« First « Previous Comments 176 - 215 of 608 Next » Last » Search these comments
Glock-n-Load says
Only a 20% drop is needed? That’s pretty crazy imo. Prices went up to high so fast, I’d think not but, I’m not an expert.
Depends on the market. 20% for most of average America. For most of California 40% - 80%. DC area, 60% at least. For Dumfuq, IL...I'll defer to Wookie but I am guessing none at all or just 5% at most.
DC 60%? That is not going to happen. Ever.
My question: how is it even possible to be so dumb?
Glock-n-Load says
DC 60%? That is not going to happen. Ever.
And what magic will continue to prop it up? I can think of some.
FuckTheMainstreamMedia says
My question: how is it even possible to be so dumb?
So you’re for or against deportations?
They’re supported by the incomes.
Just kind of interesting:
My question: how is it even possible to be so dumb?

Which means it’s not overvalued. They’re supported by the incomes.
That 6 million homes left by the 14 million seems very high.
Boomers' impact on the economy has always been high.
The diaper companies grew and made bank when they were babies. Now, they do the same with depends.
All becomes moot in the case of hyperinflation.
Glock-n-Load says
They’re supported by the incomes.
DC has a median income of $106,287 and a median house price of $764,716.
That's far beyond reasonable.
Just kind of interesting:
What are cities planning as far as infrastructure like public schools and water and sewer ?
I am not sure all those 14 million baby boomers dying have homes to pass on to their heirs
What are the economists saying who advise residential developers, DR Horton, Toll Brothers, and the 84 Lumber's ?
One stat I heard today: There are as many 70+ homebuyers in the market as under 35 buyers.
So Boomers are flipping houses to other Boomers.
But they have to find a Boomer who can afford 10% down on a $450k house first

Mortgage rates could decrease soon, though. The Federal Reserve is poised to cut rates at least once this year, and Fannie Mae predicts a 6.4% average interest rate by the end of 2026. While it’s not a huge dip from today’s levels, it could inspire more homeowners to list their homes and buy into other properties.
So #1, cities are getting hit and specifically the inland hipster ones. #2 most all are coastal besides the hipsters which I've been saying for months. Austin is hipster and within coastal range in a days drive, Miami, Los Angeles, Sacramento, Nashville (borderline weekend coastal trip). Minneapolis is a Somali shit hole, so that's no surprise, white flight.
Cm'on, man! You are a bonafied Housing Expert of PatNet! Don't embarrass yourself with such pathetic gaslighting. Its so...so..Realtor™ish!
MolotovCocktail says
Cm'on, man! You are a bonafied Housing Expert of PatNet! Don't embarrass yourself with such pathetic gaslighting. Its so...so..Realtor™ish!
I know it more than you do. Not sure your point. Unless you're 60 with 40 years of experience stop talking real estate.
Hipster experience? Cut the crap. You don't know shit. You make it all up.
MolotovCocktail says
Hipster experience? Cut the crap. You don't know shit. You make it all up.
Name any place you've been. Just the US and small, mid and major cities. Any of them. I don't make anything up, you don't know anything is the problem.
WookieMan says
MolotovCocktail says
Hipster experience? Cut the crap. You don't know shit. You make it all up.
Name any place you've been. Just the US and small, mid and major cities. Any of them. I don't make anything up, you don't know anything is the problem.
Why? What does that have to do with you creating a totally bogus categorization to cover up your wrong BS?
« First « Previous Comments 176 - 215 of 608 Next » Last » Search these comments
So the only way to decrease real prices is to decrease demand, and the only way to do that is to kick out all illegal immigrants and anchor babies. Will Trump do this? Almost certainly not. Even with control over all three branches of the government, the Republicans are not going to get rid of all the illegals who are driving up housing prices and social welfare costs. I wish that I was wrong about this, but I'm not.
The United States population reached 200 million on November 20, 1967. If there was no net migration, then the U.S. population have stabilized to about 220 million. Instead, the population is 335 million. This is why housing is so expensive. This is why rent is so damn high. This is why the younger generations cannot afford to have children. This is why the only way to keep the population from falling is to import massive numbers of unskilled, uneducated, and often criminal immigrants. Both parties are responsible for this: democrats for importing voters and republicans for importing farm laborers. Both parties want cheap labor.
When you import massive numbers of low-iq, low-skill workers, your per capital GDP declines relative to where it would have been otherwise. Yes, technological advancements mask this because technology increases GDP faster than low-skill immigration decreases it, but most of those gains don't get seen by the middle class.
Since both parties, and their corporate overlords, are benefiting from the current system, immigration will continue and housing prices will also continue to rise. I suppose I shouldn't care since I own and have a 2.25% mortgage that is being eaten away by inflation, but anyone young enough that they having bought already is fucked.