuesday night’s vice presidential debate, Republican nominee JD Vance was hit with phony “fact-checks” from the left-wing CBS News moderators.
On the debate stage, Vance asserted that the massive influx of illegal aliens over the Biden-Harris administration’s open border is causing housing prices to rise.
Moderator Margaret Brennan challenged Vance’s assertion.
However, Vance replied that after the debate, he would publish remarks from the Federal Reserve Board that supported his contention.
Just hours after the debate ended, Vance shared the supporting evidence in a post on X “as promised.”
Vance stated during the debate:
“We do want to blame Kamala Harris for letting in millions of illegal aliens into this country, which does drive up costs, Tim.
“Twenty-five million illegal aliens competing with Americans for scarce homes is one of the most significant drivers of home prices in the country.
“It’s why we have massive increases in home prices that have happened right alongside massive increases in illegal alien, alien populations under Kamala Harris’s leadership. …
“We have a lot of Americans that need homes.
“We should be kicking out illegal immigrants who are competing for those homes, and we should be building more homes for the American citizens who deserve to be here.”
Brennan then interjected, “But, Senator, on that point, I’d like for you to clarify.
“There are many contributing factors to high housing costs.
“What evidence do you have that migrants are part of this problem?”
“Well, there’s a Federal Reserve study that we’re happy to share after the debate,” Vance replied.
“We’ll put it up on social media.
“Actually, that really drills down on the connection between increased levels of migration, especially illegal immigration, and higher housing prices.
“Now, of course, Margaret, that’s not the entire driver of higher housing prices.
“It’s also the regulatory regime of Kamala Harris.
“Look, we are a country of builders.
“We’re a country of doers,” Vance noted.
“We’re a country of explorers.
“But we increasingly have a Federal administration that makes it harder to develop our resources, makes it harder to build things, and wants to throw people in jail for not doing everything exactly as Kamala Harris says that they have to do.
“And what that means is that you have a lot of people who would love to build homes who aren’t able to build homes.”
A few hours later, Vance published remarks from Michelle W. Bowman.
Bowman has served as a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors since 2018.
She spoke at the Massachusetts Bankers Association Annual Convention in Key Biscayne, Florida, on May 3.
Vance wrote in a post on X:
“As promised earlier tonight, here is Michelle Bowman of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors.”
Bowman stated:
“There is a risk that strong consumer demand for services, increased immigration, and continued labor market tightness could lead to persistently high core services inflation.
“Given the current low inventory of affordable housing, the inflow of new immigrants to some geographic areas could result in upward pressure on rents, as additional housing supply may take time to materialize.
“Wage growth has remained at an elevated rate of between 4 and 5 percent, still higher than the pace consistent with our 2 percent inflation goal given trend productivity growth.”
As promised earlier tonight, here is Michelle Bowman of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors:
"Given the current low inventory of affordable housing, the inflow of new immigrants to some geographic areas could result in upward pressure on rents."https://t.co/dfO0wFmyPs pic.twitter.com/KfDjPaZC7G
— JD Vance (@JDVance) October 2, 2024
« First « Previous Comments 60 - 99 of 114 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://rumble.com/v5es7od-real-americas-voice-247.html