2
1

Bombs Away


               
2025 Jun 21, 4:56pm   2,161 views  150 comments

by TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter   follow (9)  




https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114724035571020048

Sub-optimally, we did it, since there is nothing that can really carry bombs big enough in the IDF inventory.

Khameni vanished and neither he or his delegates were no shows the last negotiation offer by Trump in the past hours.

Should have taken the deal! It was the best deal.

Got rid of Iran's nuclear bomb development program (60% enriched uranium in the 100s of pounds can be for nothing BUT nuclear weapons)

Now it's time for peace - Peace through Strength. Not endlessly crossed redlines or negotiations to nowhere like Obama-Biden.

« First        Comments 41 - 80 of 150       Last »     Search these comments

41   FortWayneHatesRealtors   2025 Jun 22, 8:44am  

TPB:

We have been for years saying they are weeks away from Nukes.

we funded wars against them and covert action. Stuxnet operation was one, blew up some of their guys in 2020, funded terrorists who shot missiles at Iran.

point is, out of nowhere our government every time starts ratcheting up war propaganda… and now we have new bad guy we must kill or else under false pretenses. Trump doesn’t even bother convincing us… he just unilateral actions. this isn’t our first Rodeo. All meanwhile middle class shrinks and rich become richer.
42   mell   2025 Jun 22, 8:49am  

Tenpoundbass says

mell says


since we were kids Iran gets bombed every 10 years or so with the same spiel every time


Bull Shit! Shit Stain McCain and the other war hawks, used Iran as an excuse to bomb everywhere in the middle east but Iran.
The same old canard was trotted out, "Oh don't bomb Iran, or if you do, WWIII will break out." So we bombed their proxies instead.
It was this cozy arrangement that Shit Stain McCain pivoted the Cold War military spending, to using small Middle East countries as our proxy war spending bitch.

Iran needed a good bombing since Carter and Reagan, they have only grown stronger through the strength projection from our GOP war hawks bestowed on them. Had we taken them down a notch or two decades ago, 90% of all of the other Middle east conflicts would have never happened.

Sure, but once again the US removed secular regimes on.a regular basis only to go to war with the new regime later. Also if Iran were a serious threat to their neighbors who helped Israel in this conflict then they can and surely would deal with it together. Doesn't look like they are terribly worried at this point.
43   TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter   2025 Jun 22, 10:25am  

Tenpoundbass says


Bull Shit! Shit Stain McCain and the other war hawks, used Iran as an excuse to bomb everywhere in the middle east but Iran.
The same old canard was trotted out, "Oh don't bomb Iran, or if you do, WWIII will break out." So we bombed their proxies instead.
It was this cozy arrangement that Shit Stain McCain pivoted the Cold War military spending, to using small Middle East countries as our proxy war spending bitch.

This. Whackamole on the proxies was waste of time and money and resources, which it was intended to be, as it never solved anything but used up expensive munitions.

Also the endless negotiations that went nowhere.
44   RayAmerica   2025 Jun 22, 10:29am  

Benjamin Netanyahu's 33 years of Iran nuclear warnings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mzmtdwsef8s
45   TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter   2025 Jun 22, 10:30am  

RayAmerica says

Benjamin Netanyahu's 33 years of Iran nuclear warnings

Don't forget the 13 KNOWN acts of Sabotage, most prominently Stuxnet that broke all their centrifuges.
46   TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter   2025 Jun 22, 10:31am  

RayAmerica says

Benjamin Netanyahu's 33 years of Iran nuclear warnings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mzmtdwsef8s

What was the non-weapon purpose of 100kgs of 60% enriched uranium?

Iran fluffers dodge this constantly.
47   RayAmerica   2025 Jun 22, 10:50am  

Name a single Middle East war or regime change conducted by the USA in the past 30 years that turned out well. Just one.

Iraq? Gulf War? Huge military operation that accomplished nothing.

Post 9/11 Iraq War based on WMDs? Complete disaster ... country is now worse off than it was under Saddam.

Afghanistan? Complete disaster. After 20 years, the Taliban won.

Libya? Another disaster. Country is now run by terrorists.

Syria? More disaster. Coup orchestrated by Israel & USA. Country is now run by terrorists.

Egypt? Mubarak removed from power ... country taken over by the Muslim Brotherhood.

Yemen? How has that one worked out so far?
48   RayAmerica   2025 Jun 22, 10:52am  

When can we expect to read that Kulak has officially volunteered to serve in the IDF in order to really, really 'BLESS ISRAEL?'

I wouldn't want to think that he is nothing other than a Keyboard Warrior that will not put his firmly held 'beliefs' into action ...
49   Maga_Chaos_Monkey   2025 Jun 22, 10:57am  

AmericanKulakMaximumTrumper says

What was the non-weapon purpose of 100kgs of 60% enriched uranium?


I wonder where that is at right now.
50   RayAmerica   2025 Jun 22, 10:59am  

Iran Parliament votes to back Hormuz closure, top security body must make the final decision

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTvf790RWN0
51   TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter   2025 Jun 22, 11:02am  

AmericanKulakMaximumTrumper says


What was the non-weapon purpose of 100kgs of 60% enriched uranium?

Iran fluffers dodge this constantly.

Still dodged.

RayAmerica says


When can we expect to read that Kulak has officially volunteered to serve in the IDF in order to really, really 'BLESS ISRAEL?'

I wouldn't want to think that he is nothing other than a Keyboard Warrior that will not put his firmly held 'beliefs' into action .

Ah, the Handmaids Tale for the WokeRight.


52   TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter   2025 Jun 22, 11:06am  

Maga_Chaos_Monkey says


I wonder where that is at right now.




"Meiguoren no find enriched uranium? Maybe Trump big Liar, heh heh heh"

"Hey, Xi said they never found the uranium, guess ZionDon lied again. Buy my buttcoin and subscribe to my newsletter, buy me a coffee"
53   RayAmerica   2025 Jun 22, 11:08am  

Clever response Kulak.

But, WHEN are you joining the IDF in order to fight for your beloved 'blessed' Israel? They are looking for non-Israeli volunteers. What are you waiting for?

Can you even begin to imagine the 'blessings' that await you for 'blessing' your idol secular Zionist State?
54   RayAmerica   2025 Jun 22, 11:10am  

33 YEARS of Lies by Bibi Netanyahu ... in his own words:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mzmtdwsef8s
55   TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter   2025 Jun 22, 11:10am  

And that's what it's all about:

"FIDDLESTICKS, Iran can't nuke IsraHELL now! Nevermind America, Israel Last!"
56   RayAmerica   2025 Jun 22, 11:19am  

Duh .... Iran couldn't 'nuke Israel' prior to last night, and it's downright laughable that you would think that Iran could have successfully "nuked" America.

I know this is way over your head, but this is nothing other than another attempt at Middle East regime change. How well did all those others work out Kulak? Care to comment???
57   TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter   2025 Jun 22, 11:25am  

RayAmerica says

I know this is way over your head, but this is nothing other than another attempt at Middle East regime change. How well did all those others work out Kulak? Care to comment???

No answers until I get an explanation why 100s of kgs of 60% uranium enrichment was for.
59   Ceffer   2025 Jun 22, 11:27am  

The absurdities of 'international calculus'. Trump 'gave Israel what it wanted'. Now, Iran will have to take it out on Israel. The proxy got proxied.

60   Ceffer   2025 Jun 22, 11:32am  

Mistaken identity again in the fogs of bullshit. The bunker busters would ruffle dirt, but the damages would all be underground.



61   Maga_Chaos_Monkey   2025 Jun 22, 11:33am  

AmericanKulakMaximumTrumper says

"Meiguoren no find enriched uranium? Maybe Trump big Liar, heh heh heh"


I heard something about that visit from China. Plausible.
62   Ceffer   2025 Jun 22, 11:34am  

Make of it what you will. Not even rototilled on the surface. A bunch of dirt jumped then fell again? Interesting weapons.





63   Ceffer   2025 Jun 22, 11:39am  

Well, if the Economist toilet paper City of London rag says so. The world became a stranger place when all credibility was abandoned for short term gains or demon contempt spewing bravura.

64   Maga_Chaos_Monkey   2025 Jun 22, 11:41am  

Ceffer says

Make of it what you will. Not even rototilled on the surface. A bunch of dirt jumped then fell again? Interesting weapons.


If you look closely that gray has a light shade of blue. The Iranians put it out with crop dusters when they detected the bombers. To protect them from ground penetrating DEW weapons that were required to soften things up before the bombs.
65   TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter   2025 Jun 22, 11:45am  

Voting for gay race communism and an open border because of some targeted strikes halfway across the world (which Trump had always supported) - this is just narcissism. "Me me me. Don't forget about me."
66   Patrick   2025 Jun 22, 12:12pm  

RayAmerica says

Name a single Middle East war or regime change conducted by the USA in the past 30 years that turned out well.


All of them were resounding successes for Lockheed Martin and Raytheon.
67   RayAmerica   2025 Jun 22, 3:18pm  

Russian leader claims multiple nations are ‘ready to directly supply Iran’ with nuclear weapons following U.S. attack

Russian leader Dmitry Medvedev warned that multiple nations are “ready” to supply Iran with nuclear warheads following the United States’ airstrikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities on Saturday.

Medvedev, a former Russian president and current deputy chairman of the Russian Security Council issued a series of X posts following the United States’ attack against Iran.

Medvedev stated Iran’s “enrichment of nuclear material — and, now we can say it outright, the future production of nuclear weapons — will continue.”

https://www.oann.com/newsroom/russian-leader-claims-multiple-nations-are-ready-to-directly-supply-iran-with-nuclear-weapons-following-u-s-attack/
68   goofus   2025 Jun 22, 3:50pm  

AmericanKulakMaximumTrumper says


RayAmerica says


I know this is way over your head, but this is nothing other than another attempt at Middle East regime change. How well did all those others work out Kulak? Care to comment???

No answers until I get an explanation why 100s of kgs of 60% uranium enrichment was for.



Stereotomy had a good response here as to why 60% enrichment does not (necessarily) mean bomb-making :
https://patrick.net/post/1384792/2025-06-13-israel-attacks-iran?start=518#comment-2184354

“The assumption here is that only 60% enriched uranium will be used. How do you use 60% uranium? You mix it in with natural uranium to obtain the proper degree of enrichment for the reactor design.

Goddamn, this is done ALL THE TIME. Ever since the end of the cold war, there have been mixed fuel reactors - add some plutonium from decommissioned pits to natural uranium to create fuel rods.

This is pure propaganda. Every nuclear nation does this to some degree.

Also, nuclear subs and aircraft carriers use >80% enriched U235 to make their reactors very compact. This speaks to reactor design - the higher the degree of enrichment, the smaller the fuel mass needs to be and thus the smaller the reactor proper can be.”
69   RayAmerica   2025 Jun 22, 4:19pm  

AmericanKulakMaximumTrumper says


No answers

Admittedly, his quote has been taken out of context. But, it's the same method that Kulak uses with the Scriptures in order to justify his blind support for the secular, political, Zionist modern State of Israel that is being run by the crook terrorist Netanyahu.
70   TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter   2025 Jun 22, 4:35pm  

stereotomy says


The assumption here is that only 60% enriched uranium will be used. How do you use 60% uranium? You mix it in with natural uranium to obtain the proper degree of enrichment for the reactor design.


How many nuclear powered submarines or aircraft carriers does Iran have, and have they completed just one functioning version of those small highly efficient reactors?

What commercial reactor needs hundreds of Kgs of 60%+ enriched U-235 to function?

Is Iran on the vanguard of efficiency or just working through it's first few domestic nuclear plant?

Is Iran the size and scope of US Industry that it needs to dispose of highly enriched uranium? Why bother in the first place?

Why is Iran delaying their commercial program by enriching so much 60%+ uranium instead of just going to 4-5%? 20% for one research reactor, tops.

Is the Enrichment step from 60 to 90% shorter or longer than 20% to 60%?
71   TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter   2025 Jun 22, 4:36pm  

24-7-365 100% proof of Iran's benign intent at all times. All members of the IRGC and Ayatollah hooked up to a Mind Reading Device at all times, with a kill switch that makes a Harrison Bergeron device go off in their earlobe

OR

No capability, so no need to worry about intent.

Which one is a better guarantee of no nukes?
72   RayAmerica   2025 Jun 22, 4:40pm  

Kulak,

Do you favor a pre-emptive bombing of North Korea because they hate us and have plenty of nukes? If not, why not?

(Answer: of course not. Where's the 'blessing' in that?)
73   TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter   2025 Jun 22, 4:45pm  

RayAmerica says


Do you favor a pre-emptive bombing of North Korea because they hate us and have plenty of nukes? If not, why not?

What pre-emptive?

North Korea already has nukes (thanks Bill!), and China holds them on a tight leash economically and politically and militarily.

Iran does not have a nuke yet (at least we hope so). Iran is ruled by a Theocracy with an Apocalyptic Mission.

It's better to stop the crazy man from having a LMG, than to wait until after he's announced his willingness to clear the block of traffic.
74   RayAmerica   2025 Jun 22, 4:51pm  

AmericanKulakMaximumTrumper says

Iran does not have a nuke yet


Russian leader claims multiple nations are ‘ready to directly supply Iran’ with nuclear weapons following U.S. attack

Russian leader Dmitry Medvedev warned that multiple nations are “ready” to supply Iran with nuclear warheads following the United States’ airstrikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities on Saturday.

Medvedev, a former Russian president and current deputy chairman of the Russian Security Council issued a series of X posts following the United States’ attack against Iran.

Medvedev stated Iran’s “enrichment of nuclear material — and, now we can say it outright, the future production of nuclear weapons — will continue.”

https://www.oann.com/newsroom/russian-leader-claims-multiple-nations-are-ready-to-directly-supply-iran-with-nuclear-weapons-following-u-s-attack/
75   goofus   2025 Jun 22, 4:52pm  

”What commercial reactor needs hundreds of Kgs of 60%+ enriched U-235 to function?

Is Iran on the vanguard of efficiency or just working through it's first few domestic nuclear plant?

Is Iran the size and scope of US Industry that it needs to dispose of highly enriched uranium? Why bother in the first place?”


A country that’s been embargoed for 45 years might not expect a ready supply of foreign-sourced 4% uranium. Hence the 100 kg stockpile of 60%.

To be facile, if I expected an orange juice shortage, I’d stockpile oj concentrate.
76   TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter   2025 Jun 22, 4:54pm  

You can never truly know intent.

But can track capability very accurately.
77   TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter   2025 Jun 22, 4:55pm  

goofus says

A country that’s been embargoed for 45 years might not expect a ready supply of foreign-sourced 4% uranium. Hence the 100 kg stockpile of 60%.

To be facile, if I expected an orange juice shortage, I’d stockpile oj concentrate.

Can the Big and Little Satans disappear the world's 5th largest oil reserve from beneath the surface of Iran?
78   Ceffer   2025 Jun 22, 5:07pm  

I think something else was going on with those sites, and nukes were and have been a straw man bogey. Iran can probably purchase black market nukes (or have them gifted) or use dirty bombs without enriched uranium. They already have the rockets to send such.

No radiation at all after the bombings? "Moving" the stockpiles out is another bogey. There would have been SOME kind of radiation signature after the bombings.

So, there was likely other kinds of tech thing going on there, and they likely have DUMBS that extend for long distances underground from the sites. They probably wouldn't have needed surface transport at all to move or remove anything.
79   MolotovCocktail   2025 Jun 22, 5:18pm  

Trump stole that move from Kirk's manipulation in Star Trek 2 of Khan when saying “weeks” for “days”, as Spock says “days” for “hours.”


« First        Comments 41 - 80 of 150       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste