« First « Previous Comments 346 - 385 of 422 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://x.com/TonySeruga/status/1932460364731699532
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/la-protests-response-approval-rating-b2767215.html
Americans are not backing the Los Angeles protests with only a third taking the side of those standing up against the ICE deportation raids, a new poll finds.
Around one in three Americans (36 percent) said they approve of the protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement, compared to 45 percent who disapprove, a YouGov poll of more than 4,200 U.S. adults found. Of those polled, 19 percent said they were not sure.
yeah Patrick, these AntiFa riots are meant to be extortion like mafia-style extortion to scare people into complying
in this case its not about paying protection money
its about AntiFa scaring the independent voters into not supporting Trump's policies
AD says
yeah Patrick, these AntiFa riots are meant to be extortion like mafia-style extortion to scare people into complying
in this case its not about paying protection money
its about AntiFa scaring the independent voters into not supporting Trump's policies
These riots are happening in blue cities. Don't see this shit going on in Cheyenne or even Boise, do you?
It's not even happening in the Bay Area.
All libs. No 'independent' voters. Certainly not enough of them to make much a difference in 2026 or 2028.
Its to influence the independent voters in swing states like Nevada and Arizona which went for Trump, which you already knew this







Why the f would they be allowed to come back in?
Guest workers like the successful program we had before, is my guess.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bracero_Program
https://rumble.com/v6up1kv-jesuits-caught-on-camera-actively-fomenting-the-protests-in-los-angeles.html
1) Over 100,000 illegal aliens (not undocumented bullshit) have been deported.
I would have figured him for an Episcopagan or Unitarian Universal Socialist
Since these riots are being funded, and aren’t grassroots efforts, shouldn’t the business and individuals harmed by these riots be able to sue the organizations funding the rioters? The victims of rioters probably would never have been harmed without these organizations funding and escalating the violent riots.
To get to millions, we must pass the BBB,

https://x.com/TheStormRedux/status/1932540904507908304
In our country, the Democratic Party has been waging jihad against order, liberty, truth, and decency. You can tell it’s jihad because it’s irrational, frankly, insane. Americans are asked to submit to propositions that will destroy the country and its traditions, and they have had enough of the hustles aimed at that outcome.
Too many of us do not believe that uncontrolled illegal immigration is okay, that government should replace the family, that all journeys in life can be equally favorable, that men can become women by wishing it, that our history must be erased, that censorship is required to keep the jihad going, and that the punishment against citizens will continue until morale improves.
That is the program of the American left and lately of the Democratic Party it has taken over. They demonstrate it by their deeds. The Party represents a dwindling cohort of the populace, but its forces have already marched through and captured many institutions crucial to our national life. The opposing force, loosely called Populism, will not submit to that program, is now actively putting a stop to as much of it as possible, shaking out those institutions.
The Left and the Democrats have lost a lot of ground in recent months, especially their control on the levers of power. And since power is really all they care about — the power to make everybody else submit — they are growing desperate, seeking to induce as much chaos across the land as they can possibly generate. Hence, the outbreaks of civil disorder in the cities, using illegal immigrants as one set of shock troops and mentally-ill youth as another phalanx.
The object of the chaos is to provoke the Populist opposition to exert its authority to control that chaos, and therefore — in the insane reasoning of the leftists — to prove that authority itself is an intolerable wickedness. This is only possible, of course, in minds that do not comprehend boundaries, differences between right and wrong, up and down, inside and outside, reality and fantasy. That is the mentality that drives itself toward chaos. So, it remains for the Populists to demonstrate that authority is not innately wicked, that it can have a beneficent purpose in the scheme of civilized humanity. Order is not necessarily tyranny.
The other once-great nations of Western Civ — Britain, Germany, France — slump towards collapse, having already submitted to the EU, run by an unelected, dictatorial, bureaucracy, under the occult influence of megalomaniacs such as Bill Gates and the Soros family. The newly-arrived hordes of Islamic immigrants in these countries demand submission of the Europeans, and the Europeans have so far failed to resist. But an inflection point draws near, and the latent ferocity of the indigenous population has yet to express itself. It may be too late to avert some kind of violent civil conflict across the continent. Governments will surely fall. Mighty empires die of old age and are conquered, alas.
The idea that the American Southwest was “stolen” from Mexico is repeated so often that people begin to mistake it for actual history.
This is no accident. In the modern West, history is not remembered but weaponized, its meaning distorted to serve the political agenda of the ruling class.
The “stolen land” narrative has become one of the primary talking points used to justify the demographic invasion we are watching unfold today. It is now framed as a righteous Reconquista, as if the land were simply returning to its original owners. This fairytale is used to excuse mass migration and population replacement, repackaged as a form of bizarre and ultimately false “historical justice.” But none of it holds up to serious scrutiny. Not historically. Not politically. Not civilizationally.
California was never Mexican in any serious civilizational or national sense. It was a colonial holding of the Spanish Empire, part of a vast imperial project directed from Madrid. The Spanish established a few missions, forts, and coastal towns in the late 1700s, but the region remained thinly settled, dominated by Native tribes, and loosely administered by a handful of priests and military officers. When Mexico declared independence in 1821, it inherited California the way a squatter inherits a crumbling estate—by default, not by right, and without the capacity to develop or defend it.
From 1821 to 1846, Mexico held Alta California for just twenty-five years. During that time, it did little to develop, populate, or secure the region. The Californios, Mexican elites of largely Spanish and European descent, were granted large tracts of land and operated ranching estates that were politically and culturally disconnected from Mexico City. Governance was weak, local uprisings were common, and Anglo-American settlers were invited through generous land grants, bringing with them the civilizing order that Mexico had failed to establish. Their numbers grew quickly, along with ethnocultural and political tensions that the Mexican state was unable to manage. Its response was sporadic at best. It lacked both the will and the capacity to assert meaningful control over the northern frontier.
Meanwhile, the Mexican state was collapsing. The 1830s and 1840s were marked by coups, civil wars, and widespread banditry. Mexico lost Texas after mismanaging the Anglo settlements it had invited to serve as a buffer against Comanche raids. The conflict came to a head in a series of bloody confrontations, including the defense of the Alamo, where a small band of American settlers and volunteers were killed resisting Mexican forces. Though a defeat, it became a rallying cry for Texan independence. By 1846, war erupted not because the United States sought arbitrary expansion, but because Mexican troops crossed the Rio Grande and attacked American forces in territory already claimed and settled by the United States.
The U.S. military responded decisively. American forces invaded Mexico, secured the entire northern frontier, occupied New Mexico and California, and eventually marched to the capital, seizing Mexico City. The war concluded with the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848. Mexico ceded nearly half its territory, most of which it had barely governed, and received fifteen million dollars in compensation, a literal fortune at the time. That was not “theft,” but rather conquest followed by diplomacy.
Since then, California has been part of the United States for over 175 years, nearly ten times longer than it was part of an independent Mexico. It has been settled, built, governed, and defended by Americans. Every road, dam, rail, law, institution, and city that makes it livable was built by us, not by Mexico. The idea that modern Mexicans have some ancestral or civilizational claim to California is laughable. Their ancestors did not turn San Francisco, Los Angeles, or San Diego into thriving, modern cities. They inherited a handful of Spanish missions and allowed them to rot. It was American engineers, Irish laborers, and Midwestern farmers who transformed the region into a functioning civilization.
And yet today, Mexican nationalists, “Chicano” activists, and globalist ideologues reframe mass migration as a justified Reconquista. They welcome the demographic flooding of the Southwest and celebrate it as a righteous act of “historical justice,” as if the dissolution of a nation were some noble moral reckoning. They claim the land belongs to them, that history grants them the right to reclaim territory not through war, but through numbers, dependency, and subversion.
This is not the natural occurrence of organic migration. It is a deliberate act of colonization, in which Mexico offloads its poorest and most unstable citizens, and the elites in the United States embrace the process as a tool of demographic warfare. These are the types who seek to replace a self-governing White citizenry with a more pliable, servile population—a population easier to manage, less likely to rebel, and more willing to trade freedom for comfort. By flooding the country with foreign masses, they dilute the ethnocultural and political cohesion necessary for resistance, ensuring that real power remains concentrated in the hands of an unaccountable managerial class.
In short, it is colonization in reverse, the very thing they falsely accuse Americans of doing. The irony is that this new servile class depends entirely on the infrastructure, wealth, and legal order of the very civilization they claim was illegitimate. They do not come to resurrect some golden “Aztlan” or Aztec-Mexican homeland. They come to inhabit the ruins of what Americans built. After all, access to White people is now considered a human right. They come to benefit from it temporarily, and to reduce it slowly and inevitably into the same dysfunction they left behind.
Let us be clear. No part of America belongs to Mexico, not historically, not civilizationally, and not demographically. The longer we indulge this delusion, and the longer we remain paralyzed by guilt, historical ignorance, or false moralism, the harder the reckoning will be.
A nation that cannot defend its border cannot defend its future. And a people that forgets why it conquered in the first place will be conquered in return.
Florida Sheriff's Ominous Warning to Rioters: 'Kill You Graveyard Dead'
« First « Previous Comments 346 - 385 of 422 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://x.com/iAnonPatriot/status/1931336353238638770