主流媒体不会告诉你的疫苗伤害信息 The vaccine injury information that mainstream media won’t tell you.
https://substack.com/@sebaterribilini/note/m-83531206-ab8b-4b77-bd46-fb98f1742e05 ‼️THE WHOLE WORLD IS WATCHING‼️ 👉Here’s a summary: Arno Van Kessel, together with his colleague Peter Stassen, started a civil law suit in 2023 against Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, Mark Rutte (former Dutch PM) and others, on behalf of several plaintiffs injured by Covid-19 vaccines. Arno Van Kessel was locked up in jail on trumped-up charges in June 2025. Peter Stassen is now the main lawyer in the proceeding against the above mentioned individuals. The expert witnesses Sasha Latypova, Dr. Mike Yeadon, Catherine Austin Fitts, Katherine Watt and Dr. Joseph Sansone, who were ready to testify, were rejected by the Court. There was a sixth expert witness, Professor Francis Boyle (see video above), a bioweapons expert who helped draft international bioweapons laws. Three weeks after he agreed to testify, he suddenly died. 👉 More details here: https://open.substack.com/pub/sashalatypova/p/breaking-court-in-the-netherlands 👉 Update: appeal of August 20, 2025 order denying application for preliminary evidence proceedings; appeal filed September 15, 2025. https://open.substack.com/pub/sashalatypova/p/netherlands-case-update-appeal-of 👉 Update: press conference held on December 15, 2025 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TxlmMU3vLds On December 15, 2025 a press conference was held at the court in Leeuwarden by Stichting Recht Oprecht. The reason for the event was the ongoing civil lawsuit that the foundation is facilitating on behalf of seven individuals — now six, because one has died — who claim to have suffered serious health damage after COVID-19 vaccination. ‼️全世界都在关注‼️ 👉总结如下： Arno Van Kessel 与他的同事 Peter Stassen 于 2023 年代表几名因 Covid-19 疫苗受伤的原告对比尔·盖茨、阿尔伯特·布尔拉、马克·鲁特（荷兰前总理）等人提起民事诉讼。 2025 年 6 月，阿诺·范·凯塞尔 (Arno Van Kessel) 因莫须有的罪名被关进监狱。 Peter Stassen 现在是针对上述个人的诉讼的主要律师。 准备出庭作证的专家证人萨莎·拉蒂波娃 (Sasha Latypova)、迈克·伊登 (Mike Yeadon) 博士、凯瑟琳·奥斯汀·菲茨 (Catherine Austin Fitts)、凯瑟琳·瓦特 (Katherine Watt) 和约瑟夫·桑索恩 (Joseph Sansone) 博士均被法庭拒绝。 还有第六位专家证人，弗朗西斯·博伊尔教授（见上面的视频），他是一名生物武器专家，帮助起草了国际生物武器法。 在他同意出庭作证三周后，他突然去世。 👉更多详情请看这里： https://open.substack.com/pub/sashalatypova/p/writing-court-in-the-netherlands 👉 更新：对2025年8月20日拒绝初步证据程序申请的命令提出上诉； 上诉于 2025 年 9 月 15 日提出。 https://open.substack.com/pub/sashalatypova/p/netherlands-case-update-appeal-of 👉更新：2025年12月15日举行新闻发布会 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TxlmMU3vLds 2025 年 12 月 15 日，Stichting Recht Oprecht 在吕伐登法院举行了新闻发布会。 该事件的原因是该基金会正在代表 7 个人（目前有 6 人，因为其中一人死亡）协助正在进行的民事诉讼，这些人声称在接种 COVID-19 疫苗后遭受了严重的健康损害。
According to their lawyer, Mr. Peter Stassen, new and crucial evidence has recently been submitted that strikes at the core of the case. 🛑 New Evidence in Two Legal Procedures Mr. Stassen explained that the new evidence was formally presented on December 7 to both the Court in Leeuwarden, where the main procedure is ongoing, and to the Court of Appeal in Amsterdam, where an appeal has been filed. The material consists of video messages and written reports from five international experts, supported by hundreds of source references. These submissions are meant to show that the plaintiffs were insufficiently and incorrectly informed before they chose to get vaccinated. Stassen argues that this amounts to systemic misleading — and that if they had been fully informed, the plaintiffs would have decided differently. That alleged deception forms the basis for a claim of unlawful conduct (“onrechtmatige daad”) against the State and other defendants. 🛑 Expert Conclusions Presented in the Evidence Mr. Stassen presented what the expert material concludes. According to him: 👉The COVID-19 injections cannot be regarded as regular vaccines, but were used as emergency measures with a military context. 👉Because of that, they were used outside normal pharmaceutical law and consumer protections. 👉The experts argue that the injections offer no health benefit, are not safe or effective, and cause serious side effects — allegedly foreseeable at the time of their design. 👉Stassen links these conclusions to what he calls a broader “COVID-19 reset” or “Great Reset,” where vaccination plays a central role. 🛑 Criticism of Opposing Parties Stassen sharply criticized the position of the opposing parties, including the Dutch State and several prominent government and health officials as well as pharmaceutical leaders. He noted that they refuse to engage substantively with the expert reports and oppose having the experts heard in court. He claimed that only Bill Gates formally responded to the judge, but without substantive rebuttal to the request to hear the experts. 🛑 Next Steps in the Legal Case Concerning how the lawsuits will proceed, Stassen indicated that the Leeuwarden court plans a hearing between March and October 2026. In the appeal, the question remains whether the experts will ultimately be heard by the judges. Stassen emphasized that the new evidence now submitted makes a substantive legal debate unavoidable. 🛑 Support and Media Criticism After the press conference, supporters of the plaintiffs were interviewed. A former general practitioner, Berber Pieksma, expressed support for Stassen and the foundation, and criticized mainstream media for largely ignoring the case. She claimed this was due to psychological barriers in accepting that the injections were harmful, despite widespread vaccination. 🛑 Role of the Foundation Abe Dijkstra, Chairman of Stichting Recht Oprecht, explained that the foundation facilitates and funds the lawsuit. He stressed that legal costs are high, and that the campaign is funded entirely by donations. He framed the case as a struggle between a small group of citizens and a powerful government, with a large imbalance in resources. 🛑 Call to Follow the Case The event concluded with an appeal to the public to continue following the case, to share information, and to financially support the foundation. Organizers stressed that the lawsuit is not only about seeking compensation for individuals but also about enabling what they describe as broader truth-finding and preventing similar situations in the future. 🛑🙏 PLEASE CONSIDER TO DONATE: https://rechtoprecht.online/doneren/ 🛑 For a detailed overview please read Sasha Latypova’s article on her Substack: https://open.substack.com/pub/sashalatypova/p/my-testimony-for-the-case-in-the 据他们的律师彼得·斯塔森先生称，最近提交的新的关键证据触及了案件的核心。 🛑 两个法律程序中的新证据 斯塔森先生解释说，新证据已于 12 月 7 日正式提交给吕伐登法院（主要程序正在进行中）和阿姆斯特丹上诉法院（已提出上诉）。 该材料由五位国际专家的视频信息和书面报告组成，并有数百个来源参考资料的支持。 这些意见旨在表明原告在选择接种疫苗之前没有得到充分且错误的通知。 斯塔森认为，这相当于系统性误导——如果原告充分了解情况，他们就会做出不同的决定。 这种所谓的欺骗构成了对国家和其他被告提出非法行为（“onrechtmatige daad”）的基础。 🛑 证据中提出的专家结论 斯塔森先生介绍了专家材料的结论。 据他说： 👉COVID-19注射不能被视为常规疫苗，而是作为军事背景下的紧急措施。 👉因此，它们的使用超出了正常的制药法和消费者保护范围。 👉专家们认为，注射剂对健康没有任何好处，不安全或不有效，并且会引起严重的副作用——据称在设计时就可以预见到。 👉Stassen 将这些结论与他所说的更广泛的“COVID-19 重置”或“大重置”联系起来，其中疫苗接种发挥着核心作用。 🛑 对反对党的批评 斯塔森尖锐批评了反对党的立场，包括荷兰政府和几位著名的政府和卫生官员以及制药业领导人。 他指出，他们拒绝与专家报告进行实质性接触，并反对在法庭上听取专家的意见。 他声称，只有比尔·盖茨对法官做出了正式回应，但没有对听取专家意见的请求进行实质性反驳。 🛑 法律案件的后续步骤 关于诉讼将如何进行，斯塔森表示，吕伐登法院计划在 2026 年 3 月至 10 月之间举行听证会。在上诉中，问题仍然是法官最终是否会听取专家的意见。 斯塔森强调，现在提交的新证据使得实质性的法律辩论不可避免。 🛑 支持和媒体批评 新闻发布会结束后，原告的支持者接受了采访。 前全科医生 Berber Pieksma 表达了对斯塔森和基金会的支持，并批评主流媒体基本上忽视了此案。 她声称这是由于尽管广泛接种疫苗，但仍接受注射有害的心理障碍。 🛑 基金会的作用 Stichting Recht Oprecht 主席 Abe Dijkstra 解释说，该基金会为诉讼提供便利和资助。 他强调，法律费用很高，而且该活动的资金完全来自捐款。 他将此案描述为一小群公民与强大政府之间的斗争，资源严重失衡。 🛑 拨打电话关注案件 该活动最后呼吁公众继续关注此案，分享信息，并为该基金会提供经济支持。 组织者强调，该诉讼不仅是为了为个人寻求赔偿，也是为了实现他们所说的更广泛的真相调查，并防止未来出现类似情况。 🛑🙏 请考虑捐赠： https://rechtoprecht.online/doneren/ 🛑 有关详细概述，请阅读 Sasha Latypova 关于她的子堆栈的文章： https://open.substack.com/pub/sashalatypova/p/my-testimony-for-the-case-in-the
主流媒体不会告诉你的疫苗伤害信息
The vaccine injury information that mainstream media won’t tell you.
https://substack.com/@sebaterribilini/note/m-83531206-ab8b-4b77-bd46-fb98f1742e05
‼️THE WHOLE WORLD IS WATCHING‼️
👉Here’s a summary:
Arno Van Kessel, together with his colleague Peter Stassen, started a civil law suit in 2023 against Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, Mark Rutte (former Dutch PM) and others, on behalf of several plaintiffs injured by Covid-19 vaccines.
Arno Van Kessel was locked up in jail on trumped-up charges in June 2025.
Peter Stassen is now the main lawyer in the proceeding against the above mentioned individuals.
The expert witnesses Sasha Latypova, Dr. Mike Yeadon, Catherine Austin Fitts, Katherine Watt and Dr. Joseph Sansone, who were ready to testify, were rejected by the Court.
There was a sixth expert witness, Professor Francis Boyle (see video above), a bioweapons expert who helped draft international bioweapons laws.
Three weeks after he agreed to testify, he suddenly died.
👉 More details here:
https://open.substack.com/pub/sashalatypova/p/breaking-court-in-the-netherlands
👉 Update: appeal of August 20, 2025 order denying application for preliminary evidence proceedings; appeal filed September 15, 2025.
https://open.substack.com/pub/sashalatypova/p/netherlands-case-update-appeal-of
👉 Update: press conference held on December 15, 2025
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TxlmMU3vLds
On December 15, 2025 a press conference was held at the court in Leeuwarden by Stichting Recht Oprecht.
The reason for the event was the ongoing civil lawsuit that the foundation is facilitating on behalf of seven individuals — now six, because one has died — who claim to have suffered serious health damage after COVID-19 vaccination. ‼️全世界都在关注‼️
👉总结如下：
Arno Van Kessel 与他的同事 Peter Stassen 于 2023 年代表几名因 Covid-19 疫苗受伤的原告对比尔·盖茨、阿尔伯特·布尔拉、马克·鲁特（荷兰前总理）等人提起民事诉讼。
2025 年 6 月，阿诺·范·凯塞尔 (Arno Van Kessel) 因莫须有的罪名被关进监狱。
Peter Stassen 现在是针对上述个人的诉讼的主要律师。
准备出庭作证的专家证人萨莎·拉蒂波娃 (Sasha Latypova)、迈克·伊登 (Mike Yeadon) 博士、凯瑟琳·奥斯汀·菲茨 (Catherine Austin Fitts)、凯瑟琳·瓦特 (Katherine Watt) 和约瑟夫·桑索恩 (Joseph Sansone) 博士均被法庭拒绝。
还有第六位专家证人，弗朗西斯·博伊尔教授（见上面的视频），他是一名生物武器专家，帮助起草了国际生物武器法。
在他同意出庭作证三周后，他突然去世。
👉更多详情请看这里：
https://open.substack.com/pub/sashalatypova/p/writing-court-in-the-netherlands
👉 更新：对2025年8月20日拒绝初步证据程序申请的命令提出上诉； 上诉于 2025 年 9 月 15 日提出。
https://open.substack.com/pub/sashalatypova/p/netherlands-case-update-appeal-of
👉更新：2025年12月15日举行新闻发布会
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TxlmMU3vLds
2025 年 12 月 15 日，Stichting Recht Oprecht 在吕伐登法院举行了新闻发布会。
该事件的原因是该基金会正在代表 7 个人（目前有 6 人，因为其中一人死亡）协助正在进行的民事诉讼，这些人声称在接种 COVID-19 疫苗后遭受了严重的健康损害。
According to their lawyer, Mr. Peter Stassen, new and crucial evidence has recently been submitted that strikes at the core of the case.
🛑 New Evidence in Two Legal Procedures
Mr. Stassen explained that the new evidence was formally presented on December 7 to both the Court in Leeuwarden, where the main procedure is ongoing, and to the Court of Appeal in Amsterdam, where an appeal has been filed. The material consists of video messages and written reports from five international experts, supported by hundreds of source references. These submissions are meant to show that the plaintiffs were insufficiently and incorrectly informed before they chose to get vaccinated.
Stassen argues that this amounts to systemic misleading — and that if they had been fully informed, the plaintiffs would have decided differently. That alleged deception forms the basis for a claim of unlawful conduct (“onrechtmatige daad”) against the State and other defendants.
🛑 Expert Conclusions Presented in the Evidence
Mr. Stassen presented what the expert material concludes.
According to him:
👉The COVID-19 injections cannot be regarded as regular vaccines, but were used as emergency measures with a military context.
👉Because of that, they were used outside normal pharmaceutical law and consumer protections.
👉The experts argue that the injections offer no health benefit, are not safe or effective, and cause serious side effects — allegedly foreseeable at the time of their design.
👉Stassen links these conclusions to what he calls a broader “COVID-19 reset” or “Great Reset,” where vaccination plays a central role.
🛑 Criticism of Opposing Parties
Stassen sharply criticized the position of the opposing parties, including the Dutch State and several prominent government and health officials as well as pharmaceutical leaders. He noted that they refuse to engage substantively with the expert reports and oppose having the experts heard in court. He claimed that only Bill Gates formally responded to the judge, but without substantive rebuttal to the request to hear the experts.
🛑 Next Steps in the Legal Case
Concerning how the lawsuits will proceed, Stassen indicated that the Leeuwarden court plans a hearing between March and October 2026. In the appeal, the question remains whether the experts will ultimately be heard by the judges. Stassen emphasized that the new evidence now submitted makes a substantive legal debate unavoidable.
🛑 Support and Media Criticism
After the press conference, supporters of the plaintiffs were interviewed. A former general practitioner, Berber Pieksma, expressed support for Stassen and the foundation, and criticized mainstream media for largely ignoring the case. She claimed this was due to psychological barriers in accepting that the injections were harmful, despite widespread vaccination.
🛑 Role of the Foundation
Abe Dijkstra, Chairman of Stichting Recht Oprecht, explained that the foundation facilitates and funds the lawsuit. He stressed that legal costs are high, and that the campaign is funded entirely by donations. He framed the case as a struggle between a small group of citizens and a powerful government, with a large imbalance in resources.
🛑 Call to Follow the Case
The event concluded with an appeal to the public to continue following the case, to share information, and to financially support the foundation. Organizers stressed that the lawsuit is not only about seeking compensation for individuals but also about enabling what they describe as broader truth-finding and preventing similar situations in the future.
🛑🙏 PLEASE CONSIDER TO DONATE:
https://rechtoprecht.online/doneren/
🛑 For a detailed overview please read Sasha Latypova’s article on her Substack:
https://open.substack.com/pub/sashalatypova/p/my-testimony-for-the-case-in-the 据他们的律师彼得·斯塔森先生称，最近提交的新的关键证据触及了案件的核心。
🛑 两个法律程序中的新证据
斯塔森先生解释说，新证据已于 12 月 7 日正式提交给吕伐登法院（主要程序正在进行中）和阿姆斯特丹上诉法院（已提出上诉）。 该材料由五位国际专家的视频信息和书面报告组成，并有数百个来源参考资料的支持。 这些意见旨在表明原告在选择接种疫苗之前没有得到充分且错误的通知。
斯塔森认为，这相当于系统性误导——如果原告充分了解情况，他们就会做出不同的决定。 这种所谓的欺骗构成了对国家和其他被告提出非法行为（“onrechtmatige daad”）的基础。
🛑 证据中提出的专家结论
斯塔森先生介绍了专家材料的结论。
据他说：
👉COVID-19注射不能被视为常规疫苗，而是作为军事背景下的紧急措施。
👉因此，它们的使用超出了正常的制药法和消费者保护范围。
👉专家们认为，注射剂对健康没有任何好处，不安全或不有效，并且会引起严重的副作用——据称在设计时就可以预见到。
👉Stassen 将这些结论与他所说的更广泛的“COVID-19 重置”或“大重置”联系起来，其中疫苗接种发挥着核心作用。
🛑 对反对党的批评
斯塔森尖锐批评了反对党的立场，包括荷兰政府和几位著名的政府和卫生官员以及制药业领导人。 他指出，他们拒绝与专家报告进行实质性接触，并反对在法庭上听取专家的意见。 他声称，只有比尔·盖茨对法官做出了正式回应，但没有对听取专家意见的请求进行实质性反驳。
🛑 法律案件的后续步骤
关于诉讼将如何进行，斯塔森表示，吕伐登法院计划在 2026 年 3 月至 10 月之间举行听证会。在上诉中，问题仍然是法官最终是否会听取专家的意见。 斯塔森强调，现在提交的新证据使得实质性的法律辩论不可避免。
🛑 支持和媒体批评
新闻发布会结束后，原告的支持者接受了采访。 前全科医生 Berber Pieksma 表达了对斯塔森和基金会的支持，并批评主流媒体基本上忽视了此案。 她声称这是由于尽管广泛接种疫苗，但仍接受注射有害的心理障碍。
🛑 基金会的作用
Stichting Recht Oprecht 主席 Abe Dijkstra 解释说，该基金会为诉讼提供便利和资助。 他强调，法律费用很高，而且该活动的资金完全来自捐款。 他将此案描述为一小群公民与强大政府之间的斗争，资源严重失衡。
🛑 拨打电话关注案件
该活动最后呼吁公众继续关注此案，分享信息，并为该基金会提供经济支持。 组织者强调，该诉讼不仅是为了为个人寻求赔偿，也是为了实现他们所说的更广泛的真相调查，并防止未来出现类似情况。
🛑🙏 请考虑捐赠：
https://rechtoprecht.online/doneren/
🛑 有关详细概述，请阅读 Sasha Latypova 关于她的子堆栈的文章：
https://open.substack.com/pub/sashalatypova/p/my-testimony-for-the-case-in-the