by Al_Sharpton_for_President follow (6)
« First « Previous Comments 434 - 473 of 633 Next » Last » Search these comments
The man, later identified as Zinn, told the officer, “I shot him, now shoot me” twice, according to a jail report compiled by UVU police. The officer reported that he could not see a weapon, but he placed Zinn in handcuffs while others at the scene cleared the area.
Once in custody, Zinn continued to say he was the shooter, the report continued. Officers asked Zinn where the gun was, but they say he refused to tell them. He reportedly asked for his attorney when he was brought back to the university police headquarters for questioning, even after police said they didn’t believe he was the shooter.
He later said he “did it to draw attention from the real shooter,” police wrote in the report. He was first taken to a nearby hospital for an undisclosed medical condition. While at the hospital, Zinn told an officer that “he was glad he said he shot the individual so the real suspect could get away,” the affidavit adds.
He reportedly asked for his attorney when he was brought back to the university police headquarters for questioning, even after police said they didn’t believe he was the shooter.
I would not be surprised if Robinson affiliated with them such as online gaming networks, etc

In my most recent podcast appearance, I opined that Charlie Kirk has single-handedly rescued our young men. Charlie arguably deserves sole credit for triggering the dual trends of young men returning to church and recommitting to the sanity of Republican political affiliation, where they are valued and lifted up instead of humiliated and mocked.
What Charlie Kirk has built is fairly called a signature accomplishment. But there’s so much more. Maybe most importantly, Charlie taught the rest of us that it could be done. He practically rubbed our faces in the fact that young people are not a lost cause.
Progressives slew him to shut him up and shut him down. But it was too late. Charlie survived long enough to prove the concept. He pioneered the trail. He showed us the way. He created an organization to train others, to reproduce and multiply his methods across the country and around the world.
No one can ever do it as well as Charlie. We will never again be gifted with an individual of Charlie’s good faith and with his breathtaking combination of talents.
But we will make up in numbers what we cannot reproduce in quality.
His assassination —his martyrdom— has sparked a wildfire of long-overdue conversation. For example, should people be fired for saying hateful and evil political things, calling ordinary people ‘’Hitler’ and fascists,’ and wishing death on fellow Americans? Obviously, the answer is yes. Yes, they should be fired. Promptly.
It shouldn’t be controversial. It’s not ‘cancel culture.’ It’s common sense. No one, for instance, should complain if a daycare worker gets fired for posting man-boy love memes.
German state media have systematically slandered Charlie Kirk in the wake of his assassination ...
This man is Elmar Theveßen. He is the Washington D.C. correspondent also for the state media broadcaster ZDF, and he is routinely presented to the German public as an expert on all things American.
The day after Charlie Kirk’s assassination, Theveßen appeared on Markus Lanz’s eponymous political talkshow before a nationwide audience to peddle a series of lies about the recently deceased:
Theveßen: [Kirk] has very, very strong right-wing convictions. Let me give you a few examples. For example, he said that homosexuals should be stoned to death (...). He said that black people are taking jobs away from white people because of the policies of the Democrats in recent years. He said that if you’re sitting in an aeroplane with a black pilot, you should be afraid.
Lanz: Have I understood you correctly, he said homosexuals should be stoned?
Theveßen: Yes, of course he’s referring to the Bible, when he says that Christianity should be taken literally. He’s not applied this to modern times, which is actually, um, largely, well of course. But you can say these are racist statements, these are anti-minority statements, and it’s also true, clearly, he belongs to the right-wing radicals in the USA...
Theveßen repeated the notorious falsehood that Kirk advocated stoning homosexuals to death in two other podcast appearances on 11 September. This was not an isolated slip-up. As everyone now knows, of course, Kirk had merely insisted Old Testament exhortations to love one’s neighbour do not imply any biblical endorsement of homosexuality because they stand alongside much harsher provisions, like that at Leviticus 20:13. Theveßen’s other statements are also crude mischaracterisations of Kirk’s opposition to minority hiring preferences and his criticism of the Federal Aviation Administration’s efforts to relax merit-based hiring standards for Air Traffic Control in favour of a (more minority-friendly) “Biographical Questionnaire.”
Were Charlie Kirk still alive, he could request that charges be brought against Theveßen for slander, and his widow could probably still file a complaint under section 189 of the German criminal code, which prohibits “Defiling the memory of the dead.” Of course, nobody thinks this will happen, which is why Theveßen has decided to trifle with the truth in this case.
In response to inquiries from BILD, Theveßen said that he “regrets not having been more detailed,” but naturally he stopped short of apologising. After I and others brought Theveßen’s remarks to the attention of the U.S. State Department (along with another podcast appearance in which Theveßen implied that Stephen Miller was a neo-Nazi), Richard Grenell called for authorities to revoke his work visa …
@RichardGrenell
This radical Lefty German keeps calling for violence against people he
politically disagrees with.
He poses as a journalist in Washington, DC.
His visa should be revoked.
There is no place in America this type of inciter.
Mysteriously, the ordinarily voluble Theveßen has gone silent.
And just like that "conservatives" have embraced the cancel culture. 🤭🤡
Gaming "addressed"
how?
Mysteriously, the ordinarily voluble Theveßen has gone silent.
It's no wonder gamers do crazy shit

Well, people are getting fired not for wielding guns or knives, but for saying words. Being OK with firing for words is a slippery slope towards being OK with killing for words.
Murder of Iryna Zarutska: Charlie Kirk VS. Van Jones
Utah County Attorney Jeff Grey says the mother of the suspect in Charlie Kirk’s assassination said her son had become “over the last year or so...more political and had started to lean more to the left, becoming more pro-gay and trans-rights oriented.”
“She stated that Robinson began to date his roommate, a biological male who was transitioning genders.”
Utah County Attorney Jeff Grey says the transgender roommate/lover of the alleged Charlie Kirk assassin “received messages from Robinson about the shooting, and he did provide those messages to police.” In one text exchange, the suspect said he killed Kirk because he “had enough of his hatred” and “some hate can’t be negotiated out”
He also quipped he would “have a stroke” if he saw Fox News mention the messages written on the bullets
And just like that "conservatives" have embraced the cancel culture. 🤭🤡
RWSGFY says
And just like that "conservatives" have embraced the cancel culture. 🤭🤡
Cancel Culture: Firing or for having personal views.
Not Cancel Culture: Firing schoolteachers, health care professionals, and others for celebrating and lionizing the assassination of a non-violent person.
You can't have an "Ethics Tutor" or K-12 "SEL" Teacher who thinks it's okay to assassinate people who merely like to debate
« First « Previous Comments 434 - 473 of 633 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,349,865 comments by 15,721 users - ForcedTQ online now