patrick.net

"Making the population really, really toxified and stupid works! It really, really works! Of course, with a little help from endless money and Intel organization from the City of London."

Of course, arresting main players up the food chain might seem to be efficient, but it never happens. No consequences means repeat criminal behavior at the top as well as the bottom.

https://x.com/basedbandita/status/2014962439398318315?s=46

https://genesiustimes.com/breaking-the-coexist-crowd-is-destroying-the-city-again/

Eric_Holder says

NRA is not amused with CA libtard Assistant U.S. Attorney's hot take:



https://x.com/NRA/status/2015227627464728661

He isn’t a bad guy and I think I understand the point he was trying to make(don’t interfere with federal officers engaged in legal operations) but he definitely stated it without proper context.

Insurrection sweepstakes and betting pool. Who will wind up Horny Bubba's prison cell mate first? I guess the 'women' (if they are) will get the ham hock arm super lez as their cell mate. Place your bets now! There is also the null hypothesis that nobody at all will be arrested after the soap opera ends.

LOL! Trump cracks me up.

Ya think.

Minneapolis Police stand down and watch as rioters attack Home2Stay by Hilton where ICE is rumored to be staying.

Rioters targeting rental vehicles suspected of being ICE. They have insiders at Law Enforcement/DOT/DMV/Rental Agencies working on plates.

If it wasn't a threat, they wouldn't be moaning

The exact moment Minneapolis PD turned around a block from the Hilton being assaulted by rioters.

Belatedly, the Minneapolis PD did show up and disperse the rioters about an hour or so ago.



We need to escalate.

She has an excuse because her family are all KommieKunts. She was imprinted. Oh, yeah! And baby wants her adrenochrome.

I see. He was 'expecting a firefight,' therefore the officers had the legal right to hold him, take his weapon, and murder him.
good to know the police can kill you for 'future knowledge.'
What was that Tom Cruise movie again?
Oh, yeah - minority report.

cool tactic, btw - just label someone a 'domestic terrorist,' then you can murder them!
I support our brownshirts!

ffs - this is 'Not allowed to Protest the Gov.' J6 all over again.
Yeah - I know. last time, it was the 'cons' being oppressed, this time it's the libs.

Figure it out -

"The Second Amendment protects Americans' right to bear arms while protesting - a right the federal government must not infringe upon." -- Gun Owners of America

"Carrying a firearm is not a death sentence, it's a constitutionally protected God-given right, and if you don't understand this you have no business in law enforcement or government." -- Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY)

Well, I have to admit that the psyops are getting more effective. Our mockingbird media in collusion with globohomo is staging "atrocities" and breathlessly trumpeting "FASCISM!" in the hopes that another St. George Floyd moment will catalyze the NPCs to mass uprisings.

This incident should be properly investigated (esp. since it looks like he has been disarmed prior to his killing) and there could be a case made to always do this if there is even the slightest doubt, so they could have at least done a formal investigation for the killed womyn as well. To compare this with brownshirts or scenarios where legally armed citizens gets randomly or purposely killed by Feds is ridiculous hyperbole, dude violently impeded a LEO operation trying to apprehend a fugitive. Completely and utterly different from Ashly babbit who wasnt impeding anything, unarmed and got shot for nothing.

"
This has nothing to do with the 2nd Amendment. You have every right to keep and bear arms but the decision to bear arms in public means if you commit a crime while in possession of said firearm the penalty is elevated and your conduct becomes subject to a second set of standards in that by going armed you publicly demonstrate your capacity to use deadly force. This is a serious personal decision -- it is one you have every right to make but you are responsible for the consequences. Further and in all cases intent matters; Minnesota State Law requires a CWP holder to carry identification while in possession of said weapon in public and this individual deliberately did not do so. That speaks directly to his intent to commit an unlawful act while armed.

The standard for getting shot by law enforcement is that you present to them a reasonable belief (on their part, in the instant of the circumstances, not on a frame-by-frame slowed video analysis afterward) that you will inflict upon any of them or any other person in the area great bodily harm or death. If that standard is met they are authorized to terminate said threat by whatever means are available and necessary. Whether that standard has been met is the only issue on the table here and it is not entirely clear from what I've seen thus far which way that decision does or should fall. But what is very clear and in fact unquestioned is that the individual who was shot decided of his own free will to interfere with an arrest as a deliberate act while carrying a firearm in public and that act of interference is clearly shown and without reasonable question as to whether it was committed.

In every case actively interfering with an arrest by law enforcement is a felony and makes you an accessory to the original crime the person sought committed originally. If you go to a protest and exercise your First Amendment right to speak while armed there is not only no problem you are entirely within your rights. After all some random thug might****ault you unprovoked and you have the right to exercise self-defense in that instance.
"

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=254835