« First « Previous Comments 44 - 83 of 94 Next » Last » Search these comments
MolotovCocktail says
Sperm contain 3.2Gb (gigabases)
Each base is represented as 2 bits of info.
8 bits is 1 byte
6.4 billion bits / 8 = 800MB
Data in Sperm DNA
Amount of Data per Sperm
Each sperm cell contains approximately 787 MB of DNA data.
This is derived from the human genome, which consists of about 3.3 billion base pairs. Each base pair represents two bits of data.
Total Data in Ejaculation
An average ejaculation contains around 280 million sperm.
This results in a total of about 220,000 terabytes (TB) of data per ejaculation.
Comparison to Other Data
To put this in perspective, the data from one ejaculation could store:
330 million copies of a video game like Mario Kart.
The entire storage capacity of a human brain could fit into an ejaculation 88 times.
The famous image of a black hole could be stored 55 times.
Data Characteristics
Much of the DNA data is repetitive, meaning it contains many copies of similar sequences.
The actual unique information is less than the total data suggests, as it primarily consists of repeated genetic sequences.
This highlights the vast amount of genetic information contained within sperm, illustrating both its complexity and redundancy.


New word I learned on X today.
wigger
Made me laugh. I had to appreciate the originality & contextual use.
Nanny's gave hand jobs to kids and it was considered normal. Pre-1901 I think though.
MolotovCocktail says
I don't know how accurate those depictions are. Florida's federal land is a hell of a lot more than that infograph is showing.
The everglades alone is two times that size.
I don't know how accurate those depictions are. Florida's federal land is a hell of a lot more than that infograph is showing.
The everglades alone is two times that size.
He posts inaccurate info
post a link to the data so people can verify.
Get me to the data...post a link to the data so people can verify.. .the date..... 20 years ago. 2004. Lol.
I'm just curious, why does Wookieman have to defend, or validate some useless stat he found on the internet somewhere
Do you trust every stat you come across? I sure as hell don't. At best they should be posted for commentary and critique, with or without the data.
I'm just curious, why does anyone have to defend, or validate some useless stat he found on the internet somewhere.
I do get your point, but when you're making a point about something with 2004 data, no link to the data, no updated data, you're 100% untrustworthy.
WookieMan says
Get me to the data...post a link to the data so people can verify.. .the date..... 20 years ago. 2004. Lol.
See eveyone? He even contradicts his own bullshit.
Wookie claims the image is useless shit unless someone provides his lazy ass with 'a link'...and then immediately references part of it as authority data to bitch about.
Wookie's Schrödinger's Evidence Standard: Whichever Wookie can claim to demand that preserves his fantasy 'real estate expertise' or shuts down all challenges to said bullshit, even when both options contradicts the other.
Posting bull shit on the internet is bad for society
Fact is that map is obvious. BLM, Forestry and National Parks. You can still live on it as well.
That 45 million excess is across all of the nearly 1.5 billion Indians. In specific provinces, the sex ratio disparity is approaching 70/30 M/F.
« First « Previous Comments 44 - 83 of 94 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,349,983 comments by 15,721 users - Booger, Patrick, RC2006 online now