patrick.net

新冠肺炎計劃，虛假和昂貴的生物安全議程，全球主義者為獲得實驗性疫苗而使用的伎們，以及如何向前邁進並結束這種混亂

我們面臨的只是帝國主義的現代迭代

梅麗爾·納斯
COVID plandemic, the Bogus and Expensive BioSecurity Agenda, Tricks Globalists Play to Get Experimental Vaccines into Arms, and How to Move Forward and End This Mess
What we face is simply the modern iteration of Imperialism
MERYL NASS
DEC 21

新冠“计划性大流行”、虚假且昂贵的生物安全议程、全球主义者将实验性疫苗注入人们手臂的手段，以及我们该如何继续前行并结束这场混乱

我们所面对的，不过是帝国主义在现代的一个变种

梅丽尔·纳斯
12月21日

https://open.substack.com/pub/merylnass/p/my-talk-on-the-covid-plandemic-the

My talk on the COVID plandemic, the Bogus and Expensive BioSecurity Agenda, Tricks Globalists Play to Get Experimental Vaccines into Arms, and How to Move Forward and End This Mess
What we face is simply the modern iteration of Imperialism
MERYL NASS
DEC 21

READ IN APP

My talk in Venice today.

The above screenshot is part of an email that Ron Fouchier of Erasmus University (who trained a Bird Flu to spread between ferrets, which are the model for human flu—a very dangerous experiment—while funded by NIAID) in the Netherlands wrote to Fauci, listing the problematic sequences, and providing him with ideas about how he might justify each as natural. He had been on the Fauci call a day or so earlier.

Not only was Fauci aware of at least 6 areas on the COVID genome that looked engineered on February 1, 2022—but he had Ralph Baric secretly listening in to the call who probably already knew what the others might identify as engineered sequences and was helping to plan the cover-up. Ralph Baric’s hidden presence suggests that he and Fauci already knew the virus was engineered, and may have been trying to get a bead on what strategies they would need to use to hide it. This is also a hint that Baric had something to do with developing the COVID virus, or knew who did.

Part of the globalists’ plan was never to entirely end the pandemic restrictions, but keep pulling them out for intermittent use, to train us to adapt to them.

And now masks are back in parts of Spain, the UK and Italy in hospitals!

Yet it really does not seem to be that severe a flu season. The red line above is the current year. The other colors represent past years since 2018-19.

The public is constantly being told to fear pandemics and bioterrorism by credentialed experts. They want us to always fear death.

The public is constantly being told to fear pandemics and bioterrorism by credentialed experts. They want us to always fear death.

I want to give you 3 examples from drafts of the WHO pandemic treaty and health regulation amendments to show you what the WHO was trying to accomplish. This draft from June 2023 encouraged nations to minimize the “unnecessary administrative hurdles” for gain of function research. Were they asking for accidents?

The WHO wanted to supervise GOF research worldwide.

The WHO wanted samples of deadly organisms to be shared throughout its laboratory networks—but insanely, it would have allowed members of the network to share their samples with whomever they pleased. This is prohibited under other international laws.

Now I’d like to show you that while no one really knows what to expect from biowarfare, what products to develop, or what might actually be effective, a lot of money can be spent on the BioSecurity Agenda (aka Pandemic Preparedness, aka Biodefense) nonetheless.

After 9/11, the US began spending about $6 Billion/year. Then it rose to $10-11 Billion/year.

By Biden’s last or second-to-last budget, the ask to Congress was for $20 Billion a year for biodefense. I posted on this at the time.

What would the WHO have spent, if it got its way with the Pandemic Treaty? McKinsey was tasked to come up with an estimate, or should I say guesstimate? According to a McKinsey estimate, the WHO’s global biodefense program would increase the WHO budget by 10-30 times what it is now, most of this coming from the member states, who last year paid less than 20% of the WHO’s total budget.

But this is what they don’t tell you—pandemic preparedness is the new wild west for the Biopharma industry

Unfortunately, the globalists are deadly serious about unleashing more pandemics and more dangerous vaccines on the public, using the excuse that they had no time to properly test them for safety. They are deadly serious about rolling out vaccines in 100 days, next time. And the time after that….

Here’s what they claim it will take to roll out vaccines in 100 days. Some combination of the following. The globalists and their medical lackeys do not care about safety nor efficacy—but they do care about getting the paperwork right and making whatever they do be “legal.” They don’t want to wind up in jail for poisoning the population, after all.

The “mock-up” vaccine is a horrible idea. You license any prototype vaccine that has barely been tested, somehow creating what might appear to be a complete dossier on it. But the regulators know they are only going through the motions. This vaccine will supposedly never be used, but it provides a license—a loophole—through which a new vaccine using the same platform, only with an updated antigen, can be squeezed through for a rollout and rubberstamped by regulators, using the old license.

There are 3 licensed bird flu vaccines that were barely tested on small numbers of unfortunate subjects, and last time I looked there there were 4 mock-up vaccines for bird flu licensed in the EU.

Here are 2 academic articles written about this crazy process:

So, even though the mock-up vaccine is irreparably flawed, because you cannot simply switch out an antigen and expect to know what safety and efficacy issues the new vaccine will have—well, it is a legal way of getting untested vaccines out into use in record time—so what the hell, even though the WHO, EMA and NVAC have all written that the theory does not hold up—it remains a pillar of the globalists’ plans.

But it normally takes 10-15 years to develop a licensed vaccine. Most vaccines fail due to inadequate safety or efficacy. Rolling out 100 day vaccines, with no meaningful human testing, will only be done if there is no liability for those involved—and it is a recipe for disaster. The vaccine companies know better than to roll out such products if they are responsible for them.

Only repurposed drugs can roll out quickly and safely enough to contain a future pandemic.

11 days ago, the NY Times editorial board pointed out, as I have repeatedly, that we already have a treaty to ban biological weapons. The WHO’s proposals fly in the face of this treaty, which is why its existence has been hidden. The treaty needs strengthening to make it enforceable, but it already exists and has been ratified by almost every country in the world, and it is the perfect starting point for stopping biological warfare.

There is some hopeful news in Robert Malone’s substack today about this very issue.

The next slide I made 2 years ago, and it was designed to show how the provisions of the draft Pandemic Treaty and IHR amendments could be applied by the globalists. It is still good to recall what they attempted to do then, because this is still what they wish to accomplish. The pandemic pathogen library (the Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing [PABS] system) is still being negotiated, even today, by WHO and a group of member states that does not include the US.

My other takeaway message is that the globalists rely entirely on lies, tricks and misdirection to accomplish their goals, framing the most awful concepts in virtue-signalling language. But it is a double-edged sword for them, because people hate being tricked and fooled.

If we can each focus on identifying the lies and tricks they play on us, and then share our newly discovered methods of discernment with others, and help them identify the lies they too face, we can win this war for the world. Isn’t that a worthy goal?

我关于“新冠计划性大流行”、虚假且昂贵的生物安全议程、全球主义者将实验性疫苗注入人们手臂的手段，以及我们如何继续前行并结束这场混乱的演讲

我们所面对的，不过是帝国主义在现代的一个变种

梅丽尔·纳斯
12月21日

在应用中阅读

我今天在威尼斯的演讲。

⸻

上面的截图是荷兰伊拉斯谟大学的罗恩·福彻（Ron Fouchier）写给福奇的一封电子邮件的一部分。福彻曾在美国国家过敏与传染病研究所（NIAID）资助下，训练禽流感病毒在雪貂之间传播——雪貂是人类流感的模型动物——这是一个极其危险的实验。在邮件中，他列出了存在问题的基因序列，并向福奇提供了如何将这些序列解释为“自然形成”的理由和思路。他在一两天前还参加过福奇主持的一次电话会议。

不仅如此，早在2022年2月1日，福奇就已经意识到新冠病毒基因组中至少有6个区域看起来像是经过工程改造的——而且他还让拉尔夫·巴里克秘密旁听了这次电话会议。巴里克很可能早就知道哪些序列会被其他人认定为“人工改造”，并协助策划掩盖行动。巴里克的秘密出席表明，他和福奇可能早就知道该病毒是被工程化的，并试图摸清需要采用哪些策略来掩盖事实。这也暗示巴里克可能参与了新冠病毒的研发，或者知道是谁做的。

全球主义者计划的一部分，从来就不是彻底结束疫情限制措施，而是间歇性地重新启用这些措施，以训练我们去适应它们。

而现在，在西班牙、英国和意大利的部分地区，医院里又重新开始戴口罩了！

然而，看起来这并不是一个特别严重的流感季。上方的红线代表今年，其它颜色代表自2018–2019年以来的往年数据。

公众不断被“有资质的专家”告知要害怕疫情和生物恐怖主义。他们希望我们始终活在对死亡的恐惧之中。

（重复）公众不断被告知要害怕疫情和生物恐怖主义。他们希望我们始终恐惧死亡。

⸻

我想通过世卫组织（WHO）《大流行病条约》和《国际卫生条例》修正案草案中的三个例子，来说明世卫组织试图实现什么。2023年6月的一份草案鼓励各国减少功能获得性研究（GOF）的“不必要行政障碍”。他们是在为事故铺路吗？

世卫组织希望在全球范围内监管功能获得性研究。

世卫组织还希望致命病原体样本在其实验室网络中共享——但极其荒谬的是，它居然允许网络成员将样本随意分享给任何人。这在其他国际法律下是被禁止的。

⸻

现在我想向你们展示，尽管实际上没有人真正知道生物战争会是什么样子、该开发什么产品、或者什么才真正有效，但仍然可以在“生物安全议程”（也称为“疫情防备”“生物防御”）上花掉巨额资金。

9·11事件后，美国开始每年花费约60亿美元，随后上升到每年100至110亿美元。

在拜登最近或倒数第二次预算中，向国会提出的生物防御经费请求是每年200亿美元。我当时对此做过分析。

如果世卫组织在《大流行病条约》中得逞，它会花多少钱？麦肯锡被要求提出一个估算——或者说“猜测”。根据麦肯锡的估计，世卫组织的全球生物防御项目将使其预算增加到现在的10到30倍，而其中大部分资金将来自成员国；而去年成员国提供的经费还不到世卫组织总预算的20%。

但他们没有告诉你的是——疫情防备已成为生物制药行业的新“蛮荒西部”。

不幸的是，全球主义者对于向公众释放更多疫情、以及更危险的疫苗，是极其认真的，他们以“没有时间充分测试安全性”为借口。他们也非常认真地打算在下一次、再下一次，在100天内推出疫苗。

⸻

以下是他们声称在100天内推出疫苗所需要的条件，通常是以下因素的组合。全球主义者及其医学帮手并不关心安全性或有效性——他们关心的是文件是否齐全，以及一切是否“合法”。毕竟，他们不想因为毒害公众而进监狱。

所谓“样板疫苗（mock-up vaccine）”是一个可怕的想法。你先给一个几乎未经测试的原型疫苗发放许可，表面上看起来像是拥有一整套完整档案。监管机构心知肚明，这只是走过场。这个疫苗据说永远不会真正使用，但它却提供了一个法律漏洞——通过这个漏洞，可以用同一技术平台、只更换抗原的新疫苗迅速获批并大规模推出，并由监管机构盖章放行。

目前已有3种禽流感疫苗获得许可，但它们只在少量不幸的受试者中进行过测试；而我上次查看时，欧盟已有4种禽流感“样板疫苗”获批。

这里有两篇学术文章讨论了这一疯狂的过程：

（原文未列出具体链接）

因此，尽管“样板疫苗”在科学上存在不可弥补的缺陷——因为你不能仅仅更换抗原，就指望了解新疫苗的安全性和有效性问题——但它仍然是一种合法方式，可以在极短时间内将未经充分测试的疫苗投入使用。即便世卫组织、欧洲药品管理局（EMA）和美国国家疫苗咨询委员会（NVAC）都曾指出这一理论站不住脚，它仍然是全球主义者计划的支柱。

但通常开发一款获批疫苗需要10到15年，大多数疫苗因安全性或有效性不足而失败。在没有任何有意义的人体测试情况下推出“100天疫苗”，只有在相关方不承担任何责任的前提下才可能发生——这无异于灾难的配方。疫苗公司很清楚，如果他们要承担责任，就绝不会推出这样的产品。

只有“再利用药物”（已有安全记录的药物）才能足够快、足够安全地用于遏制未来的疫情。

⸻

11天前，《纽约时报》编辑委员会指出——正如我多次强调的那样——我们早已有一项禁止生物武器的条约。世卫组织的提案与该条约背道而驰，这也是为什么这项条约的存在被刻意淡化。该条约确实需要加强执行力，但它已经存在，并且几乎被世界上所有国家批准，是阻止生物战争的完美起点。

今天，罗伯特·马龙在他的 Substack 中就这一问题发布了一些令人鼓舞的消息。

⸻

接下来这张幻灯片是我两年前制作的，目的是展示全球主义者如何利用《大流行病条约》和《国际卫生条例》修正案草案中的条款。这一点至今仍值得回顾，因为这正是他们仍然想要实现的目标。所谓“大流行病原体库”（病原体获取与利益分享系统，PABS）至今仍在由世卫组织和部分不包括美国在内的成员国谈判中。

⸻

我另一个重要的结论是：全球主义者完全依赖谎言、花招和误导来实现他们的目标，并用“道德正确”的语言包装最可怕的概念。但这对他们来说是一把双刃剑，因为人们憎恨被欺骗和愚弄。

如果我们每个人都能专注于识别他们对我们使用的谎言和手段，并把我们新学到的辨别方法分享给他人，帮助他们识破自己所面对的谎言，我们就能赢得这场关乎世界的战争。这难道不是一个值得追求的目标吗？