patrick.net

I’ve been thinking Rubio has come a long way and definitely added some gravitas to his resume.

Rubio - yes. Luna is too loony. Gives Sara Palin vibes.

What About a Vance Rubio ticket? That is if he doesn't end up being appointed president pro temp of Cuba after we invade.

Both Rubio and Vance have the easiest President to serve their roles in. It's not like either of them are forging their own policy.
They are trying to push the Trump agenda.

SOS is where the power on the world stage is, for the Cabinet. And what's great about Rubio, he isn't undermining Trump. He is in a position to make Trump look good or bad. But here's the thing, for Rubio, it's about whether he looks bad or good administering Trump's policy. For Rubio if he goes too far, then it's Trump that will get the heat ultimately. He could even be a snake in the grass in the future and say "Trump made me do it." But if the policy works then it makes Rubio look good. Remember Pompeo he looked like a champ too. But Pompeo was doing Pompeo things. Jared Kushner led Trump around on his foreign focus. While Rubio seems to be doing Trump things. I see a difference.

Vance on the other hand, it's easy to be the Vice President, especially for Trump. J.D. Vance has virtually no power and no authority for anything. Only in the event Congress ties, he can pause the video game and run on down to Congress to break the tie.

In any event, say J.D. Vance catches the momentum and wins the Primary or Trump weighs in and tells Rubio he's seen polling he can't win. which is possible, Trump has chicken shit advisors that has him meddle against people better suited for Candidates, than who Trump is set up to endorse.

But say Rubio steps aside to wait for another time. Do you really see Rubio as some one who would be VP to that?

Eric_Holder says

Luna is too loony. Gives Sara Palin vibes.

I don't want any woman to be in line for the presidency.

Nor should any woman be in a combat role, or a police officer, or fireman.

Men are genetically specialized for leadership, aggression, physical strength, and dealing with extreme danger via millions of years of evolution.

To put women in those roles threatens all our lives.

Patrick says

I don't want any woman to be in line for the presidency.

THIS! They just aren't suited for any role that requires Rational Logic over emotion.

Don't get me wrong, I love women. I know many women that are smarter than me (including my wife). If it were not for female empathy we wouldn't have a civilization.

However, we all have strengths and weaknesses and it is best for society if we all stay in our own lanes. Woman can only mimic a man in terms of leadership and rational thought while under extreme stress. Sooner or later though, they can't keep up the act and we would all have to suffer the consequences.