patrick.net

Review Doctors: Is it a risk to your health? Challenging the status quo is viewed as harmful information and refusing to let fear dictate knowledge
审查医生：你的健康风险吗？挑战现状被视为有害信息，拒绝让恐惧决定知识

Censoring Doctors: Is Your Health at Risk?
FLCCC Senior Fellows Dr. Ryan Cole, Dr. Scott Jensen, and Dr. Kat Lindley discuss the dangerous consequences of medical censorship.
FLCCC ALLIANCE
DEC 7

https://open.substack.com/pub/flccc/p/censoring-doctors-is-your-health

READ IN APP

WATCH WEBINAR
“If you dared to speak out, you were pursued, you were prosecuted. That’s what happened.” — Dr. Scott Jensen

Censorship is a bit of a double-edged sword. Some argue that restricting harmful content is necessary for public protection, but what happens when that label is applied incorrectly? During the COVID-19 era, this misapplication became all too common—important discussions were silenced, not because they were truly harmful, but because they challenged the status quo. While experts advocating for repurposed medicines were silenced, the vaccine—later shown to have serious side effects—was glorified, mandated, and became the centerpiece of a coercive campaign.

Censorship during COVID-19 is a stark example of what happens when dissenting voices are stifled. By restricting access to diverse medical perspectives, many were led to believe that the vaccine was the only option, while affordable alternatives like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were vilified despite their strong safety records.

Meanwhile, the vaccine itself caused harm to millions, including loss of life.

To put it simply, censorship in healthcare impacts more than just the outspoken doctors—it affects patients’ health, too. Limiting discussions that explore multiple medical options deprives patients of informed choices and ultimately harms those in need of care.

This webinar features a vibrant discussion between three doctors who know the censorship climate well. Dr. Kat Lindley, FLCCC Senior Fellow, hosts the conversation alongside her Senior Fellow counterpart Dr. Ryan Cole, and welcomes Dr. Scott Jensen as the newest addition to the FLCCC team.

Honest Medicine Trees
Your Support Makes Webinars Possible Every Week...
DONATE TODAY

Dr. Scott Jensen: FLCCC Senior Fellow, Family Medicine

Scott Jensen
By now, in the last month of 2024, Dr. Scott Jensen has become very familiar with government censorship. But that wasn’t always the case.

Dr. Jensen is a family physician with more than 35 years of experience who was recognized as Minnesota’s Family Physician of the Year in 2016. As the founder of Catalyst Medical Clinic and a former Minnesota state senator, Dr. Jensen embodies the fight for honest medicine. He’s not just fighting for his right to speak, but for the rights of all medical professionals, filing a lawsuit against the Minnesota Board of Medical Practice and the Attorney General to protect medical freedom.

“If you don’t follow Dr. Jensen on X, please do. His thought processes and clarity are second to none. How do you go from being Family Doc of the Year to being censored? Isn’t it a strange world we find ourselves in?” — Dr. Ryan Cole

The journey of Dr. Jensen, from being celebrated as a top physician to becoming a target of censorship, is not just his story—it’s a warning to us all. Censorship doesn’t just affect doctors; it affects every patient seeking honest care.

Links for Dr. Scott Jensen

Website: Join the FIGHT – Dr. Scott Jensen
Twitter: Scott Jensen (@drscottjensen) on X
Facebook: Dr Scott Jensen
YouTube: scottjensen
Instagram: Instagram (@drscottjensenmn)
Rumble: Dr. Scott Jensen
Book: Relationship Matters
When Medicine Was About Questions, Not Compliance

The medical community once thrived on open debate. “Grand Rounds,” as Dr. Jensen recalls, were a place for rigorous discussion—where differing perspectives weren’t just welcomed, they were essential. Today, this critical exchange has been eroded. Instead of encouraging doctors to think independently, medical professionals are pressured to align with the “approved” narrative.

“We were taught early on, ‘Don’t you glom on to someone else’s perspective without being skeptical yourself.'” — Dr. Scott Jensen

The pandemic became less about an exchange of ideas and more about controlling the narrative. Dissenters were punished, and skeptics were silenced. The price of this was not just professional—it was profoundly personal, impacting the well-being of patients across the world.

A Pandemic of Censorship

Dr. Jensen never set out to be a contrarian. He asked questions when things didn’t add up, like the CDC’s directive to count COVID as a primary cause of death, even when it wasn’t. This was just one example of how censorship shaped the pandemic narrative—limiting what the public could know, hear, and ultimately, believe.

“We had a narrative put out there, we all saw it. We would see it on CNN, we would see it on NBC—broadcast after broadcast after broadcast, the same words were used. There’s no way that could be a coincidence.” — Dr. Scott Jensen

The media, social media platforms, and even medical boards played their part in restricting information. Doctors like Dr. Ryan Cole and Dr. Kat Lindley, who dared to speak out, faced severe backlash, investigations, and even threats to their licenses. The orchestrated narrative—broadcast after broadcast—made it seem like there was only one truth, and to question it was to deny “science” itself.

“We had far less of a respiratory pandemic, and far more of a pandemic of fear.” — Dr. Scott Jensen

Patients Pay the Price

The consequences of silencing doctors extend far beyond professional reputations. Patients were left without the information they needed to make informed decisions. The erosion of trust in medicine became palpable—many began to feel that they could no longer rely on their doctors for honest, unbiased care.

“When you have a noble profession like medicine being silenced, how are those patients going to get the truth?” — Dr. Ryan Cole

Patients began turning away from healthcare altogether, wary of professionals who seemed to have more allegiance to a narrative than to their patients’ needs. As Dr. Kat Lindley noted, “Half the people in our [webinar chat] say they never want to go to a doctor again.”

Is Change on the Horizon?

There may be a silver lining. With our friends RFK Jr. being nominated for HHS Secretary and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya being nominated to lead the National Institutes of Health, there’s renewed hope that diverse perspectives will be valued once again. The medical community is beginning to recognize that honest debate and skepticism are not threats—they are foundational to good science.

We are witnessing a shift—a possible unraveling of the control that has gripped medical discourse for too long. The days of one-size-fits-all narratives may be numbered as the demand for transparency and truth grows louder.

👉 Read: FLCCC Co-Founders Join Lawsuit Against the ABIM

The Fight for Honest Medicine

Silencing doctors restricts their freedom of speech and deprives patients of the right to make informed health decisions. To prevent the mistakes of the past from being repeated, we must advocate for free expression and the freedom to question.

The voices of Dr. Jensen, Dr. Cole, Dr. Lindley, and many others are part of a growing movement that refuses to let fear dictate the boundaries of knowledge.

Together, we can restore trust in healthcare by ensuring that all perspectives are heard. The path forward is one of courage, conversation, and an unwavering commitment to truth.

We are almost there. The momentum is building, and optimism is high. With your support, we can ensure that honest medicine prevails.

Learn More About The Global Censorship of Medicine:

Debrief from Down Under: The State of Censorship in Australia
Medical Censorship in Brazil and #MandateMadness
How Censoring Doctors Harms Patients
Censoring Doctors & The Impact to Pediatric Care
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT

We’re so glad you found us here on Substack! In this era, it is vitally important that we're able to stay connected. Censorship is alive and well, and although we are still currently on social media, we never know for how long.

So first and foremost, please SUBSCRIBE to our Substack now:

Subscribed

Sign up for our biweekly newsletter here:

Email me!

Here’s how you can help

Subscribe here on Substack
Follow us on Twitter (X)
Subscribe to our weekly newsletter
Follow us on Rumble
Check out our podcast
Donate to our cause 审查医生：你的健康风险吗？ FLCCC高级研究员Ryan Cole博士，斯科特Jensen博士，Kat Lindley博士讨论了医疗审查的危险后果。 FLCCC Alliance Dec 7在App Watch WebInar中阅读“如果你敢说出来，你被追求，你被起诉了。 这就是发生的事情。“ - 斯科特·詹森审查博士是一群双刃剑。 有些人认为限制有害内容对于公共保护是必要的，但是当该标签应用不正确时会发生什么？ 在Covid-19时代，这种误用变得太常见了很重要的讨论是沉默的，而不是因为他们真正有害，而且因为他们挑战了现状。 虽然倡导被重新灌注的药物的专家沉默，但疫苗 - 后来显示具有严重的副作用 - 令人生畏，授权，成为强制运动的核心。 Covid-19期间的审查是一个明显的例子，即在异议声音窒息时发生的事情。 通过限制对不同的医学观点的访问，许多人导致疫苗是唯一的选择，而伊维菌素和羟氯喹这样的负担得起的替代品仍被诽谤。 同时，疫苗本身对数百万造成伤害，包括生命丧失。 为了简单地说，医疗保健的审查影响不仅仅是直言不讳的医生 - 它也会影响患者的健康。 限制探索多种医疗选择的讨论剥夺了患者的患者，并最终损害了那些需要护理的人。 这个网络研讨会在三位医生之间具有充满活力的讨论，他们知道审查的气候。 哈特林德利博士，FLCCC高级研究员举办了牛仔博士瑞安科尔博士的谈话，欢迎斯科特·詹森博士作为FLCCC团队的最新补充。 诚实的医学树每周都可以使网络研讨会成为可能的博士斯科特·詹森博士：Flccc Scott Jensen博士，现在，在上个月的2024年，斯科特·詹森博士已经非常熟悉政府审查。 但情况并非总是如此。 Jensen博士是一家家庭医生，拥有超过35年的经验，他们被认可于2016年的年度明尼苏达家庭医生。作为催化剂医学诊所的创始人和前明尼苏达州参议员，詹森博士体现了诚实的斗争 他不只是为他的发言权而战，而是为了所有医疗专业人士的权利，向明尼苏达州的医疗实务委员会提出诉讼，并将司法部长保护医疗自由。 “如果你不遵循X·詹森博士，请做。 他的思想过程和清晰度是秒到没有。 您如何从一年中的家庭文件进行审查？ 不是我们发现自己的陌生世界吗？“ - Ryan Cole博士Jensen博士的旅程，从被庆祝为顶级医生成为审查的目标，这不仅仅是他的故事 - 这对我们所有人来说都是警告。 审查不仅影响医生; 它会影响每个寻求诚实护理的患者。 斯科特·詹森博士的链接网站：加入战斗 - 斯科特Jensen Twitter：Scott Jensen（@drscottjensen）X Facebook：Scott Jensen Youtube博士：Scottjensen Instagram：Instagram（@drsc “大轮，”Jensen Recalls博士，是一个严格的讨论的地方 - 如果不同的观点不仅受到欢迎，他们就是必不可少的。 今天，这种关键交换已被侵蚀。 而不是鼓励医生独立思考，医疗专业人员被迫与“批准”叙述保持一致。 “我们早早就教过了，”你不畏缩到别人的角度，而不是持怀疑态度。“ - 斯科特·詹森博士的大流行变得越来越少关于思想交流，更多关于控制叙述的信息。 异议者受到了惩罚，怀疑论者沉默了。 这不仅仅是专业的 - 它是深刻的个人，影响世界各地的患者的福祉。 审查博士的大流行jensen博士永远不会被宣告是一个逆势。 他在没有加起来的时候询问问题，就像CDC的指令计算Covid作为死亡的主要原因，即使不是。 这只是审查如何形成大流行叙事限制的一个例子，公众可以知道，听到，最终，相信。 “我们在那里举行了一个叙述性的，我们都看到了它。 我们会在CNN上看到它，我们会在广播后广播后看到它在NBC广播上，使用相同的单词。 没有办法可能是巧合。“ - 斯科特博士Jensen媒体，社交媒体平台，甚至医疗委员会在限制信息中扮演了他们的一部分。 像瑞安科尔博士和Kat Lindley博士这样的医生敢说地说，面临严厉的反弹，调查，甚至威胁他们的许可证。 广播后的策划叙事播放似乎只有一个真理，并质疑它是否认“科学”本身。 “我们的呼吸道大流行甚至更加害怕。” - 斯科特·詹森患者博士支付价格沉默医生的后果远远超出专业资誉。 患者留下了他们所需的信息所需的决定。 医学的信任侵蚀变得明显 - 许多人开始觉得他们无法再依赖他们的医生诚实，无偏见。 “当你有一个高贵的专业，如医学被沉默，那些患者如何得到真相？” - Ryan Cole患者博士开始从医疗保健方面开始，对似乎更忠于叙事而不是患者的需求。 正如Kat Lindley博士所指出的那样，“我们的[网络研讨会聊天]中的一半人说他们永远不想再去医生。” 在地平线上发生变化吗？ 可能有一线希望。 与我们的朋友RFK JR.被提名为HHS秘书和Jay Bhattachary博士被提名引领国家卫生研究院，更新希望各种观点再次受到重视。 医学界开始认识到，诚实的辩论和怀疑主义不是威胁 - 他们是良好的科学的基础。 我们目睹了一个转变 - 可能会解开掌握医疗话语的控制太长。 一定尺寸适合的日子可能被编号，因为对透明度和真理的需求变得更响亮。 👉阅读：FLCCC联合创始人加入诉讼对亚坡辩护的诚实医学沉默医生限制了他们的言论自由，剥夺了患者的卫生决策。 为了防止过去的错误被重复，我们必须倡导自由言论和自由要问。 林肯博士的声音，林德利博士和许多其他人都是拒绝让恐惧决定知识的界限的越来越多的运动的一部分。 在一起，我们可以通过确保听到所有观点来恢复医疗保健的信任。 前进的道路是勇气，谈话和对真理的坚定承诺之一。 我们几乎在那里。 势头是建设，乐观高。 通过支持，我们可以确保诚实的医学占上风。 了解有关全球医学审查的更多信息：从下降下的汇报：巴西的澳大利亚医疗审查的审查状况和#Mandatemadishs审查医生伤害患者审查医生和对儿科保健的影响谢谢您的支持 在这个时代，我们能够保持联系至关重要。 审查是活跃的，虽然我们目前仍在社交媒体上，但我们从不知道多长时间。 所以首先，请订阅我们的Sublack：订阅我们的双周时事通讯：给我发电子邮件！ 以下是您如何帮助在Twitter上订阅这里的订阅（x）订阅我们的每周通讯跟随我们在隆隆声明我们的播客捐赠给我们的事业