Comments 1 - 15 of 15 Search these comments
In a political realignment that would have been unthinkable just a few years ago, immigrants to the United States are now siding with Republicans over Democrats on the issue of immigration.
A seismic 49-point swing reflects a growing backlash to progressive border policies.
The fist was revealed in data from the American National Election Studies (ANES).
ANES is widely considered the gold standard of election surveys.
According to the data, voters born outside the U.S. supported Democrats over Republicans on immigration by a massive 58%-24% margin in 2020.
But in the 2024 election cycle, that gap flipped dramatically, with 45% of immigrant voters saying the GOP would better handle immigration, compared to just 30% who favored Democrats.
This reversal represents one of the largest issue-based voter shifts in modern political history.
However, it’s not coming from the traditional Republican base, but from the very group the Left claims to represent: immigrants themselves.

Curioso cómo los "tiburones" dan más miedo desde tu cómoda oficinita—segura, con aire acondicionado y financiada totalmente sacando el 4% de los cheques de los trabajadores que de verdad se rompen la espalda en Moorpark y Oxnard. Interesante cómo tus "ojos en el terreno" siempre son los de alguien más, mientras tú valientemente tuiteas desde atrás de un escritorio, pagando por vistas para que mágicamente siempre tengas exactamente 5 mil lecturas. Debe sentirse bien ganar dinero sembrando pánico. PATÉTICO.
Curious how the "sharks" seem scarier from your cozy little office—safe, air-conditioned, and fully funded by skimming 4% off the paychecks of workers who actually break their backs in Moorpark and Oxnard. Interesting how your "eyes on the ground" are always someone else’s, while you bravely tweet from behind a desk, paying for views to magically always hit exactly 5,000 reads. Must feel good making money by sowing panic. PATHETIC.
Across the West the open border left pushes the narrative that we need immigrants to fill labor shortages.
This is false. Obviously false once you work through it.
For starters, there's a world of difference between legal immigrants. Who may vote socialist but at least commit very little crime, start businesses, and tend to move up the economic ladder.
Versus illegal immigrants, who by definition wouldn't have passed our already generous immigration standards.
Illegals commit crime more than natives. More than half go on welfare. And when they do work they undercut native blue-collar and low-skill workers.
Meaning they effectively give us two welfare cases -- their own plus the native born worker who can't get a job.
Indeed, there's reports of low-skill Americans being denied jobs because they don't speak Spanish. As in, they can't communicate with the migrants.
This wouldn’t be tolerated in any country — including the origin countries of illegals. ...
So Americans cannot get a doctor's appointment. Or find a speech pathologist for their child. A veterinarian costs an arm and a leg.
But by gum gardeners are cheap.
Of course, this is why big business likes open borders: They get dirt-cheap unskilled workers. The rest of us have to deal with the new skilled labor shortages.
Meanwhile, of course, blue-collar Americans -- and even blue-collar legal immigrants -- either can't find a job or face minimum wage for back-breaking work.
Incidentally, this is also why high-skilled migrants are an economic benefit: Engineers and doctors get cheap and plentiful, then drive up demand for blue-collars when they go to the grocery store or get a haircut.
In other words, high-skilled migration helps the working class.
Low-skill migration guts the working class. ...
The labor shortage fallacy has been one of open borders’ most successful arguments.
But outside the very highest skilled migrants it is false -- we'd be better off with almost zero immigration.
Instead focusing on Americans. Improving education by replacing government schools. Ending welfare for the able-bodied so they can get on the first rung of the ladder. Making it easier for Americans to create jobs in the first place.
Final point, this isn’t just true for America, it’s true for any rich country, from Canada to France to Japan. High quality migrants are helpful — at least economically. But mass migration is pure cost.
i’m disappointed in Trump backing off
I love the opportunities that have been afforded to us by what I like to call the Trump Intervention. We are in the midst of a Nationalist/Populist revolution to save Western Civilization. The Trump Intervention has nothing to do with Trump the person and everything to do with Trump the anti-establishment symbol. A man with a loud megaphone came along at the right time and fell into a necessary revolution.
But things are going badly.
The MRNA Bioweapon has not been removed from the market and there has been no justice for the COVID Democide. Big Pharma and the biopharmaceutical/military industrial complex are winning. The people are still being maimed and murdered. ...
President Trump has decided to surrender to the desires of the big money bosses from agri-business, hospitality, and big-food, and has thus allowed these corporations to maintain their slave labor systems via illegal immigration from third-world countries. Trump has broken his promise to end all illegal immigration. ...
Trump is surrendering the revolution to the Establishment.
We may need a new revolutionary commander.
Need to be deporting at least 10k a day to make a dent and at least 25-30k a day to get most of them out of here. Trump gives in to much and Republicans are worthless.
There is no "shortage of workers" ever. There is only a shortage of Americans willing to work for the low wages that criminal aliens will accept.
Trump is betraying his base by letting business owners continue to fuck American workers and drive down their wages with illegal competition so that bosses can make more money at the expense of the poorest US citizens.