patrick.net

NEW: Former CDC Director Rochelle Walensky says if vaccine makers aren’t “free of responsibility” for injuries, they might stop making them.

That’s the whole point. If a product is so dangerous it can’t survive without legal immunity, it shouldn’t be on the market.

https://open.substack.com/pub/drwojakmd/p/vaccines-protected-by-law-not-science?showWelcomeOnShare=true 新消息：疾病预防控制中心前主任罗谢尔·瓦伦斯基表示，如果疫苗制造商不能对伤害“不承担责任”，他们可能会停止生产疫苗。

这就是重点。 如果一种产品非常危险，没有法律豁免权就无法生存，那么它就不应该投放市场。

https://open.substack.com/pub/drwojakmd/p/vaccines-protected-by-law-not-science?showWelcomeOnShare=true

同行评审结论：接種疫苗的兒童的癌症發病率高出54%，自閉症相關疾病高出549%

Peer-reviewed conclusion: Vaccinated children have a 54% higher incidence of cancer and a 549% higher rate of autism-related disorders.

突發新聞：對亨利·福特出生佇列研究的同行評審重新分析發現，接種疫苗的兒童更病

跨越所有22個

慢性病

類別

我們對有史以來最大的美國接種疫苗與未接種疫苗的出生佇列研究的重新分析顯示，接種疫苗的兒童的癌症發病率高出54%，自閉症相關疾病高出549%。

BREAKING: Peer-Reviewed Reanalysis of the Henry Ford Birth Cohort Study Finds Vaccinated Children Sicker
Across All 22
Chronic Disease
Categories
Our reanalysis of the largest U.S. vaccinated vs. unvaccinated birth cohort study ever conducted reveals 54% higher cancer rates and 549% higher autism-related disorders among vaccinated children.

https://open.substack.com/pub/petermcculloughmd/p/breaking-peer-reviewed-reanalysis

by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
Our newly published, peer-reviewed critique and independent reanalysis of the Henry Ford vaccinated–unvaccinated birth cohort study (Lamerato et al.) — revealed at the U.S. Senate Hearing on September 9, 2025 — shows that the original authors failed to analyze or disclose the dramatic proportional differences present in their own data.
Authored by John W. Oller, Jr., PhD; Daniel Broudy, PhD; and Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, this peer-review and reanalysis provides the first accurate proportional interpretation of the dataset.
The Lamerato et al. study of a total population of 18,468 individuals between birth and 18 years of age during the years from 2000 to 2016 — of which the 16,511 in the vaccinated cohort received a median of 18 vaccines, whereas the 1,957 in the unvaccinated cohort received none at all — probably represents the most comprehensive real-world comparison of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children ever conducted within a self-contained whole population in a full-service integrated health system in the US.
For context, we calculated that the current CDC childhood immunization schedule now contains at least 81 doses of vaccines by age 18 — more than four times higher than the median exposure in the Henry Ford cohort. This means that the dramatic disparities we uncovered in this dataset emerge even at a fraction of the full CDC schedule.

作者：Nicolas Hulscher，MPH

我們新發表的、同行評審的批評和獨立重新分析對亨利·福特接種疫苗-未接種疫苗出生佇列研究（Lamerato等人）——在美國披露。 2025年9月9日的參議院聽證會——表明，原作者未能分析或披露他們自己資料中存在的巨大比例差異。

作者：John W. Oller, Jr.博士；Daniel Broudy博士；和Nicolas Hulscher，MPH，這個同行評審和重新分析提供了資料集的第一個準確比例解釋。

Lamerato等人對2000年至2016年期間出生至18歲的總人口的18,468人的研究——其中接種疫苗佇列中的16,511人中位數接種了18種疫苗，而未接種疫苗的佇列中的1957人根本沒有接種疫苗——可能代表了美國全方位服務綜合衛生系統中自給自足的整個人口中接種疫苗和未接種疫苗的兒童進行的最全面的現實世界比較。

為了背景，我們計算出，目前的疾控中心兒童免疫計劃現在在18歲之前至少包含81劑疫苗——比亨利·福特佇列的中位數暴露量高出四倍多。 這意味著，我們在此資料集中發現的巨大差異甚至出現在整個疾控中心時間表的一小部分。

We initiated this reanalysis because the study used statistical approaches that masked large disparities, particularly in outcomes where the unvaccinated group had zero or near-zero cases.
Instead of examining actual proportional incidence, Lamerato et al. relied on odds-ratio modeling and a “strict definition” of cases that created the false appearance of equivalence. Our peer-review demonstrates that these choices systematically minimized the large, consistent contrasts present in the raw numbers — contrasts so large that the authors themselves, had they simply reported them, would have been compelled to acknowledge dramatically worse outcomes in the vaccinated cohort.
Once the data are viewed through the proper lens — proportions per cohort, the same approach the original table already implies — the picture changes entirely.
Our reanalysis shows that vaccinated children were sicker in all 22 chronic disease categories listed — a pattern reinforced by two of the most striking findings in the dataset: a 549% higher rate of autism-associated neurodevelopmental conditions and a 54% elevation in childhood cancer in the vaccinated cohort. These signals emerge only when the data are analyzed proportionally, without the statistical distortions used in the original report.

我們發起了這次重新分析，因為該研究使用了掩蓋巨大差異的統計方法，特別是在未接種疫苗的群體病例為零或接近零的結果中。

Lamerato等人沒有檢查實際比例發病率，而是依靠賠率建模和案例的「嚴格定義」，這些定義造成了等價的錯誤外觀。 我們的同行評審表明，這些選擇系統地將原始數字中存在的大量、一致的對比度降到最低——這些對比度如此之大，以至於作者自己，如果他們只是簡單地報告它們，就會被迫承認接種疫苗佇列中的結果明顯惡化。

一旦透過正確的視角來看待資料——每個佇列的比例，與原始表格已經暗示的相同方法——情況就會完全改變。

我們的重新分析顯示，接種疫苗的兒童在列出的所有22個慢性疾病類別中都更重——資料集中的兩個最引人注目的發現加強了這一模式：在接種疫苗的佇列中，與自閉症相關的神經發育疾病的發病率提高了549%，兒童癌症的發病率提高了54%。 這些訊號只有在按比例分析資料時才會出現，而沒有原始報告中使用的統計失真。

22種慢性病中的每一種在接種疫苗的兒童中都更高

我們對Lamerato等人的重新分析。 表2發現，所有22類慢性疾病在接種疫苗的兒童中的比例都更高，許多疾病從10倍上升到20倍。

Every One of the 22 Chronic Conditions Was Higher in Vaccinated Children
Our reanalysis of Lamerato et al. Table 2 found that all 22 chronic disease categories appeared at higher proportional rates in vaccinated children, with many conditions elevated 10× to 20×.

1. Chronic health condition (any)
0.2866 vs 0.0818 → 3.50× higher (+250%)
2. Asthma
0.1736 vs 0.0266 → 6.53× higher (+553%)
3. Atopic disease
0.0573 vs 0.0118 → 4.86× higher (+386%)
4. Autoimmune disease
0.0122 vs 0.0010 → 12.2× higher (+1,120%)
5. Brain dysfunction
0.0005 vs 0.0000 → Present only in vaccinated
6. Cancer
0.0102 vs 0.0066 → 1.54× higher (+54%)
7. Diabetes
0.0025 vs 0.0000 → Present only in vaccinated
8. Food allergy
0.0349 vs 0.0153 → 2.28× higher (+128%)
9. Mental health disorder
0.0207 vs 0.0026 → 7.96× higher (+696%)
10. Neurodevelopmental disorder (umbrella)
0.0623 vs 0.0046 → 13.54× higher (+1,254%)
11. ADHD
0.0159 vs 0.0000 → Present only in vaccinated
12. Autism
0.0014 vs 0.0005 → 2.8× higher (+180%)
13. Behavioral disability
0.0100 vs 0.0000 → Present only in vaccinated
14. Developmental delay
0.0133 vs 0.0026 → 5.12× higher (+412%)
15. Learning disability
0.0039 vs 0.0000 → Present only in vaccinated
16. Intellectual disability
0.0003 vs 0.0000 → Present only in vaccinated
17. Speech disorder
0.0280 vs 0.0031 → 9.03× higher (+803%)
18. Motor disability
0.0091 vs 0.0010 → 9.1× higher (+810%)
19. Tics
0.0028 vs 0.0000 → Present only in vaccinated
20. Other psychological disability
0.0005 vs 0.0000 → Present only in vaccinated
21. Neurological disorder
0.0077 vs 0.0061 → 1.26× higher (+26%)
22. Seizure disorder
0.0193 vs 0.0061 → 3.16× higher (+216%)
All 22 conditions were higher in vaccinated children — with increases ranging from +26% to over +1,200%, and multiple disorders appearing only in the vaccinated group.

1. 慢性健康狀況（任何）

0.2866 vs 0.0818 → 3.50×更高（+250%）

2. 哮喘

0.1736 vs 0.0266 → 6.53×更高（+553%）

3. 特應性疾病

0.0573 vs 0.0118 → 4.86倍高（+386%）

4. 自身免疫性疾病

0.0122 vs 0.0010 → 12.2倍高（+1,120%）

5. 大腦功能障礙

0.0005 vs 0.0000 → 僅在接種疫苗時出現

6. 癌症

0.0102 vs 0.0066 → 1.54倍高（+54%）

7. 糖尿病

0.0025 vs 0.0000 → 僅在接種疫苗時出現

8. 食物過敏

0.0349 vs 0.0153 → 2.28倍高（+128%）

9. 心理健康障礙

0.0207 vs 0.0026 → 7.96×更高（+696%）

10. 神經發育障礙（傘）

0.0623與0.0046→高13.54倍（+1,254%）

11. 多動症

0.0159 vs 0.0000 → 僅在接種疫苗時出現

12. 孤獨症

0.0014 vs 0.0005 → 2.8倍高（+180%）

13. 行為障礙

0.0100 vs 0.0000 → 僅在接種疫苗時出現

14. 發育遲緩

0.0133 vs 0.0026 → 5.12倍高（+412%）

15. 學習障礙

0.0039 vs 0.0000 → 僅在接種疫苗時出現

16. 智力障礙

0.0003 vs 0.0000 → 僅在接種疫苗時出現

17. 言語障礙

0.0280 vs 0.0031 → 9.03×更高（+803%）

18. 運動障礙

0.0091 vs 0.0010 → 9.1倍高（+810%）

19. 抽搐

0.0028 vs 0.0000 → 僅在接種疫苗時出現

20. 其他心理殘疾

0.0005 vs 0.0000 → 僅在接種疫苗時出現

21. 神經系統紊亂

0.0077 vs 0.0061 → 1.26倍高（+26%）

22. 癲癇發作

0.0193 vs 0.0061 → 3.16倍高（+216%）

所有22種疾病在接種疫苗的兒童中都更高——從+26%增加到超過+1,200%不等，只有接種疫苗的群體才會出現多種疾病。

549% Higher Odds of Autism-Associated Neurodevelopmental Conditions
Our reanalysis shows that the conditions which collectively form the clinical profile associated with autism spectrum disorder — including autism itself, ADHD, developmental delay, speech disorder, learning disability, neurological impairment, and related diagnoses — occurred at 5.49-fold (549%) higher odds in vaccinated children compared with those who received no vaccines.
Crucially, we performed this grouped analysis because many of the individual neurodevelopmental diagnoses had zero or near-zero cases in the unvaccinated cohort. This made standard odds-ratio modeling mathematically incapable of detecting differences (a well-known “zero-cell” problem).
By combining these clinically linked conditions into a unified ASD-associated category — a method consistent with developmental-neurology practice — we recovered the true proportional signal that the original analysis obscured.
This represents one of the most powerful autism-related population signals ever documented in a major U.S. healthcare system.

自閉症相關神經發育狀況的機率高出549%

我們的重新分析表明，與未接種疫苗的兒童相比，接種疫苗的兒童發生的機率高5.49倍（549%），與自閉症譜譜系障礙相關的疾病——包括自閉症本身、多動症、多動症、發育遲緩、言語障礙、學習障礙和相關診斷。

至關重要的是，我們進行了這種分組分析，因為許多個人神經發育診斷在未接種疫苗的佇列中病例為零或接近零。 這使得標準賠率建模在數學上無法檢測差異（一個眾所周知的「零單元格」問題）。

透過將這些臨床相關條件組合成一個統一的ASD相關類別——一種與發育神經學實踐一致的方法——我們恢復了原始分析所掩蓋的真實比例訊號。

這代表了美國主要醫療保健系統中記錄的最強大的自閉症相關人群訊號之一。

Childhood Cancer Higher in Vaccinated Children
Although the original authors stated that vaccination was not associated with an increased risk of cancer — reporting an IRR of 0.79 (95% CI 0.45–1.39) and concluding “no association” — this interpretation conflicts with their own raw data.
Our proportional reanalysis shows:

接種疫苗的兒童患癌症更高

儘管原始作者表示，接種疫苗與癌症風險增加無關——報告IRR為0.79（95%CI 0.45-1.39），並得出結論「無關聯」——但這種解釋與他們自己的原始資料相沖突。

我們的比例重新分析表明：

Vaccinated cancer rate: 1.02%

接種疫苗的癌症率：1.02%

未接種疫苗的癌症發病率：0.66%

Unvaccinated cancer rate: 0.66%

相對增長：+54%

Relative increase: +54%

這意味著兒童癌症在接種疫苗的佇列中明顯更頻繁地發生——儘管比例差異在他們自己結果的表2中直接可見，但原始論文沒有解決這個問題。

出現差異是因為作者依賴的統計模型和發病率分母不適合檢測罕見結果的差異，特別是當兩組之間的隨訪時間有很大差異時。 這些建模選擇掩蓋了原始數字中明顯的有意義的比例差異。

This means childhood cancer occurred notably more often in the vaccinated cohort — something that the original paper did not address, despite the proportional difference being visible directly in Table 2 of their own results.
The discrepancy arises because the authors relied on a statistical model and incidence-rate denominators poorly suited to detecting differences in rare outcomes, especially when follow-up time differs substantially between groups. These modeling choices obscured a meaningful proportional disparity apparent in the raw numbers.

Long-Term Outcome Curve: Vaccinated Children Collapse by Age 10

長期結果曲線：接種疫苗的兒童在10歲時崩潰

……

By Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
A major new peer-reviewed scoping review by Dr. Claudia Chaufan et al. analyzed 109 published studies on COVID-19 vaccination and autoimmune disease — and the findings are worrisome.
Across dozens of countries and all major vaccine platforms, the same pattern emerged:
COVID-19 vaccination is repeatedly associated with autoimmune flares, relapses, and entirely new autoimmune diseases — including multiple sclerosis, lupus, type 1 diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, Graves’ disease, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, and more.
More than half the studies suggested a causal link. 作者：Nicolas Hulscher，公共卫生硕士
Claudia Chaufan 博士等人进行了一项重要的新同行评审范围界定审查。 分析了 109 项已发表的有关 COVID-19 疫苗接种和自身免疫性疾病的研究，结果令人担忧。
在数十个国家和所有主要疫苗平台中，出现了相同的模式：
COVID-19 疫苗接种多次与自身免疫性发作、复发和全新自身免疫性疾病相关，包括多发性硬化症、狼疮、1 型糖尿病、类风湿性关节炎、格雷夫斯病、桥本甲状腺炎等。
超过一半的研究表明存在因果关系。 https://open.substack.com/pub/petermcculloughmd/p/breaking-study-covid-19-vaccines-f6c

记者回忆2021年与一位挚友的一段对话：（这位挚友已经因突发脑梗昏迷几天后去世）
挚友：要相信政府、接受施打新冠疫苗。
记者：政府也有犯罪的时候，拒绝疫苗，也要告诉你的家人拒绝。
挚友：要相信科学。
记者：科学要看掌握在谁的手里，在良知无私的医学家手里则救人、在邪恶唯利是图的傀儡手里则害人！
与此同时：记者在社交媒体支招贿赂医护人员，以换取“疫苗绿码通行证”。或与私人律师共同去接种机构，要求医护注射师、签署无副作用后遗症责任保证法律文件。注射师拒绝则有理由拒绝注射新冠疫苗，当事人从而保住工作。…随即记者的推特、脸书等社交媒体账号被永久封闭。
/ 记者：韩荣利

A journalist recalls a conversation from 2021 with a close friend (who later passed away after several days in a coma caused by a sudden cerebral infarction):

Friend: We must trust the government and get the COVID-19 vaccine.

Journalist: The government also commits crimes at times. Refuse the vaccine, and tell your family to refuse it as well.

Friend: We must trust science.

Journalist: It depends on whose hands the science is in. In the hands of conscientious and selfless medical scientists, it saves lives; in the hands of evil, profit-driven puppets, it harms people!

Meanwhile, the journalist was giving tips on social media about bribing medical staff in exchange for a “vaccine green-code pass.”
Alternatively, the journalist suggested going to the vaccination site with a private attorney to demand that the medical injector sign a legal document guaranteeing no side effects or long-term adverse reactions. If the injector refused, that would provide grounds to refuse the COVID-19 vaccination, allowing the individual to keep their job.
…Soon after, the journalist’s Twitter, Facebook, and other social media accounts were permanently suspended.

/ Journalist: Han Rongli

SCIENCE
"Long Covid"symptoms finally explained by scientists: YOU'RE VACCINATED

科學

科學家終於解釋了「長期新冠肺炎」症狀：你接種了疫苗

记者试问：你还敢接受注射吗？小病治好了、注射潜伏的大病可能随之而来…，人类至今还没有研究出安全可靠的注射液，更何况唯利是图的医药财团不法之徒、借机制造疾病、企图减少人口、施药、解药、层层布局促进医疗经济。/ 法国：自由健康人权记者：韩荣利

A reporter asked: “Do you still dare to accept injections? After a minor illness is cured, the serious diseases hidden within the injection may follow… Humanity has not yet developed a safe and reliable injectable solution. Moreover, profit-driven pharmaceutical conglomerates and lawbreakers take the opportunity to create diseases, attempt to reduce the population, administer drugs and antidotes, and set up layer-upon-layer schemes to stimulate the medical economy.”
/ France: Reporter for Freedom, Health, and Human Rights: Han Rongli



Trust in doctors is low for a reason. Here’s how to find one you can rely on. 人们对医生的信任度很低是有原因的。 以下是如何找到您可以信赖的人。 https://substack.com/@marybowdenmd/note/c-186866163

中国29岁帅哥刘垚猝死
评论区明确透露，刘垚生前并无基础疾病，猝死的直接诱因就是“喝酒加熬夜”，这种无节制的生活习惯…

中共媒体舆论引导指向，年轻人猝死怨自己的生活习惯、回避疫苗伤害、没有人敢于提及中共强迫施打新冠疫苗造成的后遗症猝死。

A handsome 29-year-old Chinese man, Liu Yao, suddenly died.
Comments clearly revealed that Liu Yao had no underlying medical conditions during his lifetime, and the direct triggers of his sudden death were ‘drinking alcohol and staying up late’—this kind of uncontrolled lifestyle…

Chinese Communist Party (CCP) media guidance directs public opinion to blame the sudden deaths of young people on their own lifestyle habits, avoiding discussion of vaccine injuries. No one dares to mention the sudden-death aftereffects caused by the CCP’s forced administration of COVID-19 vaccines

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) infiltrated the World Health Organization, exaggerated the pandemic, and pushed forward the long-planned toxic vaccines, resulting in catastrophic global consequences. The CCP is an evil axis.

In 2003, the CCP deliberately engineered the SARS virus 🦠. At that time, Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon decisively ordered the blockade of China’s land, sea, and air, strictly controlling the spread of the virus. … In contrast, the CCP was unprepared and caught off guard. However, the Wuhan COVID-19 virus is different: the CCP meticulously prepared, intentionally planned, and laid out a multi-layered scheme to poison all of humanity! ⚠️ The vaccine ingredients 🧂 originate from the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Wuhan Pfizer Vaccine Development Center, located just 10 kilometers apart, both within the Wuhan Bio-pharmaceutical Economic Zone.
/ HAN rongli

一項新的研究發現，100%的接種疫苗的參與者都有異常的澱粉樣微凝塊，並認為通常被描述為長新冠肺炎的可能是「長疫苗」。

Participants who received the vaccine all had abnormal amyloid-like microclots, and it is believed that what is commonly described as long COVID may actually be long vaccine.

https://open.substack.com/pub/diedsuddenlynews/p/breaking-new-study-finds-micro-clots

根據這項研究，研究人員檢查了一個接種了94%疫苗的佇列，並報告說，每個參與者——包括那些被標記為健康對照組的參與者——在血液中迴圈著抗纖維蛋白溶解的澱粉樣微凝塊。 該帖子的作者斷言，這些微凝塊與一些防腐師和病理學家報告在全球屍檢中發現的大、白色、橡膠的凝塊是相同的病理。

A new study found anomalous amyloid micro clots in 100 percent of vaccinated participants and argues that what has commonly been described as Long COVID may instead be “Long Vaccine.”
According to the study, researchers examined a cohort that was 94 percent vaccinated and reported that every participant — including those labeled healthy controls — had fibrinolysis-resistant, amyloid micro-clots circulating in their blood. The author of the post asserts these microclots are the same pathology as the large, white, rubbery clots that some embalmers and pathologists have reported finding in postmortem examinations worldwide.

大約90%被歸類為長期新冠肺炎的參與者接種了疫苗，該研究沒有透過PCR測試、抗體測試或病毒測序確認之前感染SARS-CoV-2。 相反，單獨的尖峰蛋白能夠在實驗室實驗中複製相同的澱粉樣微凝塊，這是直接因果關係的證據。 研究表明，在長期新冠肺炎組中接種疫苗的人中，觀察到最大和最病理的凝塊的比率高達20倍。

研究稱：「這些凝塊含有中性粒細胞外陷阱、錯誤摺疊的澱粉樣纖維蛋白和抵抗正常分解的炎症酶，」該研究稱這一發現是全球累積血管損傷的警告。 它最後要求疾病控制和預防中心立即進行調查，並呼籲禁止任何將尖峰蛋白引入血液的平臺。

Around 90 percent of participants categorized as having Long COVID were vaccinated, and that the study did not confirm prior SARS-CoV-2 infection through PCR tests, antibody testing, or viral sequencing. Instead, spike protein alone was able to reproduce the same amyloid microclots in laboratory experiments, which is evidence of direct causation. The largest and most pathological clots, the study says, were observed at rates up to 20 times higher in vaccinated individuals within the Long COVID group.
“These clots were loaded with neutrophil extracellular traps, misfolded amyloid fibrin, and inflammatory enzymes that resist normal breakdown,” the study says, calling the findings a warning of global, cumulative vascular injury. It concludes by demanding immediate investigations by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and calling for a ban on any platform that introduces spike protein into the bloodstream.

辯論進一步加劇，由MPH的Nicholas Hulscher單獨發帖強調。 Hulscher在宣告中引用了他描述的兩項基於屍檢的研究，他聲稱這些研究在新冠肺炎mRNA注射和死亡之間建立了因果關係。

據Hulscher稱，這些研究集體記錄了240例他描述為「經屍檢證明的疫苗死亡」的病例，他認為，他們的發現應該立即引發FDA I類召回——該機構最嚴重的召回指定，保留給被認為會造成死亡或嚴重傷害風險的產品。

The debate intensified further with a separate post highlighted by Nicholas Hulscher, MPH. In his statement, Hulscher cited what he described as two autopsy-based studies that he claims establish a causal link between COVID-19 mRNA injections and death.
According to Hulscher, the studies collectively document 240 cases he characterizes as “autopsy-proven vaccine deaths,” and he argues their findings should trigger an immediate FDA Class I recall — the agency’s most serious recall designation, reserved for products believed to pose a risk of death or serious injury.

Hulscher的帖子斷言，73.9%的調查死亡直接歸因於新冠肺炎疫苗，同時聲稱資料集中100%的心肌炎相關死亡是疫苗引起的。

他將心臟猝死列為主要原因，佔35%的病例，其次是肺栓塞佔12.5%，心肌梗死佔12%，疫苗誘導的血小板減少（VITT）佔7.9%，心肌炎佔7.1%，多系統炎症綜合徵佔4.6%，腦出血佔3.8%。

Hulscher寫道：「可注射的產品不屬於人們的懷抱。」他呼籲立即採取監管行動。

Hulscher’s post asserts that 73.9 percent of the deaths examined were directly attributable to the COVID-19 shots, while claiming that 100 percent of myocarditis-related deaths in the dataset were vaccine-caused.
He lists sudden cardiac death as the leading cause, accounting for 35 percent of cases, followed by pulmonary embolism at 12.5 percent, myocardial infarction at 12 percent, vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) at 7.9 percent, myocarditis at 7.1 percent, multisystem inflammatory syndrome at 4.6 percent, and cerebral hemorrhage at 3.8 percent.
“Deadly injectable products do not belong in people’s arms,” Hulscher wrote, calling for immediate regulatory action.

這項研究強調了一個更廣泛的現實：對公共衛生機構的信任仍然脆弱，未解答的問題——真實或感知——繼續在網上獲得牽引力。 在這個領域工作的研究人員表示，進一步的獨立研究、透明的方法和開放資料共享對於澄清這些微凝塊發現對患者的真正意義至關重要。

截至目前，病毒帖子中的說法尚未得到主要醫療組織的認可，也沒有監管機構宣佈政策變更作為回應。 然而，這場辯論幾乎沒有消退的跡象。

The study underscores a broader reality: trust in public health institutions remains fragile, and unanswered questions — real or perceived — continue to gain traction online. Researchers working in this space say further independent studies, transparent methodologies, and open data sharing are essential to clarify what, if anything, these microclot findings truly mean for patients.
As of now, the claims made in the viral post have not been endorsed by major medical organizations, and no regulatory agency has announced a policy change in response. The debate, however, shows little sign of fading.

Dr. Brian Hooker published a study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children—and the results couldn’t have been clearer.

“The vaccinated children were less healthy than the unvaccinated by a long shot.”

“They were getting more recurrent infections. They had more autoimmune and neurological conditions.”

“Whatever we studied—either a recurrent infection, an autoimmunity or a neurological condition—we saw it more in the vaccinated than what we saw in the unvaccinated.” 布莱恩·胡克博士发表了一项研究，比较了接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的儿童，结果再清楚不过了。

“接种疫苗的儿童的健康状况远远低于未接种疫苗的儿童。”

“他们的复发性感染越来越多。他们患有更多的自身免疫性疾病和神经系统疾病。”

“无论我们研究什么——无论是反复感染、自身免疫还是神经系统疾病——我们在接种疫苗的人身上看到的情况比在未接种疫苗的人身上看到的更多。” https://substack.com/@stopthoseshots/note/c-186950321

博士 Marivic Villa在世界衛生理事會的演講揭露了新冠肺炎注射運動後出現的嚴重免疫功能障礙。 根據她在佛羅里達州The Villages的診所護理的4000多名患者的資料，她提供了免疫崩潰、病毒重新啟動和患者群體中癌症診斷增加的證據——這是生物系統受到持續攻擊的跡象。

https://open.substack.com/pub/drtrozzi/p/dr-marivic-villa-the-collapse-of

Dr. Marivic Villa’s presentation at the World Council for Health exposes the profound immune dysfunction emerging in the aftermath of the COVID injection campaign. Drawing from data on more than four thousand patients cared for through her clinic in The Villages, Florida, she presents evidence of immune collapse, viral reactivation, and increasing cancer diagnoses in her patient population—signs of a biological system under sustained assault.

I filed an Emergency Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and 3.5 Hour Evidentiary Hearing. As the motion indicates, I intend to subpoena Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo, M.D., PhD, should the hearing be granted. Now we will have to wait for the Court to act. 我提交了一份紧急动议，要求发出初步禁令和 3.5 小时的证据听证会。 正如该动议所示，如果听证会获得批准，我打算传唤佛罗里达州外科医生约瑟夫·拉达波博士（医学博士、哲学博士）。 现在我们必须等待法院采取行动。 https://substack.com/@josephsansone/note/c-186779103

https://substack.com/@petermcculloughmd/note/p-180063472

🚨 Dr. Karl Jablonowski just EXPOSED a “huge revelation” about autism.

“Children’s Health Defense—myself and my co-author Dr. Brian Hooker—just published a pre-print and have an article in review that demonstrates that children of people who served in the US military are more likely to have autism than people who did not serve.”

“That is a huge revelation.”

“It gets worse when both parents were serving in the US military.”

“It gets worse if they were a National Guard reserve or active, but not deployed.”

“And just the severity, um, gets worse as well, going from mild, m- moderate to severe autism.”

“This is a major issue … and it’s incumbent upon the Department of War to really look into what could be attributing to a higher autism rate in children of the US military 🚨 Karl Jablonowski 博士刚刚揭露了关于自闭症的“巨大启示”。

“儿童健康保卫组织——我本人和我的合著者布莱恩·胡克博士——刚刚发表了一篇预印本，并有一篇文章正在审查中，该文章表明，在美国军队服役的人的孩子比没有服役的人更有可能患有自闭症。”

“这是一个巨大的启示。”

“当父母都在美国军队服役时，情况会变得更糟。”

“如果他们是国民警卫队预备役或现役人员，但没有部署，情况会变得更糟。”

“而且严重程度也变得更糟，从轻度、中度到重度自闭症。”

“这是一个重大问题……战争部有责任真正调查美军儿童自闭症发病率较高的原因 https://substack.com/@stopthoseshots/note/c-187315980

Nicolas Hulscher: mortality rate of babies is 77% up since covid shot.

Humanity is in big trouble... Nicolas Hulscher：自新冠疫苗注射以来，婴儿死亡率上升了 77%。

人类遇到了大麻烦…… https://substack.com/@fallofthecabalofficial/note/c-187380119

Unvaxxed kids are always the healthiest. 未接种疫苗的孩子总是最健康的。 https://substack.com/@stopthoseshots/note/c-178086727