patrick.net

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/why-jfk-opposed-israels-nuclear-program

Almost as soon as President John Kennedy was sworn into office, he was presented with evidence that Israel was probably developing nuclear weapons, with special concern expressed about an apparent enrichment reactor at Dimona.

Kennedy’s Secretary of State, Christian Herter, expressed grave concern that if Israel acquired nuclear weapons, it would incite Israel’s neighbors to seek the same. Herter reasoned that it was completely untenable to tell the Arabs and Persians that they can’t have the bomb but that the Israelis can. ...

As the American president saw it, a bomb for Israel would lead to proliferation, thereby elevating the risk of an eventual nuclear exchange.

One wonders at what point they may have succeeded in assassinating the 'real Trump' and given us the fake Trump avatar.

It appears the 'real Trump' is already dueling at times with some fake avatar promoted by MSM and SES/CIA/Deep State stage sets. It seems to explain the reversals and schizoid behaviors. When they decided that impersonation nation was the way to go, body doubles that were once used for convenience became the actual puppets. This silent civil war is not publicized, even by 'real Trump' himself. What actions are taken by the avatar(s) in his name? Too much Overton WIndow?

At that point when the fake takes over, the game is over and the country is over.

This guy sounds absolutely central to the assassination of JFK:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myer_Feldman

Myer Feldman, known as Mike Feldman (June 22, 1914 – March 1, 2007), was an American political aide in the Kennedy and Johnson administrations. Hailing from Philadelphia, Feldman was a trained lawyer and alumnus of the University of Pennsylvania...

He also worked on agriculture issues and foreign relations on the subject of nuclear arms sales, often meeting secretly with Israeli Prime Minister David Ben Gurion and Foreign Minister Golda Meir. ...

Upon Kennedy's assassination, Johnson retained Feldman...

His second wife was Adrienne Arsht, who still has deep links to the CIA.

Article also says Feldman had a great, jocular relationship with Kennedy and Sorensen and often was at odds with Helms' analysis.

Was JFK's Deputy Special Counsel. Nothing linking him to the Assassination, except the Qatar-manufactured "Jews killed JFK" very recent (2010) narrative that neither (either Roger's book or Oliver's movie) Stone, Marrs, Garrison, Lane, Meagher, or anybody else postulated or found in half a century of JFK research.

He married Arsht in the early 80s, almost two decades after the JFK Assassination.

The fact that we still don't know who killed JFK argues very strongly for Israeli involvement.

Why else keep it hidden?

That's pretty much the only plausible explanation.

Patrick says

The fact that we still don't know who killed JFK argues very strongly for Israeli involvement.

Why else keep it hidden?

That's pretty much the only plausible explanation.

It was a team effort. Everybody wanted brushstrokes on the Mona Lisa of false flags on 9/11.
Kennedy's assassination was also multi-disciplinary. There were mafia and intel guys who hated him for screwing their women. There was Bush CIA. There were the corrupt Texas politicians, including LBJ. Kennedy was threatening the Euro banksters and the Fed. The only one who probably didn't have a motive to kill JFK was Oswald. Toss participation ribbons to Israel and the Vatican. Then, of course, there is the round robin musical chairs of ever shifting blames as pragmatic disinformation. Everybody is right, but nobody is completely right: rabbits popping out of hats in a hall of mirrors, just the way the dire forces like it.
It's like rolling the credits after a big, expensive film. Everybody wants some credit for their professional participation, and the lists are long.

Patrick says

The fact that we still don't know who killed JFK argues very strongly for Israeli involvement.

I think not a shred of evidence pointing to Israel/Mossad.

All these deep digging attorneys, political operatives, and researchers found nothing, so what is the evidence that leads to Israel/Mossad?

A conjecture to a motive != Evidence. And that's all I've heard from the Muslim Brotherhood's Preferred JFK Assassination Theory.

DemoralizerOfPanicans says

I think not a shred of evidence pointing to Israel/Mossad.

Everyone else involved is dead. Israel continues, and continues to have enormous influence on the US government.

So it's not proof, but it's a plausible theory.

https://www.helleniscope.com/2025/07/09/in-may-1963-jfk-opposed-israels-nuclear-ambitions-six-months-later-he-was-assassinated/

Kennedy, undeterred, continued pressing. In a follow-up letter to new Prime Minister Levi Eshkol, dated July 5, 1963, JFK sharpened his tone:

JFK to Eshkol:
“It is essential that I have your assurance that American Government representatives will be permitted to visit Dimona… at intervals of six months… In the absence of such assurance, the U.S. Government’s commitment to Israel could be seriously jeopardized.” ...

Kennedy’s assassination on November 22, 1963 brought an end to the only serious U.S. pressure campaign on Israel’s nuclear program.

President Lyndon B. Johnson abandoned the inspection demands, and Dimona was never subjected to recurring, intrusive inspections.

I think Johnson was in on it too, for the obvious reason.

Patrick says

So it's not proof, but it's a plausible theory.

This is a conjectured motive, not evidence.

Cart before the horse.

Patrick says

The fact that we still don't know who killed JFK argues very strongly for Israeli involvement.

So if some future JFK files are found and released fingering Israel/Mossad, that's proof Israel didn't do it, right?

You see the problem of falsifiability here? Heads it's Israel, Tails it's Israel.

Will the Russkies blow all covers? That is, if anybody ever releases their files. Trump said before his administration is over, we will know the complete truth about 9/11. I'm not holding my breath.

Ceffer says

I will believe it when I see it.

Grok says that such a tunnel would cut the shipping time between China and the US from 20 days to 4 days.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/the-bridge-to-1963-tuesday-october

Almost no one covered what should have been last week’s most interesting and most discussed story. Only Fox and foreign media dared. U.S. corporate outlets flinched like they saw the vast arc of history landing on the roof of their Smart Car. India Today covered the news that started the ball rolling, which ran under the headline, “Russia gives US super-secret JFK files with map that could shake up world.” Just wait. This is another world-shaker.



The hand-drawn map within the newly released files —never seen before— bears the provocative English legend, “Kennedy-Khruschev World Peace Bridge—could and should be built between Alaska and Russia. AT ONCE.”

Last week, photogenic Florida Representative Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fl.), member of the House Disclosure Committee, announced that —after asking them nicely— the Russians handed over a curated copy of their 400-page KGB dossier on President John F. Kennedy’s assassination.

Translators are still working. But that map jumped right out and launched a week of wild speculation over what could be Trump’s most controversial and world-changing move yet.

One trending hypothesis is that, if the Russian dossier is accurate, at the time of his death, Kennedy—scared straight by the Cuba standoff— was engaged in personal back-channel talks with Soviet General Secretary Khrushchev to officially broker peace between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, including a joint trade development plan as shown on the dossier’s map.

Others have wondered whether his top-secret peace efforts were the straw that spurred his assassination. ...

It could be nothing, or it could open a whole new chapter in the JFK story, right when we thought it had gone back to sleep. For instance, we have never heard about Kennedy’s outreach to the Soviets.

But even more provocatively, the Cold War-era “Peace Bridge” map appears to be much more than a mere historical relic. This week, Kyrill Dmitriev, a Putin confidante and director of Russia’s sovereign wealth fund, took the map on what could best be described as world tour, or maybe a drive to the hoop, suggesting with custom infographics that Elon Musk could build the whole thing for pennies on the ruble. ...

This week, even President Trump mentioned the Peace Bridge. During the latest dramatic but mostly useless meeting with diminutive President Zelensky —who at least wore a jacket this time— the President hilariously surprised the Ukrainian President by asking what he thought about building a Peace Bridge between America and Russia. Zelensky: “I’m not happy with this idea.”

Trump laughed out loud, looked around at reporters, and said, “I don’t think he liked it.” But Trump referred to the idea as “interesting.” Remember— the entire concept is insanely controversial, because Russia is buried under about twelve layers of sanctions, and there is almost no trade happening between that country and the US.

The neocons would stroke out.

Returning now to everyone’s favorite space billionaire and world’s richest man, consider this curious missive. Several months ago, Elon re-posted without comment a short, mysterious video explaining just how close Russia and the US are in the Bering Strait off Alaska (only about 70 miles). ...

In April, Elon retweeted that Bering Strait video, which emphasizes the real possibility of building a trade tunnel between Alaska and Siberia. Last week, the Russians suddenly handed over their long-sought, secret JFK files, including a map of the exact same territory, and then started chattering about how Elon’s Boring Company could connect the two nations. Our media pretended it couldn’t even see the story, like a middle-schooler playing the “I’m ignoring you” game.

It is hard to ignore the remarkable similarity between Kennedy’s Peace Bridge map and Elon’s video map. What are the odds?

Then a couple days ago, Trump floated the same idea in one of the week’s most widely covered presidential meetings, and did it in a provocative way that appeared designed for maximum press coverage (“Trump insulted Zelensky with dumb Russian idea”).

Could this “Peace Bridge” thing be more than just a random notion that unexpectedly floated out of the surprising release of a JFK dossier meaningless to anyone except historians and JFK conspiracy buffs?

If President Trump —the real-estate developer— has a primary peace tool, it is trade, commerce, and real-estate development. His Gaza plan, for instance, involves the redevelopment of the war-torn region into a world-class tourist destination (“Riviera on the Mediterranean”). Now we begin to see the outlines of an even more massive move: settling the world’s conflict with Russia by formally developing the two countries into the next-door neighbors that they geographically are, through the massive real-estate development of a trade corridor.



All the pieces are on the chessboard: The arc of history running right through Democrat President JFK. The looming settlement of the Ukraine war. Elon Musk’s breakthrough drilling technology. Russian interest in the plan. Siberian rare earths providing a compelling predicate. A U.S.–Russia link that could outflank China’s Belt and Road. I could go on.

Democrats —set on a hair trigger to detect any Russia ‘favoritism’— apparently immediately sussed out the plan when JFK’s map appeared, and that is why corporate media is stubbornly ignoring the story.

If I’m right, Trump will settle the Ukraine war with a grand economic deal that will also resolve the longest-running conflict in modern history, a conflict that spawned countless proxy wars (Vietnam, Korea, Ukraine, etc), using a stillborn solution designed at the peak of the Cold War by one of the Democrats’ favorite presidents.

They won’t give him the Nobel, of course, but still. Just think of it.

Soviets ALWAYS lie. I LOL at the idiots who take this hand-drawn BS at face value.

Seems like a good idea anyway. Could become a major shipping route.

HeadSet says

Ceffer says

I will believe it when I see it.

It wound up being nothing. It was mostly an illustrated denial that the Russians did not assassinate JFK without any other real meaningful information.