patrick.net

We will hunt you down; terrorists and tyrannical leaders. You cannot hide.
Most of our leaders are weak and cowards. We need more leaders like Russell Broadbent, Malcolm Roberts, Gerard Rennick and Ralph Babet. Not the liars and misinformants who have poisoned us.
IAN BRIGHTHOPE
OCT 19

READ IN APP

Share Ian Brighthope's Substack

Why does it take a single courageous female journalist, a woman, to expose the truth?

And a single courageous man to start the hunt for the globalist aides that have waged a war with humanity using a weaponised virus and toxic genetic injection ( a bioweapon)

Click on the picture below for the video.

Click on the picture below for the video.

Save our Freedom of Speech or we will lose our freedoms, the rule of law and what is left of our so-called democracy. Sign the petition below.

Holding Globalist Protesters to Account when they endorse horrors

Covid19 Saving the Next Generation
Holding Globalist Protesters to Account when they endorse horrors.
"I see that it is terrible; I see it on the news. I understand enough to hold up my protest sign and let the world know that I want it to stop; therefore I am doing the right thing and I have the true and unquestionable Moral stance…
Read more
5 months ago · 18 likes · 57 comments · The Nobody Who Knows EveryBody
In times of crisis, whether due to a global pandemic, economic instability, or societal unrest, leadership plays a critical role in shaping the direction of nations. However, when leaders abuse their power, impose unnecessary restrictions, or govern through deception and fear, it becomes clear that a change is needed. The solution to these challenges lies not only in holding such leaders accountable but also in selecting a different, more responsible, and ethical set of leaders who are committed to transparency, justice, and the protection of civil liberties. It is through this conscious selection of new leadership that societies can find a better way forward—one that upholds democracy, ensures accountability, and fosters a more equitable and prosperous future.

Ian Brighthope

OPINION:

We Will Hunt You Down: Whether You Are a Terrorist or a Tyrannical Leader, You Cannot Hide

Throughout human history, tyrants and terrorists have wreaked havoc on societies, destabilised regions, and caused untold suffering. Whether driven by ideology, a thirst for power, or a desire to spread fear, these individuals have left scars on humanity that demand justice. In the modern world, however, it has become increasingly clear that no matter how powerful or elusive they may seem, they cannot hide forever. The forces of justice, advanced by international cooperation, technology, and the determination of societies, are relentless. We will hunt them down—whether they are terrorists or tyrannical leaders—because their actions cannot go unpunished, and the pursuit of justice is inevitable.

The Global Mandate Against Terrorism and Tyranny

In the aftermath of events like 9/11, the world saw a renewed emphasis on eradicating terrorism and its destructive ideology. Nations realised that terrorism does not recognise borders, and the threat to one country is a threat to all. As a result, a global mandate emerged to confront terrorists wherever they may hide. International coalitions were formed, intelligence-sharing agreements were solidified, and military alliances were strengthened to bring perpetrators of violence to justice.

Similarly, tyrannical leaders—those who rule through oppression, genocide, or severe human rights abuses—have found themselves increasingly targeted by the international community. Leaders like Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, and others who once ruled with impunity, using fear to control their populations, found that their power was fragile in the face of global justice. The world has made it clear that tyranny will not be tolerated and that leaders who abuse their power will eventually be held accountable.

The idea that terrorists or tyrants can hide from justice is an illusion. Advances in technology, from satellite surveillance to biometrics, have made it incredibly difficult for those on the run to remain undetected. In the 21st century, hiding is not as simple as retreating to a cave or a secluded palace. The global interconnectedness of the digital world means that even the most secretive movements can be tracked. Financial transactions, communication networks, and international borders are no longer the impenetrable shields they once were.

Terrorists, whether lone actors or organized networks like al-Qaeda or ISIS, have discovered that their attacks provoke relentless pursuit by intelligence agencies, military operations, and special forces. Osama bin Laden, once the world’s most wanted terrorist, was eventually found in a compound in Pakistan after a decade of evasion. His eventual demise is a stark reminder that no one can remain hidden forever. Similarly, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of ISIS, was hunted down by a coalition of forces despite efforts to conceal his whereabouts.

Tyrannical leaders, too, have discovered that their crimes do not go unnoticed. After decades of brutal rule, leaders like Gaddafi faced justice, not just from external forces but from the very people they oppressed. The International Criminal Court (ICC) and other international tribunals have pursued war crimes and human rights abuses, ensuring that even if tyrants escape domestic justice, they cannot escape international law.

The pursuit of terrorists and tyrannical leaders is not just a legal or strategic imperative; it is a moral one. Their actions often result in the deaths of innocent civilians, the destruction of communities, and the repression of basic human freedoms. To allow such individuals to escape justice would be an affront to the very values that bind civilized societies. The suffering they inflict demands a response, not only to punish the guilty but to ensure that future generations are protected from similar atrocities. "We will hunt you down," is a statement of commitment to uphold the rule of law, protect the innocent, and preserve human dignity. Whether it is a terrorist planting bombs in crowded markets, a dictator ordering the massacre of his people or a politician locking you down and injecting you with a toxic gene therapy, their crimes are an attack on the very foundation of human decency. And justice, even if delayed, is inevitable.

Hunting down terrorists and tyrants requires cooperation on an unprecedented scale. No single country can combat these threats alone. The power of international coalitions, intelligence-sharing networks, and diplomatic efforts has become crucial in tracking down and capturing individuals responsible for mass atrocities. The post-9/11 era showed the world how vital it is to unite against terrorism, but it also set a precedent for dealing with tyrannical leaders who believe they are untouchable.

Organizations like INTERPOL, NATO, and the United Nations play a pivotal role in ensuring that there are no safe havens for such criminals. Moreover, efforts like the creation of international arrest warrants, sanctions, and military interventions have become tools to hold these individuals accountable. The cooperation between nations signals that the global community will not stand idly by while terrorists and tyrants attempt to hide from justice. However, at least one of these organisations has been totally corrupted and must be destroyed and replaced; the United Nations.

If history has taught us anything, it is that the long arm of justice eventually reaches those who commit heinous crimes. Whether it is Adolf Hitler’s reign of terror ending in ruin, Saddam Hussein’s capture, or Slobodan Milošević standing trial for war crimes, tyrants and terrorists rarely escape unscathed. The international community, armed with the lessons of history and the tools of modern technology, is better equipped than ever to bring these individuals to justice.

While the path to justice may be long, history shows that persistence pays off. The message is clear: whether you are a terrorist spreading fear or a tyrant oppressing your people, you cannot run far. The world will pursue you until you are brought to account for your crimes.

Tyrannical leaders who impose unnecessary lockdowns and justify their actions with lies represent a unique form of modern oppression. These leaders exploit crises, whether real or manufactured, to consolidate power, restrict freedoms, and control populations under the guise of "public good." This raises crucial questions about the balance between public health, civil liberties, and the transparency of government actions.

One of the most effective tools of a tyrannical regime is the manipulation of fear. During a crisis—such as a pandemic—fear becomes a potent weapon that can be used to justify extreme measures. Leaders may invoke the threat of a deadly virus or other dangers to legitimize restrictions on personal freedoms. While such measures might be warranted in certain circumstances, tyrannical leaders often extend or exaggerate them far beyond what is necessary. Once fear has been instilled, it is very easy to amplify it to the point where it becomes irrational-paranoia is irrational fear and paranoia is a symptom of mental illness. Mass mental illness is not uncommon thank to the manipulation of minds by those in powerful positions.

Lockdowns, a pretence to curbing the spread of disease, serves as a means of population control. A lockdown restricts not only movement but also free expression, assembly, and the ability to challenge authority. Under the guise of "protecting the public," leaders may institute severe and prolonged lockdowns, citing false or exaggerated reasons, while hiding behind the rhetoric of safety. The narrative of “it’s for your own good” is repeatedly voiced, while those who question these measures are branded as irresponsible, dangerous or conspiracy theorists.

The erosion of civil liberties during such lockdowns is a serious concern. Freedom of speech, movement, and even the right to question government actions can be severely limited. When these rights are suspended indefinitely, it becomes easier for governments to impose broader, more permanent controls. In some cases, governments have taken advantage of emergency powers to curtail dissent, enforce surveillance, or implement policies that would have been unthinkable under normal circumstances. The Victorian government was the most tyrannical of all during the covid pandemic. This erosion of liberty becomes even more dangerous when leaders fail to provide clear, transparent reasoning for their actions. When data is manipulated or hidden, when contradictory information is presented as fact, and when experts dissent but are ignored or silenced, it signals that the measures may not be in the public’s interest. Instead, they may be serving the interests of those in power, perpetuating fear to justify ongoing control.

The use of lies, misinformation, or selective truths by tyrannical leaders to justify lockdowns and other restrictive measures is a betrayal of public trust. Science and public health should be rooted in transparency, evidence-based decision-making, and open dialogue. SCIENCE IS NEVER SETTLED. When leaders distort or misuse scientific data to serve their own ends, it undermines the legitimacy of their policies.

For instance, during the COVID-19 pandemic, some governments were criticised for misrepresenting infection rates, overstating the effectiveness of certain measures, or using flawed models to justify prolonged lockdowns. Public health experts who presented alternative viewpoints were sidelined or discredited, even when their arguments had merit. This abuse of science is especially dangerous because it delegitimises both science itself and the institutions responsible for guiding public policy. I discuss the almost complete corruption of medical/health sciences in another Substack.

Tyrannical leaders often rely on carefully crafted narratives to justify their actions. The message that "it’s for your own good" is delivered in a way that appeals to fear, invoking the idea that the population is under threat and only the government can protect them. This framing creates a binary choice—either accept the restrictions or face a catastrophe. By presenting themselves as the only solution to a crisis, leaders stifle debate and discourage questioning of their actions. At the same time, alternative perspectives are often painted as dangerous or irrational. Those who challenge lockdowns, question government statistics, or propose less invasive solutions are labeled as conspiracy theorists or enemies of the common good. This demonization of dissent serves to further entrench the narrative of necessity, while sidelining legitimate concerns about overreach and abuse of power.

Just as with more overt forms of tyranny, leaders who impose unnecessary lockdowns and rely on lies for justification must be held accountable. While traditional forms of resistance to authoritarian regimes often focus on physical repression, the resistance to this kind of tyranny requires a different approach, one rooted in critical thinking, transparency, and democratic accountability.

1. Demand for Transparency:

The first step in countering unnecessary lockdowns and government overreach is to demand transparency. Governments must provide clear, evidence-based explanations for their decisions, including the scientific data they rely on and the reasoning behind their policies. When decisions appear to be based on faulty or manipulated data, the public has the right to challenge them.

2. Freedom of Information and Speech:

In a democracy, the free flow of information is crucial. Independent media, watchdog organizations, and individuals must be able to access and share accurate information without fear of reprisal. When leaders attempt to suppress dissent or limit access to information, it is a red flag for tyranny. Encouraging open debate and critical discourse is essential to counter the narrative of control.

3. Holding Leaders Accountable:

Tyrannical leaders, whether they impose their will through violence or under the guise of protection, must be held accountable. This can be achieved through democratic mechanisms, legal challenges, and public protest. In cases where lockdown measures are found to be unjustified or disproportionate, leaders should face legal and political consequences. International courts and human rights organizations can also play a role in holding leaders accountable for overreach.

4. Civil Disobedience:

When lockdowns are demonstrably unnecessary, civil disobedience becomes a powerful tool of resistance. If the government uses lies to justify oppressive measures, individuals and groups can engage in non-violent protests, refuse to comply with unjust regulations, and challenge the legitimacy of such actions. Throughout history, civil disobedience has been a key strategy for standing up against tyranny, and it remains relevant today. The use of harmful physical force such as beatings and the shooting of people with rubber bullets should be held as an indication for imprisonment of the politicians and police leaders of the times.

The Importance of Selecting a Different Lot of Leaders to Hold Tyrants to Account and a Better Way Forward

In times of crisis, whether due to a global pandemic, economic instability, or societal unrest, leadership plays a critical role in shaping the direction of nations. However, when leaders abuse their power, impose unnecessary restrictions, or govern through deception and fear, it becomes clear that a change is needed. The solution to these challenges lies not only in holding such leaders accountable but also in selecting a different, more responsible, and ethical set of leaders who are committed to transparency, justice, and the protection of civil liberties. It is through this conscious selection of new leadership that societies can find a better way forward—one that upholds democracy, ensures accountability, and fosters a more equitable and prosperous future.

Tyrannical leaders, whether overtly oppressive or more subtly manipulative, pose a significant threat to freedom, democracy, and social progress. These leaders often use fear, misinformation, and divisive rhetoric to consolidate their power, restricting the ability of citizens to challenge their decisions. They frame their actions as necessary for the public good, but their true goal is to maintain control over their populations. When leaders operate in this way, they erode public trust, weaken democratic institutions, and create societies where dissent is suppressed, and innovation is stifled.

For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, some leaders implemented lockdowns, surveillance measures, and restrictions on freedoms that extended far beyond what was necessary for public health. Instead of engaging with scientific data in a transparent way and allowing debate, they used the crisis to advance their own political agendas. In these situations, citizens were left disillusioned, feeling powerless against leaders who wielded excessive authority under the guise of protecting them. To break free from such leadership, it is essential to hold these individuals accountable. Accountability must come not only through legal or institutional mechanisms but also through the power of the ballot box. The people have the ultimate authority to decide who governs them, and it is through collective action, informed decision-making, and the promotion of better alternatives that tyrannical leadership can be challenged and replaced.

To move forward, it is imperative to select leaders who possess qualities vastly different from those of the tyrants or deceptive politicians they are replacing. These new leaders must demonstrate integrity, prioritize the public interest over personal or political gain, and be committed to democratic principles such as transparency, accountability, and the protection of individual freedoms.

Leaders who value truth and honesty are essential in restoring public trust in governance. Tyrannical leaders often rely on lies, misinformation, and secrecy to manipulate the public. In contrast, honest leaders engage openly with citizens, provide accurate information, and admit when they do not have all the answers. They do not shy away from difficult conversations or hide their mistakes, but instead seek to learn from them. By selecting leaders who demonstrate integrity, societies can rebuild trust between governments and citizens.

A defining trait of effective leadership in a democracy is transparency. Leaders must be willing to share the rationale behind their decisions, including scientific data, economic models, and the advice they are receiving from experts. Transparency fosters accountability because it allows citizens to scrutinize government actions and make informed judgments. Leaders who are open about their decision-making processes are more likely to gain public support and are less likely to abuse their power. Selecting leaders who prioritise transparency will help ensure that future crises are handled with openness and fairness.

The protection of civil liberties should be a non-negotiable requirement for any leader. During times of crisis, it can be tempting for governments to implement restrictive measures that limit freedom of movement, expression, and assembly. While some measures may be necessary for public safety, they must always be proportionate, temporary, and subject to review. Leaders who respect the fundamental rights of their citizens, even in challenging times, create societies that are resilient and capable of overcoming adversity without sacrificing freedom. It is essential to elect leaders who have a deep respect for these liberties and who will resist the temptation to use crises as an opportunity to expand their power.

Tyrants and oppressive leaders often use division to maintain control, pitting different groups against each other to weaken collective resistance. A better way forward requires leaders who have the ability to unite people across ideological, cultural, and social lines. These leaders focus on common goals—such as prosperity, health, and security—rather than exploiting differences for political gain. Selecting leaders who are skilled at fostering unity will help create a more cohesive and harmonious society, where citizens feel empowered to participate in the democratic process.

It is not enough for new leaders to possess good intentions; they must also have the competence and vision to address the complex challenges facing society. Tyrannical leaders often focus on short-term power consolidation, neglecting long-term planning and sustainable governance. In contrast, capable leaders are forward-thinking, understanding that today's decisions will have lasting impacts on future generations. They invest in education, healthcare, infrastructure, and the environment, creating conditions for long-term prosperity. Electing leaders with a clear, positive vision for the future is essential for progress and stability.

Selecting a new lot of leaders is only part of the solution. For a society to truly move forward, it must also empower its citizens and strengthen the institutions that protect democracy. A strong and engaged citizenry, coupled with robust democratic institutions, creates the foundation for a thriving society where tyranny cannot take hold. Educated and informed citizens are the cornerstone of a healthy democracy. Governments and civil society must invest in education, access to information, and civic engagement programs that empower people to make informed decisions. Citizens must be encouraged to critically evaluate the actions of their leaders, participate in public discourse, and hold those in power accountable through democratic means such as voting, protests, and advocacy. A society that values citizen engagement is less vulnerable to the rise of tyrannical leaders. A functioning democracy relies on strong, independent institutions that act as checks and balances on power. Judicial systems, legislatures, and watchdog organizations must be free from political interference, ensuring that no leader can operate without oversight. It is essential to build institutions that can investigate and hold leaders accountable for misconduct, ensuring that abuses of power are met with consequences. Strengthening these institutions will protect society from future attempts by tyrannical leaders to undermine democratic governance.

The challenges posed by tyrannical leadership are not limited to individual countries; they often have global repercussions. International cooperation is vital for promoting good governance, sharing best practices, and holding leaders accountable on a global scale. International bodies such as the United Nations and the International Criminal Court can play a role in prosecuting human rights violations and ensuring that tyrants cannot evade justice by retreating to their strongholds. By fostering global cooperation, we can create a world where tyrants have no safe havens.

The challenge of holding tyrannical leaders accountable becomes even more daunting when the very institutions designed to maintain international order and justice, such as the United Nations (UN) and the International Court of Justice (ICJ), are compromised or perceived as corrupt. The reality of international power politics often means that these organizations are influenced by the interests of powerful states, making it difficult to bring leaders to justice if they are backed by strong geopolitical allies or are shielded by a system that is slow, bureaucratic, and at times ineffectual.

However, even in the face of this international corruption, there are ways to pursue justice, hold tyrants accountable, and "hunt them down" figuratively—through a combination of grassroots movements, alternative alliances, legal frameworks, and new models of justice that bypass corrupted power structures. Here's how:

1. Building Strong, Independent Civil Movements

One of the most powerful ways to hold corrupt leaders accountable is through grassroots, citizen-led movements that operate independently of corrupted international institutions. Civil society organizations, human rights groups, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) play a critical role in exposing abuses, documenting evidence, and mobilizing public opinion. When international institutions fail, it is often civil movements that shine a light on tyranny and demand accountability. These movements have succeeded in the past, even against entrenched authoritarian regimes. The fall of apartheid in South Africa, the ousting of dictators in Eastern Europe, and the Arab Spring movements all demonstrate that citizens can challenge entrenched powers and force change, even when international organizations remain inactive. In today's digital age, social media and independent journalism give these movements unprecedented power to raise awareness, galvanize support, and put pressure on leaders.

2. Creating Alternative International Coalitions

While major international institutions like the UN and ICJ can be compromised, smaller coalitions of like-minded nations, regional bodies, and alternative alliances can offer a more agile, less politically entangled route to justice. For instance, organizations like the International Criminal Court (ICC) can be instrumental in pursuing justice, even if they face limitations. Regional bodies like the European Union, African Union, or even emerging alliances such as the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad) or the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) can sometimes act independently to hold leaders accountable. If larger organizations are unable or unwilling to act, smaller states can form coalitions to pursue legal actions, issue sanctions, or even sponsor independent tribunals. These alternatives to the UN and ICJ can circumvent political corruption and inertia, allowing justice to proceed on a regional or issue-specific basis.

3. Targeting Economic and Political Networks

One of the key ways to pursue tyrannical leaders is through targeting the economic and political networks that support them. Many of these leaders rely on international financial systems, trade relationships, and political alliances to maintain their power. By focusing efforts on these networks—through sanctions, asset freezes, diplomatic isolation, and targeting the enablers of tyranny—activists and governments can exert pressure on authoritarian leaders without relying on corrupted international institutions.

For example, the Magnitsky Act, used by several countries, allows governments to sanction individuals, companies, and regimes involved in human rights abuses. These types of legal frameworks bypass compromised international institutions and allow justice to be pursued on a more decentralized and targeted level. Such measures can force tyrannical leaders to face consequences even when international justice systems are gridlocked or obstructed.

The *Magnitsky Act is applicable in Australia. In December 2021, Australia passed its own version of the Magnitsky-style laws under the Autonomous Sanctions Amendment (Magnitsky-style and Other Thematic Sanctions) Act 2021*. This legislation enables the Australian government to impose targeted sanctions on individuals and entities responsible for serious human rights abuses, corruption, and other egregious misconduct, regardless of where these acts take place. By adopting this legislation, Australia has joined the international community in using targeted sanctions to deter oppressive regimes and corrupt officials, contributing to global efforts to hold such individuals accountable. This Act may apply to certain Australian politicians and ex-politicians. Time will tell.

4. Leveraging International Public Opinion

Tyrants thrive in environments where they can control the narrative and manipulate information. However, in today's interconnected world, it's much harder for authoritarian regimes to hide their crimes from the global public. Leveraging international public opinion can create enormous pressure on corrupt leaders and their backers. Governments, even those that are corrupt or complicit, often have to respond to public pressure from citizens, allies, and the broader international community. High-profile cases of injustice or oppression can become focal points for global movements that demand change. For example, public outcry has forced corrupt governments to reconsider their positions on issues ranging from apartheid to the treatment of political dissidents. Even major powers are not immune to the consequences of a tarnished global reputation, and when enough global attention is drawn to abuses, it can force action where institutional justice systems have failed.

5. Innovative Justice Models and Universal Jurisdiction

In some cases, traditional legal systems can be bypassed through innovative models of justice. For example, "universal jurisdiction" is a principle that allows countries to prosecute individuals for serious crimes like genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity, regardless of where the crimes were committed and the nationality of the perpetrators. This principle has been used in cases like that of former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet, who was arrested in the UK under universal jurisdiction for crimes committed in Chile.

Universal jurisdiction cases may face political obstacles, but they represent a powerful legal tool for bringing tyrannical leaders to justice even if the international community is unwilling or unable to act. This principle, combined with growing transnational legal frameworks, gives hope that even powerful leaders can face consequences for their actions in courts beyond their own borders.

6. Whistleblowers and Leaks

Whistleblowers and leaks are increasingly becoming powerful weapons against corrupt leadership. Individuals within oppressive regimes or international organizations can expose corruption, abuse, and collusion at the highest levels, even when the official systems are compromised. High-profile leaks like the Panama Papers or the revelations from whistleblowers like Edward Snowden and Chelsea Manning have shown that individuals can reveal the workings of tyrannical systems to the public. Encouraging and protecting whistleblowers who can expose the inner workings of corrupt leaders is essential. International organizations, civil society, and independent media can create networks to support and shield those who risk their lives to bring the truth to light. These revelations can dismantle power structures, spark investigations, and turn public opinion against regimes that previously seemed invulnerable.

7. Resilience and Persistence in the Face of Corruption

Tyranny thrives when it is met with apathy or resignation. The ultimate key to hunting down tyrannical leaders in a corrupted system is resilience and persistence. Even when the UN, ICJ, or other international bodies fail, it is critical for the global community—whether through alternative legal systems, civil movements, or even decentralised justice efforts—to continue pushing for accountability.

The path to justice is often long, but history has shown that tyrants rarely escape accountability forever. Over time, regimes change, allies abandon them, and opportunities arise for justice to be served. The persistence of those who continue to document abuses, campaign for human rights, and pressure governments ensures that even the most powerful oppressors can eventually be brought to justice.

It is the relentless pursuit of justice that will ensure peace and security for future generations. The world has spoken: we will hunt you down, I have particular targets and you cannot hide.

Ian Brighthope. 我们会追捕你; 恐怖分子和暴虐的领导者。 你无法隐藏。 我们的大多数领导者都是弱者和懦夫。 我们需要更多的领导者，如Russell Broadbent，Malcolm Roberts，Gerard Rennick和Ralph Babet。 不是毒害我们的骗子和误导性。 Ian Brighthope 10月19日阅读App Share Ian Brighthope的词弃员为什么需要一个勇敢的女性记者，一个女人，暴露真相？ 和一个勇敢的人开始追捕全球人的助手，这些助手使用武器化病毒和有毒遗传注射（BioWeapon）点击下面的视频的WATM。 点击下面的图片为视频。 拯救我们的言论自由或我们将失去自由，法治和我们所谓的民主的自由。 签署下面的请愿书。 持有全球会抗议者才能考虑恐怖Covid19保存下一代持有全球主义抗议者在他们认可恐怖时占据账户。 “我看到它是可怕的;我在这个消息中看到了它。我理解足以忍受我的抗议标志，让世界知道我想要它停止;因此我正在做正确的事情，我有正确的事情，我有真正和难以理解的道德立场...阅读更多5个月前·18· 伊恩大峡谷意见：我们会追捕你：无论你是恐怖主义还是一个暴虐的领导者，你就无法掩饰在人类历史上，暴君和恐怖分子在社会，不稳定的地区造成严重破坏，并造成了无尽的痛苦。 无论是由意识形态驱动，渴望权力，还是传播恐惧的愿望，这些人都对人类留下了要求的人性。 然而，在现代世界中，无论他们看起来有多强大或难以捉摸，他们都越来越明显，他们无法永远隐藏。 国际合作，技术和社会的决心先进的正义力量是无情的。 我们会追捕他们 - 无论是恐怖主义者还是暴虐的领导者 - 因为他们的行动不能逍遥法外，追求司法是不可避免的。 全球对阵恐怖主义和暴政的全球授权在9/11这样的事件之后，世界观一直在重新强调消除恐怖主义及其破坏性思想。 国家意识到恐怖主义不承认边界，对一个国家的威胁是对所有国家的威胁。 因此，全球授权在任何可能隐藏的地方都出现恐怖分子。 国际联盟成立，智力分享协议得到了巩固，加强军事联盟，使暴力犯罪行为司法。 同样，暴虐的领导者 - 通过压迫，种族灭绝或严重的人权滥用统治的人 - 发现自己越来越受到国际社会的目标。 像萨达姆侯赛因一样的领导人，穆斯马尔卡扎菲等人，曾经统治着逍遥法外，用恐惧控制他们的人口，发现他们的力量在全球正义面前脆弱。 世界已经明确说，暴政不会被忍受，并且滥用其权力的领导者最终将被持有责任。 恐怖分子或暴君可以躲避正义的想法是一种幻觉。 从卫星监测到生物识别技术的技术进步使得持续未被发现的人令人难以置信的困难。 在21世纪，躲藏并不像退回到洞穴或僻静的宫殿一样简单。 数字世界的全局互连意味着即使是最秘密的运动也可以被跟踪。 金融交易，通信网络和国际边界不再是他们曾经是难以置信的盾牌。 恐怖分子，无论是孤立演员还是组织的网络，也发现他们的攻击挑起了情报机构，军事行动和特种力量的无情追求。 奥萨马·本·拉登，一旦世界上最受欢迎的恐怖分子，最终被发现在巴基斯坦的一大部分逃避之后。 他的最终消亡是一个卑鄙的提醒，没有人能永远隐藏。 同样，伊斯尼斯领袖阿布布拉德·巴格达（Abu Bakr Al-Bagdadi）在努力隐瞒下落的努力，由一支部队联盟追捕。 Tyrannical领导人也发现他们的罪行不会被忽视。 经过几十年的残酷统治，领导人喜欢卡扎菲面临正义，而不仅仅是来自外力，而且来自他们被压迫的人。 国际刑事法院（ICC）和其他国际法庭侵犯了战争罪和侵犯人权，确保即使暴君逃脱国内司法，他们也无法逃脱国际法。 追求恐怖分子和暴虐的领导者不仅仅是法律或战略的必要性; 这是一个道德。 他们的行为经常导致无辜的平民死亡，社区的破坏以及镇压基本人的自由。 允许这样的个人逃脱正义将是束缚文明社会的价值观的侮辱。 他们造成的痛苦要求回应，不仅要惩罚内疚，而且为了确保未来几代人受到类似的暴行。 “我们会追捕你，”是坚持法治的承诺，保护无辜，保护人类尊严。 无论是恐怖主义炸弹在拥挤的市场中，一个独裁者订购了他的人民或一个政治家锁定你的政治家，并用毒基因治疗注射你，他们的罪行是对人类体弱的基础的攻击。 和正义，即使延迟，是不可避免的。 狩猎恐怖分子和暴君需要合作前所未有的规模。 没有单一国家可以单独打击这些威胁。 国际联盟，情报分享网络和外交努力的力量在跟踪和捕获负责大规模暴行的个人方面都是至关重要的。 9/11时代展示了世界对恐怖主义起到多么重要，但它也为处理他们不可触及的暴虐的领导者制定了一个先例。 国际刑警组织，北约和联合国等组织在确保对此类罪犯没有避风港的避风单中发挥了关键作用。 此外，努力建立国际逮捕权，制裁和军事干预措施已成为持有这些个人责任的工具。 国家之间的合作证明全球社区不会在恐怖分子和暴君试图躲避正义时不相下。 但是，这些组织中至少有一个完全腐败，必须被摧毁和更换; 联合国。 如果历史教导了我们任何事情，那就是正义的长臂最终到达那些犯下令人发指的罪行的人。 无论是阿道夫希特勒在毁灭，萨达姆侯赛因的捕获，还是斯洛博丹Milošević的战争罪，暴君和恐怖主义者都很少逃脱。 国际社会，武装有历史教训和现代技术的工具，比以往任何时候都更好地将这些人带到正义。 虽然司法道路可能很长，但历史表明持久性偿还。 消息很清楚：无论你是恐怖主义传播恐惧还是压迫你的人民的暴君，你就无法奔跑。 世界将追求你，直到你被带到你的罪行。 强迫不必要的锁定的暴虐领导人并证明他们与谎言的行为代表着一种独特的现代压迫形式。 这些领导者利用危机，无论是真实的还是制造，巩固权力，限制自由，并在“公共良好”的幌子下限制自由 这提出了关于公共卫生，公民自由和政府行动透明度之间的余额的关键问题。 暴虐制度最有效的工具之一是操纵恐惧。 在危机期间 - 例如大流行 - 恐惧成为一种能够用来证明极端措施的有效武器。 领导者可能会调查致命病毒或其他危险的威胁，以合法化对个人自由的限制。 虽然这些措施可能在某些情况下保证，但暴虐的领导者经常延伸或夸大他们远远超出必要的情况。 一旦恐惧被灌输，它就会很容易扩大到它变得不合理 - 偏执的程度是非理性的恐惧，偏执是精神疾病的症状。 大规模精神疾病并不常见，感谢人们对强大职位的操纵。 锁定，遏制疾病传播的假装，用作人口控制手段。 锁定不仅限制了移动，而且是免费表达，装配和挑战权威的能力。 在“保护公众”的幌子下，领导人可以研究严重和长期的锁定，引用虚假或夸张的原因，同时隐藏安全的言论。 “这是为了你自己的好”的叙述反复发表浊音，而那些质疑这些措施的人被称为不负责任，危险或阴谋的理论家。 在这种锁定期间的公民自由侵蚀是一个严重的问题。 言论自由，运动，甚至质疑政府行动的权利可能会受到严重限制。 当这些权利无限期暂停时，政府会更容易征收更广泛，更永久的控制。 在某些情况下，各国政府利用紧急权力来限制异议，执行监督或实施在正常情况下将不可思议的政策。 维多利亚时代的政府在科迪德大流行期间是最严厉的政府。 当领导人未能为他们的行为提供明确透明的推理时，这种自由侵蚀变得更加危险。 当被操纵或隐藏数据时，当矛盾的信息作为事实呈现时，当专家意见但被忽视或沉默时，它表示措施可能不是公众的兴趣。 相反，它们可能是为权力的利益提供服务，延续恐惧，以证明正在进行的控制。 由暴虐的领导人使用谎言，错误信息或选择性真理来证明锁值和其他限制性措施是对公众信任的背叛。 科学和公共卫生应植根于透明度，基于证据的决策和开放对话。 科学永远不会解决。 当领导者扭曲或滥用科学数据时，它会破坏其政策的合法性。 例如，在Covid-19流行病中，一些政府因歪曲感染率而受到批评，夸大了某些措施的有效性，或使用有缺陷的模型来证明长期锁定的合理性。 提出替代观点的公共卫生专家缺乏缺陷或诋毁，即使他们的争论有价值。 这种滥用的科学是特别危险的，因为它使科学本身和负责指导公共政策的机构都表达了。 我讨论了另一种家具中的医疗/健康科学的几乎完全腐败。 暴虐的领导者经常依靠精心制作的叙述来证明他们的行为。 “这是为了你自己的好”的信息是以一种呼吁恐惧的方式交付，援引人口受到威胁的想法，只有政府可以保护他们。 这个框架创造了二元选择 - 接受限制或面临灾难。 通过将自己作为危机的唯一解决方案展示，领导人扼杀了辩论并劝阻询问他们的行为。 与此同时，替代观点通常被绘制为危险或非理性。 挑战锁定，问题政府统计或提出较少侵入性解决方案的人被标记为共同利益的阴谋理论家或敌人。 这种妖魔化对不同意的是为了进一步巩固必要的叙述，同时对妇女合法担忧，对誓言和滥用权力。 与更广泛的暴政形式一样，必须持有责任不必要的锁定和依靠理由的领导者。 虽然传统形式的抵制威权制度往往专注于身体镇压，但对这种暴政的抵抗需要不同的方法，植根于批判性思维，透明度和民主责任。 1.透明需求：反击不必要的锁定和政府overrach的第一步是要求透明度。 各国政府必须为其决定提供明确，证据的解释，包括他们依赖的科学数据以及其政策背后的推理。 当决策似乎基于有错误或操纵数据时，公众有权挑战它们。 2.信息自由和言论：在民主中，信息的自由流动至关重要。 独立媒体，看门狗组织和个人必须能够在不担心报复的情况下访问和分享准确的信息。 当领导者试图抑制异议或限制信息时，它是暴政的红旗。 鼓励公开辩论和批判性话语对于反对控制叙事至关重要。 3.持有领导者责任：暴虐领导人，无论是通过暴力还是在保护的幌子上征收他们的意志，必须持有责任。 这可以通过民主机制，法律挑战和公开抗议实现。 在发现锁定措施不合理或不成比例的情况下，领导者应该面临法律和政治后果。 国际法院和人权组织也可以在举行持有的领导者方面发挥作用。 4.公民不服从：当锁上持太明显不必要时，公民不服从成为强大的抵抗工具。 如果政府用途遵守压迫措施，个人和团体可以从事非暴力抗议，拒绝遵守不公正的法规，并挑战这些行动的合法性。 在整个历史中，公民不服从是抵抗暴政的关键战略，今天仍然相关。 应举行有害体力，如殴打和橡胶子弹的人们的射击，作为监禁政治家和警察领导人的迹象。 选择不同众多领导人的重要性将暴君持有账户和危机时期的更好的前进方式，无论是由于全球大流行，经济不稳定还是社会骚乱，领导力在塑造国家方向方面发挥着关键作用。 但是，当领导者滥用他们的权力时，施加不必要的限制，或者通过欺骗和恐惧来治理，很明显需要改变。 这些挑战的解决方案不仅在持有此类领导人责任中，而且在选择致力于透明度，正义和保护公民自由的领导者方面也是如此责任，而且持有这些领导者。 通过这种有意识地选择新领导，社会可以找到更好的前进方式 - 坚持民主，确保责任，并促进更加公平和繁荣的未来。 无论是明显的压抑还是更巧妙的操纵，对自由，民主和社会进步构成重大威胁的暴虐的领导者。 这些领导者经常使用恐惧，错误信息和分裂的言论来巩固其权力，限制公民挑战其决定的能力。 他们根据公众的必要筹集了他们的行动，但他们的真实目标是保持对他们的人群的控制。 当领导者以这种方式运作时，他们侵蚀了公众信托，削弱了民主主义的机构，并制定了抑制了异议的社会，并扼杀了创新。 例如，在Covid-19大流行期间，一些领导者实施了锁定，监测措施和对远远超出公共卫生所需的自由的限制。 他们以透明的方式与科学数据与辩论一起参与，而是利用危机来推进自己的政治议程。 在这些情况下，公民被迷失了，对欺骗保护他们的幌子感到无能为力的领导者。 为了摆脱这样的领导力，必须持有这些个人负责任。 问责制不仅通过法律或机构机制而且通过投票箱的力量来源。 人民有最终的权力决定谁治理他们，并通过集体行动，知情的决策，以及促进更好的替代方案，暴虐领导能力可能受到挑战和更换。 为了向前迈进，选择拥有与他们正在取代的暴君或欺骗性政治家的品质差异的领导者。 这些新领导人必须展示诚信，优先考虑对个人或政治收益的公共利益，并致力于透明度，问责制和保护个人自由等民主原则。 重视真理和诚实的领导人对于恢复治理的公众信任至关重要。 暴虐的领导者经常依靠谎言，错误的信息和保密来操纵公众。 相比之下，诚实的领导人与公民公开聘用，提供准确的信息，并在没有所有答案的时候承认。 他们不会害羞地远离艰难的谈话或隐藏他们的错误，而是寻求向他们学习。 通过选择展示诚信的领导者，社会可以重建政府和公民之间的信任。 民主有效领导的定义特征是透明度。 领导者必须愿意分享他们决定背后的理由，包括科学数据，经济模式，以及他们从专家收到的建议。 透明度促进责任，因为它允许公民审查政府行为并做出明智的判断。 对其决策过程开放的领导者更有可能获得公共支持，并且不太可能滥用权力。 选择优先级透明度的领导人将有助于确保未来的危机具有开放性和公平性。 保护公民自由应该是任何领导者的不可谈判要求。 在危机时期，各国政府可能会诱人实施限制流动，表达和大会自由的限制性措施。 虽然公共安全可能需要一些措施，但必须始终占据临时，审查。 尊重其公民的基本权利的领导者，即使在充满挑战的时期，也会创造有弹性的社会，并且能够在不牺牲自由的情况下克服逆境。 选择对这些自由深切尊重的领导者，谁将抵制使用危机作为扩大其权力的机会的诱惑。 暴君和压抑领导经常使用司来维持控制，达到不同的群体，以削弱集体抵抗。 更好的前进方向要求有能力团结思想，文化和社会形态的人。 这些领导人侧重于共同目标 - 例如繁荣，健康和安全 - 而不是利用政治利益的差异。 选择培养统一员工的领导人将有助于创造一个更具凝聚力和和谐社会，公民感受到参与民主进程。 新领导人拥有良好的意图是不够的; 他们还必须拥有能力和愿景来解决社会面临的复杂挑战。 暴虐的领导者往往专注于短期功率整合，忽视长期规划和可持续治理。 相比之下，有能力的领导者正在前瞻性思考，了解今天的决定将对未来几代产生持久的影响。 他们投资于教育，医疗保健，基础设施和环境，为长期繁荣创造条件。 为未来的明确态度选择领导者对于进步和稳定至关重要。 选择新的很多领导者只是解决方案的一部分。 对于一个真正向前迈进的社会，它还必须赋予其公民并加强保护民主的机构。 一个强大而聘请的公民，加上强大的民主机构，为一个暴政无法抓住的繁荣社会创造了基础。 受过教育和知情的公民是健康民主的基石。 政府和民间社会必须投资于教育，获取信息，以及赋予人们提出知情决定的公民参与计划。 必须鼓励公民批判性地评估其领导者的行动，参加公众话语，并通过民主手段持有权力，如投票，抗议和宣传等。 价值观公民参与的社会易受暴虐领导者的兴起。 一个运作的民主依赖于强大的独立机构，该机构充当了权力的支票和余额。 司法系统，立法机构和看门狗组织必须摆脱政治干扰，确保没有监督没有领导人可以运作。 必须建立可以调查和持有对不当行为负责任的领导的机构，确保滥用权力符合后果。 加强这些机构将保护社会保护社会，由暴君领导人破坏民主治理。 暴虐领导所带来的挑战不仅限于个别国家; 他们经常有全球影响。 国际合作对于促进良好的治理，分享最佳做法，并持有全球范围责任的领导人至关重要。 联合国和国际刑事法院等国际机构可以在起诉人权行为中发挥作用，并确保暴君不能通过撤回股权来逃避正义。 通过促进全球合作，我们可以创造一个暴君没有避风港的世界。 当旨在维持国际秩序和正义（如联合国（联合国）和国际法院（ICJ）的机构被损害或被视为腐败时，持有暴虐领导者负责的挑战变得更加令人生畏。 国际权力政治的现实往往意味着这些组织受到强大国家利益的影响，如果他们被强大的地缘盟国盟国支持或被缓慢，官僚主义的系统屏蔽，难以使领导人司法司法 然而，即使面对这一国际腐败，也有办法追求正义，抱着暴君责任，并“追捕他们”的成像性 - 通过基层运动，替代联盟，法律框架和绕行腐败的新型号的组合 - 绕过 这里是如何：1。建立强大，独立的民事动力，腐败领导者最强大的方式之一是通过基层，公民主导的运动，独立于国际机构运营。 民间社会组织，人权团体和非政府组织（非政府组织）在暴露滥用行为，记录证据和动员舆论方面发挥着关键作用。 当国际机构失败时，通常在暴政和需求问责制的亮度亮起。 这些运动在过去成功，即使是反对根深蒂固的授权制度。 南非种族隔离的堕落，东欧的独裁者和阿拉伯春季运动都表明公民可以挑战根深蒂固的力量和力量变革，即使国际组织仍然不活动。 在今天的数字时代，社交媒体和独立新闻使这些运动前所未有，以提高意识，镀锌支持和对领导者的压力。 2.创建替代国际联盟，而联合国和伊氏委员会这样的主要国际机构可能会受到损害，较小的志同体，区域机构和替代联盟的较小联盟可以提供更加敏捷的，较为政治纠缠的绳索途径。 例如，如国际刑事法院（ICC）这样的组织可以在追求正义方面是有助于追求的。 像欧盟，非洲联盟等地区机构，甚至是新兴的联盟，如四边形安全对话（四边形）或东南亚国家（东盟）有时可以独立行动，以持有领导者责任。 如果更大的组织无法或不愿意采取行动，较小的国家可以形成联盟以追求法律行动，发行制裁甚至赞助独立法庭。 联合国和ICJ的这些替代方案可以规避政治腐败和惯性，允许司法进行区域或问题特定的基础。 3.针对经济和政治网络，追求暴虐领导者的一个关键方法是通过针对支持它们的经济和政治网络。 这些领导人的许多领导者依靠国际金融制度，贸易关系和政治联盟来维持其权力。 通过对这些网络的努力 - 通过制裁，资产冻结，外交孤立，并针对暴政活动家的推动者，政府可以对威权领导人施加压力而不依赖于国际机构。 例如，若干国家使用的Magnitsky行为允许各国政府制裁侵犯人权的个人，公司和制度。 这些类型的法律框架绕过了受损的国际机构，并允许在更加分散和有针对性的水平上追求司法。 即使国际司法系统被控锁或阻塞，这种措施也可以强迫暴虐的领导者面临后果。 * magnitsky act 适用于澳大利亚。 2021年12月，澳大利亚通过了自己版本的Magnitsky风格法律，根据自治制裁修正案（MagnitSky风格和其他主题制裁）法案2021 *。 本立法使澳大利亚政府能够对负责严重人权滥用，腐败和其他严重的不当行为负责的个人和实体强加有针对性的制裁，无论这些行为发生在哪里。 通过采取这一立法，澳大利亚已加入国际社会，利用有针对性的制裁来阻止压迫制度和腐败官员，为全球努力举办持有此类个人的努力。 该法案可能适用于某些澳大利亚政治家和前政治家。 时间会告诉。 4.利用国际舆论暴君在他们可以控制叙述和操纵信息的环境中茁壮成长。 然而，在当今的相互关联的世界中，专制政权更难隐瞒从全球公众隐瞒他们的罪行。 利用国际舆论可以对腐败的领导人和背叛人产生巨大压力。 政府甚至是那些腐败或同谋的政府往往必须应对公民，盟友和更广泛的国际社会的公众压力。 不公正的不公正或压迫的高调案例可以成为需求变化的全球运动的焦点。 例如，公众露头已迫使腐败的政府重新考虑他们关于从种族隔离到治疗政治持有人的问题的问题。 即使是主要的权力也不会免受玷污的全球声誉的后果，而当滥用足够的全球关注时，它可以强迫机构司法系统失败的行动。 5.在某些情况下，创新的司法模型和普遍管辖权，可以通过司法的创新模式绕过传统的法律制度。 例如，“普遍管辖权”是一种原则，允许各国起诉个人对种族灭绝，战争罪和危害人类罪等严重罪行的原则，无论犯罪犯罪以及肇事者的国籍。 这一原则已被使用，如前智利独裁者Pinochet的案件，他在英国被捕，他在智利致力于犯罪的普遍司法管辖区。 普遍管辖权案件可能面临政治障碍，但它们也代表了一种强大的法律工具，即使国际社会不愿意或无法采取行动，即使将暴君领导人带来严格的领导者。 这一原则与不断增长的跨国法律框架相结合，希望甚至强大的领导人可能会对他们在自身边界的法院的行为面临后果。 6.举报人和泄漏举报人和泄漏越来越多地成为腐败领导力的强大武器。 压迫性制度或国际组织内的个人可以在最高级别暴露腐败，滥用和勾结，即使官方系统受到损害。 像巴拿马文件一样的高调泄漏或来自爱德华和切尔西曼宁等举报人的录音表明，个人可以向公众揭示暴虐制度的工作。 鼓励和保护可以暴露腐败领导者内部工作的举报人至关重要。 国际组织，民间社会和独立媒体可以创建网络来支持和保护那些冒着生命的人将真理带到光明。 这些启示可以拆除权力结构，火花调查，并打开舆论对先前似乎无懈可击的制度。 7.在腐败暴动时茁壮成长时，弹性和持久性在遭遇冷漠或辞职时茁壮成长。 在腐败的系统中击倒暴虐领导者的最终关键是抵御能力和持久性。 即使联合国，ICJ或其他国际机构失败，对于全球社会而言， - 是否通过替代法律制度，民事动力，甚至分散司法努力 - 继续推动问责制。 正义的道路往往很长，但历史表明，暴君很少永远逃脱责任。 随着时间的推移，制度变化，盟友放弃了它们，并为司法提供机会。 继续记录滥用文件的人，为人权和压力政府提供侵犯的人确保最终最强大的压迫者甚至最终会被绳之以法。 这是对司法的不懈追求，以确保后代的和平与安全。 世界已经发言：我们会追捕你，我有特定的目标，你无法隐藏。 伊恩大风。

https://open.substack.com/pub/ianbrighthope/p/we-will-hunt-you-down-terrorists