Covid Vaccines Damage All Hearts, Study Finds BY IGOR CHUDOV 2 OCTOBER 2023 7:00 AM
A new scientific study by Nakahara et al. tested Covid-vaccinated people to see if they have “silent” changes in heart muscle function that standard radiology tests could detect. The study shows very unsettling results.
Scientists measured myocardial 18Fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) uptake. F-FDG has molecular similarity to glucose. However, 18F-FDG does not metabolise like glucose. Therefore, PET scans could detect it, and its presence shows the heart muscle’s abnormally high demand for glucose, indicative of abnormal cardiac function. More about it here.
Conclusions: Focal myocardial 18F-FDG uptake seen on oncologic PET/CT indicates a significantly increased risk for multiple myocardial abnormalities. Indeed, this is what the Nakahara study finds (emphasis added, here and below):
Results
The study included 303 nonvaccinated patients (mean age, 52.9 years; 157 females) and 700 vaccinated patients (mean age, 56.8 years; 344 females). Vaccinated patients had overall higher myocardial FDG uptake compared to nonvaccinated patients (median SUVmax, 4.8 vs median SUVmax, 3.3 ; P < .0001). Myocardial SUVmax was higher in vaccinated patients regardless of sex (median range, 4.7-4.9 ) or patient age (median range, 4.7-5.6) compared to corresponding nonvaccinated groups (sex median range, 3.2-3.9; age median range, 3.3-3.3; P range, <.001-.015). Furthermore, increased myocardial FDG uptake was observed in patients imaged 1-30, 31-60, 61-120, and 121-180 days after their second vaccination (median SUVmax range, 4.6-5.1) and increased ipsilateral axillary uptake was observed in patients imaged 1-30, 31-60, 61-120 days after their second vaccination (median SUVmax range, 1.5-2.0) compared to the nonvaccinated patients (P range, <.001-<.001). This was not supposed to happen! The Covid vaccine is not supposed to affect the heart in any way. It was promised to ‘stay in the arm’.
The explosive findings of the study are discussed in the editorial that the Editor of the magazine, Dr. Bluemke, felt obliged to publish.
Dr. Bluemke’s editorial is somewhat apologetic, and he gives faint praise for Covid vaccines.
The development of messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccines is a remarkable biotech story. While traditional vaccines took 5-10 years to develop, the COVID-19 vaccines took less than a year. By comparison, the fastest conventional vaccine previously developed was the mumps vaccine, on a timescale of four years. Dr. Bluemke also does not mince words. He explains that the findings are not due to chance:
The main results: asymptomatic patients vaccinated for COVID-19 before PET had about 40% greater radiotracer activity in the myocardium than unvaccinated individuals. The P value was low, less than .0001. This translates to only one time out of 10,000 that these results would occur by chance. The editorial states that there is no rational way to ignore and explain away the negative findings of myocardial inflammation by Takahara et al.:
Vaccine manufacturers are aware of the adverse effects of mRNA vaccines. These adverse effects lead to vaccine hesitancy. The study results by Nakahara et al. suggest that mild asymptomatic myocardial inflammation could be more common than we ever expected. This in turn would support a hypothesis of more severe systemic inflammation related to mRNA vaccination in some patients who present with symptoma-c myocarditis. Dr. Bluemke calls for further research into this:
The investigators understood their first result was only the starting point. They next performed extensive ‘sensitivity analyses’ – i.e., looking at the same data from multiple different directions. What if we account for age differences between groups, and the number of vaccinations? If mRNA vaccinations do cause asymptomatic myocardial inflammation, wouldn’t the effect be more likely shortly after vaccination, rather than six months later? Many of us who had COVID-19 vaccines had flu-like symptoms immediately after vaccination – perhaps those of us with common flu-like reactions would have more myocardial inflammation as well? Could trained readers see the differences visually? Or were the differences seen only after placing regions of interest on the heart that could be accidentally mispositioned? The list goes on. Great researchers are also sceptics – they need to prove the results to themselves. Was the increase in myocardial inflammation due to a few unlucky patients driving high averages, with most people remaining unaffected?
Unfortunately, that is not the case: all quartiles were affected deleteriously, as this image shows:
Is there a dose-response relationship, providing further proof of causality? Can we see if the higher-dose Moderna vaccine causes more heart problems than the lower-dose Pfizer vaccine?
Recall that studies of other topics, such as pregnancy outcomes, show a 42% greater miscarriage rate and 93% greater infant death rate for Moderna (higher dose vaccine) compared to Pfizer.
What about the Nakahara study we are discussing? It shows a weaker but similar pattern of greater response due to Moderna:
The authors say there is “no difference” between Pfizer and Moderna. However, there is a difference. Pfizer-vaccinated patients’ SUVmax was 4.7, and Moderna-vaccinated patients (Moderna is a greater dose, remember) had a greater SUVmax of 5.1. The difference did not reach statistical significance, likely due to a small sample size.
Does the ill effect go away as time passes? Unfortunately, the scientists’ chart of SUVmax over time does not show complete recovery during 180 days, still above the unvaccinated level:
A test of cardiac function via F-FDG uptake, a standard radiological test, is something that careful scientists conducting Covid vaccine clinical trials could carry on with a few hundred patients. Watchful vaccine safety agencies could demand such tests to be conducted to ensure the general public’s safety. They chose not to do it, and their sponsors (Pfizer and Moderna) made much money selling unproven and untested Covid vaccines.
The vaccines, instead of stopping the pandemic, damaged the heart muscles of millions.
I hope that the vaccinated people will be able to ask for compensation for their damaged hearts.
The reality, sadly, is that the damage will most likely be ignored, and the vaccine billionaires will enjoy their newfound wealth while the hysterical Pfizer-sponsored press will be scaring us with new distractions.
This article was first published on Igor’s Substack page. Subscribe here.
We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.
DONATE TODAY COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE
You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.
SIGN UP Previous Post News Round-Up
Next Post ‘Nonsense’ of Gender Data Collected by Public Bodies Set for Review
Subscribe Login Please log in to comment To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
65 COMMENTS Oldest Mogwai Mogwai 1 year ago They do damage, full stop. Here’s Guy Hatchard talking about a recent study demonstrating the possibility of integration of the toxic crud into DNA and the implications;
”Transfection involves the insertion of foreign nucleic acids into a cell. What does the stabilisation of this process mean for us? The stable (permanent) integration of genetic material into a host cell chromosome may result in activation of oncogenes (cancer genes) or knockout of tumour suppressor genes. In other words, it can cause cancers. In an attempt to avoid this happening, genetic material, including that used in mRNA vaccines, has been ‘end-capped’. However, unexpectedly, the study found that “the end modification of linear DNA did not significantly decrease the rate of integration [into human cell lines].”
We have been repeatedly assured that mRNA vaccines could not integrate into the human genome. Our concerns were often described by so-called fact checkers (aka media hacks and disinformation project scaremongers) as conspiracy theories. The study found that not only can this happen, but that it could happen with a frequency of up to 20%, one case in every five. The outcome of these DNA integration events can only be described as a slowly unfolding train wreck of global proportions. The integration of DNA in this way is heritable—it can be passed to future generations, placing billions of our children’s children and so on in the shadow of genetic illness created by scientists who ignored evidence of harm and pressed ahead to subject the whole world’s population to novel biotech experimentation.”
https://hatchardreport.com/our-worst-nightmare-beckons/ 161 0 JeremyP99 JeremyP99 1 year ago Reply to Mogwai “They do damage, full stop. Here’s Guy Hatchard talking about a recent study demonstrating the possibility of integration of the toxic crud into DNA and the implications;”
Multiple papers on this now. Not a “possibility” but reality. 87 0 Mogwai Mogwai 1 year ago Reply to JeremyP99 Not sure if you’ve seen the latest excellent ‘stack from Arkmedic. He writes about ‘Plasmidgate’ but with a twist. It’s certainly looking less and less likely that ‘Hanlon’s Razor’ applies here. But I always knew it was malice not cock-up. This just confirms it for me;
”But this article is not directly about the discovery of Plasmid DNA in the Pfizer and Moderna jabs (that has been now verified by 6 labs worldwide). It’s about the special properties of the contents of that DNA and the RNA that is made from it, combined with the RNA that accompanies it (the jabs have the stated RNA in them as well as the stowaway DNA). You see, it turns out that there are at least 5 different mechanisms for that DNA-RNA-protein combination to take that DNA into the nucleus of your cells. And that wasn’t on the advertising brochure was it?”
My God. 80 0 Mogwai Mogwai 1 year ago Reply to huxleypiggles Aye, that’s about the size of it. As I’ve said before, they want us dead, injured or infertile. Sounds deserving of a Nobel Prize doesn’t it? 😮 Only in Clown World… 59 0 Jon Smith Jon Smith 1 year ago Reply to Mogwai I’m interested who you think “they” are?? Last edited 1 year ago by Jon Smith 7 -27 Jon Smith Jon Smith 1 year ago Reply to Jon Smith I know who they are… Last edited 1 year ago by Jon Smith 0 0 FerdIII FerdIII 1 year ago Great article. Heart disease is heart disease. Heart damage is heart damage. It is never ‘mild’. And the study used an unstabbinated control group – no issues with those higher IQ people who said nein to poisons from Medical Nazis, criminals, lunatics and liars.
Conclusions: Focal myocardial 18F-FDG uptake seen on oncologic PET/CT indicates a significantly increased risk for multiple myocardial abnormalities. 115 -12 Occams Pangolin Pie Occams Pangolin Pie 1 year ago Reply to FerdIII Yes!
IQ though? Not so sure. Just the time and space to give it some thought was the only requirement. We have been deliberately placed on never ceasing hamster wheels where deference to experts is easy and abnegation of basic common sense is the norm, from Professor up to binman. 66 -1 Marcus Aurelius knew Marcus Aurelius knew 1 year ago Reply to FerdIII I don’t know about IQ. I’ve come out with some pretty low scores, but then I never did like the arbitrary, absurd, unreal nature of desk tests. So boring, you see.
No. What I thought to myself in March 2020 was simply that if it was going to be as deadly dangerous as they said it was going to be, then I would need to up sticks to somewhere very remote. Which could be a very expensive exercise. So I decided to undertake Due Diligence.
The first form of Due Diligence was to look out of the window. No dead people.
The second form of Due Diligence was to check if the numbers of people dying every day (regardless of pathology) were anything above the norm. They weren’t.
Job done. Is that evidence of “High IQ”? I sincerely hope not… 104 0 transmissionofflame transmissionofflame 1 year ago Reply to Marcus Aurelius knew As stewart likes to point out, there’s a difference between intelligence and wisdom. 58 0 Marcus Aurelius knew Marcus Aurelius knew 1 year ago Reply to transmissionofflame So which is it? Eternal questions… 9 0 transmissionofflame transmissionofflame 1 year ago Reply to Marcus Aurelius knew Doubtless you have both but you are certainly wise. 23 0 Marcus Aurelius knew Marcus Aurelius knew 1 year ago Well I suppose it’s nice to have all this detail. But the fact that fit, young, healthy athletes suddenly started dropping dead or being excused from sport for the rest of their lives in far greater numbers than ever before was a kind of giveaway.
And guess what – it didn’t start happening before the jabs. Last edited 1 year ago by Marcus Aurelius knew 177 0 modularist modularist 1 year ago I read this in the middle of the night. I recalled Vinay Prasad asking about a year ago, ‘What if everybody suffers sub-clinical myocarditis?’.
This should add some fuel for Andrew Bridgen’s parliamentary speech on October 20th.
Just a shout-out while I’m here for the fantastic symposium in Sweden on Saturday (which AB was on a panel at and regular on this site Dr David Bell presented at):
I understand that will broken out into chunks on CHD Europe and UKColumn soon. It’s all worth watching (that was my Saturday!), and there are many familiar names, but particularly interesting and a little different was a money strand and a superb presentation from Prof Richard Werner (of QE and ‘money as debt’ fame) on the history of banking and the road to CBDCs, followed by an equally interesting one by John Titus on the coming US debt crisis). Werner begins at 5:26 in. 69 0 For a fist full of roubles For a fist full of roubles 1 year ago I await the outcome of the post mortem on the M53 school bus driver to hear what the “medical issues” were that he suffered at the wheel. 104 0 JohnK JohnK 1 year ago Reply to For a fist full of roubles And there will be several claims for damages against him, and in effect the bus company. Their insurer will end up having to shell out for that. 29 0 RTSC RTSC 1 year ago Reply to For a fist full of roubles We won’t be told. Privacy, don’cha know. 52 0 Jane G Jane G 1 year ago Reply to For a fist full of roubles Did we ever find out what caused the driver of the 4×4 to pile into the school tea- party? 38 0 Less government Less government 1 year ago Reply to Jane G Good question. 9 0 Roy Everett Roy Everett 1 year ago Reply to For a fist full of roubles If there is an inquest and there is prior suspicion about the fundamental cause of the “medical issue” then it will be held with the press and general public excluded, and with the attendees warned not to speak to anybody about it. Some approved narrative will be created. That is the norm for coroner’s inquests. However, it is quite conceivable that this case has nothing to do with vaccines. We shall never know. 22 0 CircusSpot CircusSpot 1 year ago What of the AZ jabs that disappeared completely following bans in various European Countries? What was in them and are they equally dangerous? 87 0 WyrdWoman WyrdWoman 1 year ago Reply to CircusSpot Original report says they were excluded, insufficient numbers:
Subjects with unknown vaccination dates or with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Astra Zeneca) and miscellaneous vaccines were excluded when patients were stratified by time interval or type of vaccine due to the small sample size. 14 0 For a fist full of roubles For a fist full of roubles 1 year ago There is one group that remains unaffected – trans activists. They are heartless. 77 0 DevonBlueBoy DevonBlueBoy 1 year ago Reply to For a fist full of roubles 🤣🤣 12 0 godknowsimgood godknowsimgood 1 year ago https://youtu.be/YU0VrC-33RE?si=_QYHooFKxURYLib5 9 0 Marcus Aurelius knew Marcus Aurelius knew 1 year ago Reply to godknowsimgood A good heart these days is hard to find indeed 25 0 huxleypiggles huxleypiggles 1 year ago Reply to Marcus Aurelius knew “…so please be gentle with this heart of mine” 10 -1 huxleypiggles huxleypiggles 1 year ago Reply to Marcus Aurelius knew One of my all time favourite singles.
Feargal Sharkey – magical voice. 9 -1 RTSC RTSC 1 year ago I warned my adult sons about reports of myocarditis coming from Israel long before they were “invited” to be jabbed. My older son, then age 32 isn’t jabbed. My younger one (then age 30) had 2 Pfizer shots against my advice because he wanted to travel, but no boosters. He’s very sporty and I thank God that he has a desk-job AND had returned to live with me temporarily during the Covid lunacy, where his sporting opportunities were extremely limited.
After the jabs he went back to his desk and we were having quiet evenings and limited weekend activities due to the restrictions, so the chances of him suffering an adrenaline-induced heart attack were significantly reduced.
Since he’s slim, very fit and has no known health issues, I just hope and pray the danger period has passed and reduces further every year. 92 0 Marcus Aurelius knew Marcus Aurelius knew 1 year ago Reply to RTSC Everything crossed for your son. 28 0 RTSC RTSC 1 year ago Reply to Marcus Aurelius knew Thank you. 11 0 LaptopMaestro LaptopMaestro 1 year ago Reply to RTSC The danger never passes – heart damage is permanent. 23 0 Sepulchrave Sepulchrave 1 year ago Reply to LaptopMaestro I haven’t seen this finding, this is very concerning, please can you cite the studies that confirm permanent heart damage caused by Covid vaccines? 1 -8 LaptopMaestro LaptopMaestro 1 year ago Reply to Sepulchrave ALL heart damage is permanernt. 7 0 DS99 DS99 1 year ago Reply to RTSC For what it’s worth, I’m a big believer in the power of the human spirit and the occasonal prayer. The body has quite untapped powers of recuperation. You did your best, your son did what he thought was best – maybe the batches he got were the less harmful ones? . 22 -1 thelightcavalry thelightcavalry 1 year ago Pfizer, Moderna etc must pay the compensation. The fraudulent testing and cover-ups invalidate any legal immunities and if necessary just enact retro-active legislation. Neither they nor the medics like Fauci nor the politicians like Johnson, Gove and Hancock should escape justice. 87 0 Chris P Chris P 1 year ago Reply to thelightcavalry And the regulators who are supposed to protect us. 56 0 Less government Less government 1 year ago Reply to Chris P And the Media that suppressed the truth. 20 0 The Real Engineer The Real Engineer 1 year ago Reply to Less government They still are. 5 0 Sepulchrave Sepulchrave 1 year ago The summary states:
“Asymptomatic patients who underwent PET/CT 1-180 days after their second SARS-CoV-2 vaccination showed increased myocardial 18Fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on images compared to nonvaccinated patients, but patients imaged >180 days after vaccination did not.”
None of the subjects had clinical myocarditis and the effect disappeared after 180 days, so it seems that the impact was mild and transient, perhaps not that concerning. 1 -30 JohnK JohnK 1 year ago Reply to Sepulchrave And many infections are somewhat mild and transient, thus no need to use potentially hazardous drugs to limit their effects. 43 0 CHRIS CHRIS 1 year ago More disgusting COVID fear mongering from the BBC this morning, health officials pushing the COVID “vaccine” again against the new variant even though it’s impossible for any vaccine to have been developed to cover a variant that has only just been detected.
Also, the article (even though the headline is all COVID) includes information about the flu jab but it’s difficult at first reading to separate the two. 52 0 Chris P Chris P 1 year ago Reply to CHRIS It is interesting that you cannot buy a covid injection privately in the UK. That suggests to me they are banned for most of the population. An acknowledgement by the authorities that they are dangerous? 27 0 JohnK JohnK 1 year ago Reply to Chris P It suggests that the private sellers can’t afford the insurance. 36 0 TheTartanEagle TheTartanEagle 1 year ago Reply to Chris P Are they even licensed? Certified? Or whatever happens in the twilight zone of medical substances. Maybe they cannot be prescribed privately because some process hoop hasn’t been passed. 13 0 Chris P Chris P 1 year ago Reply to TheTartanEagle Yes, you’re probably correct. They’re still on emergency use authorisation and the manufacturers still have their liability shield. Although, if fraud can be proved presumably the shield becomes worthless. 21 0 Roy Everett Roy Everett 1 year ago Dr Katalin Kariko and Dr Drew Weissman may find that they have received more of an albatross than a Nobel Prize! 32 0 Roy Everett Roy Everett 1 year ago Reply to Roy Everett Is the Nobel Prize for Medicine going the same way as the Nobel Prize for Peace, that is, a political gesture, essentially an end-of-year prize for getting the “right” answers, not breaking the school rules and for singing the school anthem in tune? 44 0 Ravin Mad Ravin Mad 1 year ago And the inventors of these heart-damaging DNA altering interventions get awarded the Nobel prize!!!!!!!! Words fail me!!!! 52 0 Roy Everett Roy Everett 1 year ago Reply to Ravin Mad The entire IPCC team that injected Global Warming into the world’s minds also got a Nobel Prize. Medicine has become similarly politicized. 53 0 Roy Everett Roy Everett 1 year ago Reply to Ravin Mad They may be the inventors, but who chose to deploy the vaccine, and was it morally justified? The equivalent question was raised in the recent Oppenheimer movie, notably at the end in the exchange between Oppenheimer and Biden Truman. There is no easy answer as it all depends on modelling what would have happened if different decisions had been made. Perhaps in another eighty years some Hollywood film producer will make the movie “Kariko” and some yet-to-be-born actors and film professionals will get an Oscar. Come to think of it, perhaps Kariko and Weissman are essentially actors on a world stage. Or puppets. Last edited 1 year ago by Roy Everett 19 0 DevonBlueBoy DevonBlueBoy 1 year ago Reply to Ravin Mad Perfectly in keeping with the originator of the prize, the inventor of dynamite. 12 0 Steven Robinson Steven Robinson 1 year ago The finding confirms an earlier study (2022) that the vaccines injure the heart of all vaccine recipients. 39 0 waterbear waterbear 1 year ago Even if Bluemke’s assertion of only a mild impact holds true, the absence of any benefit makes any level of risk completely unacceptable. 24 0 The Real Engineer The Real Engineer 1 year ago Reply to waterbear 11,000 excess deaths per month, affecting a large number of the young and not so much the very old? I don’t call that minor, he is using very loose English. Pandemic would suit quite well, it is in every country with any vax rate at all. “Safe and Effective”, at killing people at a much higher rate than even the other pandemic managed. 5 0 Jabba the Hut Jabba the Hut 1 year ago Why does this comes as no surprise and the heart isn’t the only organ that is damaged by the jabs. On the plus side I’ve just seen an advert for medical negligence specialists, looks like they’ll be busy. 29 0 The Real Engineer The Real Engineer 1 year ago Reply to Jabba the Hut I rather doubt that, the Government has underwritted the vaccine use, and suing the Government is very difficult and extremely expensive, partly because they have the entire tax take to fund litigation and hundreds of tame lawyers. 3 0 Jumpin' Jehosaphat Jumpin' Jehosaphat 1 year ago Don’t worry. Any vaccine-induced heart disease epidemic will be blamed on climate change. 41 0 The Real Engineer The Real Engineer 1 year ago Reply to Jumpin' Jehosaphat It is already being blamed on waiting lists, which is not the issue, this is diagnosis! Waiting lists for GPOs might produce a tiny skew in the results. 2 0 thebookishtoad thebookishtoad 1 year ago There’s no doubt they do damage but I am slightly irritated by the fact that they tested 2.5 times more vaxxed than unvaxxed – wouldn’t that skew the results in favour of heart damage? Don’t get me wrong, these gene therapy experiments are horrific but shouldn’t they have tested roughly equal numbers from each group – or am I missing something? 5 0 LaptopMaestro LaptopMaestro 1 year ago Reply to thebookishtoad Dependent on location – admitting to being unjabbed might be an issue. 1 0 The Real Engineer The Real Engineer 1 year ago Reply to thebookishtoad In statistical terms the group size is irrelevant, as long as both groups are large enough to produce a statistically significant result. Remember it is hard to find the totally unvaxed! 3 0 LaptopMaestro LaptopMaestro 1 year ago Presumably with the exception of hearts belonging to the unvaccinated? 5 0 True Spirit of America Party True Spirit of America Party 1 year ago Wow, this is probably the most damning study of the jabs that I have seen yet, and that really says something! Covid疫苗伤害所有的心，研究发现由Igor Chudov 2 10月20日7:00 AM A AM Nakahara等人的新科学研究。 被测试的Covid接种人员认为它们具有“沉默”的心肌功能变化，即标准放射学检测可以检测到。 该研究表明了令人不安的结果。 科学家测定了心肌18氟氟硅氧葡萄糖（18F-FDG）吸收。 F-FDG与葡萄糖具有分子相似性。 然而，18F-FDG不会像葡萄糖一样代谢。 因此，宠物扫描可以检测到它，其存在表明心肌对葡萄糖的异常高的需求，指示心脏功能异常。 更多关于它在这里。 结论：肿瘤学宠物/ CT上局灶性心肌18F-FDG摄取表明多种心肌异常的风险显着增加。 实际上，这就是Nakahara研究发现（重点添加，这里和以下）：研究结果包括303名非疫苗患者（平均年龄，52.9岁; 157名女性）和700名疫苗患者（平均年龄，56.8岁; 疫苗接种患者与非Vaccalinal患者相比，疫苗的患者具有全面的心肌FDG吸收（中位数Suvmax，4.8 Vs中位数Suvmax，3.3; P <.0001）。 与相应的非Vaccaled群体相比，疫苗的患者中疫苗的患者（中位数，4.7-5.6）（中位数范围，3.2-3.9;年龄中位数 此外，在第二次疫苗接种（中位Suvmax范围，4.6-5.1）和同侧腋窝增加后，在成像1-30,31-60,61-120和121-180天内，观察到增加的心肌FDG摄取。 这不应该发生！ Covid疫苗不应该以任何方式影响心脏。 它被承诺“留在手臂”。 该研究的爆炸性调查结果是在杂志中的编辑中讨论了这项研究的讨论，杂志博士Bluemke博士的觉得有义务发布。 Bluemke博士的社论有点抱歉，他对Covid疫苗带来了微弱的赞美。 Messenger RNA（mRNA）Covid-19疫苗的发展是一个非凡的生物技术故事。 虽然传统疫苗花了5-10年来开发，但Covid-19疫苗花了不到一年。 相比之下，先前开发的最快疫苗是腮腺炎疫苗，在四年的时间内。 Bluemke博士也没有碎的话。 他解释说，这些发现不是由于机会：主要结果：在PET之前对Covid-19疫苗接种的无症状患者在心肌中比未移植的个体具有大约40％的放射性机构活性。 P值低，小于.0001。 这只转化为10,000中只有一个时间，即偶然会发生这些结果。 编辑指出，没有理性的方式来忽视并解释Takahara等人的心肌炎症的消极结果.:疫苗制造商了解mRNA疫苗的不良影响。 这些不利影响导致疫苗犹豫不决。 Nakahara等人的研究结果。 表明，轻度无症状的心肌炎症可能比我们预期的更常见。 这反过来将在一些患有症状-C心肌炎的一些患者中支持与mRNA疫苗相关的更严重的全身炎症。 Bluemke博士呼吁进一步研究这一点：调查人员理解他们的第一个结果只是起点。 他们接下来进行了广泛的“敏感性分析” - 即，从多个不同方向看相同的数据。 如果我们考虑到群体之间的年龄差异以及疫苗接种数量怎么办？ 如果mRNA疫苗接种会导致无症状的心肌炎症，疫苗接种后的效果不会更可能，而不是六个月后？ 患有Covid-19疫苗的许多人在疫苗接种后立即进行了流感样症状 - 也许我们常见的流感反应的人也会有更多的心肌炎症？ 训练有素的读者可视地看到差异吗？ 或者只是在将感兴趣的地区放置在可能意外失误的内心之后看到的差异？ 列表继续。 伟大的研究人员也是怀疑论者 - 他们需要向自己证明结果。 由于一些不幸的患者推动高平均患者，心肌炎症的增加是由于剩下的大多数人不受影响？ 不幸的是，这并非如此：所有四分位数都受到了风格的影响，因为此形象显示：是否有一种剂量 - 反应关系，提供进一步的因果关系证明？ 我们可以看出更高剂量的现代疫苗是否导致较低剂量辉稿疫苗的心脏问题？ 回想一下，与辉瑞相比，对妊娠结果等其他主题的研究表明，与PFizer相比，对现代（较高剂量疫苗）的流产率提高了42％，婴儿死亡率提高了93％。 我们正在讨论的Nakahara学习怎么样？ 它显示了由于现代人而越来越多的反应模式：作者说，辉瑞和现代人之间存在“无差异”。 但是，存在差异。 PFizer疫苗的患者的Suvmax是4.7，而现代疫苗的患者（现代人的患者是更大的剂量，记住）5.1的SUVMAX。 差异没有达到统计学意义，可能是由于样品大小的小。 随着时间的推移，病情会消失吗？ 不幸的是，Suvmax的科学家们的图表随着时间的推移不会显示完全恢复，仍然高于未接种的水平：通过F-FDG摄取的心功能测试，标准放射性测试，是谨慎的科学家进行Covid Vac的东西 注意疫苗安全机构可能需要进行这样的测试，以确保公众的安全。 他们选择不这样做，他们的赞助商（辉瑞和现代人）赚了很多钱，销售未经证实和未经证实的Covid疫苗。 疫苗，而不是停止大流行，损坏了数百万的心肌。 我希望疫苗的人能够要求赔偿他们受损的心灵。 遗憾的是，损害很可能会被忽视，疫苗亿万富翁将享受他们的新财富，而歇斯底里的辉瑞赞助的新闻将吓到我们的新分心。 本文首次发布于iGor的重置页面。 订阅这里。 标签：covid vacinisemodernamrna疫苗疫苗痘痘ispfizervaccine危害捐赠我们依靠您的捐款来保持这个网站。 请给你能提供什么。 捐赠今天对本文的评论，如果您没有已经拥有一个，您需要设置帐户以评论。 如果您想在我们的论坛中发表评论或邮寄，我们要求5英镑的最低捐款。 注册上一篇文章新闻循环下一页帖子“废话”由公共机构收集的性别数据设置为审查订阅登录请登录评论加入讨论请捐赠给日常怀疑论者。 将删除亵渎和虐待，可能导致永久禁令。 65评论最古老的mogwai mogwai 1年前他们做伤害，全部停止。 这是一个庭院谈论最近的一项研究，展示了将有毒冠军融入DNA的可能性以及含义; “转染涉及将外部核酸插入细胞中。 这个过程的稳定性是什么意思对我们来说意味着什么？ 遗传物质到宿主细胞染色体中的稳定（永久性）将遗传物质的整合可能导致肿瘤抑制基因的癌基因（癌症基因）或敲除。 换句话说，它会导致癌症。 为了避免这种情况，遗传物质（包括用于mRNA疫苗的遗传物质）已被“结束”。 然而，出乎意料的是，研究发现，“线性DNA的最终改性并没有显着降低人体细胞系的整合速率”。“ 我们已经反复放心MRNA疫苗不能整合到人类基因组中。 我们的担忧通常是由所谓的实况跳棋（AKA Media Hacks和Disinformation项目Scaremongers）描述为阴谋理论。 这项研究发现，这不仅可以发生这种情况，而且它可能会发生在每五个频率上的频率，每五个案例。 这些DNA集成事件的结果只能被描述为全球比例的缓慢展开的火车残骸。 以这种方式整合DNA是可遗传的 - 它可以传递到后代，将数十亿名孩子的孩子们放在遗传疾病的阴影中，由科学家们忽视危害的证据，并使整个世界人口对新的生物技术实验来说 https://hatchardreport.com/our-worst-nightmare-beckons/161 0 jeremyp99 jeremyp99 1年前回复mogwai“他们做伤害，全面停止。 这是伙计差管谈到最近的一项研究，展示了将有毒的Crud融入DNA和含义的可能性;“ 现在有多篇论文。 不是“可能性”，而是现实。 87 0 Mogwai Mogwai 1年前回复jeremyp99不确定您是否已经看过来自ArkMedic的最新优秀'堆栈。 他写了“质粒”，但扭曲了。 这肯定看起来越来越少，“汉仑的剃刀”适用于此。 但我总是知道这是恶意的不是僵失。 这只是为我确认; “但是本文并不直接关于辉瑞和现代刺戳中的质粒DNA的发现（现在已在全球6个实验室验证）。 这是关于该DNA的内容的特殊性质和由其制成的RNA，与伴随物的RNA（JABS在它们中具有陈述的RNA以及储存DNA）。 你看，事实证明，DNA-RNA蛋白质组合至少有5种不同的机制，将DNA置于细胞的细胞核中。 那不是广告宣传册在广告宣传册上吗？“ https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/5-ways-to-skin-a-genetically-modified 80 0 hxleypiggles huxleypiggles 1年前回复Mogwai换句话说，数百万人有时间 - 如果心力衰竭不会让它们遗嘱。 我的上帝。 80 0 Mogwai Mogwai 1年前回复HuxleyPiggles Aye，这是关于它的大小。 正如我之前所说的那样，他们希望我们死亡，受伤或不孕。 听起来值得诺贝尔奖不是吗？ 😮只在小丑世界... 59 0 jon smith jon smith 1年前回复mogwai我对谁感兴趣，你觉得“他们”是谁？ 上次编辑1年前jon smith 7 -27 jon史密斯jon史密斯1年前回复jon史密斯我知道他们是谁...上次编辑1年前由jon smith 0 0 ferdiii ferdiii 1年前很棒的文章。 心脏病是心脏病。 心脏伤害是心脏损伤。 它永远不会“轻度”。 该研究使用了未甲基对照组 - 没有关于那些更高的智商的问题，他对来自医疗纳粹，犯罪分子，疯子和骗子的毒药毒药。 结论：肿瘤学宠物/ CT上局灶性心肌18F-FDG摄取表明多种心肌异常的风险显着增加。 115 -12冬季pangolin pie occams pangolin馅饼1年前回复ferdiii是的！ 虽然？ 不太确定。 只有时间和空间给它一些思想是唯一的要求。 我们被故意放置在永不停止仓鼠的呼喊，在那里尊重专家很容易且忽略基本常识是常态，来自Binman的教授。 66 -1 Marcus Aurelius知道Marcus Aurelius知道1年前回复Ferdiii我不知道智商。 我已经出来了一些相当低的分数，但后来我从来没有像桌面测试的任意，荒谬，虚幻的本质。 所以无聊，你看。 不，我想到了2020年3月的对自己的想法只是，如果它会像他们所说的那样致命危险，那么我需要把棍子伸到一个非常遥远的地方。 这可能是一个非常昂贵的运动。 所以我决定采取尽职调查。 最尊重的第一种形式的追求是看窗外。 没有死人。 尽职调查的第二种形式是检查每天死亡的人数（无论病理学如何）是常数高于常态的任何东西。 他们不是。 工作完成了。 是“高智商”的证据？ 我真诚的希望不是...... 104 0传输OFFLAME传输OFFLAME 1年前回复Marcus Aurelius知道Stewart喜欢指出，情报和智慧之间存在差异。 58 0 Marcus Aurelius知道Marcus Aurelius知道1年前回复运输Offlame，所以这是什么？ 永恒的问题...... 9 0传输OFFLAME传输OFFLAME 1年前Marcus Aurelius的回复毫无疑问你有两个，但你肯定是明智的。 23 0 Marcus Aurelius知道Marcus Aurelius知道1年前我想拥有所有这些细节很好。 但是，适合，年轻，健康的运动员突然开始死亡或从运动中的剩余生活中突然开始死亡，而不是以往任何时候都是一种赠品。 并猜猜是什么 - 它在刺戳前没有开始发生。 上次编辑的1年前由Marcus Aurelius知道177 0模块化核心核心人1年前我在半夜看了这个。 我回忆起Vinay Prasad关于一年前的询问，“如果每个人都患有亚临床心肌炎怎么办？”。 这应该在10月20日增加Andrew Bridgen的议会演讲。 在周六我在这里寻找瑞典的神奇研讨会（在这个网站上的小组和常规的小组上举行的奇妙研讨会）：https://childrenshealthdefense.eu/doctors-app 这一切都值得关注（那是我的星期六！），并且有许多熟悉的名字，但特别有趣，有点不同，是金钱赛（QE和QE和'货币的奖金上的一笔卓越的演讲）银行和道路的债务“名誉” Werner从5:26开始。69 0对于一个充满武器的拳头充满了卢布1年前，我等待M53校车司机在M53校车司机的结果，听到他在车轮上遭受了什么“医学问题”。 104 0 Johnk Johnk 1年前回复一个充满卢布的拳头，将有几个索赔对他的损害赔偿，并生效公交公司。 他们的保险公司将最终不得不为此剥离。 29 0 RTSC RTSC 1年前回复充满卢布的拳头我们不会被告知。 隐私，Don'Cha知道。 52 0 Jane G Jane G 1年前回复一个充满卢布的拳头我们有没有发现导致4×4驾驶员队伍的队伍才能进入学校茶党？ 38 0减少政府少政府1年前回复简克好问题。 9 0 Roy Everett Roy Everett 1年前回复一个拳头的拳头，如果有一个调查，那么事先怀疑“医学问题”的根本原因，那么它将与新闻界和普通公众一起举行，并与与会者警告 将创建一些批准的叙述。 这是验尸官查询的标准。 但是，这可以想到，这种情况与疫苗无关。 我们永远不知道。 22 0 Circusspot Circusspot 1年前Az Jabs在各种欧洲国家的禁止遵循禁令时消失了什么？ 他们在其中什么，它们同样危险吗？ 87 0 Wyrdwoman Wyrdwoman 1年前回复Circusspot原始报告称，他们被排除在外，数字不足：具有未知疫苗接种日期或与Chadox1 Ncov-19（Astra Zeneca）和杂项疫苗的受试者 14 0对于充满鲁布的拳头充满了卢布1年前的卢布1年前，有一个遗留因素不受影响 - 跨活动分子。 他们是无情的。 77 0 devonblueboy devonblueboy 1年前回复一个拳头满满的卢布12 0 godknowsimgood godknowsimgood 1年前https：//youtu.be/yu0vrc-33reimewood Feargal Sharkey - 神奇的声音。 9 -1 RTSC RTSC 1年前我警告了我的成年儿子关于在“邀请”被刺戳的时候长期来自以色列的心肌炎的报道。 我的旧儿子，那么32岁不是刺戳。 我的年轻人（然后30岁）有2个辉瑞公司反对我的建议，因为他想旅行，但没有助推器。 他非常运动，我感谢上帝，他有一个桌子工作，并暂时暂时在Covid Lunacy期间与我住在一起，他的体育机会非常有限。 在刺戳后，他回到了他的办公桌后，我们正在享受安静的晚上和有限的周末活动，因为限制，他患有肾上腺素引起的心脏病发作的机会明显减少。 由于他的苗条，非常适合并且没有已知的健康问题，我只是希望并祈祷危险时期每年都进一步减少。 92 0 Marcus Aurelius知道Marcus Aurelius知道1年前回复RTSC的一切越过你的儿子。 28 0 RTSC RTSC 1年前回复Marcus Aurelius知道谢谢。 11 0 Laptopmaestro laptopmaestro 1年前回复RTSC危险从未通过 - 心脏伤害是永久性的。 23 0 Sepulchrave Sepulchrave 1年前回复Laptopmaestro我还没有见过这个发现，这很讨论，请你能引用学习，确认由Covid疫苗造成的永久性心脏损伤吗？ 1 -8 laptopmaestro laptopmaestro 1年前回复坟墓所有的心脏伤害是alerlernt。 7 0 DS99 DS99 1年前回复RTSC的价值，我是人类精神力量和欧洲祷告权的大信徒。 身体有很不开发的恢复力量。 你做到了最好的，你的儿子做了他的想法是最好的 - 也许他得到的批次是那么有害的人？ 。 22 -1 ThelightCavalry ThelightCavalry 1年前辉瑞，现代人等必须支付赔偿金。 欺诈性测试和掩护无效，无论有任何法律豁免权，如果需要，刚刚制定复古积极的立法。 它们也不是生气勃勃等医学家，也不是像约翰逊，哥坡和汉臣这样的政治家都应该逃脱正义。 87 0 Chris P Chris P 1年前回复TheLightCavalry和应保护我们的监管机构。 56 0减少政府少政府1年前回复克里斯P和抑制真相的媒体。 20 0真实工程师真正的工程师1年前回复他们仍然存在的政府。 5 0 Sepulchrave Sepulchrave 1年前摘要状态：“第二个SARS-COV-2疫苗接种后1-180天接受PET / CT的无症状患者显示出Myocardial 18氟葡聚糖葡聚糖增加 没有一个受试者患有临床心肌炎，并且在180天后的效果消失，因此似乎影响温和和瞬态，也许不是那样的。 1 -30 johnk Johnk 1年前回复坟墓和许多感染有些温和和瞬态，因此无需使用潜在的危险药物来限制它们的影响。 43 0 Chris Chris 1年前，今早从BBC担心的令人作呕的Covid恐惧咒语，卫生官员再次将Covid“疫苗”推动新的变体，即使任何疫苗都不可能发展，以覆盖一个变种 Https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-66963982此外，这篇文章（即使是标题是Covid）还包括有关流感刺戳的信息，但在第一次阅读时很难分开两者。 52 0 Chris P Chris P 1年前回复克里斯，很有趣，你不能在英国私下私下购买Covid注射。 这向我暗示他们被禁止为大多数人口。 他们危险的当局的确认？ 27 0 Johnk Johnk 1年前回复Chris P它表明私人卖家买不起保险。 36 0 Thetartaneagle TheTartaneagle 1年前回复克里斯P是他们甚至获得许可吗？ 认证？ 或者，无论在暮光之城的医疗物质中发生什么。 也许他们不能私下规定，因为一些过程箍尚未通过。 13 0 Chris P Chris P 1年前回复Thetartaneagle是的，你可能是正确的。 它们仍然在紧急使用授权，制造商仍然有责任盾牌。 尽管如此，如果可以证明欺诈可能是盾牌变得毫无价值。 21 0 Roy Everett Roy Everett 1年前Katalin Kariko博士和Dr Drew Weissman可能会发现他们已经超过了比诺贝尔奖更多的信天翁！ 32 0 Roy Everett Roy Everett 1年前回复Roy Everett是诺贝尔医学奖，就像诺贝尔和平奖一样，即政治姿态，基本上是获得“正确”答案的年底奖，而不是违反学校规则 44 0 Ravin Mad Ravin疯狂1年前，这些心脏破坏的DNA改变干预措施获得了诺贝尔奖!!!!!!!! 言语让我失望!!!! 52 0 Roy Everett Roy Everett 1年前回复Ravin Mad的整个IPCC团队注入全球变暖的全球思想也有诺贝尔奖。 医学变得类似地政治化。 53 0 Roy Everett Roy Everett 1年前回复Ravin Mad他们可能是发明者，但谁选择部署疫苗，并是道德上的合理吗？ 最近的oppenheimer电影中提出了同等问题，特别是在oppenheimer和竞标杜鲁门之间的交流结束。 没有容易的答案，因为这一切都取决于建模如果已经进行了不同的决定会发生什么。 也许在另外八十年代，一些好莱坞电影制片人将使电影“kariko”和一些尚未出生的演员和电影专业人士得到奥斯卡。 想想它，也许Kariko和Weissman基本上是世界阶段的演员。 或木偶。 上次编辑1年前由Roy Everett 19 0 Devonblueboy Devonblueboy 1年前回复Ravin Made疯狂完美地与奖项的发起者，炸药的发明者。 12 0 Steven Robinson Steven Robinson 1年前查找确认了早期的研究（2022）疫苗损害所有疫苗接受者的心脏。 39 0 Waterbear Waterbear 1年前即使Bluemke对只有轻度影响的断言持有真实，没有任何益处的风险完全不可接受。 24 0真正的工程师真正的工程师1年前回复水抱11000每月多余的死亡，影响大量的年轻人，而不是那么旧？ 我不打电话给未成年人，他正在使用非常宽松的英语。 大流行会非常适合，它在每个国家都有任何vax率。 “安全有效”，以比其他大流行管理更高的速度杀死人们。 5 0 jabba the hut jabba the hut 1年前为什么这不令人惊讶，而心脏不是禁止禁止损坏的器官。 在我刚才看到医疗过失专家的广告，看起来他们会很忙。 29 0真正的工程师真正的工程师1年前回复Jabba我宁愿怀疑，政府已被承认的疫苗用途，并起诉政府非常困难且非常昂贵，部分原因是他们拥有全民税收资金诉讼和数百次驯化 3 0 Jumpin'Jehosaphat Jumpin'Jehosaphat 1年前别担心。 任何疫苗诱导的心脏病疫情都会归咎于气候变化。 41 0真正的工程师真正的工程师1年前回复跳跃'jehosaphat它已经被归咎于等待名单，这不是问题，这是诊断！ GPO的等待列表可能会在结果中产生微小的偏斜。 2 0 TheBookishtoad TheBookishtoad 1年前，毫无疑问他们会造成伤害，但他们对他们测试的事实略微恼火，他们测试了比未异常的vaxxed更多的2.5倍 - 不会歪斜心脏损伤的结果吗？ 不要让我错了，这些基因治疗实验是可怕的，但它们不应该从每个群体中测试大致相等的数量 - 或者我错过了一些东西？ 5 0 LaptoPMAESTRO Laptopmaestro 1年前回复依赖于地点的书签 - 承认unjabbed可能是一个问题。 1 0真正的工程师真正的工程师1年前回复统计术语中的统计术语的统计术语是无关紧要的，只要这两个群体都足够大即可产生统计上显着的结果。 请记住，很难找到完全未停过！ 3 0 LaptopMaestro Laptopmaestro 1年前可能是属于未被接种的心脏？ 5 0真正的美国派对真正的美国派对精神1年前哇，这可能是我所见过的刺刀的最大的研究，这真的说了些什么！
Nakahara等人开展的一项新科学研究对新冠疫苗接种者进行了测试，以观察他们是否存在标准放射学检查能够检测到的“隐性”心肌功能变化。这项研究的结果令人十分不安。
Covid Vaccines Damage All Hearts, Study Finds
BY IGOR CHUDOV 2 OCTOBER 2023 7:00 AM
A new scientific study by Nakahara et al. tested Covid-vaccinated people to see if they have “silent” changes in heart muscle function that standard radiology tests could detect. The study shows very unsettling results.
Scientists measured myocardial 18Fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) uptake. F-FDG has molecular similarity to glucose. However, 18F-FDG does not metabolise like glucose. Therefore, PET scans could detect it, and its presence shows the heart muscle’s abnormally high demand for glucose, indicative of abnormal cardiac function. More about it here.
Conclusions: Focal myocardial 18F-FDG uptake seen on oncologic PET/CT indicates a significantly increased risk for multiple myocardial abnormalities.
Indeed, this is what the Nakahara study finds (emphasis added, here and below):
Results
The study included 303 nonvaccinated patients (mean age, 52.9 years; 157 females) and 700 vaccinated patients (mean age, 56.8 years; 344 females). Vaccinated patients had overall higher myocardial FDG uptake compared to nonvaccinated patients (median SUVmax, 4.8 vs median SUVmax, 3.3 ; P < .0001). Myocardial SUVmax was higher in vaccinated patients regardless of sex (median range, 4.7-4.9 ) or patient age (median range, 4.7-5.6) compared to corresponding nonvaccinated groups (sex median range, 3.2-3.9; age median range, 3.3-3.3; P range, <.001-.015). Furthermore, increased myocardial FDG uptake was observed in patients imaged 1-30, 31-60, 61-120, and 121-180 days after their second vaccination (median SUVmax range, 4.6-5.1) and increased ipsilateral axillary uptake was observed in patients imaged 1-30, 31-60, 61-120 days after their second vaccination (median SUVmax range, 1.5-2.0) compared to the nonvaccinated patients (P range, <.001-<.001).
This was not supposed to happen! The Covid vaccine is not supposed to affect the heart in any way. It was promised to ‘stay in the arm’.
The explosive findings of the study are discussed in the editorial that the Editor of the magazine, Dr. Bluemke, felt obliged to publish.
Dr. Bluemke’s editorial is somewhat apologetic, and he gives faint praise for Covid vaccines.
The development of messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccines is a remarkable biotech story. While traditional vaccines took 5-10 years to develop, the COVID-19 vaccines took less than a year. By comparison, the fastest conventional vaccine previously developed was the mumps vaccine, on a timescale of four years.
Dr. Bluemke also does not mince words. He explains that the findings are not due to chance:
The main results: asymptomatic patients vaccinated for COVID-19 before PET had about 40% greater radiotracer activity in the myocardium than unvaccinated individuals. The P value was low, less than .0001. This translates to only one time out of 10,000 that these results would occur by chance.
The editorial states that there is no rational way to ignore and explain away the negative findings of myocardial inflammation by Takahara et al.:
Vaccine manufacturers are aware of the adverse effects of mRNA vaccines. These adverse effects lead to vaccine hesitancy. The study results by Nakahara et al. suggest that mild asymptomatic myocardial inflammation could be more common than we ever expected. This in turn would support a hypothesis of more severe systemic inflammation related to mRNA vaccination in some patients who present with symptoma-c myocarditis.
Dr. Bluemke calls for further research into this:
The investigators understood their first result was only the starting point. They next performed extensive ‘sensitivity analyses’ – i.e., looking at the same data from multiple different directions. What if we account for age differences between groups, and the number of vaccinations? If mRNA vaccinations do cause asymptomatic myocardial inflammation, wouldn’t the effect be more likely shortly after vaccination, rather than six months later? Many of us who had COVID-19 vaccines had flu-like symptoms immediately after vaccination – perhaps those of us with common flu-like reactions would have more myocardial inflammation as well? Could trained readers see the differences visually? Or were the differences seen only after placing regions of interest on the heart that could be accidentally mispositioned? The list goes on. Great researchers are also sceptics – they need to prove the results to themselves.
Was the increase in myocardial inflammation due to a few unlucky patients driving high averages, with most people remaining unaffected?
Unfortunately, that is not the case: all quartiles were affected deleteriously, as this image shows:
Is there a dose-response relationship, providing further proof of causality? Can we see if the higher-dose Moderna vaccine causes more heart problems than the lower-dose Pfizer vaccine?
Recall that studies of other topics, such as pregnancy outcomes, show a 42% greater miscarriage rate and 93% greater infant death rate for Moderna (higher dose vaccine) compared to Pfizer.
What about the Nakahara study we are discussing? It shows a weaker but similar pattern of greater response due to Moderna:
The authors say there is “no difference” between Pfizer and Moderna. However, there is a difference. Pfizer-vaccinated patients’ SUVmax was 4.7, and Moderna-vaccinated patients (Moderna is a greater dose, remember) had a greater SUVmax of 5.1. The difference did not reach statistical significance, likely due to a small sample size.
Does the ill effect go away as time passes? Unfortunately, the scientists’ chart of SUVmax over time does not show complete recovery during 180 days, still above the unvaccinated level:
A test of cardiac function via F-FDG uptake, a standard radiological test, is something that careful scientists conducting Covid vaccine clinical trials could carry on with a few hundred patients. Watchful vaccine safety agencies could demand such tests to be conducted to ensure the general public’s safety. They chose not to do it, and their sponsors (Pfizer and Moderna) made much money selling unproven and untested Covid vaccines.
The vaccines, instead of stopping the pandemic, damaged the heart muscles of millions.
I hope that the vaccinated people will be able to ask for compensation for their damaged hearts.
The reality, sadly, is that the damage will most likely be ignored, and the vaccine billionaires will enjoy their newfound wealth while the hysterical Pfizer-sponsored press will be scaring us with new distractions.
This article was first published on Igor’s Substack page. Subscribe here.
Tags: Covid VaccinesModernamRNA vaccinesMyocarditisPfizerVaccine Harms
DONATE
We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.
DONATE TODAY
COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE
You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.
SIGN UP
Previous Post
News Round-Up
Next Post
‘Nonsense’ of Gender Data Collected by Public Bodies Set for Review
Subscribe
Login
Please log in to comment
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
65 COMMENTS
Oldest
Mogwai
Mogwai
1 year ago
They do damage, full stop. Here’s Guy Hatchard talking about a recent study demonstrating the possibility of integration of the toxic crud into DNA and the implications;
”Transfection involves the insertion of foreign nucleic acids into a cell. What does the stabilisation of this process mean for us? The stable (permanent) integration of genetic material into a host cell chromosome may result in activation of oncogenes (cancer genes) or knockout of tumour suppressor genes. In other words, it can cause cancers.
In an attempt to avoid this happening, genetic material, including that used in mRNA vaccines, has been ‘end-capped’. However, unexpectedly, the study found that “the end modification of linear DNA did not significantly decrease the rate of integration [into human cell lines].”
We have been repeatedly assured that mRNA vaccines could not integrate into the human genome. Our concerns were often described by so-called fact checkers (aka media hacks and disinformation project scaremongers) as conspiracy theories. The study found that not only can this happen, but that it could happen with a frequency of up to 20%, one case in every five.
The outcome of these DNA integration events can only be described as a slowly unfolding train wreck of global proportions. The integration of DNA in this way is heritable—it can be passed to future generations, placing billions of our children’s children and so on in the shadow of genetic illness created by scientists who ignored evidence of harm and pressed ahead to subject the whole world’s population to novel biotech experimentation.”
https://hatchardreport.com/our-worst-nightmare-beckons/
161
0
JeremyP99
JeremyP99
1 year ago
Reply to Mogwai
“They do damage, full stop. Here’s Guy Hatchard talking about a recent study demonstrating the possibility of integration of the toxic crud into DNA and the implications;”
Multiple papers on this now. Not a “possibility” but reality.
87
0
Mogwai
Mogwai
1 year ago
Reply to JeremyP99
Not sure if you’ve seen the latest excellent ‘stack from Arkmedic. He writes about ‘Plasmidgate’ but with a twist. It’s certainly looking less and less likely that ‘Hanlon’s Razor’ applies here. But I always knew it was malice not cock-up. This just confirms it for me;
”But this article is not directly about the discovery of Plasmid DNA in the Pfizer and Moderna jabs (that has been now verified by 6 labs worldwide).
It’s about the special properties of the contents of that DNA and the RNA that is made from it, combined with the RNA that accompanies it (the jabs have the stated RNA in them as well as the stowaway DNA).
You see, it turns out that there are at least 5 different mechanisms for that DNA-RNA-protein combination to take that DNA into the nucleus of your cells. And that wasn’t on the advertising brochure was it?”
https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/5-ways-to-skin-a-genetically-modified
80
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
1 year ago
Reply to Mogwai
In other words millions of people have time-bombs ticking away inside them. If heart failure doesn’t get them the cancers will.
My God.
80
0
Mogwai
Mogwai
1 year ago
Reply to huxleypiggles
Aye, that’s about the size of it. As I’ve said before, they want us dead, injured or infertile. Sounds deserving of a Nobel Prize doesn’t it? 😮 Only in Clown World…
59
0
Jon Smith
Jon Smith
1 year ago
Reply to Mogwai
I’m interested who you think “they” are??
Last edited 1 year ago by Jon Smith
7
-27
Jon Smith
Jon Smith
1 year ago
Reply to Jon Smith
I know who they are…
Last edited 1 year ago by Jon Smith
0
0
FerdIII
FerdIII
1 year ago
Great article. Heart disease is heart disease. Heart damage is heart damage. It is never ‘mild’. And the study used an unstabbinated control group – no issues with those higher IQ people who said nein to poisons from Medical Nazis, criminals, lunatics and liars.
Conclusions: Focal myocardial 18F-FDG uptake seen on oncologic PET/CT indicates a significantly increased risk for multiple myocardial abnormalities.
115
-12
Occams Pangolin Pie
Occams Pangolin Pie
1 year ago
Reply to FerdIII
Yes!
IQ though? Not so sure. Just the time and space to give it some thought was the only requirement. We have been deliberately placed on never ceasing hamster wheels where deference to experts is easy and abnegation of basic common sense is the norm, from Professor up to binman.
66
-1
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
1 year ago
Reply to FerdIII
I don’t know about IQ. I’ve come out with some pretty low scores, but then I never did like the arbitrary, absurd, unreal nature of desk tests. So boring, you see.
No. What I thought to myself in March 2020 was simply that if it was going to be as deadly dangerous as they said it was going to be, then I would need to up sticks to somewhere very remote. Which could be a very expensive exercise. So I decided to undertake Due Diligence.
The first form of Due Diligence was to look out of the window. No dead people.
The second form of Due Diligence was to check if the numbers of people dying every day (regardless of pathology) were anything above the norm. They weren’t.
Job done. Is that evidence of “High IQ”? I sincerely hope not…
104
0
transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to Marcus Aurelius knew
As stewart likes to point out, there’s a difference between intelligence and wisdom.
58
0
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
1 year ago
Reply to transmissionofflame
So which is it? Eternal questions…
9
0
transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to Marcus Aurelius knew
Doubtless you have both but you are certainly wise.
23
0
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
1 year ago
Well I suppose it’s nice to have all this detail. But the fact that fit, young, healthy athletes suddenly started dropping dead or being excused from sport for the rest of their lives in far greater numbers than ever before was a kind of giveaway.
And guess what – it didn’t start happening before the jabs.
Last edited 1 year ago by Marcus Aurelius knew
177
0
modularist
modularist
1 year ago
I read this in the middle of the night. I recalled Vinay Prasad asking about a year ago, ‘What if everybody suffers sub-clinical myocarditis?’.
This should add some fuel for Andrew Bridgen’s parliamentary speech on October 20th.
Just a shout-out while I’m here for the fantastic symposium in Sweden on Saturday (which AB was on a panel at and regular on this site Dr David Bell presented at):
https://childrenshealthdefense.eu/doctors-appeal-symposium-sep-30-2023/
I understand that will broken out into chunks on CHD Europe and UKColumn soon. It’s all worth watching (that was my Saturday!), and there are many familiar names, but particularly interesting and a little different was a money strand and a superb presentation from Prof Richard Werner (of QE and ‘money as debt’ fame) on the history of banking and the road to CBDCs, followed by an equally interesting one by John Titus on the coming US debt crisis). Werner begins at 5:26 in.
69
0
For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
1 year ago
I await the outcome of the post mortem on the M53 school bus driver to hear what the “medical issues” were that he suffered at the wheel.
104
0
JohnK
JohnK
1 year ago
Reply to For a fist full of roubles
And there will be several claims for damages against him, and in effect the bus company. Their insurer will end up having to shell out for that.
29
0
RTSC
RTSC
1 year ago
Reply to For a fist full of roubles
We won’t be told. Privacy, don’cha know.
52
0
Jane G
Jane G
1 year ago
Reply to For a fist full of roubles
Did we ever find out what caused the driver of the 4×4 to pile into the school tea- party?
38
0
Less government
Less government
1 year ago
Reply to Jane G
Good question.
9
0
Roy Everett
Roy Everett
1 year ago
Reply to For a fist full of roubles
If there is an inquest and there is prior suspicion about the fundamental cause of the “medical issue” then it will be held with the press and general public excluded, and with the attendees warned not to speak to anybody about it. Some approved narrative will be created. That is the norm for coroner’s inquests. However, it is quite conceivable that this case has nothing to do with vaccines. We shall never know.
22
0
CircusSpot
CircusSpot
1 year ago
What of the AZ jabs that disappeared completely following bans in various European Countries? What was in them and are they equally dangerous?
87
0
WyrdWoman
WyrdWoman
1 year ago
Reply to CircusSpot
Original report says they were excluded, insufficient numbers:
Subjects with unknown vaccination dates or with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Astra Zeneca) and miscellaneous vaccines were excluded when patients were stratified by time interval or type of vaccine due to the small sample size.
14
0
For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
1 year ago
There is one group that remains unaffected – trans activists. They are heartless.
77
0
DevonBlueBoy
DevonBlueBoy
1 year ago
Reply to For a fist full of roubles
🤣🤣
12
0
godknowsimgood
godknowsimgood
1 year ago
https://youtu.be/YU0VrC-33RE?si=_QYHooFKxURYLib5
9
0
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
1 year ago
Reply to godknowsimgood
A good heart these days is hard to find indeed
25
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
1 year ago
Reply to Marcus Aurelius knew
“…so please be gentle with this heart of mine”
10
-1
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
1 year ago
Reply to Marcus Aurelius knew
One of my all time favourite singles.
Feargal Sharkey – magical voice.
9
-1
RTSC
RTSC
1 year ago
I warned my adult sons about reports of myocarditis coming from Israel long before they were “invited” to be jabbed. My older son, then age 32 isn’t jabbed. My younger one (then age 30) had 2 Pfizer shots against my advice because he wanted to travel, but no boosters. He’s very sporty and I thank God that he has a desk-job AND had returned to live with me temporarily during the Covid lunacy, where his sporting opportunities were extremely limited.
After the jabs he went back to his desk and we were having quiet evenings and limited weekend activities due to the restrictions, so the chances of him suffering an adrenaline-induced heart attack were significantly reduced.
Since he’s slim, very fit and has no known health issues, I just hope and pray the danger period has passed and reduces further every year.
92
0
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
1 year ago
Reply to RTSC
Everything crossed for your son.
28
0
RTSC
RTSC
1 year ago
Reply to Marcus Aurelius knew
Thank you.
11
0
LaptopMaestro
LaptopMaestro
1 year ago
Reply to RTSC
The danger never passes – heart damage is permanent.
23
0
Sepulchrave
Sepulchrave
1 year ago
Reply to LaptopMaestro
I haven’t seen this finding, this is very concerning, please can you cite the studies that confirm permanent heart damage caused by Covid vaccines?
1
-8
LaptopMaestro
LaptopMaestro
1 year ago
Reply to Sepulchrave
ALL heart damage is permanernt.
7
0
DS99
DS99
1 year ago
Reply to RTSC
For what it’s worth, I’m a big believer in the power of the human spirit and the occasonal prayer. The body has quite untapped powers of recuperation. You did your best, your son did what he thought was best – maybe the batches he got were the less harmful ones? .
22
-1
thelightcavalry
thelightcavalry
1 year ago
Pfizer, Moderna etc must pay the compensation. The fraudulent testing and cover-ups invalidate any legal immunities and if necessary just enact retro-active legislation. Neither they nor the medics like Fauci nor the politicians like Johnson, Gove and Hancock should escape justice.
87
0
Chris P
Chris P
1 year ago
Reply to thelightcavalry
And the regulators who are supposed to protect us.
56
0
Less government
Less government
1 year ago
Reply to Chris P
And the Media that suppressed the truth.
20
0
The Real Engineer
The Real Engineer
1 year ago
Reply to Less government
They still are.
5
0
Sepulchrave
Sepulchrave
1 year ago
The summary states:
“Asymptomatic patients who underwent PET/CT 1-180 days after their second SARS-CoV-2 vaccination showed increased myocardial 18Fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on images compared to nonvaccinated patients, but patients imaged >180 days after vaccination did not.”
None of the subjects had clinical myocarditis and the effect disappeared after 180 days, so it seems that the impact was mild and transient, perhaps not that concerning.
1
-30
JohnK
JohnK
1 year ago
Reply to Sepulchrave
And many infections are somewhat mild and transient, thus no need to use potentially hazardous drugs to limit their effects.
43
0
CHRIS
CHRIS
1 year ago
More disgusting COVID fear mongering from the BBC this morning, health officials pushing the COVID “vaccine” again against the new variant even though it’s impossible for any vaccine to have been developed to cover a variant that has only just been detected.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-66963982
Also, the article (even though the headline is all COVID) includes information about the flu jab but it’s difficult at first reading to separate the two.
52
0
Chris P
Chris P
1 year ago
Reply to CHRIS
It is interesting that you cannot buy a covid injection privately in the UK. That suggests to me they are banned for most of the population. An acknowledgement by the authorities that they are dangerous?
27
0
JohnK
JohnK
1 year ago
Reply to Chris P
It suggests that the private sellers can’t afford the insurance.
36
0
TheTartanEagle
TheTartanEagle
1 year ago
Reply to Chris P
Are they even licensed? Certified? Or whatever happens in the twilight zone of medical substances. Maybe they cannot be prescribed privately because some process hoop hasn’t been passed.
13
0
Chris P
Chris P
1 year ago
Reply to TheTartanEagle
Yes, you’re probably correct. They’re still on emergency use authorisation and the manufacturers still have their liability shield. Although, if fraud can be proved presumably the shield becomes worthless.
21
0
Roy Everett
Roy Everett
1 year ago
Dr Katalin Kariko and Dr Drew Weissman may find that they have received more of an albatross than a Nobel Prize!
32
0
Roy Everett
Roy Everett
1 year ago
Reply to Roy Everett
Is the Nobel Prize for Medicine going the same way as the Nobel Prize for Peace, that is, a political gesture, essentially an end-of-year prize for getting the “right” answers, not breaking the school rules and for singing the school anthem in tune?
44
0
Ravin Mad
Ravin Mad
1 year ago
And the inventors of these heart-damaging DNA altering interventions get awarded the Nobel prize!!!!!!!! Words fail me!!!!
52
0
Roy Everett
Roy Everett
1 year ago
Reply to Ravin Mad
The entire IPCC team that injected Global Warming into the world’s minds also got a Nobel Prize. Medicine has become similarly politicized.
53
0
Roy Everett
Roy Everett
1 year ago
Reply to Ravin Mad
They may be the inventors, but who chose to deploy the vaccine, and was it morally justified? The equivalent question was raised in the recent Oppenheimer movie, notably at the end in the exchange between Oppenheimer and Biden Truman. There is no easy answer as it all depends on modelling what would have happened if different decisions had been made. Perhaps in another eighty years some Hollywood film producer will make the movie “Kariko” and some yet-to-be-born actors and film professionals will get an Oscar.
Come to think of it, perhaps Kariko and Weissman are essentially actors on a world stage. Or puppets.
Last edited 1 year ago by Roy Everett
19
0
DevonBlueBoy
DevonBlueBoy
1 year ago
Reply to Ravin Mad
Perfectly in keeping with the originator of the prize, the inventor of dynamite.
12
0
Steven Robinson
Steven Robinson
1 year ago
The finding confirms an earlier study (2022) that the vaccines injure the heart of all vaccine recipients.
39
0
waterbear
waterbear
1 year ago
Even if Bluemke’s assertion of only a mild impact holds true, the absence of any benefit makes any level of risk completely unacceptable.
24
0
The Real Engineer
The Real Engineer
1 year ago
Reply to waterbear
11,000 excess deaths per month, affecting a large number of the young and not so much the very old? I don’t call that minor, he is using very loose English. Pandemic would suit quite well, it is in every country with any vax rate at all. “Safe and Effective”, at killing people at a much higher rate than even the other pandemic managed.
5
0
Jabba the Hut
Jabba the Hut
1 year ago
Why does this comes as no surprise and the heart isn’t the only organ that is damaged by the jabs. On the plus side I’ve just seen an advert for medical negligence specialists, looks like they’ll be busy.
29
0
The Real Engineer
The Real Engineer
1 year ago
Reply to Jabba the Hut
I rather doubt that, the Government has underwritted the vaccine use, and suing the Government is very difficult and extremely expensive, partly because they have the entire tax take to fund litigation and hundreds of tame lawyers.
3
0
Jumpin' Jehosaphat
Jumpin' Jehosaphat
1 year ago
Don’t worry. Any vaccine-induced heart disease epidemic will be blamed on climate change.
41
0
The Real Engineer
The Real Engineer
1 year ago
Reply to Jumpin' Jehosaphat
It is already being blamed on waiting lists, which is not the issue, this is diagnosis! Waiting lists for GPOs might produce a tiny skew in the results.
2
0
thebookishtoad
thebookishtoad
1 year ago
There’s no doubt they do damage
but I am slightly irritated by the fact
that they tested 2.5 times more vaxxed than unvaxxed – wouldn’t that skew the results in favour of heart damage? Don’t get me wrong, these gene therapy experiments are horrific but shouldn’t they have tested roughly equal numbers from each group – or am I missing something?
5
0
LaptopMaestro
LaptopMaestro
1 year ago
Reply to thebookishtoad
Dependent on location – admitting to being unjabbed might be an issue.
1
0
The Real Engineer
The Real Engineer
1 year ago
Reply to thebookishtoad
In statistical terms the group size is irrelevant, as long as both groups are large enough to produce a statistically significant result. Remember it is hard to find the totally unvaxed!
3
0
LaptopMaestro
LaptopMaestro
1 year ago
Presumably with the exception of hearts belonging to the unvaccinated?
5
0
True Spirit of America Party
True Spirit of America Party
1 year ago
Wow, this is probably the most damning study of the jabs that I have seen yet, and that really says something! Covid疫苗伤害所有的心，研究发现由Igor Chudov 2 10月20日7:00 AM A AM Nakahara等人的新科学研究。 被测试的Covid接种人员认为它们具有“沉默”的心肌功能变化，即标准放射学检测可以检测到。 该研究表明了令人不安的结果。 科学家测定了心肌18氟氟硅氧葡萄糖（18F-FDG）吸收。 F-FDG与葡萄糖具有分子相似性。 然而，18F-FDG不会像葡萄糖一样代谢。 因此，宠物扫描可以检测到它，其存在表明心肌对葡萄糖的异常高的需求，指示心脏功能异常。 更多关于它在这里。 结论：肿瘤学宠物/ CT上局灶性心肌18F-FDG摄取表明多种心肌异常的风险显着增加。 实际上，这就是Nakahara研究发现（重点添加，这里和以下）：研究结果包括303名非疫苗患者（平均年龄，52.9岁; 157名女性）和700名疫苗患者（平均年龄，56.8岁; 疫苗接种患者与非Vaccalinal患者相比，疫苗的患者具有全面的心肌FDG吸收（中位数Suvmax，4.8 Vs中位数Suvmax，3.3; P <.0001）。 与相应的非Vaccaled群体相比，疫苗的患者中疫苗的患者（中位数，4.7-5.6）（中位数范围，3.2-3.9;年龄中位数 此外，在第二次疫苗接种（中位Suvmax范围，4.6-5.1）和同侧腋窝增加后，在成像1-30,31-60,61-120和121-180天内，观察到增加的心肌FDG摄取。 这不应该发生！ Covid疫苗不应该以任何方式影响心脏。 它被承诺“留在手臂”。 该研究的爆炸性调查结果是在杂志中的编辑中讨论了这项研究的讨论，杂志博士Bluemke博士的觉得有义务发布。 Bluemke博士的社论有点抱歉，他对Covid疫苗带来了微弱的赞美。 Messenger RNA（mRNA）Covid-19疫苗的发展是一个非凡的生物技术故事。 虽然传统疫苗花了5-10年来开发，但Covid-19疫苗花了不到一年。 相比之下，先前开发的最快疫苗是腮腺炎疫苗，在四年的时间内。 Bluemke博士也没有碎的话。 他解释说，这些发现不是由于机会：主要结果：在PET之前对Covid-19疫苗接种的无症状患者在心肌中比未移植的个体具有大约40％的放射性机构活性。 P值低，小于.0001。 这只转化为10,000中只有一个时间，即偶然会发生这些结果。 编辑指出，没有理性的方式来忽视并解释Takahara等人的心肌炎症的消极结果.:疫苗制造商了解mRNA疫苗的不良影响。 这些不利影响导致疫苗犹豫不决。 Nakahara等人的研究结果。 表明，轻度无症状的心肌炎症可能比我们预期的更常见。 这反过来将在一些患有症状-C心肌炎的一些患者中支持与mRNA疫苗相关的更严重的全身炎症。 Bluemke博士呼吁进一步研究这一点：调查人员理解他们的第一个结果只是起点。 他们接下来进行了广泛的“敏感性分析” - 即，从多个不同方向看相同的数据。 如果我们考虑到群体之间的年龄差异以及疫苗接种数量怎么办？ 如果mRNA疫苗接种会导致无症状的心肌炎症，疫苗接种后的效果不会更可能，而不是六个月后？ 患有Covid-19疫苗的许多人在疫苗接种后立即进行了流感样症状 - 也许我们常见的流感反应的人也会有更多的心肌炎症？ 训练有素的读者可视地看到差异吗？ 或者只是在将感兴趣的地区放置在可能意外失误的内心之后看到的差异？ 列表继续。 伟大的研究人员也是怀疑论者 - 他们需要向自己证明结果。 由于一些不幸的患者推动高平均患者，心肌炎症的增加是由于剩下的大多数人不受影响？ 不幸的是，这并非如此：所有四分位数都受到了风格的影响，因为此形象显示：是否有一种剂量 - 反应关系，提供进一步的因果关系证明？ 我们可以看出更高剂量的现代疫苗是否导致较低剂量辉稿疫苗的心脏问题？ 回想一下，与辉瑞相比，对妊娠结果等其他主题的研究表明，与PFizer相比，对现代（较高剂量疫苗）的流产率提高了42％，婴儿死亡率提高了93％。 我们正在讨论的Nakahara学习怎么样？ 它显示了由于现代人而越来越多的反应模式：作者说，辉瑞和现代人之间存在“无差异”。 但是，存在差异。 PFizer疫苗的患者的Suvmax是4.7，而现代疫苗的患者（现代人的患者是更大的剂量，记住）5.1的SUVMAX。 差异没有达到统计学意义，可能是由于样品大小的小。 随着时间的推移，病情会消失吗？ 不幸的是，Suvmax的科学家们的图表随着时间的推移不会显示完全恢复，仍然高于未接种的水平：通过F-FDG摄取的心功能测试，标准放射性测试，是谨慎的科学家进行Covid Vac的东西 注意疫苗安全机构可能需要进行这样的测试，以确保公众的安全。 他们选择不这样做，他们的赞助商（辉瑞和现代人）赚了很多钱，销售未经证实和未经证实的Covid疫苗。 疫苗，而不是停止大流行，损坏了数百万的心肌。 我希望疫苗的人能够要求赔偿他们受损的心灵。 遗憾的是，损害很可能会被忽视，疫苗亿万富翁将享受他们的新财富，而歇斯底里的辉瑞赞助的新闻将吓到我们的新分心。 本文首次发布于iGor的重置页面。 订阅这里。 标签：covid vacinisemodernamrna疫苗疫苗痘痘ispfizervaccine危害捐赠我们依靠您的捐款来保持这个网站。 请给你能提供什么。 捐赠今天对本文的评论，如果您没有已经拥有一个，您需要设置帐户以评论。 如果您想在我们的论坛中发表评论或邮寄，我们要求5英镑的最低捐款。 注册上一篇文章新闻循环下一页帖子“废话”由公共机构收集的性别数据设置为审查订阅登录请登录评论加入讨论请捐赠给日常怀疑论者。 将删除亵渎和虐待，可能导致永久禁令。 65评论最古老的mogwai mogwai 1年前他们做伤害，全部停止。 这是一个庭院谈论最近的一项研究，展示了将有毒冠军融入DNA的可能性以及含义; “转染涉及将外部核酸插入细胞中。 这个过程的稳定性是什么意思对我们来说意味着什么？ 遗传物质到宿主细胞染色体中的稳定（永久性）将遗传物质的整合可能导致肿瘤抑制基因的癌基因（癌症基因）或敲除。 换句话说，它会导致癌症。 为了避免这种情况，遗传物质（包括用于mRNA疫苗的遗传物质）已被“结束”。 然而，出乎意料的是，研究发现，“线性DNA的最终改性并没有显着降低人体细胞系的整合速率”。“ 我们已经反复放心MRNA疫苗不能整合到人类基因组中。 我们的担忧通常是由所谓的实况跳棋（AKA Media Hacks和Disinformation项目Scaremongers）描述为阴谋理论。 这项研究发现，这不仅可以发生这种情况，而且它可能会发生在每五个频率上的频率，每五个案例。 这些DNA集成事件的结果只能被描述为全球比例的缓慢展开的火车残骸。 以这种方式整合DNA是可遗传的 - 它可以传递到后代，将数十亿名孩子的孩子们放在遗传疾病的阴影中，由科学家们忽视危害的证据，并使整个世界人口对新的生物技术实验来说 https://hatchardreport.com/our-worst-nightmare-beckons/161 0 jeremyp99 jeremyp99 1年前回复mogwai“他们做伤害，全面停止。 这是伙计差管谈到最近的一项研究，展示了将有毒的Crud融入DNA和含义的可能性;“ 现在有多篇论文。 不是“可能性”，而是现实。 87 0 Mogwai Mogwai 1年前回复jeremyp99不确定您是否已经看过来自ArkMedic的最新优秀'堆栈。 他写了“质粒”，但扭曲了。 这肯定看起来越来越少，“汉仑的剃刀”适用于此。 但我总是知道这是恶意的不是僵失。 这只是为我确认; “但是本文并不直接关于辉瑞和现代刺戳中的质粒DNA的发现（现在已在全球6个实验室验证）。 这是关于该DNA的内容的特殊性质和由其制成的RNA，与伴随物的RNA（JABS在它们中具有陈述的RNA以及储存DNA）。 你看，事实证明，DNA-RNA蛋白质组合至少有5种不同的机制，将DNA置于细胞的细胞核中。 那不是广告宣传册在广告宣传册上吗？“ https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/5-ways-to-skin-a-genetically-modified 80 0 hxleypiggles huxleypiggles 1年前回复Mogwai换句话说，数百万人有时间 - 如果心力衰竭不会让它们遗嘱。 我的上帝。 80 0 Mogwai Mogwai 1年前回复HuxleyPiggles Aye，这是关于它的大小。 正如我之前所说的那样，他们希望我们死亡，受伤或不孕。 听起来值得诺贝尔奖不是吗？ 😮只在小丑世界... 59 0 jon smith jon smith 1年前回复mogwai我对谁感兴趣，你觉得“他们”是谁？ 上次编辑1年前jon smith 7 -27 jon史密斯jon史密斯1年前回复jon史密斯我知道他们是谁...上次编辑1年前由jon smith 0 0 ferdiii ferdiii 1年前很棒的文章。 心脏病是心脏病。 心脏伤害是心脏损伤。 它永远不会“轻度”。 该研究使用了未甲基对照组 - 没有关于那些更高的智商的问题，他对来自医疗纳粹，犯罪分子，疯子和骗子的毒药毒药。 结论：肿瘤学宠物/ CT上局灶性心肌18F-FDG摄取表明多种心肌异常的风险显着增加。 115 -12冬季pangolin pie occams pangolin馅饼1年前回复ferdiii是的！ 虽然？ 不太确定。 只有时间和空间给它一些思想是唯一的要求。 我们被故意放置在永不停止仓鼠的呼喊，在那里尊重专家很容易且忽略基本常识是常态，来自Binman的教授。 66 -1 Marcus Aurelius知道Marcus Aurelius知道1年前回复Ferdiii我不知道智商。 我已经出来了一些相当低的分数，但后来我从来没有像桌面测试的任意，荒谬，虚幻的本质。 所以无聊，你看。 不，我想到了2020年3月的对自己的想法只是，如果它会像他们所说的那样致命危险，那么我需要把棍子伸到一个非常遥远的地方。 这可能是一个非常昂贵的运动。 所以我决定采取尽职调查。 最尊重的第一种形式的追求是看窗外。 没有死人。 尽职调查的第二种形式是检查每天死亡的人数（无论病理学如何）是常数高于常态的任何东西。 他们不是。 工作完成了。 是“高智商”的证据？ 我真诚的希望不是...... 104 0传输OFFLAME传输OFFLAME 1年前回复Marcus Aurelius知道Stewart喜欢指出，情报和智慧之间存在差异。 58 0 Marcus Aurelius知道Marcus Aurelius知道1年前回复运输Offlame，所以这是什么？ 永恒的问题...... 9 0传输OFFLAME传输OFFLAME 1年前Marcus Aurelius的回复毫无疑问你有两个，但你肯定是明智的。 23 0 Marcus Aurelius知道Marcus Aurelius知道1年前我想拥有所有这些细节很好。 但是，适合，年轻，健康的运动员突然开始死亡或从运动中的剩余生活中突然开始死亡，而不是以往任何时候都是一种赠品。 并猜猜是什么 - 它在刺戳前没有开始发生。 上次编辑的1年前由Marcus Aurelius知道177 0模块化核心核心人1年前我在半夜看了这个。 我回忆起Vinay Prasad关于一年前的询问，“如果每个人都患有亚临床心肌炎怎么办？”。 这应该在10月20日增加Andrew Bridgen的议会演讲。 在周六我在这里寻找瑞典的神奇研讨会（在这个网站上的小组和常规的小组上举行的奇妙研讨会）：https://childrenshealthdefense.eu/doctors-app 这一切都值得关注（那是我的星期六！），并且有许多熟悉的名字，但特别有趣，有点不同，是金钱赛（QE和QE和'货币的奖金上的一笔卓越的演讲）银行和道路的债务“名誉” Werner从5:26开始。69 0对于一个充满武器的拳头充满了卢布1年前，我等待M53校车司机在M53校车司机的结果，听到他在车轮上遭受了什么“医学问题”。 104 0 Johnk Johnk 1年前回复一个充满卢布的拳头，将有几个索赔对他的损害赔偿，并生效公交公司。 他们的保险公司将最终不得不为此剥离。 29 0 RTSC RTSC 1年前回复充满卢布的拳头我们不会被告知。 隐私，Don'Cha知道。 52 0 Jane G Jane G 1年前回复一个充满卢布的拳头我们有没有发现导致4×4驾驶员队伍的队伍才能进入学校茶党？ 38 0减少政府少政府1年前回复简克好问题。 9 0 Roy Everett Roy Everett 1年前回复一个拳头的拳头，如果有一个调查，那么事先怀疑“医学问题”的根本原因，那么它将与新闻界和普通公众一起举行，并与与会者警告 将创建一些批准的叙述。 这是验尸官查询的标准。 但是，这可以想到，这种情况与疫苗无关。 我们永远不知道。 22 0 Circusspot Circusspot 1年前Az Jabs在各种欧洲国家的禁止遵循禁令时消失了什么？ 他们在其中什么，它们同样危险吗？ 87 0 Wyrdwoman Wyrdwoman 1年前回复Circusspot原始报告称，他们被排除在外，数字不足：具有未知疫苗接种日期或与Chadox1 Ncov-19（Astra Zeneca）和杂项疫苗的受试者 14 0对于充满鲁布的拳头充满了卢布1年前的卢布1年前，有一个遗留因素不受影响 - 跨活动分子。 他们是无情的。 77 0 devonblueboy devonblueboy 1年前回复一个拳头满满的卢布12 0 godknowsimgood godknowsimgood 1年前https：//youtu.be/yu0vrc-33reimewood Feargal Sharkey - 神奇的声音。 9 -1 RTSC RTSC 1年前我警告了我的成年儿子关于在“邀请”被刺戳的时候长期来自以色列的心肌炎的报道。 我的旧儿子，那么32岁不是刺戳。 我的年轻人（然后30岁）有2个辉瑞公司反对我的建议，因为他想旅行，但没有助推器。 他非常运动，我感谢上帝，他有一个桌子工作，并暂时暂时在Covid Lunacy期间与我住在一起，他的体育机会非常有限。 在刺戳后，他回到了他的办公桌后，我们正在享受安静的晚上和有限的周末活动，因为限制，他患有肾上腺素引起的心脏病发作的机会明显减少。 由于他的苗条，非常适合并且没有已知的健康问题，我只是希望并祈祷危险时期每年都进一步减少。 92 0 Marcus Aurelius知道Marcus Aurelius知道1年前回复RTSC的一切越过你的儿子。 28 0 RTSC RTSC 1年前回复Marcus Aurelius知道谢谢。 11 0 Laptopmaestro laptopmaestro 1年前回复RTSC危险从未通过 - 心脏伤害是永久性的。 23 0 Sepulchrave Sepulchrave 1年前回复Laptopmaestro我还没有见过这个发现，这很讨论，请你能引用学习，确认由Covid疫苗造成的永久性心脏损伤吗？ 1 -8 laptopmaestro laptopmaestro 1年前回复坟墓所有的心脏伤害是alerlernt。 7 0 DS99 DS99 1年前回复RTSC的价值，我是人类精神力量和欧洲祷告权的大信徒。 身体有很不开发的恢复力量。 你做到了最好的，你的儿子做了他的想法是最好的 - 也许他得到的批次是那么有害的人？ 。 22 -1 ThelightCavalry ThelightCavalry 1年前辉瑞，现代人等必须支付赔偿金。 欺诈性测试和掩护无效，无论有任何法律豁免权，如果需要，刚刚制定复古积极的立法。 它们也不是生气勃勃等医学家，也不是像约翰逊，哥坡和汉臣这样的政治家都应该逃脱正义。 87 0 Chris P Chris P 1年前回复TheLightCavalry和应保护我们的监管机构。 56 0减少政府少政府1年前回复克里斯P和抑制真相的媒体。 20 0真实工程师真正的工程师1年前回复他们仍然存在的政府。 5 0 Sepulchrave Sepulchrave 1年前摘要状态：“第二个SARS-COV-2疫苗接种后1-180天接受PET / CT的无症状患者显示出Myocardial 18氟葡聚糖葡聚糖增加 没有一个受试者患有临床心肌炎，并且在180天后的效果消失，因此似乎影响温和和瞬态，也许不是那样的。 1 -30 johnk Johnk 1年前回复坟墓和许多感染有些温和和瞬态，因此无需使用潜在的危险药物来限制它们的影响。 43 0 Chris Chris 1年前，今早从BBC担心的令人作呕的Covid恐惧咒语，卫生官员再次将Covid“疫苗”推动新的变体，即使任何疫苗都不可能发展，以覆盖一个变种 Https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-66963982此外，这篇文章（即使是标题是Covid）还包括有关流感刺戳的信息，但在第一次阅读时很难分开两者。 52 0 Chris P Chris P 1年前回复克里斯，很有趣，你不能在英国私下私下购买Covid注射。 这向我暗示他们被禁止为大多数人口。 他们危险的当局的确认？ 27 0 Johnk Johnk 1年前回复Chris P它表明私人卖家买不起保险。 36 0 Thetartaneagle TheTartaneagle 1年前回复克里斯P是他们甚至获得许可吗？ 认证？ 或者，无论在暮光之城的医疗物质中发生什么。 也许他们不能私下规定，因为一些过程箍尚未通过。 13 0 Chris P Chris P 1年前回复Thetartaneagle是的，你可能是正确的。 它们仍然在紧急使用授权，制造商仍然有责任盾牌。 尽管如此，如果可以证明欺诈可能是盾牌变得毫无价值。 21 0 Roy Everett Roy Everett 1年前Katalin Kariko博士和Dr Drew Weissman可能会发现他们已经超过了比诺贝尔奖更多的信天翁！ 32 0 Roy Everett Roy Everett 1年前回复Roy Everett是诺贝尔医学奖，就像诺贝尔和平奖一样，即政治姿态，基本上是获得“正确”答案的年底奖，而不是违反学校规则 44 0 Ravin Mad Ravin疯狂1年前，这些心脏破坏的DNA改变干预措施获得了诺贝尔奖!!!!!!!! 言语让我失望!!!! 52 0 Roy Everett Roy Everett 1年前回复Ravin Mad的整个IPCC团队注入全球变暖的全球思想也有诺贝尔奖。 医学变得类似地政治化。 53 0 Roy Everett Roy Everett 1年前回复Ravin Mad他们可能是发明者，但谁选择部署疫苗，并是道德上的合理吗？ 最近的oppenheimer电影中提出了同等问题，特别是在oppenheimer和竞标杜鲁门之间的交流结束。 没有容易的答案，因为这一切都取决于建模如果已经进行了不同的决定会发生什么。 也许在另外八十年代，一些好莱坞电影制片人将使电影“kariko”和一些尚未出生的演员和电影专业人士得到奥斯卡。 想想它，也许Kariko和Weissman基本上是世界阶段的演员。 或木偶。 上次编辑1年前由Roy Everett 19 0 Devonblueboy Devonblueboy 1年前回复Ravin Made疯狂完美地与奖项的发起者，炸药的发明者。 12 0 Steven Robinson Steven Robinson 1年前查找确认了早期的研究（2022）疫苗损害所有疫苗接受者的心脏。 39 0 Waterbear Waterbear 1年前即使Bluemke对只有轻度影响的断言持有真实，没有任何益处的风险完全不可接受。 24 0真正的工程师真正的工程师1年前回复水抱11000每月多余的死亡，影响大量的年轻人，而不是那么旧？ 我不打电话给未成年人，他正在使用非常宽松的英语。 大流行会非常适合，它在每个国家都有任何vax率。 “安全有效”，以比其他大流行管理更高的速度杀死人们。 5 0 jabba the hut jabba the hut 1年前为什么这不令人惊讶，而心脏不是禁止禁止损坏的器官。 在我刚才看到医疗过失专家的广告，看起来他们会很忙。 29 0真正的工程师真正的工程师1年前回复Jabba我宁愿怀疑，政府已被承认的疫苗用途，并起诉政府非常困难且非常昂贵，部分原因是他们拥有全民税收资金诉讼和数百次驯化 3 0 Jumpin'Jehosaphat Jumpin'Jehosaphat 1年前别担心。 任何疫苗诱导的心脏病疫情都会归咎于气候变化。 41 0真正的工程师真正的工程师1年前回复跳跃'jehosaphat它已经被归咎于等待名单，这不是问题，这是诊断！ GPO的等待列表可能会在结果中产生微小的偏斜。 2 0 TheBookishtoad TheBookishtoad 1年前，毫无疑问他们会造成伤害，但他们对他们测试的事实略微恼火，他们测试了比未异常的vaxxed更多的2.5倍 - 不会歪斜心脏损伤的结果吗？ 不要让我错了，这些基因治疗实验是可怕的，但它们不应该从每个群体中测试大致相等的数量 - 或者我错过了一些东西？ 5 0 LaptoPMAESTRO Laptopmaestro 1年前回复依赖于地点的书签 - 承认unjabbed可能是一个问题。 1 0真正的工程师真正的工程师1年前回复统计术语中的统计术语的统计术语是无关紧要的，只要这两个群体都足够大即可产生统计上显着的结果。 请记住，很难找到完全未停过！ 3 0 LaptopMaestro Laptopmaestro 1年前可能是属于未被接种的心脏？ 5 0真正的美国派对真正的美国派对精神1年前哇，这可能是我所见过的刺刀的最大的研究，这真的说了些什么！