by Patrick ➕follow (58) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 106,598 - 106,637 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
Biden is no longer a senator, but Warren would be tied up. Sparticus would be tied up too, but he's pretty much already out of the race.
Would these senators either have to show up or resign from the senate?
Would these senators either have to show up or resign from the senate?
by someone from the east coast, not San Francisco.
I just really don't see how Trump loses. I'm starting to think the 7D chess game jokes are no longer jokes anymore.
The couple was absolutely drowning in debt, and they desperately needed a good year just to keep the farm going.
I remember that stuff happening in the 80's. Farmers had land that had been in the family for generations, yet somehow managed to squander it.
Wall Street is awash in federal money to float investors while employment participation is lowest ever.
... while employment participation is lowest ever.
"For Millions Of Americans In The Middle Of The Country, It Feels Like An Economic Depression Right Now"
They say religion started when the first scoundrel met up with the first fool.
WookieMan saysHarris, Sanders, Warren, Klobuchar, Booker and Bennet would either be locked up in impeachment proceedings, resign
Why would they have to resign? They can simply recuse themselves (not show up) or ask Roberts to recuse them if he doesn't ask them first.
Oh yeah it does. Recuse means they are still Senators. Resign is WAY different. That means they quite the Senate, which they not only do not have to do but is a BIG DIFFERENCE to themselves and their Kool-Aid drinkers.
does that mean we have to endure four more years of this attempt to remove him from office?
If the impeachment fails (since Senate will not remove him even if the House brings charges against him) and Trump wins a second term, does that mean we have to endure four more years of this attempt to remove him from office? Can you impeach a president more than once a so long it's not for the same "crime". Is this a case of at first you dont succeed they try again? I don't care for Tump personally but I feel the case to remove him from office is a weak one. After 3 plus years they'd be better of focusing on policy rather than procedure.
Does anyone dispute the facts?
« First « Previous Comments 106,598 - 106,637 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,267,401 comments by 15,159 users - Barbstod, Ceffer online now