patrick.net

More blinking:

.

Lets see how the stock market responds tomorrow to this. I guess Bessent tried to clarify his comments yesterday during after hours trading which caused a +8% spike in Amazon stock.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/live/trump-tariffs-live-updates-bessent-says-theres-no-unilateral-offer-to-slash-tariffs-on-china-191201348.html

,.

One more challenge filed:



https://ag.ny.gov/sites/default/files/court-filings/state-of-oregon-et-al-v-donald-j-trump-united-states-department-of-homeland-security-et-al-complaint-2025.pdf

HeadSet says

It won' even be that. Th iPhone already sells at what the market will bear, so no increase in price. Apple will just make 16% less profit per phone,

Unless you're a phone junkie, who the hell gets new phones? I maybe get one every 5 years.

The phones are a revenue generator, but it's in the form of sucking you into their ecosystem. App store sales. Mac sales. Music subscriptions. They'd be better off cutting the price because the net per phone is so high. Sell 1M more phones the money generated there is by app developers and musicians and they skim 30%. You then get the user locked in and other people did the work for you.

WookieMan says

Basically I haven't noticed any tariff price increases on products.

Because it's too soon to see any, if they are even going to have an effect. Meaning that prices are based on whatever the market will bear, not necessarily on the cost to make the item. Offshoring was all about reducing producer prices, not consumer prices. That's why the stock market has been doing what it's been doing lately. Corporate profits will potentially be lower.

zzyzzx says

Offshoring was all about reducing producer prices, not consumer prices

Bingo. And THAT IS WHY the bullshit about "'free trade' is great for Americans" and 'tariffs are bad for consumers' is being posted all over social media and the official narrative of the MSM.

...and even some PatNetters.

But it is not working anymore.

Let's see. If Apple is the one that has to pay the US government the tariff on parts, then someone has to eat that cost:

Consumer? Prolly not if they're already paying the max they're willing to pay.
China? Apple could tell them to lower their prices by the amount of the tariff, but I'm pretty sure Apple already negotiated them to the bone.
Apple? They have massive margins at the expense of the US worker.

So yes, I think Apple is the one that's going to be the real payer, and that's justified because they refused to use US workers, and the tariffs are a revenue source for the government that is not income tax or money printing. Let's see their stock:



One could argue that the stock market agrees that Apple's profits the expense of US workers will be lower, and that's why the stock took a hit.

Yes. The comparative advantage thing only exists when capital and labor is not allowed to cross borders.

Therefore all the talking heads - even Economics Ph.Ds and professors who teach Econ - who play the comparative advantage card on TV are full of shit.

The media of course, never calls them out on it.

Apple can eat shit if they don't like the tariffs.

So what if an iPhone costs another 50 bucks; people finance them in some cases.

zzyzzx says

Offshoring was all about reducing producer prices, not consumer prices. That's why the stock market has been doing what it's been doing lately. Corporate profits will potentially be lower.

🤡🤡🤡

"The American people support this agreement because they know it's good for jobs in America . And good for human rights. And the development of democracy in China."
Bill Clinton, 10 October 2000
https://www.c-span.org/.../trade-relations-with.../105973

.

Ben Shapiro's take on BBFT at 58:33 :

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XvSq2mxAPk0&t=51s&pp=2AEzkAIB

Patrick says

Let's see. If Apple is the one that has to pay the US government the tariff on parts, then someone has to eat that cost:

Consumer? Prolly not if they're already paying the max they're willing to pay.
China? Apple could tell them to lower their prices by the amount of the tariff, but I'm pretty sure Apple already negotiated them to the bone.
Apple? They have massive margins at the expense of the US worker.

So yes, I think Apple is the one that's going to be the real payer, and that's justified because they refused to use US workers, and the tariffs are a revenue source for the government that is not income tax or money printing. Let's see their stock:



One could argue that the stock market agrees that Apple's profits the expense of US workers will be lower, and that's why the stock took a hit.

Or the iPhones will become much more cheap and primitive while still costing the same to the consumer.

this is my take on it thus far:

tariffs will be minimal, too many panicans.
manufacture will stay overseas.
white collar will offshore to India and AI

what happens after… america will be like rest of the world, few ultra rich, rest living in poverty. feels like it’s going that way anyhow.

.

Remember the Foxconn deal (or the Fox Con Job) in Wisconsin ?

https://www.govtech.com/question-of-the-day/what-technology-is-going-to-revitalize-the-failed-foxconn-center-in-wisconsin

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisconn_Valley_Science_and_Technology_Park#Foxconn_construction_and_manufacturing

That went no where , but at least maybe not a complete failure. As they say, its better than nothing, and the deal was made during Trump's 1st administration.

Trump can promote "better than Biden" (more so than better than nothing) as far as getting not only Taiwan Semiconductor to build more in the USA, but companies like Apple, Johnson and Johnson, Nvidia, Hyundai Steel, and IBM.

.

Fortwaye says

what happens after… america will be like rest of the world, few ultra rich, rest living in poverty. feels like it’s going that way anyhow.

Not sure about that, as this is the first 100 days of Trump deal making. I'd say this is W I N N I N G.

IBM on Monday announced that it will invest $150 billion in U.S. manufacturing to "fuel the economy."

South Korea's Hyundai Steel will invest $5.8 billion along with Hyundai Motor Group to build a steel plant in the U.S. state of Louisiana.

Johnson & Johnson's plan to invest $55 billion in U.S. manufacturing

Apple and Nvidia have also announced substantial commitments to expanding their U.S. manufacturing capabilities. The iPhone maker said in February it is committed to spending more than $500 billion on growing its U.S. manufacturing facilities and increasing jobs at its plants in Arizona, California, Iowa, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Oregon, Texas and Washington.

clambo says

So what if an iPhone costs another 50 bucks; people finance them in some cases.

Most cases? Very rare that people buy them without financing through the cell phone provider/carrier.

The thing people don't get with the iPhone is it has ZERO to do with parts. It's the ecosystem they suck you into. You get an apple watch, mac mini or iMac, music, apps, cloud storage and other various revenue generating setups.

Apple throws Verizon, Att and others a bone to give people a deal. That has nothing to do with parts. It's new customers. That's it. One new customer will likely buy 2-4 Apple products after getting an iPhone. The camera is probably the most expensive part of the phone. Why? People need to store their photos so they don't lose them. Monthly cloud storage that you set and forget. You like music, $10/mo or whatever it is and you can listen to anything. Buy a movie for your AppleTv and they get 30%. Same with apps.

Point is nothing is physical. iPhone is their top seller but the subscriptions and sales of something as simple as an AppleTV is higher margin. It's all about downstream labor free revenue with subscriptions. Parts don't matter if tariffed.

WookieMan says

Most cases? Very rare that people buy them without financing through the cell phone provider/carrier.

Good point as I was looking at Cricket Wireless (owned by AT&T) and it is offering "deals" such as $199 for an IPhone 16 for minimum 2 years service.

This concept is similar to Google and your fav Chromebook (aka: CheapBook) , as well as an Android phone. I just bought a new Samsung A15 for $100.

.

AD says

Good point as I was looking at Cricket Wireless (owned by AT&T) and it is offering "deals" such as $199 for an IPhone 16 for minimum 2 years service.

I'm making this up, some one else may have, but I think of it as the domino economy. The iPhone, the Chromebook, Samsung product. You get one and you're in. I only know of one person that switched from Samsung to Apple. ONE. Or vice versa. They will switch carriers, but that's a monthly service/revenue.

There are very few industries that can do it. Banks and tech are the biggies. Southwest locked us in, but we're the worst possible people on the planet for them to have as customers. We're nearing a decade not paying for a flight as a family of 5.

Another rollback on car parts. Shows how well-thought out the whole thing was.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration announced Tuesday it will provide $12 billion in emergency relief to ease the pain of American farmers slammed by President Donald Trump’s escalating trade disputes with China and other countries.

So tell me again how stimulating of re-shoring of critical manufacturing instead of blanket tariffs was not an option because we didn't want to spend billions of gumbint money on it. 🤡

AD says

BM on Monday announced that it will invest $150 billion in U.S. manufacturing to "fuel the economy."

South Korea's Hyundai Steel will invest $5.8 billion along with Hyundai Motor Group to build a steel plant in the U.S. state of Louisiana.

Johnson & Johnson's plan to invest $55 billion in U.S. manufacturing

Apple and Nvidia have also announced substantial commitments to expanding their U.S. manufacturing capabilities. The iPhone maker said in February it is committed to spending more than $500 billion on growing its U.S. manufacturing facilities and increasing jobs at its plants in Arizona, California, Iowa, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Oregon, Texas and Washington.

And now add this as Walmart is spending money to get more USA made products

https://corporate.walmart.com/news/2025/04/29/grow-with-us-how-walmarts-new-program-aims-to-help-small-businesses-go-big

.

Everything is going great. Xi just did a whirlwind charm tour of SE Asia, esp. Vietnam, to try to get some kind of pushback. He was treated politely but got nothing but vague glittering generalities about how nice Free Trade is, absolutely nothing substantial.

Vietnam and Malaysia just did COO crackdowns at the behest of native manufacturers terrified of Trump's certain consequences if Chinese fraudulently re-branding their products from there.

Vietnam and Malaysia taking hurried domestic action to postpone or reform taxation due to the All-American Founding Father Approved Tariff :
https://www.scmp.com/news/asia/southeast-asia/article/3308408/malaysia-delays-sales-tax-expansion-amid-trumps-tariff-pressure-offering-businesses-respite

Congress should pass a law requiring Retailers with a market cap of over $1B to provide a "Tariff Free" category of products on their websites or face a $100,000 per day fine.

AD says

One day, the great ruler Tamerlane was searching for someone to teach his donkey to talk. No one dared to take on such an impossible task—except Nasreddin. He boldly stepped forward and promised to teach the donkey to speak, but he needed *ten years* to do it.

His friends were baffled. “Nasreddin, have you lost your mind? You can’t teach a donkey to talk!”

Nasreddin simply smiled and replied, “The money is good, the job isn’t hard, and in ten years, a lot can happen—maybe I’ll die, maybe Tamerlane will die, or maybe the donkey will die!”

RWSGFY says

One day, the great ruler Tamerlane was searching for someone to teach his donkey to talk. No one dared to take on such an impossible task—except Nasreddin. He boldly stepped forward and promised to teach the donkey to speak, but he needed ten years to do it.

Thanks for the parable , Rick Wicks Says Go Fuck Yourself (RWSGFY). But even if only 50% is accomplished its still an improvement and that is what some do not want to understand as far as why there is a Trump's 2nd term.

Let's see what happens about 6 months before the 2026 midterm as far as the federal deficit, trade deficit, manufacturing jobs as a % of total jobs, etc.

AD says

manufacturing jobs as a % of total jobs, etc.

A dubious metric: if we're talking about the return of high-tech manufacturing in critical areas the needle will not move much as these areas are highly automated.

For example in case of Apple the 500B announced was before the botched BBF rollout, was not for labor-intensive stuff like iphones, but for highly automated manufacturing of servers. So they will
employ maybe 300 guys. Maybe.

AD says

But even if only 50% is accomplished its still an improvement

Not necessarily. The collateral damage might offset any improvements and even move the needle way lower. The "what to do" goes hand-in-hand with "how to do it".

RWSGFY says

For example in case of Apple the 500B announced was before the botched BBF rollout, was not for labor-intensive stuff like iphones, but for highly automated manufacturing of servers. So they will
employ maybe 300 guys. Maybe.

What about the direct employees of that plant such as maintenance workers ? do they count toward manufacturing jobs ?

Obviously service workers like the trash company employees that empty the dumpsters for that building are not counted towards manufacturing jobs
.

AD says

RWSGFY says

For example in case of Apple the 500B announced was before the botched BBF rollout, was not for labor-intensive stuff like iphones, but for highly automated manufacturing of servers. So they will
employ maybe 300 guys. Maybe.

What about the direct employees of that plant such as maintenance workers ? do they count toward manufacturing jobs ?

Obviously service workers like the trash company employees that empty the dumpsters for that building are not counted towards manufacturing jobs
.

No idea. Do they?

WWRD:

Reagan took a bold step to protect U.S. auto manufacturing during the 1980s. He negotiated a *voluntary export restraint (VER)* with Japan, limiting the number of Japanese cars imported into the U.S. for four years. This gave American automakers time to retool and adapt to the competition. The policy also encouraged Japanese automakers to invest in U.S.-based assembly facilities, creating jobs and boosting the economy

Cat - skinned, collateral damage - minimal.

RWSGFY says

WWRD:

Reagan took a bold step to protect U.S. auto manufacturing during the 1980s. He negotiated a voluntary export restraint (VER) with Japan, limiting the number of Japanese cars imported into the U.S. for four years. This gave American automakers time to retool and adapt to the competition. The policy also encouraged Japanese automakers to invest in U.S.-based assembly facilities, creating jobs and boosting the economy

Cat - skinned, collateral damage - minimal.

Yes, and foreign companies are investing more in the USA manufacturing sector like Hydudai Steel and Taiwan Semiconductor.

non organic bananas at Walmart Front Beach Rd were 49 cents and now are 54 cents a pound and I wonder if this is due to weakened dollar as much as the 10% Trump tariff on any import

==============================================================

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/china-exports-to-us-drop-sharply/

U.S. import duties on Chinese products now stand as high as 145%. China, meanwhile, has hit back with 125% tariffs on U.S. products.

At the Port of Los Angeles, which, along with the Port of Long Beach, receives roughly 40% of all imports from Asia, shipments last week were down 10% compared with the same period one year earlier. That number is expected to keep falling.

"We are now beginning to see the flow of cargo to the Port of Los Angeles slow," Port of Los Angeles executive director Eugene Seroka said at a Los Angeles Board of Harbor Commissioners meeting on April 24. "It's my prediction that in two weeks time, arrivals will drop by 35%," he added.

Great @AD, this also weakens the Communist Radical Longshoreman's Union.

Domestic Manufacturing and Expansion benefits American Truckers who are generally 110% Pro-America.

So this has political benefits; weakens enemy unions and rival nations while strengthening indies and companies that are pro-America.

Win-Win for America. Lose-Lose for Rivals and Socialists and ESG financiers.

https://financialpost.com/news/trump-challenge-tariffs-senate

Donald Trump barely repelled a challenge to his global tariff offensive in the Republican-controlled U.S. Senate as the president’s trade policy stokes public fears of inflation and recession.

The Senate tied 49-49 in a Wednesday vote on a resolution to end the barrage of import taxes the president announced earlier this month on China and most other U.S. trading partners.

Republicans immediately pivoted to a procedural motion to effectively kill the measure, a move that required Vice President JD Vance to cast the tie-breaking vote. ...

Three Republican senators crossed party lines to join all Democrats in supporting the resolution. The resolution’s impact would have been primarily symbolic since Trump had vowed to veto it anyway. ...

The Senate earlier this month passed a resolution to eliminate tariffs Trump announced in February against Canada, though the president also said he would veto that measure if it reaches his desk.

McConnell and Whitehouse supported that resolution, as did the three Republican senators who voted on Wednesday to end the global tariffs: Rand Paul of Kentucky, Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska.

me: How can the Senate even try to block Trump's tariffs? I thought tariffs were the president's prerogative.

AI answers:

Under the U.S. Constitution (Article I, Section 8), Congress has the power to: "lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises"

That includes setting tariffs. So Congress, not the President, has the explicit authority to impose or regulate tariffs.

In practice, Congress has delegated broad trade powers to the President through a series of laws, including:

Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (Section 232): lets the president impose tariffs for national security reasons.
Trade Act of 1974 (Section 301): lets the president respond to unfair foreign trade practices.
International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA): allows tariffs or restrictions in declared emergencies.

These laws gave presidents — including Trump — a lot of discretion to act unilaterally on tariffs.

What is not mentioned (couldn't quote the post - it was "too large" even though it was a single image) is that the Trump exempted bullion from the tariffs - that's why gold went from over $3500 now down below $3300. It was a run up against the perception that gold bullion would be subjected to tariffs.

Major mainstream media fail #1,000,000+

stereotomy says

What is not mentioned (couldn't quote the post - it was "too large" even though it was a single image) is that the Trump exempted bullion from the tariffs - that's why gold went from over $3500 now down below $3300. It was a run up against the perception that gold bullion would be subjected to tariffs.

Major mainstream media fail #1,000,000+

Keith Weiner is founder & CEO of Monetary Metals. They handle gold and silver bullion transacrions all the time.

So I am guessing your info is what isn't correct. Or, Trump's exemption is rather recent.

https://ground.news/article/us-payroll-growth-totals-177-000-in-april-topping-expectations

American employers added 177,000 jobs in April 2025, surpassing economists' expectation of 135,000 new jobs according to the Labor Department report released on Friday.

Anybody else NOTICE that the one thing that really animated RAND PAUL to get off his ass and do something in the Senate was an explicit, original Constitutional Tax?

I'm noticing a lot about Libertarians these days.