良知医学家对所有品牌疫苗诡异成分的揭露 The Revelation of Strange Components in All Vaccine Brands by Conscientious Medical Experts
At Least 55 Undeclared Chemical Elements Found in COVID-19 Vaccines Produced by AstraZeneca, CanSino, Moderna, Pfizer, Sinopharm, and Sputnik V Using Accurate ICP-MS (Di Blasi et al., 2024) David Nixon October 19
⸻
Read in the app
I really enjoyed this study.
I am personally familiar with three of the four authors. They are intelligent, diligent, truth-seeking, and genuinely want to help us understand what’s happening. Lorena holds a PhD in biotechnology, Martin is a general practitioner, David Nonis is a molecular biologist working in biotechnology in the US, with experience in bringing new biopharmaceuticals to market. The fourth author, Marcella, holds a PhD in biology.
The introduction to the study offers a useful summary of independent research on vaccines since their introduction. The materials and methods section details the equipment and processes used. The results section elaborates on the chemical elements found in the tested vaccines. Please note, in this context, “chemical elements,” “atomic elements,” and “elements” are interchangeable; any other terminology would be deliberately misleading.
I’ve seen a lot of strange microscopic things, and as far as I’m concerned, nanotechnology exists. I’m not entirely clear if the existence of RNA technology serves the purpose implied by the official narrative – after all, my career in the pharmaceutical industry showed me how things operate, so forgive my skepticism after seeing the cartoons!
What should we expect to find? I think we expect to find what Di Blasi et al. have shown: heterogeneous samples. Odd materials – applicable to all vaccines, regardless of their source.
I asked David Nonis about the result patterns and the sensitivity of the tests – how small are the actual relevant quantities?
David Nonis: “That’s a fair question, which is why we used controls. But for future studies, it’s certainly important to emphasize this point and others. Without a doubt, getting clear results is crucial. However, it’s actually not a coincidental coincidence that products made in different countries, based on different technologies, have the same elements. And the distribution of these elements in the samples, whether in trace amounts or in larger quantities, shows the same distribution pattern across different brands and samples. We also need to address and measure the observed statistical patterns, which will help clarify what we believe or interpret. The other side is the practical approach: time – that variable! We think it’s very important to release this information as soon as possible.”
If someone is unaware of the potential for nanotechnology in COVID-19 injections, they may have difficulty accepting this possibility. What?! How? Why? WHO???
My advantage is that I’ve seen various aspects of this technology over the past two years. Yet, even my most stunning videos have encountered responses like, “I just can’t see it,” to the other extreme of “We’ve been seeing it in the lab.”
Here’s another structural example from Pfizer, which forms in hours and is recorded in real-time, significantly accelerated – by about 1000 times. Darkfield, 200x magnification. No cover glass. The image below links to my website, where you can download the video. The sequential on and off lighting is intriguing—are they utilizing lanthanide element luminescence? How much does it cost to achieve this at this scale?
“We believe that such accidental occurrences, across the various vaccine brands we studied, would not happen so persistently and widely. While the astonishing diversity of undeclared chemical elements is still strange, the evidence seems to point to some form of global technological experimentation. As we pointed out earlier, the discovery of lanthanide elements, which are known to be highly toxic to cells (Voncken, 2016; Balaram, 2019), in such large quantities, as well as their presence in all the vaccines we studied, suggests some degree of impact from ‘nanotechnology experimentation’.” — Di Blasi et al.
I look forward to our discussion on Sunday morning, and hope David Nonis will join us as well.
Wishing you all the best for the rest of the weekend.
David
⸻
A huge thank you to everyone who helped! (Coffee prices have dropped!)
Coffee logo www.drdavidnixon.com
You are currently a free subscriber to Nixonlab. For the full experience, please upgrade your subscription.
良知医学家对所有品牌疫苗诡异成分的揭露
The Revelation of Strange Components in All Vaccine Brands by Conscientious Medical Experts
At Least 55 Undeclared Chemical Elements Found in COVID-19 Vaccines Produced by AstraZeneca, CanSino, Moderna, Pfizer, Sinopharm, and Sputnik V Using Accurate ICP-MS
(Di Blasi et al., 2024)
David Nixon
October 19
⸻
Read in the app
I really enjoyed this study.
I am personally familiar with three of the four authors. They are intelligent, diligent, truth-seeking, and genuinely want to help us understand what’s happening. Lorena holds a PhD in biotechnology, Martin is a general practitioner, David Nonis is a molecular biologist working in biotechnology in the US, with experience in bringing new biopharmaceuticals to market. The fourth author, Marcella, holds a PhD in biology.
The introduction to the study offers a useful summary of independent research on vaccines since their introduction. The materials and methods section details the equipment and processes used. The results section elaborates on the chemical elements found in the tested vaccines. Please note, in this context, “chemical elements,” “atomic elements,” and “elements” are interchangeable; any other terminology would be deliberately misleading.
I’ve seen a lot of strange microscopic things, and as far as I’m concerned, nanotechnology exists. I’m not entirely clear if the existence of RNA technology serves the purpose implied by the official narrative – after all, my career in the pharmaceutical industry showed me how things operate, so forgive my skepticism after seeing the cartoons!
What should we expect to find? I think we expect to find what Di Blasi et al. have shown: heterogeneous samples. Odd materials – applicable to all vaccines, regardless of their source.
I asked David Nonis about the result patterns and the sensitivity of the tests – how small are the actual relevant quantities?
David Nonis: “That’s a fair question, which is why we used controls. But for future studies, it’s certainly important to emphasize this point and others. Without a doubt, getting clear results is crucial. However, it’s actually not a coincidental coincidence that products made in different countries, based on different technologies, have the same elements. And the distribution of these elements in the samples, whether in trace amounts or in larger quantities, shows the same distribution pattern across different brands and samples. We also need to address and measure the observed statistical patterns, which will help clarify what we believe or interpret. The other side is the practical approach: time – that variable! We think it’s very important to release this information as soon as possible.”
If someone is unaware of the potential for nanotechnology in COVID-19 injections, they may have difficulty accepting this possibility. What?! How? Why? WHO???
My advantage is that I’ve seen various aspects of this technology over the past two years. Yet, even my most stunning videos have encountered responses like, “I just can’t see it,” to the other extreme of “We’ve been seeing it in the lab.”
Here’s another structural example from Pfizer, which forms in hours and is recorded in real-time, significantly accelerated – by about 1000 times. Darkfield, 200x magnification. No cover glass. The image below links to my website, where you can download the video. The sequential on and off lighting is intriguing—are they utilizing lanthanide element luminescence? How much does it cost to achieve this at this scale?
I’ll conclude with these choices from the article. I’ve set up a section on my website where you can access the paper and leave comments. If you want to leave a comment for the authors, I’ll be sure to forward it.
https://drdavidnixon.com/1/en/topic/at-least-55-undeclared-chemical-elements-found-in-covid-19-vaccines
“We believe that such accidental occurrences, across the various vaccine brands we studied, would not happen so persistently and widely. While the astonishing diversity of undeclared chemical elements is still strange, the evidence seems to point to some form of global technological experimentation. As we pointed out earlier, the discovery of lanthanide elements, which are known to be highly toxic to cells (Voncken, 2016; Balaram, 2019), in such large quantities, as well as their presence in all the vaccines we studied, suggests some degree of impact from ‘nanotechnology experimentation’.” — Di Blasi et al.
I look forward to our discussion on Sunday morning, and hope David Nonis will join us as well.
Wishing you all the best for the rest of the weekend.
David
⸻
A huge thank you to everyone who helped! (Coffee prices have dropped!)
Coffee logo
www.drdavidnixon.com
You are currently a free subscriber to Nixonlab. For the full experience, please upgrade your subscription.
使用精确 ICP-MS 在阿斯利康、康希诺、Moderna、辉瑞、国药和 Sputnik V 生产的 COVID-19 疫苗中发现至少 55 种未申报的化学元素
（迪布拉西等人，2024）
大卫·尼克松
10月19日
在应用程序中阅读
我真的很喜欢这项研究。
我对四位作者中的三位很了解。 他们聪明、勤奋、致力于追求真理，并希望尽最大努力帮助我们了解正在发生的事情。 Lorena 拥有生物技术博士学位，Martin 是一名全科医生，David Nonis 是一名在美国从事生物技术工作的分子生物学家，拥有将新生物制剂推向市场的经验。 第四位作者马塞拉拥有生物学博士学位。
该研究的简介提供了自推出以来通过独立研究对疫苗了解的有用总结。 材料和方法详细介绍了所使用的设备和工艺。 结果部分详细介绍了测试疫苗中发现的化学元素。 请注意，化学元素、原子元素和元素在这种情况下可以互换使用，任何其他说法都是故意误导。
我见过很多奇怪的微观东西，就我而言，纳米技术是存在的。 我不太清楚 RNA 技术的存在是为了实现官方叙述所暗示的那样——在药物代表的职业生涯中向我展示了事物如何运作的漫画之后，请原谅我的怀疑！
我们期望发现什么？ 我认为我们期望找到 Diblasi 等人所展示的内容。 非均质样品。 奇异材料 - 适用于所有疫苗，无论其来源如何。
我向 David Nonis 询问了结果模式和测试的敏感性——实际相关的数量有多小？
David Nonis：“这是一个公平的问题，这也是我们使用对照的原因，但对于接下来的研究来说，肯定需要强调这一点和其他观点，毫无疑问，获得明确的结果非常重要。 然而，据称在不同国家制造、基于不同技术的产品具有相同的要素，这实际上是不可能的巧合。 并且这些元素在样品中的分布，无论是微量的还是大量的，在不同品牌的不同样品中具有相同的分布模式。 我们还需要解决和衡量观察到的统计模式，这将有助于更清楚地看到我们相信或解释的内容。 另一方面是实用的方法，时间，那个变量！ 我们认为尽快发布这一信息非常重要。”
如果有人不知道纳米技术在 Covid-19 注射剂中的可能性，那么他们可能很难接受这种可能性。 什么？！ 如何？ 为什么？ WHO？？？
我的优势是在过去两年里看到了这项技术的各个方面。 然而，即使是我最令人惊叹的视频也遇到了：“我只是看不到它”到另一个极端“我们一直在实验室里看到它”。
这是辉瑞公司的另一个结构示例，该结构在数小时内形成，并被实时记录并显着加速 - 大约 1000 倍。 暗场 200 倍放大倍率。 无盖玻片。 下图链接到我的网站，您可以下载该视频。 按顺序亮起和熄灭的灯很有趣——它们是否利用了镧系元素发光？ 以这种规模实现这一目标需要多少钱？
我将以本文中的这些选择作为结束。 我在我的网站上设立了一个章节，以便您可以在此处访问该论文并发表评论。 如果您想给作者留下评论，我一定会转发。 https://drdavidnixon.com/1/en/topic/at-least-55-undeclared-chemical-elements-found-in-covid-19-vaccines
“我们认为，在我们研究的各种品牌的疫苗中，偶然造成的事故不会如此持续和普遍地发生。 尽管未申报化学元素的惊人多样性的出现仍然很奇怪，但线索似乎指向某种世界范围内的技术实验。 正如我们上面所指出的，由于已知镧系元素具有极高的细胞毒性（Voncken，2016；Balaram，2019），因此它们的大量发现以及我们在此研究的所有疫苗中都暗示着某种程度的影响。 纳米技术实验” Diblasi 等人
我期待着我们周日早上的讨论，并希望大卫·诺尼斯也能加入我们。
周末剩下的时间一切顺利。
大卫
非常感谢所有帮助！ （咖啡现在降价了！）
科菲标志
www.drdavidnixon.com
您目前是 Nixonlab 的免费订阅者。 要获得完整的体验，请升级您的订阅。