by AmericanKulak ➕follow (11) ignore
Comments 1 - 40 of 152 Next » Last » Search these comments
Fed Employees mad at having to return to Office
Last night, Mr. Trump signed an order to declassify government files relating to the murders of the Kennedys and Martin Luther King. Of course, the intel agencies holding these files have had a half-century to expunge anything in the files that might reflect poorly on the intel agencies — such as, the long-trafficked rumor that the CIA was behind the killing of all three. Why would you expect to get anything like that? How could the remaining material be anything but a cover-your-ass file? Well, now we shall see. At some point in his first term, Mr. Trump allegedly saw what was in the files and demurred from his promise then to release them. Was it too shocking? Or was it the well-groomed nothingburger described above?
That’s not to say that there’s any shortage of weird, tantalizing documentation around all those cases, inexplicable doings. . . sketchy characters like Oswald, Jack Ruby, Howard Hunt, Clay Shaw, Sirhan Sirhan, Thane Eugene Cesar, James Earl Ray, “Raul” (Ray’s alleged “handler”), Frank Liberto, Loyd Jowers. . . . and curious circumstances like the so-called “magic bullet” that supposedly exited JFK and wounded Texas Governor Connolly, and was later found oddly intact on a stretcher in Parkland Hospital. I guess we’ll find out shortly.
It is inarguable that the security agencies do not want these records released. By ordering their release, Trump is applying pressure to the agencies, by creating perception problems occupying their time and attention with damage control. It leaves them with less bandwidth to make mischief.
Jefferson Morley on the real reason it’s taken 63 years to get the JFK documents — and how we’ll know when they’re all released.
Americans’ mood toward the intelligence agency has, shall we say, soured. It worsened when, thanks to Trump 1.0 declassification, we discovered Kennedy’s assassin was on the CIA’s payroll mere weeks before JFK’s killing—with no coherent explanation forthcoming from the Agency.
FBI Uncovers 2,400 New Files on JFK Assassination as Trump Orders Full Declassification
“The search resulted in approximately 2,400 newly inventoried and digitized records that were previously unrecognized as related to the JFK assassination case file.”
The government has long resisted transparency into the assassination, which has helped fuel speculation of a cover-up.
Sources told Axios that efforts are still underway to block out details of the new files.
So some group that is still very powerful wants to keep their involvement hidden.
Sources told Axios that efforts are still underway to block out details of the new files.
What part about "Full Declassification" don't they get ???
EOs have 30-day delays on orders like this. February 20th is the earliest date.
AmericanKulak says
EOs have 30-day delays on orders like this. February 20th is the earliest date.
Came and gone. Anything juicy? Nothing in the press, so I guess nothing.
AmericanKulak says
EOs have 30-day delays on orders like this. February 20th is the earliest date.
Came and gone. Anything juicy? Nothing in the press, so I guess nothing.
RWSGFY says
AmericanKulak says
EOs have 30-day delays on orders like this. February 20th is the earliest date.
Came and gone. Anything juicy? Nothing in the press, so I guess nothing.
"earliest date"
Question: Is it fair to say JFK strongly opposed this program?
ChatGPT said:
Yes, it is fair to say that President John F. Kennedy strongly opposed Israel's nuclear weapons program, especially during the early 1960s. His administration sought to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons and was concerned about the potential for regional instability in the Middle East, particularly with Israel’s nuclear ambitions.
Here are a few key points about JFK’s opposition:
Pressure on Israel: Kennedy made efforts to convince Israel to abandon its nuclear weapons ambitions or at least open its nuclear facilities to international inspection. In 1963, the U.S. provided Israel with substantial aid, but Kennedy also pushed for transparency in the Dimona reactor's operations. There are reports that Kennedy was frustrated with Israel's secrecy and its refusal to allow international oversight of its nuclear program.
Diplomatic Moves: Kennedy's administration pressured Israel diplomatically by leveraging American aid and alliances. The U.S. sought assurances that Israel’s nuclear program would not proceed unchecked. The U.S. government, under Kennedy, was also working on broader non-proliferation efforts, including the establishment of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which aimed to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons.
Kennedy’s Concerns: Kennedy’s opposition was motivated by both moral concerns about nuclear proliferation and strategic concerns about the Middle East. He feared that an Israeli nuclear weapons capability would lead to an arms race in the region, particularly among neighboring Arab states, and further destabilize an already volatile geopolitical landscape.
Israel’s Secrecy and Response: Despite Kennedy's efforts, Israel continued to develop its nuclear program in secret. The Israeli government, led by Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion at the time, was determined to acquire nuclear weapons as a deterrent, citing existential threats posed by its Arab neighbors. Israel did not openly acknowledge its nuclear weapons capability and maintained a policy of ambiguity, which ultimately defied Kennedy’s pressures. ...
Question: What would be the 'fallout' (pun intended) if it were proven Israel was behind Kennedy's Cranial aeration?
ChatGPT said:
If it were proven that Israel was behind JFK’s assassination, specifically his cranial aeration (a term you've used to refer to the fatal headshot), the fallout would be enormous and multifaceted. The repercussions would not only reshape the historical narrative of the assassination but would also have far-reaching political, diplomatic, and legal consequences for Israel, the United States, and global politics. Here’s a look at the potential fallout:
1. Global Diplomatic Crisis:
U.S.-Israel Relations: The relationship between the United States and Israel, which has been one of the closest alliances in the modern geopolitical landscape, would likely be severely strained. A revelation of Israel’s involvement in such a major assassination would trigger an immense backlash in the U.S., potentially leading to the suspension of aid, sanctions, or a reevaluation of the longstanding alliance.
Middle Eastern Politics: Israel’s role in the Middle East would be further complicated. If Israel had orchestrated JFK’s assassination, it could provoke animosity not only from its traditional adversaries but also from regional powers that have a history of supporting Palestinian and Arab nationalist causes. It could even provoke destabilizing effects across the entire region, possibly leading to increased anti-Israel sentiment and actions from both governments and populations.
2. Domestic U.S. Reactions:
Public Trust and National Trauma: The American public’s trust in its government could be severely shaken. For decades, various conspiracy theories about JFK's assassination have thrived, but if Israel’s involvement were confirmed, the realization that an ally had engaged in such a dramatic act would lead to widespread outrage, particularly among those who had believed in the official narratives.
Political Fallout: Such a revelation could open the door for massive political upheaval in the U.S. Depending on the timing and the circumstances of the disclosure, it could lead to calls for accountability at the highest levels of government. It could also damage the political reputations of individuals who were involved in suppressing or manipulating the investigation into the assassination.
3. Legal and Accountability Issues:
International Legal Action: Israel would likely face severe international legal repercussions, with calls for accountability from the global community. This could include charges of assassination, covert operations against a foreign leader, or violations of international law. Legal experts would debate whether the actions taken could be classified as state-sponsored terrorism or assassination, both of which could result in severe international sanctions or actions taken by the United Nations.
Reopened Investigation: If proof were discovered, it would likely lead to a reopened investigation into the assassination, which could change the historical understanding of what happened that fateful day in Dallas. The new evidence would probably bring about renewed public interest in the case and increase pressure on the U.S. government to act.
4. Impact on the Israeli Government:
Political Isolation: Israel could face political isolation if such a truth were made public. It could alter how other nations interact with Israel, leading to embargoes or restrictions on trade, particularly in sensitive sectors like defense and technology. Some countries might take steps to distance themselves from Israel, while others might adopt a more cautious approach to dealing with the nation.
Loss of Moral Authority: Israel’s position as a key ally of the U.S. and a symbol of democracy and sovereignty in the Middle East could suffer significantly. Israel's moral authority would be severely undermined, especially among international human rights groups and advocates for peaceful conflict resolution in the region.
5. Potential for Domestic and International Protests:
Protests and Civil Unrest: If the truth were revealed, protests in both Israel and the U.S. could become widespread. Many Americans might feel betrayed by an ally they have supported for decades, leading to large-scale civil unrest. Similarly, Israel could see a rise in domestic opposition, as political movements within the country could seek to distance themselves from such actions.
Rise in Conspiracy Theories: Conspiracy theories about JFK's assassination have flourished for decades. While the proof would likely quell some, new, even more intricate theories could emerge, potentially clouding the issue further.
6. Rewriting History:
Historiography of the 1960s: Such a revelation would force historians to reconsider the entire framework of the Cold War and U.S.-Israel relations in the 1960s. It would shift how Kennedy’s policies, especially in the Middle East, are interpreted. The assassination would be viewed as a pivotal moment that radically altered the trajectory of U.S. foreign policy and could potentially influence historical debates about Israel’s nuclear program and its role in the region.
Loss of Faith in Official Accounts: It would cast serious doubt on the official story of many major events from that era, from Kennedy’s presidency to subsequent U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East and the U.S.-Israel relationship. Future generations would grow up with a radically different view of the 1960s and the international dynamics that shaped that period.
7. The Geopolitical Domino Effect:
Regional Tensions: If Israel’s involvement in JFK’s assassination were confirmed, it might embolden or enrage other powers in the Middle East, including Iran, Syria, and Lebanon, potentially resulting in increased proxy conflicts or more direct confrontations. The Arab world’s view of the U.S. and Israel would likely harden, while nations such as Iran could take advantage of the shift in alliances to solidify their position as a regional power.
Impact on U.S. Strategy: The U.S. would likely reconsider its support for Israel in future international conflicts, such as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict or the broader Arab-Israeli conflict. It could impact U.S. foreign policy priorities in the Middle East, potentially leading to a recalibration of alliances, particularly with Arab nations or other powers that had historically opposed Israel.
In conclusion, if Israel’s involvement in JFK's assassination were proven, it would trigger a political earthquake with global repercussions, altering both the course of history and the fabric of international relations. The situation would be volatile, with a mix of legal, diplomatic, and public relations fallout that would reverberate across the world for decades to come.
Is it fair to say JFK strongly opposed this program?
There isn't any evidence pointing to any Israeli agent or official involved in the JFK assassination.
Comments 1 - 40 of 152 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,295,106 comments by 15,440 users - AD, Ceffer, HANrongli online now