Comments 1 - 10 of 10 Search these comments
if you advocate violence toward people based on their views, you have stepped outside the contract of granting peaceful agency in exchange for your own.
you no longer get to whine about "cancel culture."
you lost that right when you engaged in it yourself and cheered violence in response to speech.
if you refuse to be bound by the rules, you forfeit their protection.
the right to self-defense is fundamental and retaliation is not the same as initiating aggression. they are fundamentally different acts.
if you punch me in the face, you do not get to say “but i thought you said you oppose punching people in the face!” when i punch you back.
you also do not get to say “ok, i stopped punching you, you have to stop punching me now!”
once you are shown to be a real and committed threat who has crossed the line and aggressed upon peaceful people, you’re in a new category and self-defense extends to removing the threat, not just fighting until the threat starts to snivel and whine and cry “no fair.”
and the constitution does not oppose this, it defends it.
this is the same crowd that would howl to fire you if you said things about vaccines or gender or climate change or immigration or if you opposed DEI.
consequences from speech are for when i punish you, they should certainly never apply to me!
these crybullies are so incredibly aggressive because they have for decades been untouchable. now comes the “find out” part.

patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,349,553 comments by 15,721 users - HANrongli, Patrick online now