patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,349,766 comments by 15,721 users - Ceffer, DemoralizerOfPanicans, Glock-n-Load online now
Comments 1 - 5 of 5 Search these comments
1
MolotovCocktail
2025 Mar 6, 10:04pm
MolotovCocktail
2025 Mar 6, 10:04pm
Eric Holder says
The bullshit propaganda you cling to.
The Russians produce millions of shells per year and more tanks than the useless eloi do.
Eric Holder says
WTF? The eloi annual GDP growth is what again? Compared to Russia's 5%?
But the main difference is in that the Russians MAKE ACTUAL SHIT while most of Europe does not and rapidly deindustrializing. The Poles are the exception. They licensed to build thousands of South Korea's Panther MBTs. Buy that will take years. They have a crash order of a few hundred to be build in SK. But the rest of Europe? Crap.
their biggest tank manufacturer cranks out only 10-12 fresh tanks per month and they get fucking artillery shells from NoKo.
The bullshit propaganda you cling to.
The Russians produce millions of shells per year and more tanks than the useless eloi do.
Eric Holder says
more economically powerful
WTF? The eloi annual GDP growth is what again? Compared to Russia's 5%?
But the main difference is in that the Russians MAKE ACTUAL SHIT while most of Europe does not and rapidly deindustrializing. The Poles are the exception. They licensed to build thousands of South Korea's Panther MBTs. Buy that will take years. They have a crash order of a few hundred to be build in SK. But the rest of Europe? Crap.
2
DemoralizerOfPanicans
2025 Mar 6, 10:09pm
DemoralizerOfPanicans
2025 Mar 6, 10:09pm
Russia is estimated at 2M shells pre-war which is believed to be nearing 3M. I think Rheinmetall is now up to 300k 155mm shells. The US about 800k, though I forget if that's total or given to Ukraine. France and Italy manufacture but in much smaller quantities
None of this is surprising, the Russians have believed even more than Napoleon that Arty is the Queen of Battle.
None of this is surprising, the Russians have believed even more than Napoleon that Arty is the Queen of Battle.
3
MolotovCocktail
2025 Mar 6, 10:16pm
MolotovCocktail
2025 Mar 6, 10:16pm
Eric Holder says
The Russians are winners despite all their problems. Vs the eloi can't - and more importantly won't - do shit about China.
The Russians can still wipe us out with the world's largest nuclear arsenal. That commands respect.
The Eloi are nothing but an albatross over our necks. Even more so than when the Cold War ended.
Just stop with the Ukey Nazi Fluffing, will ya?
It's pathetic.
So what's the point of this misalliance again?
The Russians are winners despite all their problems. Vs the eloi can't - and more importantly won't - do shit about China.
The Russians can still wipe us out with the world's largest nuclear arsenal. That commands respect.
The Eloi are nothing but an albatross over our necks. Even more so than when the Cold War ended.
Just stop with the Ukey Nazi Fluffing, will ya?
It's pathetic.
4
MolotovCocktail
2025 Mar 6, 10:20pm
MolotovCocktail
2025 Mar 6, 10:20pm
Eric Holder says
You fucking kidding me? Their missiles don't even work w/o US guidance systems, as the whole world just found out.
technologically advanced
You fucking kidding me? Their missiles don't even work w/o US guidance systems, as the whole world just found out.
5
RWSGFY
2025 May 9, 6:24pm
RWSGFY
2025 May 9, 6:24pm
How's that reverse Nixon going? Asking for a friend.
'Friends of steel' — Xi, Putin vow to strengthen cooperation ahead of Victory Day celebrations, slam US leadership.
Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping hailed their countries' relationship on May 8, vowing to increase cooperation in all areas, including military ties.
With this assumption in mind, I have two questions:
1) Did the original faustian bargain by Nixon play out good in long perspective? Apparently not since we're now on the verge of WWIII with PRC and these fucks are more powerful now than USSR ever was.
2) What is the value of having USSR on our side at the cost of much more economically powerful, technologically advanced and populous Europe? It can't be their tech - their tech is shit. It can't be their industrial capacity: their biggest tank manufacturer cranks out only 10-12 fresh tanks per month and they get fucking artillery shells from NoKo. It can't be their military - their military is going into battle against much smaller opponent on fucking donkeys and avance 40 miles in two years. Do you think then can put any significant pressure on China on the ground while we fight them in the Pacific while keeping pressure on the European side? With what? Their fleet is even bigger joke than their army, so they can't help us in the Pacific. So what's the point of this misalliance again?