Comments 1 - 19 of 19 Search these comments
There should be no EBT. This automatically solves the soda problem.
The lesson here is that if "Influencers" will take a lousy $1000 to push EBT still applying to Coke...
...what else are they paid to promote?
If you can't get a Coke at Burger King, what are you gonna wash down your burger and fries with ??
RWSGFY says
There should be no EBT. This automatically solves the soda problem.
Yes, there should be rice/flour, beans/canned meat, and seasonal unsold veggies and fruit (fresh or canned) distributed. Milk and Cheese occasionally.
The rules should have been held to decades ago that you can only purchase basic food stuffs. No Soda, energy drinks, Chips, No Snacks, No High sugar cereals,etc.
If you’re curious how the influencer media pay-op works on the right, here’s a short explainer:
Coca Cola never actually writes a check to Ian Miles Cheong. First the Coke money is laundered to a libertarian or “pro capitalism” think tank as a “donation.”
Then a PR person for the think tank sent an email blast to all of these conservabro influencers with versions of the post to make.
No direct compensation is attached, but it maintains the implicit promise of future access and funds. So Ian can say he honestly never took a check from Coca Cola. Coca Cola can say they never paid a bunch of social media influencers to advocate for taxpayer-funded obesity.
And yet, thanks to the magic of middlemen, that’s exactly what happened.
Lord, we got folks in the street, ain't got nothin' to eat
And the obese milkin' welfare
Well, God, if you're five-foot-three and you're three-hundred pounds
Taxes ought not to pay for your bags of Fudge Rounds
The point of those EBT cards is to get poor people some nutrition. Drinking sugar syrup is the opposite of getting nutrition.
I have a Chinese friend who bought stock in both Coca-Cola and dialysis centers. His reasoning is that he wins on both ends: Coca-Cola causes obesity and kidney disease, and then those poisoned people need dialysis later. Evil reasoning, but not incorrect.
There are many billions of dollars at stake here, all derived from poisoning the public via sugar-water purchased with public money.
So the companies making the poison have started paying off "influencers" on X etc to claim that it's a violation of "freedom" somehow to restrict EBT cards so that they can't buy that poison. It's kind of sad to see them sell out.
Unspoken is the fact that EBT already limits what food you can buy with public money. I think it has to at least have a nutrition label on it to be eligible.
I'd never tell people what they can't buy with their own money, but preventing people from using public money to give themselves diabetes seems fine to me.
https://covidsteria.substack.com/p/fatsteria-best-big-soda-memes-beware-paid-influencers