patrick.net

为什么打压伊维菌素及广谱驱虫药对疫苗解毒及癌症的治疗 记者综述
Why the Suppression of Ivermectin and Broad-Spectrum Anthelmintic Drugs in Vaccine Detoxification and Cancer Treatment – A Reporter’s Overview

Reporter’s Overview: Why have authoritative institutions and even lawmakers joined forces to suppress alternative treatments like Ivermectin (a Nobel Prize-winning drug) that target the COVID-19 virus and its aftereffects? Ivermectin and broad-spectrum anthelmintic drugs not only prevent COVID-19 (and the flu), but also help alleviate vaccine side effects, and even treat or eliminate cancer cells induced by mRNA vaccines. Ivermectin is a detoxifying agent that counters vaccine 💉 biological preparations! The conflict of interest between inexpensive old drugs and mainstream pharmaceutical companies is at the heart of this suppression. A top-down corruption infiltrates hospitals, the media, the judiciary, and various sectors of society! Over the past four years, during the period of Biden’s fraudulent power grab, humanity has been enveloped in darkness and evil. We thank President Trump for restoring order, upholding justice, and defending human health and dignity!
/ France: Freedom, Health, and Human Rights Reporter: Han Rongli

记者综述：为什么机构权威甚至立法者联手压制伊维菌素（荣获诺贝尔医学奖荣誉作品）等针对新冠病毒及后遗症的替代疗法，因伊维菌素及广谱驱虫药不仅预防新冠病毒（流感）、而且，是缓解疫苗后遗症、甚至治疗消除因注射mRNA疫苗引发的癌细胞，伊维菌素是抵抗疫苗💉生物制剂的解毒手段！廉价老药对机构主流大药厂利益冲突！自上而下的压制腐化渗透医院、媒体、司法、…社会各个环节！…拜登舞弊窃取政权的过去四年时间，人类被黑暗与罪恶笼罩，感谢川普总统拨乱反正、匡扶正义、捍卫人类健康尊严！/ 法国：自由健康人权记者：韩荣利

https://open.substack.com/pub/2ndsmartestguyintheworld/p/the-pharma-larpers-and-the-syncytin

This Substack has been exposing the BigPharma trojan horse operative and virus-denier who spend decades at Pfizer studying viruses…
這個子堆疊一直在揭露BigPharma木馬特工和病毒否認者，他們在輝瑞花了幾十年時間研究病毒......

There has been a lot of deliberate disinformation of late about the miracle drug Ivermectin, which has now been handily debunked by actual experts.

最近有很多關於奇蹟藥物伊維菌素的蓄意虛假資訊，現在已經被實際專家輕鬆揭穿了。

…and now we have even further proof of just how evil this Yeadon character is, and just how vast and byzantine this criminal BigPharma conspiracy is to poison humanity all while extracting the maximum profits from their victims.
The following is a must read article:

...現在，我們有了進一步的證據，證明這個Yeadon角色是多麼邪惡，以及這個犯罪的BigPharma陰謀是多麼龐大和拜佔庭，在從受害者身上榨取最大利潤的同時，毒害人類。

以下是必讀的文章：

每次我試圖休息一下時，大製藥公司的壞人似乎都急於把我帶回來，所以我咬了一口。

但這是一個笨蛋——它的核心是製藥公司（及其政府的走狗助手）如何說服一代孕婦在研究試驗之外冒著新型未經測試的基因療法候選疫苗的風險。

Every time I try to take a break the baddies from Big Pharma seem to be desperate to bring me back into the fold, so I’ve bitten.
But this one is a doozy - and goes to the heart of how the pharma corporations (with their government lackey helpers) were able to persuade a generation of pregnant women to take the risk of a novel untested genetic therapy vaccine candidate outside of a research trial.

澄清一下，這是自沙利度胺醜聞以來一直沒有做過的事情，該醜聞導致數以萬計兒童改變生活的殘疾。

只是為了記錄在案，我已經廣泛地寫了關於新冠肺炎mRNA疫苗和懷孕風險之間非常明顯的聯絡，從這裡開始到這裡結束，結論性地表明，根據美國食品藥品監督管理局和輝瑞自己的資料，流產和出生缺陷的風險增加。

To clarify, this was something that had not been done since the thalidomide scandal that caused lifechanging disabilities in tens of thousands of children.
Just for the record I have written extensively about the very demonstrable link between the COVID mRNA vaccine and pregnancy risks starting here and ending here showing conclusively that there is an increased risk of miscarriage and birth defects based on the FDA and Pfizer’s own data.

無論製藥公司和他們的懷孕疫苗接種步兵多麼希望它消失，這個故事也不會消失。 最近曝光的#Placentagate醜聞已經將其帶到了頂點，我們將繼續啃咬。

This story is not going away, however much the pharma companies and their vaccination-in-pregnancy foot soldiers want it to. The recent revelations of the #Placentagate scandal has brought it to a head, and we are going to keep gnawing away.

唯一可靠和可用的資料顯示，對於那些在懷孕早期接受這種產品的婦女來說，這種增長幅度大約是兩倍，這促使製藥公司和政府團結起來，用「現實世界資料」來掩蓋這個問題。 也就是說，資料不是來自隨機試驗，而且——因為它是由已經承諾疫苗是安全的製藥公司或政府部門策劃的——顯示根本沒有問題。 如果你對政府如何向公眾出售虛假資料感興趣，你可以看到這是如何在這裡和這裡發生的，以及所有利益衝突都涉及的。

然而，這篇文章並不是關於在懷孕期間使用這種新技術涉及安全訊號的事實。 它涉及另外兩個問題：

The magnitude of that increase as shown by the only reliable and available data was approximately double for those women who received a product like this in very early pregnancy, prompting the pharma companies and governments to rally to cover up this problem with “real world data”. That is, data that was not from a randomised trial and - because it was curated by the pharma companies or government departments who already promised the vaccines would be safe - showed no problem at all. If you’re interested in how the governments sold fake data to the public you can see how this happened here and here with all the conflicts of interest involved.
However, this article is not about the fact that there were safety signals involved with the use of this novel technology in pregnancy. It is concerned with two other questions:

為什麼不允許懷孕作為疫苗授權的豁免如此重要——以至於每個工作的孕婦必須服用這些產品之一，否則就會失去工作，無視幾十年的歧視法？

Why was it so important that pregnancy was not allowed as an exemption from vaccine mandates - such that every working pregnant woman had to take one of these products or lose their job, ignoring decades of discrimination law?

………