patrick.net

goofus says

A little less insinuation, a little more action. I think Kulak has no intention of watching the interview, just breezy takedowns of it. Going to primary sources punctures the media bubble we claim to oppose.

Updated my prior post with lots of juicy links that offer counterfactuals to "Jewness Studies" (Whiteness studies for Wokeright).

They only discussed foreign policy. At no time did Tucker, the alleged anti-Globalist, bring up any of Sach's pro-WEF, pro-"Sustainability", etc. stances.

There's a difference between "Alt Globalization" and "Anti-Globalization". I'm beginning to suspect many of the latter are actually the former.

I’ve tried to square Sach’s advocacy for “shock therapy” with Russia (in the perestroika era) with what he says he tried to do. It’s confusing, to be fair.

His descriptions of 30 years of US foreign policy, however, do align with what we know of Middle East and Russia policy. Phony WMD in Iraq to justify war, CIA funding of ISIS in Syria, provoking Russia with NATO expansion, etc. Because he implicates Israel in the long-term planning of US FP, he makes reflexive enemies. It’s clearly a job hazard.

But find where he’s wrong, and I’d be happy to reconsider.

You realize that about a decade ago I was pushing Mearsheimer, critical of Iraq War (nothing to do with Israel, everything to do with the militant wing of Globalists-neocons instead of more cautious globalist neoliberals like Sachs), talking about the neocons in Ukraine starting shit, etc. I was one of the first posters pushing that issue.

Every rebel group in Syria - and there were more than just ISIS - has various backers.

The #1 supporter of ISIS was Turkey. Now Turkey backs it's latest iteration, HTS, to impose it's influence on Syria. The reason Assad lost so fast wasn't because the CIA got competent, and Israel had more than enough problems as it is, it's because Hezbollah stupidly intervened at the request of Iran to save Hamas and got the shit slapped out of it, depriving Assad of his reliable allies. Russia, busy in Ukraine, could not help like they had done. And Russia can't afford to piss off Turkey right now, either, with the Turks looking the other way on a host of things that benefits Putin.

The consensus among Israelis is that the new boss will probably be as bad as the Old boss in regards to Assad and ISIS/HTS.

And of course, a look at Middle East history shows the worst wars don't involve Israel, like Hussein trying to sieze territory from Iran when he thought it was too weak and isolated (neither US or USSR support) after the Revolution.

Example: 2015 by me.

https://patrick.net/post/1281654/2015-06-07-realism-in-one-lesson

When Tucker first came off Fox, he was great, and I "Noticed"
https://patrick.net/post/1380895/2024-02-06-tucker-putin-interview

Then he (or his program staff) began to cultivate an interest. Funny thing is when Tucker DOES have pro-Zionist guests on, he ONLY talks to them about other issues. Yet does the opposite with Sachs and others despite having a field day of things to talk about from Climate Baloney to 15 minute cities with him.

AmericanKulak says

Then he (or his program staff) began to cultivate an interest.

Insurrection Barbie
@DefiyantlyFree
🧵 I did a deep dive into Jeffrey Sachs and although I knew he wrote books promoting mass migration, I had no idea he was literally the brainchild behind the mass migration scheme we have been experiencing in the United States since 2010.

He is on the advisory board of a think tank funded by George Soros which literally came up with the entire academic and tactical blueprint for the NGO mass migration pipeline we see today. He then took that blueprint and implemented it at the UN and at Catholic Charities.
https://x.com/DefiyantlyFree/status/1893205773662199872

Is Sachs just pretending to have some quasi rational attitudes to disguise the baleful agendas? That seems common amongst the mother WEFers with virtue signaling and enough rationale to avoid TOO MUCH radical cognitive dissonance or to make evil intentions appear to be altruism. The real goals as always are subversions leading to the goals of their control grids.

Immigration schemes probably didn't derive from him except as a distraction focus or a message deliverer. He's a bootlicking subscriber decepticon/promulgator who wants an audience. Somebody or something else is further up the chain and he is an errand boy with the academia staging creds.