patrick.net

Step in the Right Direction’: RFK Jr. Cancels $500 Million in mRNA Vaccine Contracts

https://open.substack.com/pub/tdefender/p/hhs-secretary-rfk-jr-cancels-500-million-funding-mrna-vaccine-development

朝着正确的方向迈出一步'：RFK Jr.取消5亿美元的mRNA疫苗合同

Behind the FDA Curtain: WarRoom/DailyClout Pfizer Reports cross-posted a post from The Defender

Presented by DailyClout
Aug 8 · Behind the FDA Curtain: WarRoom/DailyClout Pfizer Reports
“We reviewed the science, listened to the experts, and acted,” Kennedy said in an announcement made late Tuesday. “The data show these vaccines fail to protect effectively against upper respiratory infections like COVID and flu."

‘Step in the Right Direction’: RFK Jr. Cancels $500 Million in mRNA Vaccine Contracts
“The data show these vaccines fail to protect effectively against upper respiratory infections like COVID and flu,” U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said late Tuesday.
THE DEFENDER
AUG 8

READ IN APP

by Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.

U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. canceled nearly $500 million in contracts and grants to develop mRNA vaccines, in a move that drew harsh criticism from supporters of the technology and lukewarm praise from critics who said existing mRNA vaccines should be pulled from the market.

“We reviewed the science, listened to the experts, and acted,” Kennedy said in an announcement made late Tuesday. “The data show these vaccines fail to protect effectively against upper respiratory infections like COVID and flu. We’re shifting that funding toward safer, broader vaccine platforms that remain effective even as viruses mutate.”

Twenty-two programs will be affected in the “coordinated wind-down” of mRNA development within the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

HHS said it canceled contracts with some research institutions, reduced the scope of others, rejected or canceled multiple research proposals, and restructured several U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) collaborations within the vaccine industry.

No new mRNA-based projects will be initiated, HHS said. However, some existing contracts will be allowed to run their course “to preserve prior taxpayer investment.” Other uses of mRNA technology within the department will remain in place.

Longtime critics of the technology who allege the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines were rushed to market without adequate safety testing welcomed the news.

“The mRNA vaccines have not been fit for purpose. Indeed, the overwhelming evidence suggests that they were injurious and deadly to millions, said Mary Holland, CEO of Children’s Health Defense (CHD).

“CHD believes the COVID mRNA injections should be off the market, but we applaud this important step in the right direction,” Holland added.

Former pharmaceutical industry executive Sasha Latypova said the move was “a small symbolic step in the right direction.” She acknowledged that the canceled funds, which average $22 million per project, are significant sums for private investment.

However, the funds “are really small change compared to the billions of dollars in taxpayers’ funds that have been spent on Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca and other mRNA medical countermeasures that DO remain on the market,” she said.

According to Latypova:

“Pfizer and Moderna alone received $10B+ each as initial grants, and subsequently, many more billions of dollars were spent for both development and government purchasing of these toxic, ineffective ‘medical countermeasures.’

“These products remain on the market, with new versions of mRNA still being approved by the current HHS administration without any placebo-controlled studies or long-term safety studies.”

Supporters warn of dangers ahead because of cuts

Mainstream media and the “vaccine experts” they quoted said the cuts would leave the U.S. unprepared for a new pandemic. The department is “undermining our ability to rapidly counter future biological threats,” said Rick Bright, former head of BARDA. Bright was forced out during the first Trump administration.

Jennifer Nuzzo, director of the Pandemic Center at Brown University School of Public Health, accused Kennedy of incorrectly claiming in a video posted on X that the mRNA vaccines don’t protect well against upper respiratory viruses like COVID-19 and flu.

“Had we not used these lifesaving mRNA vaccines to protect against severe illness, we would have had millions of more Covid deaths,” she told The New York Times.

Multiple news organizations asserted that the vaccines are “safe and effective” and have “saved millions of lives” — assertions that have been shown to lack any evidence.

Research shows mRNA vaccine efficacy has been substantially overstated. Several studies, including two large investigations by the Cleveland Clinic, showed the vaccine could not confer protection against COVID-19. Instead, those trials found that the more vaccines a person received, the more susceptible that person was to contracting COVID-19.

mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have been linked to abnormal blood clotting and autoimmune disorders. In May, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ordered Pfizer and Moderna to add more detailed warnings to their product labels about the risk of heart damage.

Evidence also shows the COVID-19 vaccines were rushed through the regulatory process and never underwent adequate safety and toxicological testing. Since the vaccine rollout, researchers — including those at regulatory agencies — have identified a significant number of adverse events and serious adverse events, and linked the vaccines and other countermeasures to a global spike in excess deaths.

Holland said:

“Despite mainstream media’s attempt to suggest that the COVID vaccines ‘slowed the pandemic,’ the evidence strongly points the other way — that the shots against COVID were injurious, deadly and prolonged the pandemic by raising the risk of COVID infection and disease spread.”

A growing chorus of scientists and researchers, as well as members of the general public, have called for an end to the COVID-19 vaccines and the use of mRNA technology.

This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Upgrade to paid
Critics question BARDA’s entire mission

BARDA, which operates under HHS’ Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response, develops and procures medical countermeasures to address public health emergencies, largely through collaboration with industry, academia and other government agencies, including the DOD.

Because the products BARDA develops are protective measures used during public health emergencies, they are excluded from the typical regulations that pharmaceutical manufacturers, distributors or regulatory agencies are required to follow.

The COVID-19 vaccines, for example, were protected by the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act or PREP Act, which shields “covered persons” — such as pharmaceutical companies, or the DOD/BARDA — from liability for injuries sustained from “countermeasures” such as vaccines and medications administered during a public health emergency.

Several researchers called for Kennedy to do more to address the broader issue of “pandemic preparedness.”

Bioweapons expert Dr. Meryl Nass welcomed the cancellation of the mRNA vaccine contracts, but said:

“What other ‘countermeasures’ is BARDA funding? Why not defund all the bird flu contracts? The monkeypox contracts? Why not look into whether BARDA’s dozens of billions of taxpayer dollars spent have yielded any useful products at all?

“BARDA was formed to provide funding to the biodefense industry for early development of drugs and vaccines for bioterrorism and pandemics. Is this where our money should be spent? What about ending [National Institutes of Health] funding for mRNA products?”

Nass said the “entire concept of pandemic preparedness” ought to be reexamined.

“Why don’t we admit that safe and effective vaccines simply cannot be developed fast enough to respond to bioterrorism or new pandemics? The idea that they can is simply a false claim that has never worked, and for which there is not even a theory to support it,” she said.

Latypova said mRNA countermeasures shouldn’t be on the market, given the announcement by HHS that they aren’t working. She said:

“When is HHS going to honestly disclose to the public, as they are obligated by the PREP Act, that all mRNA ‘vaccines’ on the market today are nothing but ‘medical military countermeasures’ regulated outside of the pharmaceutical law and devoid of any consumer safety protection?”

Substack writer Jon Fleetwood said canceling the contracts was “great,” but “they’ve only stopped some mRNA vaccine projects, and they’re going to allow others to continue,” including Acturus Therapeutics’ commercial mRNA vaccines and bird flu vaccines.

In April, the FDA fast-tracked Arcturus’ self-replicating mRNA flu vaccine. That contract wasn’t canceled.

Latypova said:

“Keeping these known dangerous and ineffective countermeasures on the market while removing those other 22 projects only creates a bigger monopoly position for Pfizer and Moderna, i.e., protects their commercial interests, while not doing anything to protect the public health and safety. The FDA continues to approve new versions of mRNA from ‘preferred’ companies while putting U.S. public at risk.”

Fleetwood said that leaves the door open to “the next pandemic” and its countermeasures.

Pediatrician and author Dr. Joel “Gator” Warsh noted that other uses of mRNA technology — for cancer, autoimmune disease research and rare genetic therapies — will continue under this new model.

“mRNA isn’t being abandoned, it’s being repositioned,” he said.

Related articles in The Defender

Kennedy Hits Pause on COVID Vaccine Project Worth Hundreds of Millions
HHS, NIH Launch $500 Million Project to Develop Universal Vaccines to Protect Against ‘Pandemic-Prone’ Viruses
FDA Has Authority to Recall COVID Vaccines — A Growing Number of Scientists Are Demanding the Agency Take Swift Action
Government Contracts With COVID Vaccine Makers Let Federal Agencies Bypass Normal Regulatory Process, FOIA Documents Show

LIKE
COMMENT
RESTACK

Originally posted on
The Defender
The Defender
The Defender
Subscribe
The Defender is Children’s Health Defense’s online news site. We report on the toxic exposures driving today's epidemic of childhood disease and how agency capture has led government agencies to protect corporate profits at the expense of public health.

FDA幕后：WarRoom/DailyClout 辉瑞报告转发了《捍卫者》的帖子

由 DailyClout 提供
2025年8月8日 · 《FDA幕后：WarRoom/DailyClout 辉瑞报告》

“我们审查了科学，听取了专家意见，并采取了行动，”肯尼迪在周二晚间的公告中表示，“数据显示这些疫苗无法有效预防COVID和流感等上呼吸道感染。”

“迈出正确的一步”：小罗伯特·F·肯尼迪取消5亿美元的mRNA疫苗合同

美国卫生部长小罗伯特·F·肯尼迪在周二晚间宣布，取消了近5亿美元用于开发mRNA疫苗的合同和资助计划。此举遭到mRNA技术支持者的强烈批评，但也获得了一些批评者的冷淡认可，他们认为现有的mRNA疫苗本应被撤出市场。

“我们审查了科学，听取了专家意见，并采取了行动，”肯尼迪表示。“数据显示这些疫苗无法有效预防COVID和流感等上呼吸道感染。我们正将这些资金转向更安全、覆盖面更广的疫苗平台，即使病毒发生变异也依然有效。”

根据美国卫生与公众服务部（HHS）的说法，此次mRNA项目的“协调有序缩减”将影响22个项目，这些项目原属于生物医学高级研究与发展局（BARDA）。

HHS表示，已取消与一些研究机构的合同，缩减了其他项目的范围，拒绝或取消了多项研究提案，并重组了与美国国防部（DOD）在疫苗行业中的多个合作项目。

HHS还表示，不会再启动任何新的mRNA项目，但某些现有合同将继续执行，以“保留纳税人之前的投资”。此外，部门内部其他领域仍将继续使用mRNA技术。

长期批评者认为COVID-19 mRNA疫苗是在缺乏充分安全测试的情况下仓促推向市场，他们对这一决定表示欢迎。

“mRNA疫苗根本不符合使用要求。大量证据显示，这些疫苗对数百万人造成了伤害，甚至致命，”儿童健康捍卫组织（CHD）首席执行官玛丽·霍兰德（Mary Holland）表示。

“CHD认为COVID mRNA疫苗应当全面下架，但我们仍为这个重要的第一步鼓掌，”霍兰德补充道。

前制药行业高管萨莎·拉蒂波娃（Sasha Latypova）表示，这一举措是“一个象征性但正确方向的小步骤”。她指出，被取消的资金平均每个项目为2200万美元，对私营投资而言是一笔不小的数额。

然而她也指出：“与辉瑞、Moderna、强生、阿斯利康以及其他仍在市场上的mRNA应急产品所获得的数十亿美元纳税人资金相比，这些资金只是九牛一毛。”

拉蒂波娃表示：

“仅辉瑞和Moderna各自就获得了超100亿美元的初始拨款，之后还花费了更多数十亿美元用于这些有毒、无效‘医疗应对措施’的研发和政府采购。”

“这些产品仍在市场上，新一代的mRNA产品还在继续获得HHS批准，而且没有任何安慰剂对照试验或长期安全性研究。”

Senior HHS Adviser Confirms the Worst COVID Fears Were True
This explains why RFK Jr. effectively shut down all mRNA vaccine funding.
THE VIGILANT FOX
AUG 8

HHS高级顾问证实，最严重的新冠肺炎恐惧是真的

这解释了为什么RFK Jr.有效地关闭了所有mRNA疫苗的资金。

警惕的狐狸

8月8日

https://open.substack.com/pub/vigilantfox/p/senior-hhs-adviser-confirms-covid

READ IN APP

Another COVID “conspiracy theory” just came true.

A Senior HHS Adviser confirmed it, and you could see the pain written all over his face.

This explains why RFK Jr. effectively shut down all mRNA vaccine funding.

Upgrade to paid
HHS Secretary RFK Jr. dropped a mega bombshell on Tuesday when he announced that BARDA will be CANCELING 22 mRNA vaccine development contracts, saving taxpayers about $500 million in the process.

He declared, “mRNA technology poses MORE risk than benefits for these respiratory viruses.”

Now, we have a clearer picture as to why he made that bold statement.

Thursday, on Steve Bannon’s War Room, HHS Senior Adviser Dr. Steven Hatfill revealed that RFK Jr. pulled mRNA funding after the data showed getting vaccinated was MORE dangerous than COVID itself.

In other words, the “cure” was WORSE than the disease.

Dr. Hatfill said, “It was more dangerous to take a vaccine than it was to contract COVID-19 and be hospitalized with it.”

He explained that when meta-analyses were conducted, the results would consistently show “NO BENEFIT TO RISK RATIO for taking a messenger RNA vaccine.”

Dr. Hatfill added that the shots send a “sudden flood” of mRNA into the body, which overwhelms the cells and creates “BIOLOGICAL HAVOC.”

With pain written all over his face, he concluded, “IT HAD TO BE STOPPED.”

No one says something that grave unless the data is absolutely damning.

In another series of explosive statements, Dr. Hatfill attested that the vaccine manufacturers never did their due diligence to ensure their shots were safe and “essentially ran the pandemic response.”

“Nobody stood up to them. Nobody questioned them… Pfizer wanted a [75]-year moratorium on the clinical trial data, which from the start showed these never prevented infection or disease transmission,” he explained, adding, “There’s no good clinical data to ever show it reduced the severity of disease.”

“The vaccines have injured hundreds of thousands, and we’re not really sure how many have been killed by it, but a significant amount,” Dr. Hatfill lamented.

“They [mRNA vaccine technology] had to come off the market. There was no choice. You want to make America healthy again? It had to be stopped.”

Dr. Hatfill’s statements are backed up by damning study after study.

In 2022, the same year Dr. Hatfill said the data began piling up, Joseph Fraiman and colleagues published a reanalysis of the Pfizer and Moderna trials, showing that the number of serious post-vaccine adverse events far EXCEEDED the number of hospitalizations prevented.

Pfizer trial:

• Adverse Events of Special Interest: 10.1 extra cases per 10,000 vaccinated compared to placebo.

• Hospitalizations prevented: 2.3 per 10,000.

Moderna trial:

• Adverse Events of Special Interest: 15.1 extra cases per 10,000 vaccinated over placebo.

• Hospitalizations prevented: 6.4 per 10,000

In fact, Fraiman and colleagues published another study showing that in order to prevent one COVID‑19 hospitalization over a 6‑month period among young adults (18-29), over 30,000 of them would need to receive a third (booster) mRNA dose.

For each hospitalization prevented, the analysis estimated that at least 18.5 serious adverse events would occur.

But that’s just the tip of the iceberg.

I turned to epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, MPH , who lives and breathes this research.

He’s been digging into the data non-stop and basically knows the numbers by heart.

I’ll let him break down the receipts that back up Dr. Hatfill’s claims:

Senior HHS Advisor Dr. Steven Hatfill just said mRNA shots induce “BIOCHEMICAL HAVOC.”

He’s likely referring to the new study that found mRNA shots induce severe, long-lasting genetic disruption linked to cancer and chronic disease.

Using high-resolution RNA sequencing on blood samples, they discovered that COVID-19 “vaccines” SEVERELY disrupt expression of THOUSANDS of genes—triggering mitochondrial failure, immune reprogramming, and oncogenic activation that can persist for MONTHS to YEARS post-injection.

Differential gene expression analysis compared mRNA-injured patients (cancer, adverse events) to 803 healthy controls — revealing widespread transcriptomic CHAOS.

Dr. Hatfill said the data had accumulated to the point where large studies could be conducted. He’s right. The two LARGEST COVID-19 “vaccine” safety studies in HISTORY—covering 184 MILLION people—prove mRNA shots are NOT SAFE for human use.

📍 Faksova et al. (n=99M)

➊ Myocarditis +510% (dose 2)

➋ Brain/Spinal Cord Inflammation +278% (dose 1)

➌ Brain Clots +223% (dose 1)

➍ Guillain-Barré +149% (dose 1)

📍 Karimi et al. (n=85M)

➊ Heart Attack +286% (dose 2)

➋ Stroke +240% (dose 1)

➌ Coronary Artery Disease +244% (dose 2)

➍ Cardiac Arrhythmia +199% (dose 1)

Dr. Hatfill said, “It was more dangerous to take a vaccine than it was to contract COVID-19 and be hospitalized with it.”

Nearly 1,000 peer-reviewed references across 3 landmark studies (1, 2, 3) by Mead et al. PROVE the catastrophic risks of the COVID-19 “vaccines” FAR outweigh their imaginary, theoretical benefits:

🔻 The shots didn’t save lives — they caused catastrophic harm

Autopsy evidence, reanalyzed trial data & real-world outcomes show no mortality benefit. Early treatment saved lives — not rushed genetic injections.

🔻 The risks far outweigh any theoretical benefits

Central conclusion of all 3 papers: catastrophic harm across multiple systems makes the current risk-benefit calculus indefensible.

🔻 Massive injury: heart, brain, immune system, fertility, cancer

Harms include myocarditis, strokes, immunosuppression, infertility & aggressive tumor progression — driven by spike toxicity, LNP biodistribution & genetic contamination.

🔻 Urgent call for a global moratorium

All modRNA products must be withdrawn immediately, given the scale of harm.

With HHS finally beginning its offensive against deadly mRNA injections, one objective remains: IMMEDIATE MARKET WITHDRAWAL.

A MAJOR peer-reviewed study identified FIVE irrefutable grounds for the immediate market withdrawal of COVID-19 “vaccines”:

📢Widespread & Unified Calls for Market Withdrawal – More than 81,000 physicians, scientists, and concerned citizens, 240 elected officials, 17 public health & physician organizations, 2 State Republican Parties, 17 GOP County Committees, and 6 global studies demand immediate removal.

⚰️ Excess Mortality – More than 12 studies and VAERS confirm mass COVID-19 'vaccination' led to a catastrophic number deaths -- up to 17 million.

⚠️ FDA Class I Recall Indicated – 37,544 VAERS-reported deaths exceed past vaccine recall limits by up to 375,340%.

📉 Negative Efficacy – 7 studies have demonstrated that COVID-19 'vaccination' increases your risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

🧬 DNA Contamination – 11 reports have found DNA contamination in COVID-19 vaccines, documented across multiple manufacturers, vaccine platforms, and geographic regions, with levels exceeding regulatory thresholds by up to 65,500%.

Nic is right. Immediate market withdrawal is needed. It’s completely unethical to have a “vaccine” on the market that is not only ineffective, but MORE dangerous than the disease it is supposed to protect against.

Kennedy effectively canceled future mRNA vaccines by pulling the plug on government funding. The next logical step is to yank the shots. It will come with political backlash, but it’s the right thing to do.

As Dr. Hatfill said, “They [mRNA vaccine technology] had to come off the market. There was no choice. You want to make America healthy again? It had to be stopped.”

Thanks for reading!

Huge thanks to Nicolas Hulscher, MPH for teaming up with me on this piece. No one breaks down the data like he does.

Follow him on FOCAL POINTS for one of the very best COVID newsletters out there.

FOCAL POINTS (Courageous Discourse)
Investigative scholarship and reporting of public policy, health, justice, and current affairs.
By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH

Would you like to see more threads like this one, where I break down the videos and @NicHulscher backs it up with the raw data? Maybe we could turn it into a semi-regular thing.

POLL
Should I team up with Nic Hulscher more often?
Yes
No
A little bit about me: I spent over a decade working as a licensed healthcare professional. But when the Biden administration rolled out its vaccine mandates, I couldn’t stay silent. My conscience simply wouldn’t let me.

That’s when I started this page.

Since then, I’ve shared thousands of clips featuring doctors and scientists who were brave enough to question the official COVID narrative.

Along the way, we’ve reached billions of views and helped millions of people understand the other side of the COVID story that the government didn’t want out.

If you’re looking for clear, honest information without corporate spin, you’re in the right place. Follow me for straight-to-the-point clips and threads that challenge the narrative. 高级HHS顾问确认最糟糕的Covid恐惧是真实的，这解释了为什么RFK JR.有效地关闭所有mRNA疫苗资金。 警惕福克斯8月8日在应用中阅读另一个Covid“阴谋理论”刚刚实现。 一位高级HHS顾问确认，你可以看到脸上脸上的痛苦。 这解释了为什么RFK JR.有效地关闭所有mRNA疫苗资金。 升级到支付HHS秘书RFK JR.周二宣布贝加拉将取消22例疫苗开发合同，节省了该过程中约5亿美元的纳税人。 他宣称，“MRNA技术比这些呼吸病毒的益处更多的风险。” 现在，我们有一个更清晰的图片，为什么他做出那种大胆的陈述。 星期四，在史蒂夫比恩的战争室，HHS高级顾问史蒂文·哈特博士透露，RFK JR.拉动的MRNA资金在被疫苗接种的情况下比Covid本身更危险。 换句话说，“治愈”比疾病更差。 Hatfill博士说：“疫苗比收缩Covid-19更危险，并与其住院。” 他解释说，当进行荟萃分析时，结果将一致地显示“对患有信使RNA疫苗的风险比没有益处” Hatfill博士补充说，镜头将mRNA的“突然的洪水”发送到身体中，这压倒了细胞并创造了“生物破坏” 他的脸上写着疼痛，他得出结论，“它必须停止。” 除非数据绝对诅咒，否则没有人说过坟墓。 在另一个系列的爆炸性陈述中，Hatefill博士证明了疫苗制造商从未尽职调查，以确保他们的镜头是安全的，“基本上冒了大流行反应” “没有人站在他们身边。 没有人质疑他们...辉瑞想要[75] - 暂停在临床试验数据上，从一开始就显示这些从未预防感染或疾病传播，“他解释过，加入，”迄今为止，没有良好的临床数据表明它降低了疾病的严重程度 “疫苗受伤了数十万，我们并不肯定有多少人被杀死，而是大量的数量，”哈利弗·哀叹。 “他们[mRNA疫苗技术]必须脱离市场。 别无选择。 你想再次让美国健康吗？ 它必须停下来。“ 学习后的诅咒学习博士议案博士。 在2022年，同年哈利亚博士表示，数据开始堆积，约瑟夫弗莱曼及同事发表了辉瑞和现代试验的再分析，表明严重疫苗的不良事件的数量远远超过了医院人数 辉瑞试验：•特殊兴趣的不利事件：与安慰剂相比，每10,000次接种每10,000件额外案件。 •住院治疗：每10,000人2.3。 Moderna试验：•特别兴趣的不利事件：每10,000次接种安慰剂的15.1额外案例。 •住院治疗：每10,000人实际上，Fraiman及其同事发表了另一项研究，表明，为了防止一个Covid-19在年轻人（18-29）中的6个月内，其中30,000多个需要获得第三个（Booster） 对于每次住院治疗，分析估计将发生至少18.5个严重的不良事件。 但这只是冰山一角。 我转向流行病学家Nicolas Hulscher，MPH，他生活和呼吸这项研究。 他一直在挖掘数据不停，基本上通过心脏了解这些数字。 我会让他打破备份Hatfill博士的收据：高级HHS顾问史蒂文Hatfill博士只是说MRNA镜头诱导“生化造成的伤害” 他可能提到新的研究发现mRNA射击诱导严重，持久的遗传破坏与癌症和慢性疾病相关。 在血液样本上使用高分辨率RNA测序，他们发现Covid-19“疫苗”严重破坏了数千个基因的表达，触发的线粒体衰竭，免疫重编程和致癌活化，可能持续数月 差分基因表达分析与803例健康对照相比mRNA损伤的患者（癌症，不良事件）与803次健康对照组 - 揭示了广泛的转录组织混乱。 Hatefill博士表示，数据已经积累到了可以进行大型研究的程度。 他是对的。 在历史上的两个最大的Covid-19“疫苗”安全研究占地184亿人 - 证明mRNA镜头对人类使用不安全。 faksova等。 （n = 99m）➊心肌炎+ 510％（剂量2）α脑/脊髓炎症+ 278％（剂量1）➌脑凝块+ 223％（剂量1）➍guillain-barré+ 149％（剂量1 （n = 85m）➊心脏病发作+ 286％（剂量2）➋中风+ 240％（剂量1）➌冠状动脉疾病+ 244％（剂量2）➍心脏心律失常+ 199％（剂量1）帽子博士 通过Mead等人的3个地标研究（1,2,3）近1,000个同行评审参考。 证明了Covid-19“疫苗”的灾难性风险远远超过了他们的虚构，理论益处：🔻镜头没有挽救生命 - 他们导致灾难性的伤害尸检证据，重新展示的试验数据和现实世界的外国 早期治疗保存生命 - 不赶紧遗传注射。 🔻风险远远超过了所有3篇论文的任何理论益处：跨多个系统的灾难性伤害使当前的风险效益计算不可原谅。 🔻大量损伤：心脏，脑，免疫系统，生育，癌症危害包括心肌炎，中风，免疫抑制，不孕症和侵袭性肿瘤进展 - 由穗毒性，LNP生物分布和遗传束征收驱动 🔻紧急呼吁全球暂停所有ModRNA产品必须立即撤回，鉴于伤害规模。 随着HHS终于开始反对致命的致命致命的mRNA注射，一个客观仍然存在：立即的市场退出。 一个主要的同行评审研究确定了五个不可维修的基础，即在Covid-19“疫苗”的直接市场撤离：WidePread和统一的市场撤回呼吁 - 超过81,000名医生，科学家和有关公民，240 ⚰️过量的死亡率 - 超过12项研究和变异，确认大规模Covid-19'疫苗接种'导致灾难性的人数死亡 - 高达1700万。 fda级别我回忆起表明 - 37,544名百分点报告的死亡超过过去的疫苗召回限值高达375,340％。 📉负效率 - 7研究表明，Covid-19'疫苗接种'增加了SARS-COV-2感染的风险。 🧬DNA污染 - 11报告已发现Covid-19疫苗中的DNA污染，记录在多个制造商，疫苗平台和地理区域，水平超过监管阈值高达65,500％。 NIC是对的。 需要立即的市场提款。 在市场上具有“疫苗”是完全不道德的，这不仅是无效的，而且比它应该保护的疾病更危险。 肯尼迪通过拉动政府资金来有效取消了未来的mRNA疫苗。 下一个逻辑步骤是猛击镜头。 它会带来政治间隙，但这是正确的事情。 正如Hatfill博士所说的那样，“他们[疫苗技术]必须出现市场。 别无选择。 你想再次让美国健康吗？ 它必须停下来。“ 谢谢阅读！ 感谢Nicolas Hulscher，MPH与我在这件作品上与我合作。 没有人像他一样打破数据。 在那里的最佳Covid新闻通讯之一跟随他的焦点。 焦点（勇敢的话语）公共政策，卫生，正义和时事的调查奖学金和报告。 由Peter A. McCullough，MD，MPH您希望看到更多的线程，在那里，我打破了视频，@nichulscher返回原始数据？ 也许我们可以将它变成半常规的东西。 轮询我应该经常与NIC Hulscher合作吗？ 是的，没有关于我的一点点：我花了几十多个工作作为持牌医疗保健专业人士。 但是当拜登行政当局推出其疫苗授权时，我无法保持沉默。 我的良心只是不会让我。 那是我开始这个页面的时候。 从那以后，我已经分享了数千个剪辑，包括医生和科学家，他们勇敢地质疑官方Covid叙事。 一路上，我们已经达到了数十亿的意见，帮助数百万人了解政府不想出来的科迪德故事的另一面。 如果您正在寻找明确的，没有企业旋转的诚实信息，您就在正确的地方。 跟随我的直接剪辑和挑战叙述的线程。