« First « Previous Comments 98 - 136 of 136 Search these comments
I use to be stationed at NAVSTA Roosevelt Roads.
Ok if Trymp want Russian/Chinese bases in Canada/Mexico/Panama whatever this is great move.
MAGA crowd is serving world order to China on platter.
Penny wise —Pound foolish.
Don't forget the biggest boost that items under $800 get the full tariff now. Previously they were exempt.
Despite dark Democrat predictions of doom and financial apocalypse, the Trump tariffs did not result in a global trade war yesterday. The AP ran the story headlined, “Trump agrees to pause tariffs on Canada and Mexico after they pledge to boost border enforcement.” It was that easy.
The “deal,” if you can call the short stay of execution a deal, involved substantial commitments from both North American countries to deepen their investments in border security in exchange for a one-month delay in the tariffs.
What may really be happening is that, having gotten Mexico and Canada to their first “yes,” Trump plans to continue renegotiating the main trade agreement from his first term, the USMCA, which replaced the previous long-standing agreement, NAFTA. The negotiations have to be framed in terms of emergency border protection and drug enforcement, so Trump can keep using his emergency powers to dicker about the money.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, the tariff standoff with China was not resolved yesterday. Not yet. The AP’s related story carried the headline, “China counters with tariffs on US products. It will also investigate Google.” Unless there’s a deal, cell phones, which already cost more than a five-day Caribbean cruise, will soon come with mortgage applications.
But China’s counter-tariffs could perhaps be more properly viewed as “negotiating.” According to the AP, “Trump plans to talk with Chinese President Xi Jinping in the next few days.” So we’ll see.
Democrats had hoped for something more … dramatic to complain about. Not this time. The narrative has shrunken to something like, yeah, but anybody could have done that.
From Canadian TV a couple of months ago.
They called it!
Newsflash: it's possible to transport oil and gas via pipeline going through another country while not selling any of it to the said country.
RWSGFY says
Newsflash: it's possible to transport oil and gas via pipeline going through another country while not selling any of it to the said country.
If it enters the country, it's an import. Period.
Not under CUSMA it's not. Or rarher it's not subject to tariffs.
RWSGFY says
Not under CUSMA it's not. Or rarher it's not subject to tariffs.
Prove it. Especially when that oil gets mixed in with ours. <-- gotcha!
RWSGFY says
Not under CUSMA it's not. Or rarher it's not subject to tariffs.
Prove it. Especially when that oil gets mixed in with ours. <-- gotcha!
RWSGFY says
Expand on mixing: who mixes what and why?
I accept your surrender.
The EU is poised to offer lower tariffs on US car imports amid threats from Donald Trump that he is ready to ramp up a global trade war.
Bernd Lange, chairman of the international trade committee in the European Parliament, told the FT that Europe was willing to cut its 10pc tariff on American cars to closer to the 2.5pc charged by the US on equivalent imports from Brussels.
He said: “We can try to have a deal before escalating costs and tariffs”.
He added that the EU would offer to buy more liquefied natural gas (LNG) and defence kit from the US “plus also look to lower tariffs for cars”.
RWSGFY says
I accept your surrender.
Giving up because I don't want to bother with your ignorance on oil pipelines isn't 'surrender'.
Yep, you realized you've fucked up on "mixing"
Google AI Overview
In the context of the Keystone pipeline, "oil mixing" refers to the blending of different types of crude oil within the pipeline, particularly the mixing of heavier, more viscous Canadian tar sands oil (diluted bitumen or "dilbit") with lighter conventional crude oil from other sources, like the Bakken formation in North Dakota, as it travels through the pipeline to refineries; this mixing can occur at various points along the pipeline route depending on where different oil sources are added.
Key points about oil mixing in the Keystone pipeline:
Different oil types:
The primary oil type transported through the Keystone pipeline is diluted bitumen (dilbit) from Canadian tar sands, which is often mixed with lighter crude oil from other sources to improve its flowability within the pipeline.
Impact on refining:
The mix of different oil types can affect the refining process at the destination, as refineries need to adjust their operations to handle the varied properties of the blended oil.
Bottom line: the "mixing" wrt to transit oil is a non-issue.
RWSGFY says
Not under CUSMA it's not. Or rarher it's not subject to tariffs.
Prove it. Especially when that oil gets mixed in with ours. <-- gotcha!
You tried to imply that transiting oil tariff-free is somehow impossible because pipelines go through the US. When pointed that existing trade agreement provides for tariff-free transit of goods from Canada you tried to imply that for oil it's impossible because of "mixing". Which is obviously wrong, because oil can be and regularly is transported in batches.
In the context of the Keystone pipeline, "oil mixing" refers to the blending of different types of crude oil within the pipeline, particularly the mixing of heavier, more viscous Canadian tar sands oil (diluted bitumen or "dilbit") with lighter conventional crude oil from other sources, like the Bakken formation in North Dakota, as it travels through the pipeline to refineries; this mixing can occur at various points along the pipeline route depending on where different oil sources are added.
My goodness, there was so much more. Yesterday the AP ran a world-shaking story headlined, “Trump signs a plan for reciprocal tariffs on US trading partners, ushering in economic uncertainty.” Just wait till you hear this.
“I’ve decided, for purposes of fairness, that I will charge a reciprocal tariff,” Trump said in the Oval Office at the proclamation signing. “Meaning, whatever rates the countries charge the United States of America, we will charge them. No more, no less. In other words, they charge us a tax or tariff, then we charge them the same tax or tariff.”
The President added, “It’s fair to all. No other country can complain. This is something that should have been done many years ago.”
It was another masterstroke. One commenter observed, “If it was a literal earthquake, it would have knocked the planet off its axis.”
It was also the pushback Trump has long promised was coming to Europe. The EU countries thought they knew how to stymie Trump’s’ tariffs. They planned to apply the co-called “Canada model,” by launching trade wars against conservatives and Trump allies, like Tesla, or just the red states.
Their dumb idea was to force maximum political pressure on President Trump, to weaken his support with Americans. He he just ran rings around them.
With reciprocal tariffs, the Canada Model become a hammer they hit themselves in the head with. There’s no point in entering an automatically escalating trade war. You’re just shooting yourself in the foot over and over.
Most likely, this brilliant maneuver will immediately result in lower prices for nearly everything, as countries drop their duties and shed their taxes, VAT surcharges, and tariffs. But if it has to play out, the corporate media headlines will be constantly crying about Trump’s tit-for-tat tariffs, and will cherry-pick examples products here and there with increased prices. See, Mexican tamales now cost $2.79!
They still think we voted for lower prices. It’s practically all they have left to hold onto.
Don’t miss this: We have long subsidized Europeans by paying their unilateral taxes, VATs, and tariffs on all our international trade with them, while we weren’t charging them anything in return. The Europeans have used all that extra money to fund their massive immigration and welfare systems, not to mention undermining the U.S. every chance they got, like during the RussiaGate Hoax.
Soon, they won’t be able to afford all their insane social re-programming. In that sense, Trump’s tariff plan didn’t just help the United States. It’s helping liberate Europe.
Wrong, wrong, wrong. Canadian oil is purposely mixed in.
Because there is no tariffs, duh...
As stated above there is no technical obstacle for shipping Canadian oil via pipeline networks w/o mixing it with any other.
I'm on the edge of marking the last two comments as personal.
I think it's funny when people talk about stuff they know nothing about or haven't experienced it at some level.
« First « Previous Comments 98 - 136 of 136 Search these comments
Canada and Mexico has a 25% inbound in 24 hours. China a 10% Tariff shortly.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-china-us-tariffs-beijing-prepared-for-trade-war-analysts-say/
"Hurr Durr, we'll starve in America if Trump tariffs CHYna. Also, give US big agra a big subsidy so we don't starve" LOL
We gotcha Free Traitors. The game is over.