patrick.net

The medals also sound like another pay-for-play scam:

https://babylonbee.com/cleanArticle/biden-issues-imminent-terrorist-threat-warning-due-to-the-eleven-terrorists-he-just-released-from-prison

https://babylonbee.com/cleanArticle/biden-online-store-clearance-sale-presidential-medals-of-freedom-for-999

Patrick says

Biden's dead and impeaching his Presidency is more important than going after a stable of silicon wearing masked actors. I would prefer that the 'shadow government' of SES be summarily arrested for tribunal, exposed to the public and executed after debriefings and interrogations.

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/236/79/

Burdick v. United States, 236 U.S. 79 (1915)

Here's an enlightening read, that should answer everyone's question.

The facts, which involve the effect of a pardon of the President of the United States tendered to one who has not been convicted of a crime nor admitted the commission thereof, and also the necessity of acceptance of a pardon in order to make it effective, are stated in the opinion.

He declined to accept the pardon or answer questions as to the sources of his information, or whether he furnished certain reporters information, giving the reason, as before, that the answers might tend to criminate him. He was presented by the grand jury to the district court for contempt, and adjudged guilty thereof and to pay a fine of $500, with leave, however, to purge himself by testifying fully as to the sources of the information sought of him, "and in event of his refusal or failure to so answer, a
Page 236 U. S. 87
commitment may issue in addition until he shall so comply," the court deciding that the President has power to pardon for a crime of which the individual has not been convicted and which he does not admit, and that acceptance is not necessary to toll the privilege against incrimination.
Burdick again appeared before the grand jury, again was questioned as before, again refused to accept the pardon, and again refused to answer upon the same grounds as before. A final order of commitment was then made and entered, and he was committed to the custody of the United States marshal until he should purge himself of contempt, or until the further order of the court. This writ of error was then allowed.
The question in the case is the effect of the unaccepted pardon. The Solicitor General, in his discussion of the question, following the division of the district court, contends (1) that the President has power to pardon an offense before admission or conviction of it, and (2) the acceptance of the pardon is not necessary to its complete exculpating effect. The conclusion is hence deduced that the pardon removed from Burdick all danger of accusation or conviction of crime, and that therefore the answers to the questions put to him could not tend to or accomplish his incrimination.
Plaintiff in error counters the contention and conclusion with directly opposing ones, and makes other contentions which attack the sufficiency of the pardon as immunity and the power of the President to grant a pardon for an offense not precedently established nor confessed nor defined.
The discussion of counsel is as broad as their contentions. Our consideration may be more limited. In our view, of the case it is not material to decide whether the pardoning power may be exercised before conviction. We may, however, refer to some aspects of the contentions of plaintiff in error, although the case may be brought to

So it looks like none of them have to say anything for now. Just wait until real cases develop. Then decide if they accepted the pardon or not. Very convenient.

Besides this seems like a ruling that may be revisited or challenged. At least there's a legal precedence for challenging Biden's Pardons. It seems his son and Liz Cheny are the only two that has been dumb enough to publicly accept them.

The other's can stay tight lipped, then when the case comes for them, reject the pardon, and remain silent with the 5th.

https://www.kunstler.com/p/another-door-opens

It is a fact, perhaps missed by some of you, that Rep. James Comer’s House Oversight Committee just last week issued criminal referrals on James Biden (“Joe’s” brother) and First Son Hunter. Wait-a-minute, was not Hunter already pardoned for Gawd-knows how many misdeeds dating back to 2014, and (supposedly) preemptively for any alleged crimes to come ever hereafter? Part B of that may yet have to be adjudicated. A pardon is not intended to be a get-out-of-jail-free card.

Biden Actor didn't pardon anybody, the Senior Executive Service and their Globalist masters did under fraud. They are buying time for their lackeys as a tossed bone to maintain loyalty and hopefully cover for themselves when the stalking horses start arriving. Biden Actor is an irrelevant prop.

I would much rather Trump go after these faceless demons and their masters than their now useless idiots, who were manufactured and supported to take their flak. Some pundits in the Woo think that he will.

Could be.

https://x.com/GuntherEagleman/status/1901503085802914066

I am still wondering if this is going to lead up to literally unmasking the Biden Actor fraud, or they are just going to leave it at this technicality of the autopen.

Trump really has them between a rock and a hard place. In order to maintain the fallacy that Joe Biden was ever alive to President in the first place, somewhere a legal admission needs to take place that the autosigned documents are all invalid on their face, either because he was incompetent or didn't know anything about the signing. Otherwise, they would have to assert that Biden Actor was present, but why did he not sign the documents himself?

The weird thing is, the CIA and the SES probably saw that the actors couldn't forge Biden's signatures worth shit. They either needed an expert forger who was obviously not Biden Actor to sign, or use the expediency of the autopen. It's an odd sloppiness that points to their conviction that Trump would be taken out or never re-elected.

I wonder if Trump knew about the autosign all along and was giving them enough rope to hang themselves with all of the Biden Actor orders and pardons. This is treason, subversion and an act of war by non uniformed enemy combatants. It will bounce back to the CIA (as usual) and the Senior Executive Service and likely Obama. Will some version of Biden Actor be required to testify? Are these the sands of deception that will destroy their whole foundation?

It would also mean all those 'pardoned' can use the Fifth not to testify again. But, it also means that the Biden Actor fiasco declared them to be criminals to begin with. Isn't the Hunter figure fleeing to South Africa?

Trump is declaring that he is, in fact, going after them. Another WOW moment if he follows through, and Trump is not one to comment in idleness.

Ceffer says

Will some version of Biden Actor be required to testify?

Was the real Joe Biden in front of the camera at all those White House events and even the 2024 debate and Trump's second inauguration ?

If yes, then why do they need a Biden Actor ?

The real Joe Biden would be capable to showing up at the signing events and ceremonies given he showed up at the 2024 debate and/or second inauguration of Trump.

Biden could have signed those executive orders during the last few months of his presidency while he was in private quarters or bed.

...

If Hunter would run on his trademark issue...free Ho's and Blow for everyone....he would easily become the next President.

https://radaronline.com/p/cia-docs-joe-biden-covered-up-hunter-ukraine-links/

As RadarOnline.com was among the first to report, Biden came under heavy scrutiny when his trouble-magnet son Hunter Biden, 55, notoriously cashed in on his dad's VP position by accepting a series of lucrative positions around the world, including a $1 million-a-year job on the board of directors of Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian oil and gas firm – despite having no prior experience in the field.

Notably, Hunter took the Burisma gig on May 12, 2014 – less than three months after Joe was named the Barack Obama administration's point person for U.S.-Ukraine relations and policy.

The recently unearthed report included the bombshell revelation that Ukrainian officials viewed the Biden family's ties to allegedly sketchy business practices in the Eastern European nation "as evidence of a double-standard within the United States Government towards matters of corruption and political power."

But Joe, now 82, moved quickly to bury the humiliating CIA memo, sources said, after it was included in a daily briefing on February 16, 2015.

According to an email that was also made public by Ratcliffe, the U.S. official who briefed Joe on the Ukrainians' reaction to his 2015 visit then emailed the CIA saying the VP would "strongly prefer" the critical memo not be circulated.

"Based on the Office of the Vice President's preference, the information was never shared outside of the CIA," according to an agency official.

Patrick says

The recently unearthed report included the bombshell revelation that Ukrainian officials viewed the Biden family's ties to allegedly sketchy business practices in the Eastern European nation "as evidence of a double-standard within the United States Government towards matters of corruption and political power."

He was hired to protect Burisma from anti-corruption investigations, duh.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/finding-out-saturday-november-29

“I am hereby canceling all Executive Orders, and anything else that was not directly signed by Crooked Joe Biden, because the people who operated the Autopen did so illegally,” Trump posted to Truth Social yesterday in his usual style. “Joe Biden was not involved in the Autopen process and, if he says he was, he will be brought up on charges of perjury,” Trump added.

It might be a tad over-enthusiastic. The first one is easy: Trump can legally override any Biden executive order. But it is unclear that Trump can legally override pardons or clemency decisions after they’ve been made. It will require some creative legal work to make that happen, but I can’t rule it out; no president was ever dumb enough to try this before, so it has never been tested. Last month, Attorney General Pam Bondi said her team was “reviewing the Biden administration’s reported use of autopen for pardons.” We’ll see.