« First « Previous Comments 282 - 298 of 298 Search these comments
No, the actual extent of Mamdani’s first housing orders could have been lifted from the first chapter of a textbook on Reagan-style supply-side economics. The Mayor didn’t tinker with free market prices on the demand side. Instead, his orders were intended to increase the supply of housing by (1) privatizing public property for use as private housing developments, and (2) cutting green tape, to lower developers’ costs and speed development.
I’m not making this up or exaggerating. Here’s how NBC carefully explained it. First, “the LIFT Task Force (Land Inventory Fast Track) will leverage city-owned land to accelerate housing development, increase supply, and drive down costs.” In other words, he’s going to turn over city property to private developers for new housing. It doesn’t seem like something Karl Marx would embrace.
Second, “The SPEED Task Force (Streamlining Procedures to Expedite Equitable Development) will identify and remove bureaucratic and permitting barriers that drive up costs and slow housing construction and lease-up, making it more affordable to build.”
In other words: deregulation. We noted with great amusement that neither Mamdani nor NBC mentioned which “bureaucratic and permitting barriers that drive up costs” would be “removed.” In this case, it will almost certainly require waiving or rescinding environmental regulations. ...
To be fair, and for completeness, Mamdani also appointed a crazed liberal activist to the city’s “tenants’ rights division,” announced a legal crusade against a particular big landlord (which is already in bankruptcy), revoked several of his predecessor’s orders, and practically gushed with communitarian claptrap.
Don’t get me wrong— Mamdani is a commie. But could he be a different kind of Marxist? Although the proof will be in the socialist pudding, these housing orders suggest he’s trying to lower rents using free-market principles —supply and demand— instead of mandates and edicts.
Put differently, Mamdani’s most significant practical orders —LIFT and SPEED— were conservative strategies. Fascinating! We’ll continue to watch the city’s first socialist mayor’s progress with great interest.
Patrick says
Charlie blamed the boomers for taking everything for themselves, and leaving nothing for future generations.
I believe this - both my wife and I were denied promotions in our workplaces so that the crotch fruit of the boomers, who were 10-15 years younger with virtually no experience, were given management jobs.
They pulled up the ladder behind them, occasionally reaching down to pick up their children in purely nepotistic fashion.
We'll see how things end up. It's not going to be nice. . .
Plenty of Boomers worked hard to change the world and be successful. That’s IMHO a rash generalization. I would bet the success/failure rate would be the same amongst generations. Boomers were by far the largest generation so it seems like they had an advantage when actually there were just more of them.
The problem is not that the boomers didn't work hard, many did and prospered through many boom cycles, but they aren't currently paying their fair share, and too many are never trumplers. Medicare is basically taking money from the younger generations to keep paying for boomer procedures which costs inflate by 10%-20% per year. Kicking the can down the road is despicable, regardless of how poor the work ethic of many millenials and the younger generations may be. As much of a communist dick zoran may be, his election made sense from the viewpoint of many young have nots.
« First « Previous Comments 282 - 298 of 298 Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,357,027 comments by 15,734 users - PeopleUnited online now