▲
6
0
▼

EO coming on Big Pharma Manana


               
2025 May 11, 7:16pm   960 views  74 comments

by FreeAmericanDOP   follow (9)  

For many years the World has wondered why Prescription Drugs and Pharmaceuticals in the United States States of America were SO MUCH HIGHER IN PRICE THAN THEY WERE IN ANY OTHER NATION, SOMETIMES BEING FIVE TO TEN TIMES MORE EXPENSIVE THAN THE SAME DRUG, MANUFACTURED IN THE EXACT SAME LABORATORY OR PLANT, BY THE SAME COMPANY??? It was always difficult to explain and very embarrassing because, in fact, there was no correct or rightful answer. The Pharmaceutical/Drug Companies would say, for years, that it was Research and Development Costs, and that all of these costs were, and would be, for no reason whatsoever, borne by the “suckers” of America, ALONE. Campaign Contributions can do wonders, but not with me, and not with the Republican Party. We are going to do the right thing, something that the Democrats have fought for many years. Therefore, I am pleased to announce that Tomorrow morning, in the White House, at 9:00 A.M., I will be signing one of the most consequential Executive Orders in our Country’s history. Prescription Drug and Pharmaceutical prices will be REDUCED, almost immediately, by 30% to 80%. They will rise throughout the World in order to equalize and, for the first time in many years, bring FAIRNESS TO AMERICA! I will be instituting a MOST FAVORED NATION’S POLICY whereby the United States will pay the same price as the Nation that pays the lowest price anywhere in the World. Our Country will finally be treated fairly, and our citizens Healthcare Costs will be reduced by numbers never even thought of before. Additionally, on top of everything else, the United States will save TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS. Thank you for your attention to this matter. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/114491534347862682

« First        Comments 36 - 74 of 74        Search these comments

36   Eric_Holder   2025 May 12, 2:14pm  

AmericanKulak says


Medicare is forbidden from negotiating on almost all drugs prices despite being one, if not the, largest volume drug buyer on the planet.


This only means that the US government does not impose price controls on drugs.

AmericanKulak says


Who supports those laws?


I don't know. But they are imposed by the government.
37   yawaraf   2025 May 12, 2:18pm  

You believe the premise that the prices are determined in a free market and not by a cartel. You also hold the premise that manufacturers might be content to sell to countries that impose price controls.

We can now test these premises. If the first is true, then manufacturers who are already content to sell at the French price would be content to sell to Americans at the French price.

If the second is true, then all we need to do is dictate the price and companies will happily comply.

If the US is richer as you say, that means the US should be able to buy more and better shit, not pay higher prices for the same shit that poor folks buy.
38   Eric_Holder   2025 May 12, 2:24pm  

yawaraf says


You also hold the premise that manufacturers might be content to sell to countries that impose price controls.


They don't? If this is true this means that the only reason for lower prices in other countries is their markets' inability to bear higher prices. But then there is Switzerland where the prices for the same drugs is lower (allegedly, I didn't verify this claim).
39   yawaraf   2025 May 12, 2:26pm  

Eric Holder says

They don't?

Please clarify your question.
40   Eric_Holder   2025 May 12, 2:27pm  

yawaraf says


You believe the premise that the prices are determined in a free market and not by a cartel.


I do? I don't remember making this claim. OK, supposedly there is a cartel setting prices in all countries all over the world. Why in the name of fuck would it set prices lower in other countries if government price controls is not a thing and the ability of the market to bear certain price doesn't matter? Isn't the purpose of cartel to maximize profits?
41   Eric_Holder   2025 May 12, 2:28pm  

yawaraf says

Eric Holder says


They don't?

Please clarify your question.


Is the claim essentially that price controls in other countries do not exist because if they did exist the farma companies would not be "content" to sell their drugs there and therefore would not sell?
42   Eric_Holder   2025 May 12, 2:30pm  

yawaraf says

If the first is true, then manufacturers who are already content to sell at the French price would be content to sell to Americans at the French price.


Why would be they content to leave money on the table? They can be forced into it, but this is called price controls.
43   Eric_Holder   2025 May 12, 2:33pm  

yawaraf says

If the second is true, then all we need to do is dictate the price and companies will happily comply.


Comply? Yes. Happily? No. But this is the nature of government action - like it or not they have the means to make you comply.
44   yawaraf   2025 May 12, 2:33pm  

Eric Holder says

yawaraf says

You believe the premise that the prices are determined in a free market

Eric Holder says

I do? I don't remember making this claim

Eric Holder says

I think they are getting charged what market can bea

Eric Holder says

My only explanation is either the market in the other country can't bear higher prices or the government there imposes some kind of price controls.
45   Eric_Holder   2025 May 12, 2:34pm  

yawaraf says


If the US is richer as you say, that means the US should be able to buy more and better shit, not pay higher prices for the same shit that poor folks buy.


This is not how market works absent price contols. If I hold the IP on some product I'll be setting price to maximize my profit, not improve your feelings. Until my patent expires, that is.
46   yawaraf   2025 May 12, 2:35pm  

Eric Holder says

They can be forced into it, but this is called price controls.

If the France imposes prices controls, how is the company forced to sell in that country? Why doesn't it restrict its business to countries without price controls?
47   Eric_Holder   2025 May 12, 2:40pm  

yawaraf says

Eric Holder says


They can be forced into it, but this is called price controls.

If the France imposes prices controls, how is the company forced to sell in that country? Why doesn't it restrict its business to countries without price controls?


Because it decides that it is still worth it. If selling a doze of drug X for $1000 in the US and a doze of the same drug for price-controlled $400 in FR beats just selling one doze of drug X for $1000 in the US, because $1400 > $1000, duh. Provided, of course, that $400 is still profitable enough. They are in the business of maximizing profits, not making political stands.
48   yawaraf   2025 May 12, 2:43pm  

Eric Holder says

yawaraf says



If the US is richer as you say, that means the US should be able to buy more and better shit, not pay higher prices for the same shit that poor folks buy.


This is not how market works absent price contols. If I hold the IP on some product I'll be setting price to maximize my profit, not improve your feelings. Until my patent expires, that is.

If it were a free market, then an American pharmacy, should be able to purchase the drugs at list prices in the low-price region and move them to the high-price region and sell at retail at a reasonable mark-up.

Where am I wrong in my analysis?
49   yawaraf   2025 May 12, 2:48pm  

Eric Holder says

yawaraf says
Eric Holder says

They can be forced into it, but this is called price controls.
If the France imposes prices controls, how is the company forced to sell in that country? Why doesn't it restrict its business to countries without price controls?

Because it decides that it is still worth it.

Do you still maintain that the company is forced into selling at a the lower price? It seems that you're now making the argument that the company decided it's a good business decision to sell at the French price.
50   RWSGFY   2025 May 12, 2:50pm  

yawaraf says

Eric Holder says


yawaraf says




If the US is richer as you say, that means the US should be able to buy more and better shit, not pay higher prices for the same shit that poor folks buy.


This is not how market works absent price contols. If I hold the IP on some product I'll be setting price to maximize my profit, not improve your feelings. Until my patent expires, that is.


If it were a free market, then an American pharmacy, should be able to purchase the drugs at list prices in the low-price region and move them to the high-price region and sell at retail at a reasonable mark-up.

Where am I wrong in my analysis?


In the part where the company prohibits re-export of its product. It does not go against free market. Products re-exported despite such prohibitions are called grey market exports and they do exist. I once bought a grey market camera.
51   yawaraf   2025 May 12, 2:54pm  

RWSGFY says

the company prohibits re-export of its product. It does not go against free market.

We will agree to disagree. I do not believe that such agreements are compatible with a free market.
52   RWSGFY   2025 May 12, 3:07pm  

yawaraf says

RWSGFY says


the company prohibits re-export of its product. It does not go against free market.

We will agree to disagree. I do not believe that such agreements are compatible with a free market.


In a free market companies are free to set their relationships with their dealers or re-sellers as they deem necessary. If the condition of being a Porsche dealer in the US is to not sell cars to be exported as new, Porsche is in its right to set such condition. Hiw exactly is it going against free markets? It's not imposed by the government and nobody forces you to be a Porsche dealer if you don't like this condition. Ferrary dealers in the US are not allowed to sell new Ferraris cars to people who don't already own a Ferrari (SUVs excluded). Don't like it - sell KIAs. Same with drugs. There is nothing special about drugs.
53   yawaraf   2025 May 12, 3:21pm  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_market


In economics, a free market is an economic system in which the prices of goods and services are determined by supply and demand expressed by sellers and buyers. Such markets, as modeled, operate without the intervention of government or any other external authority


I believe that in a free market the negotiation happens primarily around price, the features of the product, lead time, service, and other factors related directly to the product or service. To me is seems that geographical restrictions that have no relationship to the product (such as the ability to service) are characteristic of cartels.

In this case the drug makers want to prevent buyers in the United States from paying the same low prices that they profitably accept from other countries.
54   MolotovCocktail   2025 May 12, 5:56pm  

stereotomy says


Where are the Bernie fluffers? They should be having a commie-cunt love-in at this news.


Ro Khanna came forward:


56   Patrick   2025 May 12, 6:48pm  

What self-serving bullshit.

"Rather than just issuing a press release"? An EO is much more than a press release already.

And why did Bernie not introduce that legislation already? Why did he wait until Trump actually acted?
57   FreeAmericanDOP   2025 May 12, 7:04pm  

Eric Holder says


This only means that the US government does not impose price controls on drugs.

No way.

When First Street Bank of Atlanta orders a pallet of copier paper for their headquarters from Athens Paper Supply, they are not paying the retail price for 100 sheets as a rando walking into OfficeDepot.
58   Misc   2025 May 13, 2:52am  

The government has given the drug companies a monopoly by issuing them patents.

Under most other circumstances monopoles are regulated by the government to avoid this extract same thing -- price gouging.
59   WookieMan   2025 May 13, 5:20am  

Don't take anything. Problem solved. Outside of rare things you don't need OTC or big pharma drugs. You don't even need doctors. They fuck up more than a gas station clerk. ER docs will save you, everyone else is paid to maim you for years to make money. Docs are not honest. Plain and simple. Oh I've seen this we'll give you some ABC drug thinking you're a fucking idiot. Most are and get hooked on the pills that get the docs vacations and bonuses.

Wife does the same thing, but it benefits people, not hurts them. Once you know the game you know it. Most here don't know the game or have experienced it. Trust me I've been on those 56' boat rides with clients and bar hopped. St. Thomas/John paying for meals. With Big Pharma it injures people. You've all driven on roads my wife's product was used on from the sales people in your area, 100%. Key is it didn't hurt you and saved money.

Realtor lobby and Pharma lobby are the worst by a long shot. AG gets some bones thrown their way, but they have a product people need to survive and stay alive.
61   FreeAmericanDOP   2025 May 13, 11:29am  

Republicans at the local level: "I can't believe with 200 buses, our school district was paying full price to Dealership as if each bus was individually owned and they walked in off the street! $5000 to replace a battery on a diesel! Taxpayer Rights! Taxpayer Revolt! "

Republicans at National level: "What's wrong with Medicare paying full retail price for pills they buy annually in the billions?"
62   HeadSet   2025 May 13, 6:51pm  

AmericanKulak says


Republicans at National level: "What's wrong with Medicare paying [my donors] full retail price for pills they buy annually in the billions?"

Fixed it for you.
63   RWSGFY   2025 May 13, 7:12pm  

Misc says


The government has given the drug companies a monopoly by issuing them patents.

Under most other circumstances monopoles are regulated by the government to avoid this extract same thing -- price gouging.


So, in addition to price controls, we now clamoring for IP not being protected? Interesting. Looks like patnet went full Bernie retard, lol.

I'm old enough to remember how Kamala's proposal to regulate food prices was met with a scorn here. 🤡

PS. And no, patents are not "monopoly", because they do not monopolize an existing market but create new.
64   Misc   2025 May 13, 7:36pm  

RWSGFY says


PS. And no, patents are not "monopoly", because they do not monopolize an existing market but create new.


Of course it is a monopoly. Just think what would happen if the force of government wasn't there to enforce patent laws.
65   RWSGFY   2025 May 13, 7:50pm  

Misc says


RWSGFY says


PS. And no, patents are not "monopoly", because they do not monopolize an existing market but create new.


Of course it is a monopoly. Just think what would happen if the force of government wasn't there to enforce patent laws.



Without patents we'd have much less progress and would live more primitive lives. Countries which don't enforce patents create no meaningful IP. And I've already explained why patents don't create harmful monopolies like when cartel corners an existing market. Prior to Viagra invention the market for ED medicine was limited to maybe Chinese ginseng potions. Viagra did not deprive anyone of anything but gave people willing to pay more additional option. In case of classic monopoly somebody would buy up all ginseng and make everybody pay more for it, adding no benefits for anybody. And in case of no
patents nobody would even fucking bother to invest in costly drug development.

Of course people like Bernie and AOC always pull the "human right" card, but where that human right to a stiff erection was before Pfizer invented Viagra? Did they create that right along with the drug?
66   Misc   2025 May 13, 8:06pm  

Exactly right as far as IP goes (that's why we have patent protections), but when Americans are paying 4 times what other countries are paying. It is price gouging pure and simple and taking advantage of the monopoly a patent produces. Along with plenty of bribes to Congress critters.
67   Misc   2025 May 13, 8:08pm  

RWSGFY says

I'm old enough to remember how Kamala's proposal to regulate food prices was met with a scorn here.


Americans were not paying 4 times what other countries pay for food.
68   RWSGFY   2025 May 13, 8:09pm  

Misc says


Exactly right as far as IP goes (that's why we have patent protections), but when Americans are paying 4 times what other countries are paying. It is price gouging pure and simple and taking advantage of the monopoly a patent produces. Along with plenty of bribes to Congress critters.


No, it's market or price controls. The patent is enforced in France the same as in the US. You can't legally sell counterfeit drugs there.
69   Misc   2025 May 13, 8:12pm  

We will see how the pricing changes both here in the States and internationally over the next few months.
70   Misc   2025 May 13, 8:15pm  

RWSGFY says

No, it's market or price controls. The patent is enforced in France the same as in the US. You can't legally sell counterfeit drugs there


You can hold your breath and scream, but it's price gouging using America's system against itself.
71   RWSGFY   2025 May 13, 8:17pm  

Misc says


We will see how the pricing changes both here in the States and internationally over the next few months.


How can they not change if government rolls out price controls? Socialism works in its own way. The long-term effects are usually not great though.
72   MolotovCocktail   2025 May 14, 8:36am  

RWSGFY says

. And no, patents are not "monopoly", because they do not monopolize an existing market but create new


Monopoly is a monopoly, period. And yes, patents are monopolies.

The problem isn't the patents, it's government meddling in health care so much that there is no free market for it. That includes other countries.
74   Patrick   2025 Aug 5, 9:30pm  

I smell BS. Trump's chief of staff, Susie Wiles, is a long-time pharma lobbyist.

Nothing is going to happen.

« First        Comments 36 - 74 of 74        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste