patrick.net

That’s quite an interesting peek into the discrimination against white boys. No wonder the drivel the MSM calls news has changed so dramatically!

SharkyP says

That’s quite an interesting peek into the discrimination against white boys. No wonder the drivel the MSM calls news has changed so dramatically!

That and Obama “updating” the Smith Mundt Act?

The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012 amended the original Smith-Mundt Act of 1948, allowing U.S. government-produced content intended for foreign audiences to be accessible to American citizens. This change has raised concerns about the potential for domestic propaganda, as it lifted the previous ban on disseminating such materials within the United States.

The article misattributes the discrimination against white men as coming from the Gen-Xers in charge. That's a crock of shit. Gen-X was passed over by the boomers in favor of their crotch fruit - the millenials. Boomers led the war against young white men.

stereotomy says

The article misattributes the discrimination against white men as coming from the Gen-Xers in charge. That's a crock of shit. Gen-X was passed over by the boomers in favor of their crotch fruit - the millenials. Boomers led the war against young white men.

It's amazing GenX is acknowledged in anything all.

stereotomy says

The article misattributes the discrimination against white men as coming from the Gen-Xers in charge. That's a crock of shit. Gen-X was passed over by the boomers in favor of their crotch fruit - the millenials. Boomers led the war against young white men.

Correct. Already in the 90s the negative affirmation action ("Affirmative Action") was underway in a soft way but nowhere near as bad as the 2010s.

FreeAmericanDOP says

Already in the 90s the negative affirmation action ("Affirmative Action") was underway

Way before that.

Ironic, no? It has certainly mutated beyond that.

The term "affirmative action" was first used in the United States in Executive Order 10925, signed by President John F. Kennedy on 6 March 1961, which included a provision that government contractors "take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and employees are treated [fairly] during employment, without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin". In 1965, President Lyndon B. Johnson issued Executive Order 11246 which required government employers to "hire without regard to race, religion and national origin" and "take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, sex or national origin.

Al_Sharpton_for_President says

without regard to their race

Lol, that sure didn't happen.

"Affirmative action" became exactly the opposite, looking only at race, and discriminating against whites and Asians.

FreeAmericanDOP says

Correct. Already in the 90s the negative affirmation action ("Affirmative Action") was underway in a soft way but nowhere near as bad as the 2010s.

Try the late 60's, when Berkeley opened its first Dpt. of African American Studies and a Rastafarian jive professor used his chair to walk around campus trolling for white pussy. Things deteriorated from there.

https://x.com/IterIntellectus/status/2000846259645514219

the thing about calling DEI 'economic genocide' is that it undersells it

yes, young White men were systematically excluded from careers during their peak marriage years, but that's just first-order effects.

second-order: marriage market collapse. women date across and up. men without careers become invisible to the women who would have married them and disappear. the "eligible bachelor" pool shrinks.

third-order: fertility crisis. fewer marriages, fewer children. but it's worse than just men not marrying or having families. the women who "won" the DEI lottery got careers instead of families, delayed fertility until it was too late. DEI attacked family formation from both sides, excluded men from provider roles AND diverted women from their fertility window. everyone lost.

fourth-order: psychological. young men couldn't even name what was happening to them. the same institutions that excluded them told them they were "privileged", that complaining was proof of weakness. so they internalized failure as personal inadequacy rather than systemic rigging, retreated into depression, video games, porn. the symptoms we then pathologized as "male failure". the system broke them (on purpose) and blamed them for being broken.

fifth-order: institutional trust gone. once you know positions are filled by demographics rather than competence, every credential becomes suspect (if not a priori worthless). is your doctor qualified or a diversity hire? your pilot? your engineer? you can't prove any individual is incompetent, but you can't trust any individual is competent either. medicine skepticism, academic failure, media skepticism, none of this emerged organically. it was manufactured by the DEI hire you can't be sure is qualified to treat you.

sixth-order: reality became unspeakable. noticing any of this was a fireable offense. pointing out the obvious got you called a bigot, deplatformed or fired. pure totalitarian censorship and the problem couldn't even be acknowledged (until now, finally)
men knew they were being cheated but couldn't say it. women sensed something was wrong with the men but couldn't identify it. relationships poisoned by a dynamic neither party could name.

seventh-order: the feedback loop. fewer eligible men means more women competing for a shrinking pool, more women losing the marriage market, more resentment, more "men are trash", more support for DEI, fewer eligible men and the system accelerates itself.

and the worst part is that DEI was just the economic arm. the same people and institutions pushed the complete package
"toxic masculinity" to pathologize male identity
"the future is female" as explicit zero-sum framing delusion
"believe all women" to weaponize trust against men
"men are trash" to normalize open contempt
a coordinated ideological assault on family formation.

and it even had a business model. HR departments exploded (millions of jobs invented to administer the regime). DEI consultants became a multi-billion dollar industry. politicians got voting blocs dependent on racial grievance. established boomers kept their positions while their competition was eliminated.

the architects knew what they were doing
you don't accidentally build a system that specifically targets men during peak marriage years, tells them they deserve it, makes it unspeakable to complain, attacks their identity as toxic, promotes women into career tracks that burn their fertility, then acts confused when society collapses

if you wanted to suppress the fertility of a specific demographic, engineer the breakdown of trust between the sexes, and make it illegal to notice, the playbook would look exactly like this.

DEI should be held responsible for the fertility crisis, the marriage collapse, the epidemic of male depression and suicide, the destruction of institutional trust, the atomization of society, and the manufactured war between men and women

but DEI was the weapon
the people who designed it, funded it, made it mandatory, enforced it through HR, fired anyone who resisted, called all opposition hate and racism, built careers and industries on its maintenance, they knew. and they're the ones who should be remembered as the architects of one of the worst crimes against humanity

Peachy Keenan
@KeenanPeachy

Dec 15
One of the unspoken reasons for the decline in marriage and births: young men of marriage age had their careers derailed in favor of diversity hires.

DEI is economic genocide.

Patrick says

but DEI was the weapon
the people who designed it, funded it, made it mandatory, enforced it through HR, fired anyone who resisted, called all opposition hate and racism, built careers and industries on its maintenance, they knew. and they're the ones who should be remembered as the architects of one of the worst crimes against humanity

Its the mainstreaming of counter culture and destruction of the nuclear family. Welcome to what Obama said about fundamental change in America.

One major obstacle is the Hispanic/Latino vote did not turn out as the Democrats planned pre-Trump.

Also social media and the internet was thought to be a major advantage for the Left about 20 to 25 years ago; however that also has not turned out as planned such as with Joe Rogan's show, etc.

Hence, now you see a lot of 1984 efforts of censorship and shaming like in the United Kingdom.