by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 109,935 - 109,974 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
Initially I thought so , but looking at Trump's statement and with all the sheeple following Trump, who knows that they now believe what Trump believes.and ready to rewrite the evolution theoryYeah, in the original link provided, the embedded video shows Trump talking about COVID-19 but then there are text quotations that mention antibiotic resistance. Using the text quotations, I searched and found a different Trump video (linked in my initial response) that talks about resistance but doesn't have any mention of COVID-19 or any other context that would seem to point towards COVID-19. In fact, that 2nd video is clipped very tightly and I'm wondering if they are specifically clipping OFF the part where he mentions bacteria resistance to antibiotics.
You may have fallen for it again. That Trump statement framing Trump as not knowing the difference between virus and bacteria looks to be an amalgamation of two different unrelated speeches (see SunnyvaleCA post 8).
But as far as we know, Trump knows full well the difference between bacteria and virus. It's just that the fake-news is putting things together out of context and claiming he doesn't know the difference. This is fake-news making up fake news to smear the president.
First of all these are stupid examples.. We do have speed limits and they do save lives. There has to be an optimum speed limit which balances the time vs loss of life. We do have "driver licenses" for stopping stupid people driving and killing others.
The opening of the economy is again a cost vs life issue. Each life and hospitalization is also a cost, not just the money lost in the restaurant or a factory. They will not open games to public but may do it with empty stadium. Or they may open construction but delay non-essential projects. "Believe it, the paradigm has changed" , a quote from my Chinese friend who lived there during SARs.
Fortwaynemobile saysThey should ban sodomy and promiscuity, would save millions of lives. Also ban getting fat, that’s 10+ million lives saved.
Why do you value stupidity over life!!!!
...
The opening of the economy is again a cost vs life issue.
First of all these are stupid examples.. We do have speed limits and they do save lives. There has to be an optimum speed limit which balances the time vs loss of life. We do have "driver licenses" for stopping stupid people driving and killing others.
The opening of the economy is again a cost vs life issue. Each life and hospitalization is also a cost, not just the money lost in the restaurant or a factory. They will not open games to public but may do it with empty stadium. Or they may open construction but delay non-essential projects.
"Believe it, the paradigm has changed" , a quote from my Chinese friend who lived there during SARs.
lets keep everything closed for another half year and then we will have neither economy nor coronavirus left. Only cannibal anarchy, which is much better than corona cold.
Durham announces his indictments
There is new evidence that U.S. Attorney John Durham is getting to the root of criminal abuses by senior U.S. law enforcement and intelligence officials in their conspiracy to undermine the Trump campaign, transition and presidency. Mr. Durham's mandate from Attorney General William Barr -- to uncover the seditious plot behind the Trump-Russia hoax, if pursued vigorously, will uncover the single greatest threat to the Constitution since the nation's founding.
There's not going to be a quick return to normal.
if we were to go back to normal the epidemic would spike right back up
When you take that and herd immunity into account it's closer to 100k in a day at peak. Of course this is a possibility but not something we'll actually see because we'll keep interfering with it.
Prediction: There will indeed be a quick return to normal, except, hopefully, for some valuable lessons learned about why we should not continue to outsource to China.
Patrick saysBut vast swathes of the population have already had it
Nah, a very small proportion has had it overall. 3% maybe.
Maybe he was briefed by his globalist masters who didn't like his earlier cooperation with the Donald to prolong this as much as possible because orange! Man! Must! Look! Bad!
Joshua Gans
@joshgans
· 7h
Given that we have stuck almost everyone in households for a month, surely we only have to test one member if each household to release them. And we can do that going forward. Should cut tests by a third.
Joshua Gans
@joshgans
· 7h
Given that we have stuck almost everyone in households for a month, surely we only have to test one member if each household to release them. And we can do that going forward. Should cut tests by a third.
Do we know if they counted it?
ThreeBays saysPatrick saysBut vast swathes of the population have already had it
Nah, a very small proportion has had it overall. 3% maybe.
Source?
Patrick saysBut vast swathes of the population have already had it
Nah, a very small proportion has had it overall. 3% maybe.
100K deaths in a day would've happened some time in May if we carried on business as usual.
I'm not sure why you're so incredulous. We had around 2,500 deaths recorded today. One month ago we had 12, that's a 208x increase in one month. It's only a 40x increase from here to 100K.
I'm not sure why you're so incredulous. We had around 2,500 deaths recorded today. One month ago we had 12, that's a 208x increase in one month. It's only a 40x increase from here to 100K.
« First « Previous Comments 109,935 - 109,974 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,248,926 comments by 14,891 users - Patrick, stereotomy, The_Deplorable online now