patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,363,099 comments by 15,746 users - FuckTheMainstreamMedia, MolotovCocktail, Patrick, stereotomy online now
Comments 1 - 2 of 2 Search these comments
1
Ceffer
2025 Mar 6, 11:09pm
Ceffer
2025 Mar 6, 11:09pm
When you hear insiders in the group discussing they have a set of presumption knowledge base that a fresh listener can have a bit of trouble with so I had to infer. I wasn't entirely hip to the chat group's perspective.
I caught some of the stuff on neurolinguistic programming for influencers who imbed their scripts either tilting toward crediting or discrediting various editorial positions. The frisson between emotion and information/logic is a wedge that is constantly being played for steering. The neurolinguistic stuff is old school stuff from the day, kind of hand waving hippie dippie shit to influence weak minds with virtue signaling psych aspiration, but maybe that's the target.
I can see examples in many of the Telegram groups who may have a 'zone of agreement' especially on conservative matters but different groups will have a 'variant' position based on an variant editorial presumption that is insinuated into the themes. I see the 'shotgun antisemitic' stuff in some groups as being in a range of spread spectrum distraction i.e. mostly designed to create a universal villain while hiding or distracting from the multitude of main villains. They had a segment on the diffusion of the CCP in progressive influence shifters and they seemed to think those were well financed and distributed aka CCP is a primary villain, especially amongst the young and college aged.
I almost think we have the CCP to the left of us and Tavistock to the right of us, and there is a kind of convergence where they meet for the common goal of subverting the country, to creating various emotion related straw men. I can believe the CCP stuff because I can almost smell CCP fumes in California in the bizarre progressive brainwash. As in all things sectarian, there are also the Taiwanese Chinese who are vigorously anti-CCP because they know what they are up against.
Anyway, that's the segment I heard before they went into the weeds on Syria, I don't know if that is the one you referenced, but they did talk about the neurolinguistic stuff.
I caught some of the stuff on neurolinguistic programming for influencers who imbed their scripts either tilting toward crediting or discrediting various editorial positions. The frisson between emotion and information/logic is a wedge that is constantly being played for steering. The neurolinguistic stuff is old school stuff from the day, kind of hand waving hippie dippie shit to influence weak minds with virtue signaling psych aspiration, but maybe that's the target.
I can see examples in many of the Telegram groups who may have a 'zone of agreement' especially on conservative matters but different groups will have a 'variant' position based on an variant editorial presumption that is insinuated into the themes. I see the 'shotgun antisemitic' stuff in some groups as being in a range of spread spectrum distraction i.e. mostly designed to create a universal villain while hiding or distracting from the multitude of main villains. They had a segment on the diffusion of the CCP in progressive influence shifters and they seemed to think those were well financed and distributed aka CCP is a primary villain, especially amongst the young and college aged.
I almost think we have the CCP to the left of us and Tavistock to the right of us, and there is a kind of convergence where they meet for the common goal of subverting the country, to creating various emotion related straw men. I can believe the CCP stuff because I can almost smell CCP fumes in California in the bizarre progressive brainwash. As in all things sectarian, there are also the Taiwanese Chinese who are vigorously anti-CCP because they know what they are up against.
Anyway, that's the segment I heard before they went into the weeds on Syria, I don't know if that is the one you referenced, but they did talk about the neurolinguistic stuff.
2
TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter
2025 Mar 6, 11:13pm
TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter
2025 Mar 6, 11:13pm
Ceffer says
Yes. The part I heard was in the last hour.
Anyway, that's the segment I heard before they went into the weeds on Syria, I don't know if that is the one you referenced, but they did talk about the neurolinguistic stuff.
Yes. The part I heard was in the last hour.
https://x.com/i/spaces/1ZkKzYalqdqxv
Amazing breakdown sentence by sentence of influencers scripts and how they are trained.
Kind of like in "Dune" when the careful ear can tell which House intelligence agency trained the operative by use of phrases.