patrick.net

💉🚼👀🧠♿️☠️
How Do Vaccines Cause Sudden Death ? 疫苗如何导致猝死？The baby was unable to defend himself, strabismus, mentally retarded, disabled, and died suddenly.婴儿无法辩护，斜视、智障、残疾、猝死。

https://open.substack.com/pub/amidwesterndoctor/p/how-do-vaccines-cause-sudden-death?selection=f4e98143-07bf-426f-adf4-b78cdf07a111

This discussion highlights both the common problems of vaccination and the unique toxicities seen with the COVID-19 vaccines (e.g. the highly unusual clots they form and the severe inflammatory response within organs that are critical for survival).

I believe vaccines can cause a significant number of health issues, particularly neurological and immunological disorders, and that the historical trends in vaccination account for much of the “inexplicable” increase in these debilitating diseases that have been seen over the past 150 years. Since the preceding sentence encapsulates an immensely complex topic, I have gradually authored articles here on each aspect of it.  
In this series, I have focused on the outliers (the sudden death syndromes), as they are now easy to recognize due to the sudden “inexplicable” emergence of Sudden Adult Death Syndrome. 本次讨论重点介绍了疫苗接种的常见问题以及 COVID-19 疫苗的独特毒性（例如，疫苗形成的极不寻常的凝块以及对生存至关重要的器官内的严重炎症反应）。

我相信疫苗会导致大量健康问题，特别是神经系统和免疫系统疾病，并且疫苗接种的历史趋势在很大程度上解释了过去 150 年来这些使人衰弱的疾病“莫名其妙”增加的原因。 由于前面这句话概括了一个非常复杂的主题，因此我逐渐在这里就其各个方面撰写了文章。  
在本系列中，我重点关注异常值（猝死综合症），因为由于成人猝死综合症的突然“莫名其妙”的出现，它们现在很容易识别。

A key principle of pharmaceutical toxicity is that individual responses to a toxin distribute on a bell curve, which means that the extreme outliers, such as death, represent a relatively small number of the injuries, whereas chronic complications, like the large spike in disability that has been observed following the spike protein vaccine rollout, represent the rest of iceberg that remains unseen underwater.  
Many physicians I have either trained under, have direct knowledge of, or have read the writings of, have noted an abrupt change in the health of their patient populations from the start to the end of their career (some of the earliest examples can be found here).
The explosion of diseases I have witnessed following spike protein vaccination has made me suspect we once again have arrived at a point that will mark a profound shift in the nature of human diseases. Many others I have consulted have also made similar observations. For example in a recent correspondence with Pierre Kory, I was informed he also has seen signs this is happening (as many of the patients contacting him with vaccination complications are experiencing severe illnesses you typically never see in their demographic). 
How Do Vaccines Cause Harm?
Presently, I believe vaccines primarily cause harm through three interrelated mechanisms:
 •Agglomeration of fluid throughout the body. This clumping or thickening of fluids gives rise to issues numerous issues including blood sludging (which can create disastrous microstrokes) and was the subject of the previous part of this series.
 •The immune provoking design of vaccines makes them highly likely to also create autoimmune conditions (along with other forms of immune dysfunction).
 •Vaccines systemically activate the cell danger response (this will be the subject of a future article).
Although many vaccines do all of this, the spike protein vaccines are uniquely suited for creating these effects.  
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome
Previously in this series, I presented the century of evidence that SIDS (another unexplained “syndrome”) was caused by vaccination and the countless attempts by the government to cover this up so that the vaccine program could be maintained. I chose to dedicate an entire article to this subject because SIDS represents the closest parallel we have to SADS, and because evidence continues to emerge to support the SIDS vaccination hypothesis. Recently, for example, many individuals predicted that the COVID-19 lockdowns causing a reduction in nonessential childhood vaccinations would also result in a reduction in infant deaths, and that was exactly what happened.
Since infants cannot advocate for themselves, their adverse reactions to vaccination have been extremely easy to sweep under the rug. My sincere hope is that since adults (who can advocate for themselves) are also being harmed by forced vaccination, the political will now exists to do something to address this century-old issue.  
Although infants cannot directly advocate for themselves, a key accomplishment of Andrew Moulden MD was the identification of previously unrecognized clinical neurological signs suggesting the vaccinations were causing neurological damage through the microstrokes they induce. These signs include the distinctive and inconsolable high-pitched scream or shrill shriek that follows vaccination (before becoming a doctor it always surprised me how resistant parents were to acknowledging this suggested a problem), facial droops, and incorrect positioning or movements of the eyes.  
Many of these problems arise because the nuclei of the cranial nerves that controlled these functions are in areas of the brainstem that have poor blood supplies and thus are more vulnerable to strokes such as vaccine-induced microstrokes. The cranial nerve that has one of the most vulnerable blood supplies is responsible for turning each eye outward, and when it is dysfunctional one eye will turn inwards, while another cranial nerve is responsible for facial muscle tone and will cause a facial droop when it is affected by a microstroke.   
In the previous article explaining why all vaccines cause harm, I reviewed Andrew Moulden's work in much more detail. For those unable to read it and those wishing to learn more, I would highly recommend reviewing the video series he produced on this subject: 药物毒性的一个关键原理是，个体对毒素的反应呈钟形曲线分布，这意味着极端异常值（例如死亡）代表的伤害相对较少，而慢性并发症（例如残疾的大幅上升）则代表了相对较小的伤害。 在刺突蛋白疫苗推出后观察到的，代表了水下仍看不见的冰山的其余部分。  
我接受过培训、直接了解或读过其著作的许多医生都注意到，从他们职业生涯的开始到结束，患者群体的健康状况发生了突然的变化（一些最早的例子可以在 这里）。
我亲眼目睹了刺突蛋白疫苗接种后疾病的爆发，这让我怀疑我们再次到达了一个标志着人类疾病性质发生深刻转变的时刻。 我咨询过的许多其他人也提出了类似的意见。 例如，在最近与皮埃尔·科里（Pierre Kory）的通信中，我得知他也看到了这种情况正在发生的迹象（因为许多与他联系的患有疫苗接种并发症的患者正在经历严重的疾病，而这些疾病在他们的人口中通常是从未见过的）。 
疫苗如何造成伤害？
目前，我认为疫苗主要通过三种相互关联的机制造成伤害：
  •全身液体凝结。 液体的结块或增稠会引起许多问题，包括血液淤积（可能造成灾难性的微中风），这也是本系列前一部分的主题。
  •疫苗的免疫激发设计使其极有可能产生自身免疫性疾病（以及其他形式的免疫功能障碍）。
  •疫苗系统地激活细胞危险反应（这将是未来文章的主题）。
尽管许多疫苗可以实现所有这些效果，但刺突蛋白疫苗特别适合产生这些效果。  
婴儿猝死综合症
在本系列之前，我提出了一个世纪的证据，证明 SIDS（另一种无法解释的“综合症”）是由疫苗接种引起的，以及政府无数次试图掩盖这一点，以便维持疫苗计划。 我选择用整篇文章来讨论这个主题，因为 SIDS 代表了我们与 SADS 最接近的相似之处，并且因为不断有证据支持 SIDS 疫苗接种假说。 例如，最近，许多人预测，COVID-19 封锁导致非必要的儿童疫苗接种减少，也会导致婴儿死亡人数减少，而事实确实如此。
由于婴儿无法为自己辩护，因此他们对疫苗接种的不良反应很容易被掩盖。 我真诚地希望，由于成年人（可以为自己辩护）也因强制接种疫苗而受到伤害，因此现在存在采取行动解决这个百年问题的政治意愿。  
尽管婴儿不能直接为自己辩护，但安德鲁·莫尔登医学博士的一项关键成就是识别了以前未被识别的临床神经系统症状，表明疫苗接种通过诱发微中风而造成神经系统损伤。 这些迹象包括接种疫苗后出现的独特且令人无法安慰的尖声尖叫（在成为一名医生之前，我总是惊讶地发现父母如此抗拒承认这表明存在问题）、面部下垂以及眼睛的位置或运动不正确。  
其中许多问题的出现是因为控制这些功能的脑神经核位于血液供应较差的脑干区域，因此更容易发生中风，例如疫苗引起的微中风。 拥有最脆弱血液供应之一的脑神经负责将每只眼睛向外转动，当它出现功能障碍时，一只眼睛会向内转动，而另一根脑神经则负责面部肌肉张力，当它出现功能障碍时，会导致面部下垂。 受微中风影响。   
在上一篇解释为什么所有疫苗都会造成伤害的文章中，我更详细地回顾了安德鲁·莫尔登的工作。 对于那些无法阅读它和希望了解更多信息的人，我强烈建议您观看他制作的有关该主题的视频系列：

In the previous article on SIDS, I presented numerous pieces of evidence demonstrating that vaccination disrupts the normal respiratory function of infants. That disruption in breathing following vaccination has been observed both within a hospital setting (where it is easy to identify since infant breathing is continually monitored), and at home when a customized device was used for this purpose.

Given that infants who die from SIDS are either found after they have died or observed by their parents to suddenly stop breathing, I believe it is reasonable to assume all of these events represent the same disease process occurring. Similarly, in the studies I referenced previously, had hospital interventions not been available to detect and treat the infants who stopped breathing, they likely also would have died in a manner no different from that seen in SIDS.
Although this key aspect of SIDS is relatively unknown, most of us are familiar with the concept of interrupted breathing within the context of “sleep apnea.” Sleep apnea, like many other forms of apnea, can have two causes: obstruction of the airway (obstructive sleep apnea) and damage to the part of the brain for the automatic control of breathing (central sleep apnea).

As mentioned previously, I recently put forth the framework to explain how vaccinations frequently caused microstrokes in the body and the emphasis of Moulden’s model on the susceptibility of certain cranial nerves (particularly 4, 6, and 7) to these microstrokes due to the regional blood supply of their nuclei. Let’s quickly review where they are located in relation to the respiratory centers of the brain: 在上一篇关于 SIDS 的文章中，我提出了许多证据，证明疫苗接种会破坏婴儿的正常呼吸功能。 在医院环境中（由于婴儿呼吸受到持续监测，因此很容易识别）和在家里使用定制设备用于此目的，都观察到接种疫苗后呼吸中断。

鉴于死于 SIDS 的婴儿要么是在死后被发现，要么是被父母观察到突然停止呼吸，我认为可以合理地假设所有这些事件代表了同一疾病过程的发生。 同样，在我之前引用的研究中，如果医院无法采取干预措施来检测和治疗停止呼吸的婴儿，他们的死亡方式也可能与婴儿猝死综合症中的死亡方式没有什么不同。
尽管 SIDS 的这一关键方面相对未知，但我们大多数人都熟悉“睡眠呼吸暂停”背景下呼吸中断的概念。 与许多其他形式的呼吸暂停一样，睡眠呼吸暂停可能有两个原因：气道阻塞（阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停）和大脑自动控制呼吸的部分受损（中枢性睡眠呼吸暂停）。

如前所述，我最近提出了一个框架来解释疫苗接种如何频繁地引起体内微中风，以及莫尔登模型强调某些脑神经（特别是 4、6 和 7）由于局部血液而对这些微中风的易感性 供应它们的原子核。 让我们快速回顾一下它们相对于大脑呼吸中枢的位置：

Note: I apologize for the quality of these pictures (e.g. the extra line). They were the best images I could find to illustrate the point. It is important to remember that this view cannot show that a pair of each of these nuclei with its own blood supply exists on the left and the right of the brain (e.g. there is a different cranial nerve responsible for each eye’s outward movement).

As you may have noticed, two of the primary control centers for breathing (collectively known as the pontine respiratory centers) are located near the nuclei for cranial nerve 6, while the others are not that far from cranial nerve 7. Since Moulden observed that as microstrokes became more severe, more adjacent cranial nerves would show signs of dysfunction, he also reasoned that other nuclei within their vicinity, such as the respiratory centers could also be affected.
With further observation, Moulden concluded that if there was a microstroke to only one side, intermittent interruptions in breathing would occur, while if the process that creates microstrokes became severe enough to interrupt the blood flow to both sides, a fatal cessation of respiration would occur. Building upon the existing data showing partial or complete cessations of respiration following vaccination, Moulden correlated these apneic (interrupted breathing) episodes to the inwards movement of one of the eyes (a sign of interrupted blood flow to cranial nerve 6), and fatal episodes to both eyes moving inward. 注意：对于这些图片的质量（例如多余的线条），我深表歉意。 它们是我能找到的最好的图片来说明这一点。 重要的是要记住，这种观点不能表明大脑的左侧和右侧各有一对具有自己的血液供应的核（例如，有不同的脑神经负责每只眼睛的向外运动）。

您可能已经注意到，两个主要的呼吸控制中心（统称为脑桥呼吸中心）位于第 6 号脑神经的核团附近，而其他的则距离第 7 号脑神经不远。 微中风变得更加严重，更多邻近的脑神经会出现功能障碍的迹象，他还推断其附近的其他神经核，例如呼吸中枢也可能受到影响。
经过进一步观察，莫尔登得出结论，如果仅一侧发生微中风，就会发生间歇性呼吸中断，而如果产生微中风的过程严重到足以中断两侧的血液流动，就会发生致命的呼吸停止。 。 根据显示疫苗接种后呼吸部分或完全停止的现有数据，莫尔登将这些呼吸暂停（呼吸中断）发作与一只眼睛的向内运动（颅神经 6 血流中断的迹象）相关联，将致命发作与一只眼睛的向内运动相关联。 双眼向内移动。

Autopsy Studies
A variety of autopsy studies have been conducted on infants who died from SIDS shortly after vaccination (e.g. here and here). These autopsy studies found significant changes within the brain such as frequent edema and weakening of the blood-brain barrier. The most detailed findings were found in this study: 尸检研究
对接种疫苗后不久死于 SIDS 的婴儿进行了各种尸检研究（例如此处和此处）。 这些尸检研究发现大脑内发生了显着变化，例如频繁水肿和血脑屏障减弱。 这项研究中发现了最详细的发现：

Abnormal neuropathologic findings were acute congestion, defective blood–brain barrier, slight infiltration of the leptomeninx by macrophages and lymphocytes, perivascular lymphocytic infiltration, diffuse infiltration of the pons, mesencephalon and cortex by T-lymphocytes, microglia in the hippocampus and pons, and in one case a necrosis in the cerebellum. 异常的神经病理学结果包括急性充血、血脑屏障缺陷、巨噬细胞和淋巴细胞对软脑膜的轻微浸润、血管周围淋巴细胞浸润、T淋巴细胞对脑桥、中脑和皮质的弥漫性浸润、海马和脑桥中的小胶质细胞以及 1例是小脑坏死。

Unfortunately, I was unable to locate an autopsy study that assessed for the presence of the lesions Moulden suspected caused SIDS, and hence cannot state with certainty the apneic episodes were central (due to a neurologic issue) in origin. Conversely, I also came across one autopsy study showing the damage also occurred throughout the body which argues for the apnea’s cause partially being within the airway: 不幸的是，我无法找到一项尸检研究来评估是否存在莫尔登怀疑引起 SIDS 的病变，因此无法肯定地说呼吸暂停发作是中枢性的（由于神经系统问题）。 相反，我还发现了一项尸检研究，显示损伤也发生在全身各处，这表明呼吸暂停的原因部分是在气道内：

Histological examination revealed polivisceral stasis, mild cerebral oedema. Acute pulmonary oedema mixed with areas of acute pulmonary emphysema were recorded. Myocardial interstitial oedema was also detected. Histological examination of the cardiac conduction system was unremarkable. Small intraparenchimal haemorrhages on spleen and adrenal glands were observed. Pulmonary mast cells were identified and quantified and a great number of degranulating mast cells with tryptase-positive material outside were observed (Fig. 2). Data resulting from quantitative analysis recorded a numerical increase in pulmonary mast cells in fatal anaphylactic shock (average mast-cell count 12471/100 mm2 ) compared with that of the traumatic control group (traumatic death) whose average mast-cell count was 3657/100 mm2. 组织学检查显示多脏器瘀滞，轻度脑水肿。 记录急性肺水肿与急性肺气肿区域的混合情况。 还检测到心肌间质水肿。 心脏传导系统的组织学检查未见异常。 观察到脾脏和肾上腺的小脑实质内出血。 对肺肥大细胞进行鉴定和定量，观察到大量脱颗粒肥大细胞，外部有类胰蛋白酶阳性物质（图2）。 定量分析数据显示，与创伤对照组（创伤性死亡）相比，致死性过敏性休克（平均肥大细胞计数 12471/100 mm2）中肺肥大细胞数量增加，其平均肥大细胞计数为 3657/100 毫米2。

I also discussed this study with a government specialist who previously worked with the pertussis vaccine who informed me that some of these effects (e.g. vascular leakage) are also seen with pertussis toxin toxicity, which led me to wonder if this mechanism also plays a key role in that vaccine causing SIDS (a few physicians of the previous era suspected this).

Finally, it should be noted that Moulden believed the microstrokes and tissue damage he could detect through neurologic evaluation were also silently occurring throughout the body, and in a few instances Moulden was able to review autopsies showing this was indeed occurring.
Dose Toxicity
A key principle of toxicology is that a dose-response relationship should exist: if something is toxic, more of it will cause more harm. Many vaccine zealots believe vaccines are safe, adverse reactions are one in a million, and that countless vaccines can be given simultaneously (and for those curious, this is the context behind the “10,000 vaccines are safe” Offit quote).
Conversely, vaccine skeptics believe vaccines are unsafe and that a dose-response relationship exists between the number of vaccines given and the likelihood that severe side effects will occur. For example, in the previous article discussing the century of evidence that vaccines cause SIDS, I cited numerous studies which showed those who are at the greatest risk of dying after vaccination were either premature infants or infants who received multiple vaccines simultaneously.
From a dose-response perspective, these observations make sense. In both cases, the infants who are less able to survive the effects of vaccination are receiving a higher vaccination dose. In the case of premature infants who are smaller and less capable of tolerating the stress of vaccination, the “higher dose” they receive is a result of them receiving the same vaccine dose as a normal-weight infant, and thus relatively speaking, a “higher dose.” Additionally, it is also frequently reported that children develop permanent vaccine injuries after receiving a larger than normal number of vaccinations at the same time (which is typically not questioned by the provider as they are assumed to be completely safe regardless of the number given).
I agree with the second school of thought, but believe it is very difficult to establish a linear relationship between the dose and the toxicity. This is because individual susceptibility to injury varies greatly and the ability of a coagulating agent (e.g. many vaccine components) to coagulate a fluid (e.g. blood) does not follow a linear curve.
In the previous article of this series, I discussed this nonlinear curve and illustrated it within the context of aluminum, a standard vaccine ingredient and one of the strongest coagulating agents in existence. More recently, I discussed some of the potential explanations for why hot COVID-19 vaccine lots appear to exist and emphasized that quality control in vaccine manufacturing is often very poor, which inevitably leads to significant quality deficiencies in many batches. With that context, consider the significance of the following: 我还与一位曾从事百日咳疫苗工作的政府专家讨论了这项研究，他告诉我，百日咳毒素毒性也可以观察到其中一些影响（例如血管渗漏），这让我想知道这种机制是否也发挥着关键作用 那种疫苗会导致婴儿猝死综合症（前一个时代的一些医生对此表示怀疑）。

最后，应该指出的是，莫尔登相信他可以通过神经学评估检测到的微中风和组织损伤也在全身悄然发生，并且在少数情况下，莫尔登能够审查尸检，表明这种情况确实发生。
剂量毒性
毒理学的一个关键原则是应该存在剂量-反应关系：如果某种东西有毒，那么它越多就会造成越大的伤害。 许多疫苗狂热者相信疫苗是安全的，不良反应是百万分之一，并且可以同时接种无数种疫苗（对于那些好奇的人来说，这就是奥菲特引用的“10,000 种疫苗是安全的”背后的背景）。
相反，疫苗怀疑论者认为疫苗不安全，并且接种疫苗的数量与发生严重副作用的可能性之间存在剂量反应关系。 例如，在上一篇讨论疫苗导致 SIDS 的证据的文章中，我引用了许多研究，这些研究表明，接种疫苗后死亡风险最大的人要么是早产儿，要么是同时接种多种疫苗的婴儿。
从剂量反应的角度来看，这些观察是有道理的。 在这两种情况下，那些在疫苗接种影响下存活能力较差的婴儿正在接受更高的疫苗接种剂量。 对于体型较小、承受疫苗压力能力较差的早产儿来说，他们接受的“剂量较高”是因为他们接受了与正常体重婴儿相同的疫苗剂量，因此相对而言，“ 更高的剂量。” 此外，还经常有报道称，儿童在同时接受超过正常数量的疫苗接种后会出现永久性疫苗损伤（提供者通常不会质疑这一点，因为无论给出的数量如何，他们都被认为是完全安全的）。
我同意第二种观点，但认为剂量和毒性之间很难建立线性关系。 这是因为个体对损伤的易感性差异很大，并且凝血剂（例如许多疫苗成分）凝固液体（例如血液）的能力并不遵循线性曲线。
在本系列的上一篇文章中，我讨论了这条非线性曲线，并在铝（一种标准疫苗成分和现有最强的凝固剂之一）的背景下对其进行了说明。 最近，我讨论了为什么出现热门 COVID-19 疫苗批次的一些可能解释，并强调疫苗生产中的质量控制往往很差，这不可避免地导致许多批次出现严重的质量缺陷。 在这种背景下，请考虑以下几点的重要性：

A July 2021 study, conducted by a team of British scientists led by Christopher Exley, Ph.D., formerly of Keele University, examined the aluminum content in thirteen different childhood vaccines.  They found that six of the vaccines contained significantly higher amounts of aluminum than the manufacturer claimed, and four of the vaccines contained significantly smaller amounts. The study showed only three of the thirteen vaccines contained an amount of aluminum within 10 percent of the manufacturers’ listed contents. 由前基尔大学 Christopher Exley 博士领导的英国科学家团队于 2021 年 7 月进行了一项研究，检查了 13 种不同的儿童疫苗中的铝含量。  他们发现，其中六种疫苗的铝含量明显高于制造商声称的含量，而其中四种疫苗的铝含量明显低于制造商声称的含量。 研究显示，13 种疫苗中只有 3 种的铝含量在制造商列出的含量的 10% 以内。

Recently I covered the critical work Richard Fleming has conducted to bring criminal charges against those who were responsible for COVID-19. In his presentation I previously shared, he provided one of the best examples I have seen of how a small amount of a coagulating agent can rapidly cause blood cells to clump together by showing the immediate effects of each of the spike protein vaccines on healthy blood. 最近，我报道了理查德·弗莱明 (Richard Fleming) 为对 COVID-19 的责任人提出刑事指控所做的重要工作。 在我之前分享的演讲中，他提供了我所见过的最好的例子之一，通过展示每种刺突蛋白疫苗对健康血液的直接影响，说明少量凝血剂如何快速导致血细胞聚集在一起。

These South African researchers likewise observed the same phenomena: 这些南非研究人员同样观察到了同样的现象：

Blood incubated with spike protein showed erythrocyte agglutination, despite the very low concentration of the spike protein. An increase in platelet hyperactivation, membrane spreading, platelet-derived microparticle formation were noted due to spike protein exposure. 尽管刺突蛋白的浓度非常低，但与刺突蛋白一起孵育的血液显示出红细胞凝集。 由于刺突蛋白暴露，血小板过度活化、膜扩散、血小板衍生微粒形成增加。

This is most likely what causes sudden death immediately following vaccination in susceptible individuals, like this recent example where this ardent advocate of vaccination died 7 minutes after receiving the new booster in the pharmacy.
The Original SADS
Something many are not aware of is that SADS was a medical diagnosis prior to the COVID-19 vaccines and that there are in fact two “SADS,” sudden arrhythmic death syndrome and sudden adult death syndrome. In the former, which occurs in 1 to 1.6 in a million people (although some argue it affects more), a preexisting heart issue causes a fatal heart rhythm to initiate and kill the patient.
As many different (but not all) heart conditions can cause sudden arrhythmic death to happen, cardiologists try to screen for many of those conditions, and when identified, provide preventative treatments to those who have them. Fortunately, in many cases, the initial manifestation of the irregular heart rhythm causes much more minor symptoms than death and results in a prompt diagnosis of the underlying condition.
Victims of sudden death from a fatal heart rhythm often fall under the umbrella of sudden adult death syndrome (SADS), which was previously used to categorize sudden death without a structural cause identified by autopsy or toxicological examination. Prior to COVID-19, it was estimated to account for approximately 4% of all sudden deaths due to cardiac arrest.
I find the concept of sudden arrhythmic death syndrome useful to consider because it demonstrates how many different diseases which affect the heart can result in the same thing (death) and given the number of different ways the spike protein vaccines are able to harm the heart, it is hence not surprising sudden deaths are observed following vaccination.
Additionally, Thomas Riddick, discussed previously in this series, was able to provide numerous cases which demonstrated that an increased thickness of the blood due to red blood cells clumping together caused a dangerous heart arrhythmia. Conversely, when this issue was addressed by restoring the zeta potential of the blood, these arrhythmias resolved (others who followed in his footsteps also found the same thing). 
Given the rapid clumping of blood cells which was shown above to follow vaccination, it is also very possible this is responsible for the sudden deaths that follow vaccination (the heart is extremely sensitive to interruptions in the blood supplies of the small arteries that feed it, and the smaller a blood vessel is, the more it is affected by the blood clumping or blood sludging process).
COVID-19 Vaccine Autopsies
When I first learned of the chosen COVID-19 vaccine design (this was at a time when the toxicity of the spike protein was not yet fully understood), I had three major concerns with the design:
•Mass producing the spike proteins within the body would likely disrupt its zeta potential and thereby cause numerous problems including significant blood clotting.
•mRNA technology had previously been associated with increasing the risk of cancer (although many fatal cancers follow these vaccines, the deaths are not sudden so they will not be discussed here).
•Having cells mass produce the highly immunogenic spike proteins and then express them on their surface was a guaranteed recipe for developing autoimmunity in those cells. This was especially concerning since the spike protein also matched parts of many critical human tissues and through those matches had a real risk of creating many different autoimmune conditions.
It was thus very illuminating to read the leaked Pfizer EMA documents, as Pfizer was given a free pass on testing for a few key issues, including the risk of cancer, infertility, and autoimmunity, which should have been obvious concerns to any competent drug regulator. 
Note: One of the main reasons why so much of the scientific literature has become corrupted is due to “publication bias,” where studies that produce results the researchers or sponsors do not want are not published (this bias can also occur within a published study where inconvenient data is simply not reported or formally analyzed). As a result, when a topic is comprehensively studied, we often only receive a slice of the full picture—the one slice that contains all of its positive aspects and none of its negatives.
I thus could not help but interpret the failure to study these critical areas I could not imagine had not been studied as a tacit admission these vaccines had been found to have significant problems there. Nonetheless, I was still taken aback by how frequent and severe these side effects were and like many have done my best to help sound the alarm on them.
For example, a few open-minded rheumatologists I have worked with or corresponded with have observed that between 1 in 4 to 1 in 3 of the patients they saw had an autoimmune issue that appeared to be linked to vaccination (either a new disorder or an exacerbation of a pre-existing condition). I also know of one rheumatologist that publicly went on record attesting to this occurrence (in his case it was 1 in 2.5 or 40% of his patients) and similar percentages have been reported from this registry and this Israeli government survey.
Due to publication bias, studies that are critical of vaccination are rarely published and Robert Malone recently shared two studies that demonstrated both this bias and the various retaliations that those who nonetheless choose to publish face.
It should thus be of no surprise that despite many autopsies being conducted on those who died from COVID-19, far fewer were conducted on those who died following vaccination and only a handful have ever been published. This is especially surprising given that autopsies are often required when a healthy individual dies and no cause can be identified. In essence, this reflects the theme initially put forward in this series: if a severe condition is caused by a cause no one in power can afford to acknowledge, it is frequently labeled as a “syndrome” that is defined by the event (e.g. death) happening without any identifiable cause.
Fortunately, a few brave pathologists nonetheless chose to pursue this issue. Arne Burkhardt MD, a world-renowned pathologist, took advantage of the protection his reputation had earned him to conduct and publish 15 autopsies of individuals who died 7 days to 6 months after 1 to 2 spike protein vaccinations. I will directly quote the summary of his research: 这是最有可能在易感个体疫苗接种后立即导致猝死的原因，如最近的疫苗接种倡导者在药房接受新助推器后的7分钟内死亡。 原来的悲伤许多人不知道是在Covid-19疫苗之前的悲伤是一种医学诊断，实际上有两种“悲伤”，突然的心律病死亡综合征和突然的成人死亡综合征。 在前者中，在一百万人中发生在1到1.6（尽管有些人受到影响）中，预先存在的心脏问题会导致致命的心脏节律引发和杀死患者。 由于许多不同（但不是全部）心脏病会导致突然的心律失常死亡发生，心脏病学家试图为许多这些条件进行筛选，并且在确定的时候为那些拥有它们的人提供预防性治疗。 幸运的是，在许多情况下，不规则心律节律的初始表现比死亡更轻微症状，并导致潜在条件的迅速诊断。 致命心脏节奏猝死的受害者常常落在突然的成人死亡综合征（悲伤）的伞下，这前用于突然分类，没有尸检或毒理学检查鉴定的结构原因。 在Covid-19之前，估计由于心脏骤停而占所有突然死亡的4％。 我发现突然的心律失常死亡综合征有助于考虑的概念，因为它证明了影响心脏的不同疾病可能导致同样的事情（死亡）并给出尖刺蛋白质疫苗能够伤害心脏的不同方式，因此并不令人惊讶的突然死亡 此外，先前在本系列中讨论的托马斯·瓦迪克能够提供众多病例，这表明由于红细胞丛集的红细胞引起的血液厚度增加引起了危险的心脏心律失常。 相反，当通过恢复血液的Zeta潜力来解决这个问题时，这些心律失常解决了（其他人遵循他的脚步，也发现了同样的事情）。 鉴于上面显示的血细胞的快速簇遵循接种疫苗，这也是如此可能对突然死亡的突然死亡，伴随疫苗接种（心脏对饲料的小动脉的血液供应中断，以及较小的血管来说是非常敏感的。 Covid-19疫苗尸检当我第一次了解了所选的Covid-19疫苗设计时（这是迄今尚未完全清楚毒性毒性的毒性的时候），我对设计有三个主要问题：•批量生产尖峰抗议 •MRNA技术先前已与增加癌症的风险有关（尽管许多致命的癌症遵循这些疫苗，但死亡突然不会突然）。 •具有细胞质量产生高度免疫原性的尖峰蛋白，然后在它们的表面上表达它们是在这些细胞中显影自身免疫的保证配方。 这尤其涉及，因为穗蛋白也匹配了许多关键人体组织的部分，并且通过这些比赛具有创造许多不同的自身免疫条件的真正风险。 因此，读取泄漏的辉瑞EMA文件是非常亮起的，因为辉瑞的测试是对几个关键问题的免费转移，包括癌症，不孕症和自身免疫的风险，这应该对任何具有职位药物调节剂的显而易患。 注意：其中大部分科学文学的主要原因之一是由于“出版物偏见”，在生成结果的研究，研究人员或赞助商不想要（此偏见也可能发生在发布的研究中，没有报道不方便的数据。 因此，当全面研究一个主题时，我们常常只接收一片完整的图片 - 一个包含其所有积极方面的切片，也不是其底片。 因此，我忍不住解释了未能研究这些关键领域，我无法想象尚未被研究过，因为默契录取这些疫苗在那里发现有重大问题。 尽管如此，我仍然消除了这些副作用的频繁和严重的东西，就像许多人一样，我已经尽力帮助他们发出声音。 例如，我使用或与之相对应的一些开放的风湿病学家观察到，在3患者中，他们看到的3个患者中有1个，他们看到的自身免疫问题似乎与疫苗接种有关（一种新的疾病或加剧或加剧 我也知道一个风湿病学家，公开记录证明这一事件（在他的情况下，在2.5或40％的患者中，他的患者中的1岁）和类似的百分比已从本登记处报告，并从此登记处报告了类似的百分比，而以色列政府调查。 由于出版物偏见，很少出版疫苗接种的研究很少，罗伯特马龙最近分享了两项研究，表明这两个偏见和各种报复性，即那些仍然选择发布面部的人。 因此，尽管对来自Covid-19死亡的人进行了许多尸检，但在那些在接种疫苗之后死亡的人进行了较少的人来说，它应该毫不惊讶的是，只有疫苗，而且只有少数人发表少数人。 鉴于尸体经常在健康的个体死亡而无法识别出任何原因时，鉴于尸检通常需要尤其令人惊讶。 从本质上讲，这反映了本系列最初提出的主题：如果由于一个严重的条件是由能力的原因造成的，则它经常被标记为“综合征”，该“综合征”是由未经任何识别发生的事件（例如死亡）所定义的“综合征” 幸运的是，一些勇敢的病理学家仍然选择追求这个问题。 世界着名的病理学家Arne Burkhardt Md充分利用了他的声誉，他的声誉赢得了他进行的，并发布了15天至2天穗蛋白疫苗接种后7天至6个月死亡的尸体的15个尸体。 我将直接引用他的研究摘要：

Histopathologic findings of a similar nature were detected in organs of 14 of the 15 deceased. Most frequently afflicted were the heart (14 of 15 cases) and the lung (13 of 15 cases). Pathologic alterations were furthermore observed in the liver (2 cases), thyroid gland (Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, 2 cases), salivary glands (Sjögren`s Syndrome; 2 cases) and brain (2 cases).
A number of salient aspects dominated in all affected tissues of all cases:
•1. Inflammatory events in small blood vessels (endothelitis), characterized by an abundance of T-lymphocytes and sequestered, dead endothelial cells within the vessel lumen
•2. The extensive perivascular accumulation of T-lymphocytes
•3. A massive lymphocytic infiltration of surrounding non-lymphatic organs or tissue with T-lymphocytes.
Lymphocytic infiltration occasionally occurred in combination with intense lymphocytic activation and follicle formation. Where these were present, they were usually accompanied by tissue destruction.
This combination of multifocal, T-lymphocyte-dominated pathology that clearly reflects the process of immunological self-attack is without precedent.
Because vaccination was the single common denominator between all cases, there can be no doubt that it was the trigger of self-destruction in these deceased individuals. 在 15 名死者中，有 14 名死者的器官中检测到了类似性质的组织病理学结果。 最常受累的是心脏（15 例中的 14 例）和肺（15 例中的 13 例）。 此外，在肝脏（2 例）、甲状腺（桥本甲状腺炎，2 例）、唾液腺（干燥综合征；2 例）和脑（2 例）中还观察到病理改变。
在所有病例的所有受影响组织中，有一些显着的方面占主导地位：
•1。 小血管炎症事件（内皮炎），其特征是血管腔内存在大量 T 淋巴细胞和隔离的死亡内皮细胞
•2。 T淋巴细胞在血管周围广泛积聚
•3。 T 淋巴细胞大量浸润周围非淋巴器官或组织。
淋巴细胞浸润偶尔会与强烈的淋巴细胞活化和滤泡形成同时发生。 当这些物质存在时，它们通常伴随着组织破坏。
这种多病灶、T 淋巴细胞主导的病理学组合清楚地反映了免疫自我攻击的过程，这是史无前例的。
由于疫苗接种是所有病例的共同点，因此毫无疑问，它是这些死者自我毁灭的触发因素。

This is a pretty big deal—you almost never see this type of autoimmune response. The only possible explanation for it is cells throughout the body expressing the spike protein (when this all started every authority repeatedly told us the mRNA vaccines would not travel to those cells) and causing the immune system to attack them. For those who want to understand exactly why this is without precedent, they can watch Burkhardt’s presentation of his first 10 autopsies at a September 20, 2021 press conference. 
If the world was sane and the reasons for publication bias did not exist, this press conference (like many other things) would have been sufficient to halt the vaccination campaign. Instead, it was ignored and subsequently, draconian vaccination mandates were enacted around the world (sadly this is a mistake our society has repeated since the disastrous smallpox vaccination campaigns 150 years ago).
I also know of four other autopsies of individuals who died following vaccination:
•This autopsy of a vaccinated 61-year-old woman who died 10 days after vaccination detected myocarditis with severe inflammatory infiltration (primarily T-lymphocyte and macrophages) and inflammatory cell infiltration in other tissues.

•This autopsy of a 22-year-old man who developed chest pain 5 days after the first Pfizer and died 7 hours later also showed the immune system attacking the heart.

•These two autopsies were conducted in teenage boys who died in their sleep 3 to 4 days after the second Pfizer. It found similar inflammatory changes within the heart to those observed in the 22-year-old man.
Lastly, earlier this year, Burkhardt’s team also was able to develop a means of reliably detecting the vaccine spike protein using conventional immunohistochemistry on tissue sections. Through doing so, they were able to detect the spike protein in the blood vessels of a person who had died 4 months after the "vaccination" with both myocarditis and damage to her blood vessels. This further strengthens the argument that spike proteins being expressed by the cells are responsible for the severe autoimmune responses that have been observed.
Why Do the Spike Protein Vaccines Cause Blood Clotting?
There are so many overlaps between heart disease and blood clotting that in many ways it is completely arbitrary to categorize them as separate diseases. One author I respect, Malcolm Kendrick, recently published a book cleverly titled "The Clot Thickens," which for those interested, makes the best case for the connection between these two diseases that I know of. 
Between the two, I presently believe the primary way the COVID-19 vaccines kill is through blood clotting. However, exactly why these blood clots (especially the large fibrous ones) so frequently emerge throughout the body following vaccination is still an unanswered question because the spike protein excels in so many different ways at forming blood clots. The key mechanisms we have looked at to explain how this all happens are as follows (note: explanations beyond those listed also exist and it is quite likely more will be discovered in the future):
•The spike protein lowers the physiologic zeta potential of the body and by causing blood cells to clump together, forms microclots throughout the body.
•The spike protein is electrically attracted to the layer that protects the endothelium (the glycocalyx), which provided it with easy access to the endothelium. The endothelium has one of the highest concentrations of ACE-2 receptors in the body (the spike proteins bind these) and as a result, the spike protein is a perfect weapon for attacking the endothelium, especially once the immune system also begins to attack endothelial cells expressing spike protein cells. All of this is a major problem because one of the primary causes of blood clots is endothelial damage, and as the above autopsies show, this is a common consequence of spike protein vaccination.
•The normal blood clotting process is a complex cycle of many blood clotting factors interacting with each other. For some odd reason, the spike protein matches various parts of these factors, which has led us to suspect it is also a biologically active clotting factor. For example, if we consider the South African study, it was shown that the spike protein activates platelets (this causes clots) and many physicians treating spike protein vaccine injuries have found that an anticoagulant directed at platelets (Plavix) is quite helpful. Determining which part of the spike protein directly affects the clotting process is challenging and so far the best match has been found with the anticoagulant heparin (which is also present throughout the glycocalyx). The spike protein’s ability to bind heparin may also explain why spike protein clots do not respond to anticoagulation with heparin (which makes them quite difficult to treat).
•The spike protein activates the complement system through the alternative pathway by activating complement factor B. This inflammatory activation likely accounts for some of the hypercoagulability seen with spike protein toxicity (for example complement activation attacks many tissues including the endothelium), and my friends who work in industry have told me that multiple pharmaceutical companies are now working on developing ways to inhibit factor B.
•The spike protein causes protein misfolding, either through its unique distribution of prion-like domains or its effects on zeta potential. This is very important as the South African researchers were able to show dense misshapen fibrin clots formed in the presence of spike protein, these clots, unlike normal fibrin clots often grew large enough to disrupt the flow of arteries, and unlike normal fibrin clots would not dislodge in response to the rapid flow of blood. When the factor that promotes fibrous clots was present, these altered clots grew faster than the normal ones, and most importantly, when the factor that breaks fibrous clots apart was present, the misshapen fibrous clots resulting from the presence of spike protein did not degrade. Overall, I believe this is the most likely explanation for the highly unusual large fibrous clots seen by embalmers in vaccinated individuals. Additionally, Jessica Rose has made the case that the spike protein is causing misshapen hemoglobin to enter the circulation, which is then causing the highly unusual clots that characterize the vaccine injuries.
•Antiphospholipid syndrome is a rare condition that affects between 0.1% to 0.2% of the population and massively increases one’s risk of a heart attack or blood clot (50% of blood clots in those under 50 are attributed to it and many other heart issues are strongly linked to it). Because the spike proteins are expressed within the cell membrane (which is thus what the immune system attacks and unfortunately also where the phospholipids reside), there is some basis to suspect these vaccines could cause this disorder. I was initially alerted to the possibility this syndrome played a key role in the spike protein blood clots after hearing the previously mentioned rheumatologist state in his interview that he now regularly tests his vaccinated patients for it. At this time, approximately 30 reports on VAERS have also observed it onsetting following vaccination and there is at least one case report of this occurring.
•I suspect there may also be problematic alterations in the normal microbial composition of the body, as one therapy that was produced for addressing this imbalance decades ago (and has long been used for treating circulatory disorders) also appears to help to address the circulatory issues that follow spike protein injuries. Similarly, it has also been shown that COVID-19 can attack bacteria and alter the gut microbiome.
Delayed Deaths
One of the most unsettling aspects of these vaccines is that many of the unusual deaths that follow vaccination occur long after the initial vaccine. Steve Kirsch recently presented an excellent report on this subject that included a whistleblower testimony that made the case the vaccines on average appeared to be taking 5 months to kill those recipients who died from them along with many other datasets also showing the same trend (other analyses Kirsch did not cover also have found data in VAERS suggesting this trend).

It is important to note that within both the Pfizer and Moderna clinical trials this delayed vaccine toxicity was also shown. 这是一个非常大的交易 - 你几乎从未看到这种自身免疫反应。 对它的唯一可能的解释是在表达尖峰蛋白的身体中的细胞（当所有权威时，当所有权威者反复告诉我们MRNA疫苗不会到那些细胞而言）并导致免疫系统攻击它们。 对于那些想要了解这为什么没有先例的人来说，他们可以在2021年9月20日之前观看Burkhardt对他的前10个尸检的介绍。 如果世界是理智的，并且出版物的原因不存在，这次新闻发布会（与许多其他事情一样）将足以停止疫苗接种运动。 相反，它被忽略了，随后，世界各地颁布了Draconian疫苗接种授权（可悲的是，自从150年前灾难性的Smallpox疫苗接种活动以来，我们社会已经重复的错误）。 我也知道疫苗接种后死亡的另一个尸体的其他尸体：•这种疫苗接种的61岁女性的尸检，疫苗接种后10天死亡，检测到具有严重炎症浸润的心肌炎（主要是T淋巴细胞 •这种尸体的22岁男子，在第一个辉瑞5天后开发了胸痛，并在7小时后去世也显示了免疫系统攻击心脏。 •这两种尸检是在十几岁的男孩中进行的，他们在第二件辉瑞后的3至4天内死亡。 它在22岁男子观察到的人中，它发现了类似的炎症变化。 最后，今年早些时候，Burkhardt的团队还能够在组织切片上使用常规免疫组织化学来制定可靠地检测疫苗刺激蛋白的方法。 通过这样做，他们能够在“疫苗接种”和心肌炎损伤后4个月后死亡的人的血管中的穗蛋白。 这进一步加强了通过细胞表达的尖峰蛋白对已观察到的严重自身免疫反应负责。 为什么穗蛋白疫苗会导致血液凝固？ 心脏病和血液凝固之间存在如此多的重叠，这在许多方面，它是完全任意的，以将它们分类为单独的疾病。 一个作者我尊重，Malcolm kendrick，最近发表了一本聪明的书，标题为“凝块增厚”，这对于那些感兴趣的人来说，这是我所知道的这两种疾病之间的联系的最佳案例。 两者之间，我现在认为Covid-19疫苗杀死的主要方式是通过血液凝固。 然而，正是为什么这些血凝块（尤其是大纤维状物）如此经常出现在整个身体之后，疫苗接种疫苗仍然是一个未答复的问题，因为穗蛋白在形成血栓时的许多不同方式。 我们所考虑解释这一切的关键机制如下所示（注意：超出这些所列的解释也存在，未来也将被发现更多）：•尖峰蛋白能降低身体的生理Zeta电位并通过引起血细胞 •尖峰蛋白被电吸引到保护内皮（甘油癌）的层，这提供了方便进入内皮。 内皮细胞中的最高浓度浓度（尖峰蛋白质结合它们），结果是尖峰蛋白是攻击内皮的完美武器，尤其是一旦免疫系统也开始攻击内皮细胞表达 所有这一切都是一个主要问题，因为血栓的主要原因之一是内皮损伤，并且随着上述尸检展示，这是穗蛋白疫苗接种的常见后果。 •正常的血液凝固过程是许多血液凝固因子的复杂循环彼此相互作用。 对于一些奇怪的原因，尖峰蛋白质与这些因素的各个部分相匹配，这导致我们怀疑它也是生物活性凝血因子。 例如，如果我们考虑南非研究，则表明穗蛋白激活血小板（这导致凝块），并且许多治疗尖峰蛋白疫苗损伤的医生发现，抗凝血剂指向血小板（Plavix）是非常有帮助的 确定尖峰蛋白的哪个部分直接影响凝血过程是挑战性的，并且到目前为止已经发现了抗凝血剂肝素（也存在于整个甘油癌中）的最佳匹配。 穗蛋白结合肝素的能力也可以解释为什么穗蛋白凝块没有用肝素的抗凝血（这使得它们很难治疗）。 •通过激活补体因子B，尖峰蛋白通过替代途径激活补体系统。这种炎症激活可能占用尖峰蛋白质毒性（例如补体激活攻击许多组织在内的内皮）的超凝症状 这是非常重要的，因为南非研究人员能够在存在穗蛋白的存在下形成密集的畸形纤维蛋白凝块，这些凝块不同，正常纤维蛋白凝块通常足够大以破坏动脉的流动，并且与正常纤维蛋白凝块不同 当促进纤维凝块的因素存在时，这些改变的凝块比正常的凝块增长得更快，最重要的是，当存在打破纤维凝块的因素存在时，由穗蛋白的存在产生的畸形纤维凝集不会降低 总的来说，我相信这是对疫苗接种的个体的阻滞剂看到高度不寻常的大纤维凝块的最可能解释。 此外，Jessica Rose已经使尖刺蛋白导致初始牙龈血红蛋白进入循环，然后导致表征疫苗损伤的高度不寻常的凝块。 •抗磷脂综合征是一种罕见的病症，影响人口的0.1％至0.2％，大量增加一个人的心脏病发作或血凝块的风险（50岁以下的50岁以下的血凝块归因于它，并且许多其他心脏问题都是强烈的相关问题 因为尖峰蛋白在细胞膜内表达（因此，这是磷脂的免疫系统攻击以及磷脂的存在，所以在磷脂存在的地方），有些基础可怀疑这些疫苗可能导致这种疾病。 我最初提醒这种综合征在听到前面提到的风湿病学国在他的采访中发挥了棘手蛋白血栓的关键作用，他现在定期测试他的疫苗接种患者。 此时，大约30个关于伤害的报告也观察到疫苗接种后发病，并且至少有一个发生的案例报告。 •我怀疑在身体正常的微生物组合物中也可能存在有问题的改变，作为一种用于解决这一不平衡的一个治疗，这些治疗是在几十年前解决这种不平衡的治疗（并且已经用于治疗循环障碍）也有助于解决遵循SP的循环问题 类似地，还显示Covid-19可以攻击细菌并改变肠道微生物组。 延迟死亡这些疫苗的最令人不安的方面之一是许多遵循疫苗接种的许多不寻常的死亡发生在初始疫苗后发生。 Steve Kirsch最近介绍了这个主题的一份很好的报告，其中包括一个举报人的举报，使疫苗平均似乎需要5个月才能杀死那些与他们一起死亡的接受者以及也表现出相同趋势的其他数据集（其他分析k 值得注意的是，在辉瑞和现代临床试验中，还显示出这种延迟的疫苗毒性。

对于辉瑞（表 S3 和 S4）：
• 1 个月时，疫苗死亡人数为 3 人，安慰剂死亡人数为 5 人。
• 6 个月时，疫苗接种导致 15 例死亡，安慰剂组死亡 14 例。
对于 Moderna（在表 S8 和 S19 中）：
•第 1 个月时，疫苗死亡人数为 2 人，安慰剂死亡人数为 3 人
• 6 个月时，疫苗死亡人数为 17 人，安慰剂组死亡人数为 16 人。
这些疫苗死亡的最常见原因是心血管问题（参见 S4 和 S26）。

In light of these effects, consider this story recently shared by the same colleague I mentioned in the previous article: 鉴于这些影响，请考虑我在上一篇文章中提到的同一位同事最近分享的这个故事：

I had a good friend with no health issues in his early forties who was forced to get vaccinated for work. After his first vaccination, he immediately lost his hearing in one ear. Since we last talked and a year after his vaccination, he had an aortic dissection (this is a condition where the wall of the largest blood vessel in the body breaks apart inside and is extremely unusual for his demographic). He was taken to the intensive care unit, dangerous blood clots were found throughout his body which significantly complicated the standard treatment process for his condition, and before long he passed away. 我有一个四十岁出头的好朋友，没有任何健康问题，但因为工作而被迫接种疫苗。 第一次接种疫苗后，他的一只耳朵立即失去了听力。 自从我们上次谈话以来，在他接种疫苗一年后，他患有主动脉夹层（这是体内最大血管壁在内部破裂的一种情况，对于他的人口来说是极其不寻常的）。 他被送往重症监护室，在他的全身发现危险的血栓，这使他病情的标准治疗过程变得非常复杂，不久他就去世了。

The current model I have to explain these events is relatively straightforward. The mRNA that produces the spike protein was engineered to not break down (which was necessary so that a sufficient antibody response could be mounted to earn an emergency use authorization) and this persistence was demonstrated by this recent seminal research study. As a result in some susceptible individuals (there is also a hypothesis that some lots were modified to last longer in the body), the spike protein production continues long after vaccination (not surprisingly this also was never formally tested before these vaccines were released on the public). Then, at some point in time, a critical threshold is passed where the body can no longer tolerate the spike protein buildup and death occurs. 
Each of the mechanisms outlined throughout this article could then become applicable and lead to death. For example: 
•Physiologic zeta potential and blood clots could worsen until they pass one of many critical thresholds for the body. When we review the story mentioned above, it should also be noted that the scientists who originally studied the blood sludging phenomena observed the smaller blood vessels that fed the large blood vessels could sludge, and when this happened, that loss of blood flow would severely damage the larger blood vessel. I suspect these processes explain what happened to the above individual.
•Protein misfolding such as in fibrin clots or amyloids, can build up until a critical threshold is passed. Interestingly, Pfizer recently invested in a treatment for cardiac amyloidosis so they are also aware of this issue. This may also explain some of the neurodegenerative diseases that have been seen following vaccination (e.g. Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease).
Additionally, many of the other lethal spike protein vaccine side effects not covered in this article, such as the development of deadly cancers, are also likely to emerge within this much longer time frame but are beyond the scope of this article.
Conclusion
For decades, many within the virology community have been tinkering around with how to weaponize viruses. Coronaviruses are particularly popular in this regard due to the ease with which they can be modified and as a result, countless things that should never be done to an easily transmittable respiratory virus have been tried out on them.

For some reason, it seems that many of these projects ended up within the virus that emerged in Wuhan. Fortunately, as a species, we appear to have been resilient enough to survive most of these gains of function. Unfortunately, when that same toxin is attached to a novel gene therapy the immune system has not adapted to overcoming, that appears to be sufficient to overwhelm many of us. All I can really say at this point is that I sincerely hope Fleming and others will be successful in criminally prosecuting the individuals who created this disaster and that laws will be enacted to prevent anything similar from ever happening again.

I thank all of you for sitting through this project. I have wanted to write this series since July, and I am quite happy it is at last complete. As always, I appreciate your time and your willingness to share this article with the appropriate audiences 我目前用来解释这些事件的模型相对简单。 产生刺突蛋白的 mRNA 被设计为不会分解（这是必要的，以便能够产生足够的抗体反应以获得紧急使用授权），并且最近的这项开创性研究证明了这种持久性。 因此，在一些易感个体中（还有一种假设是，某些批次经过改造，可以在体内持续更长时间），在疫苗接种后很长一段时间内，刺突蛋白的产生仍会持续（毫不奇怪，在这些疫苗发布之前，这也从未经过正式测试） 民众）。 然后，在某个时间点，超过了一个关键阈值，身体不再能够忍受刺突蛋白的积累，并发生死亡。 
本文概述的每一种机制都可能适用并导致死亡。 例如： 
•生理zeta电位和血栓可能会恶化，直到超过身体的许多关键阈值之一。 当我们回顾上面提到的故事时，还应该指出的是，最初研究血液淤积现象的科学家观察到，为大血管供血的较小血管可能会淤积，当这种情况发生时，血流的丧失将严重损害 较大的血管。 我怀疑这些过程可以解释上述个人所发生的事情。
•蛋白质错误折叠（例如纤维蛋白凝块或淀粉样蛋白）可能会不断累积，直至超过临界阈值。 有趣的是，辉瑞最近投资了一种治疗心脏淀粉样变性的药物，因此他们也意识到了这个问题。 这也可以解释接种疫苗后出现的一些神经退行性疾病（例如克雅氏病）。
此外，本文未涵盖的许多其他致命刺突蛋白疫苗副作用，例如致命癌症的发展，也可能在更长的时间内出现，但超出了本文的范围。
结论
几十年来，病毒学界的许多人一直在研究如何将病毒武器化。 冠状病毒在这方面特别受欢迎，因为它们很容易被修改，因此，无数不应该对容易传播的呼吸道病毒做的事情都在它们身上进行了尝试。

出于某种原因，似乎许多这些项目最终都受到了武汉出现的病毒的影响。 幸运的是，作为一个物种，我们似乎有足够的弹性来生存大部分功能的增强。 不幸的是，当同样的毒素附着在一种新型基因疗法上时，免疫系统还没有适应克服，这似乎足以压倒我们许多人。 在这一点上我真正能说的是，我真诚地希望弗莱明和其他人能够成功地对制造这场灾难的个人进行刑事起诉，并制定法律以防止类似的事情再次发生。

我感谢大家参与这个项目。 我从七月起就想写这个系列，我很高兴它终于完成了。 一如既往，我感谢您花时间并愿意与适当的受众分享这篇文章