patrick.net

Patrick says

I could not find any mention of lesbianism in any religious text. When they banned homosexuality, it was specifically men having sex with men.

It was more in the laws of the countries. I can’t think of religious text, not sure why... perhaps it wasn’t a thing back then.

I know middle eastern countries and Slavic countries jailed for it. I’ll ask our pastor see what he knows.

They didn't want men wasting their energy on other men.

Romans thought the same thing - taking some guy's ass once in a blue moon was okay, but taking it in the ass, or forgoing your wife to fuck guys, that was unacceptable.

Your Uncle or other Patriarch would start having words with you about neglecting your duties.

Anal warts....

Gay Bowel Syndrome, another victim of Wiki/Big Tech censorship

Millions of years of evolution and no antibodies or lubrication in the ass = disease

It's a Civil Rights and Libertarian issue. Consenting Adults and all that.

That said, anyone who's had a digital prostate exam knows it's an abomination.

Patrick says

I could not find any mention of lesbianism in any religious text. When they banned homosexuality, it was specifically men having sex with men.

I'll be talking to Pastor mid week. However I did search and found this online. It says all same things about gay women (lesbians) as it does about gay men.

https://www.openbible.info/topics/lesbians

For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another

Yes, maybe that does show a mention of lesbianism in the bible. Didn't know that was there.

Still, I do think that lesbianism is less harmful, because it does not spread disease very much.

Patrick says

For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another

Yes, maybe that does show a mention of lesbianism in the bible. Didn't know that was there.

Still, I do think that lesbianism is less harmful, because it does not spread disease very much.

I think Bible was more concerned about morality as a slippery slope. They didn’t know about aids yet. They just seen homosexuality lead to suffering as consequence.

Fortwaynemobile says

They didn’t know about aids yet.

AIDS was waiting for the proper environment and the sexual revolution supplied it. It depended upon huge number of people having unprotected sex, 300-400 a year, for the virus to propagate into the gay population. The more sex you had, the more likely you were going to have it with someone who had been exposed to it. It was quickly politicized and there were intimations that it would soon break out into the larger heterosexual population. This was from the perspective of the early 90's and it's clear in hindsight (no pun intended) that that never did happen and AIDS stayed squarely within the gay community, recycling itself. Except for those sad early cases of people having transfusions with tainted blood, that was soon corrected by refusing blood from gay people and testing all donated blood because obviously some would sneak by. Between the Stonewall Riots of 1969 and 1981 there was a level of promiscuity that had never been exhibited in this society before. Gay men of the generation of Cole Porter, Cecil Beaton, Noel Coward, Sir John Gielgud were attracted to rough trade, not effeminate gay men. That changed with the liberation after World War II.

Rin says

Patrick says

No pork

Yes, overrated, esp in contrast with Beef Tenderloin.

Beef is amazing, so no argument there. Good pork cannot be overrated though unless it is being cooked wrong, which happens a lot. Larger cuts need to be brined. Low and slow as well. Done right, a pork tenderloin can be as juicy and buttery as the beef.

Another reason I hate religion though. Telling you WTF you can and cannot eat? That'll get ya to heaven.... lol.

Patrick says

So... to say that black people intrinsically have black skin is racist?

To not suck a lady dick is misogyny.

My gay friend says he knew he was gay from the age of 5. Yes, truly gay men are born that way. It is no more a choice for them then heterosexuality is for most men. It's just hard for heterosexuals to understand how a man could be gay because it is so foreign to them.

WillPowers says

My gay friend says he knew he was gay from the age of 5.

I'll tell you this, there is no way a 5 yo would know that. At 5 they don't know what their parts are for, at that age every thought and every idea comes form a parent. So your friend is either making shit up, or their parents started making them gay at that age.

For anyone who had kids, if you tell them that a 5yo knows sexuality... they'll laugh at you. That part develops much much much later, and it is constructed heavily by parental influence and local circle.

Patrick says

Gays are just two percent of the population, but responsible for one third of
all child sexual abuse.

MOSTLY in the Catholic Church where sexuality is so repressed it comes out in sick ways.

And AIDS was a laboratory created disease during the Reagan administration to kill off homosexuals and IV drug users, which Regan hated.

Patrick says

Identical twins are not identically gay or straight despite sharing all genes,
the same womb, and the same upbringing. The epidemiology of homosexuality
matches that of a viral disease.

Why, because twins aren't gay? That proves nothing.Patrick says

Pretending that male homosexuality is innate is like pretending that heroin
addiction is innate.

Comparing homosexuality to heroin addiction is like comparing the ocean to land. The two are completely different.Patrick says

Lesbians have at least some evidence for innate predisposition to homosexuality.

In every country, gay men are more disliked than lesbians, because people know.

What people know and don't know from the outside of the phenomenon is meaningless. The only opinion that matters here is the opinion of the gay man who lives with his sexuality. If a gay man were to say heterosexuality is learned behavior, what would heterosexuals say to that?

That is not to say heterosexuality or homosexuality cannot be learned behavior, but I can tell you from experience, there is always something inside you that knows this doesn't feel right.

WillPowers says

And AIDS was a laboratory created disease during the Reagan administration to kill off homosexuals and IV drug users, which Regan hated.

This was a Russian disinformation campaign started first in a small article back in India in the 80's IIRC and continued on for a while. In fact, Reagan confronted Gorbachev about it, and Gorbachev apologized for it and promised to stop it. So there is proof this isn't American made virus. Although many still believe it. As always KGB's disinformation blamed America for trying to hurt "blacks and gays".

WillPowers says

MOSTLY in the Catholic Church where sexuality is so repressed it comes out in sick ways.

This was also disinformation campaign with a purpose to ridicule and destroy religion in America, just like the previous one.

WillPowers says

Why, because twins aren't gay? That proves nothing

It shows that there is no gay gene, if they were identical both would be gay. Also science has not found a gay gene, and they did look. Science is simple, it's a choice. And it's a choice because people can make this choice and can unmake the choice as many have. It's mutable. People have been converted out and into homosexuality. Gays don't procreate, they would have died out, that's evolution... "what doesn't procreate = dies out". It is pretty clear that it is a choice. Now it's not as simple as choosing milk in grocery store, but it is a choice. A person who has been convinced to be gay is going to have hard time unconfusing themselves.

WillPowers says

That is not to say heterosexuality or homosexuality cannot be learned behavior, but I can tell you from experience, there is always something inside you that knows this doesn't feel right.

That is socially constructed based on upbringing and childhood. Men in prison fuck other men, they get out and go back to fucking women. Some people fuck animals on the farm, they aren't attracted to sheep, but sexuality can be confusing. Doesn't actually mean they are sheep-sexual. It's why religions of the world always tried to tell people to control their urges, as to not fuck everything up.

Patrick says

Comments greatly appreciated.

Need at least one chapter on the Chicoms.

Based on README , Patrick is OK for people to highlight "religion/Genocide".
So reporting on "Sikh Genocide" should be within confines of this website.

Lived down the street from Grandma which was nice because she'd want to feed me everything hehehe

Interesting! Nice work! Will this be a real book? I hate reading on the internet >:P

@mich Yes, I hope to get comments until the end of December, fix mistakes and be nicer about my opinions, and then print it.

Hubris to presume that MY genes are special. The family DNA passed through my Brother who is now undergoing a painful divorce his wife filed the afternoon their youngest kid sat for his senior year high school finals. I'm unmarried and childless in my 50s and have ZERO regrets and qualms. I've played stepdad to several girlfriends' kids over the years, some of whom still maintain contact a decade after Mom and I broke up and they're in their 30s now. But, I do NOT feel a yawning gap or loss from not having had children.

Patrick says

be nicer about my opinions

Why? In all honesty if you're looking to make anything off it, go in hard on it. Piss people off. Fact is the people that might be upset will end up reading it anyway if it gets traction.

Good point.

Llike Trump's interview with Leslie Stahl in the White House where she asks if he regrets being so offensive. He replied to the effect that "No, we are in the White House talking right now, aren't we?"

Automan Empire says

Hubris to presume that MY genes are special.

Maybe yours are not and you’ve self selected to forego passing them on.
Ok sure.

I felt that mine were worthy to pass on, and all three of my kids are healthy and smart and beautiful. I was right, and I picked a woman who also has excellent qualities so they got the best of us both. I realize that doesn’t always happen, but that’s why you want to have more than one kid, roll the dice a few times to increase your chances of good progeny. I just got a great roll three times in a row. Not that they aren’t a challenge for us, and cost us more money than you’d expect. But it’s a family project, a worthy cause, and an investment in the future that I hope will pay off richly in feelings of joy and accomplishment.

Gorillas and chimpanzees eat shit, too. I think Jane Goodall said it could be a warm meal on a cold day.

Other people's children, Yummie! said the Globalist.

Gorillas and chimpanzees are also not kosher.

Awesome! Still have your first book

just thought regarding theme a friend in high school was promiscuous, but she experienced sexual abuse and that is common. Also may want to touch a gay men? Women don't want men who are sluts. Disagree with this bit But women want to marry a man who has slept around, because it
proves his high value to women.

Sluts are simply hot women who are honest.

Ugly women or former hot women who are old with baby damage are threatened by younger hot women, so they get religion to condemn them.

Jesus of course didn’t agree with the prudes.

Women want a husband or simp partner to be able to monopolize his resources.

The majority of neither men nor women are that slutty. Most promiscuous and compulsive sexual behavior is relegated to less than ten percent of the population. They kind of make up for the rest. The truly promiscuous and sexually motivated woman goes through a lot of sexual partners, that's why they are 'natural resources'. Of course, they are also indifferent disease spreaders. Being on the extreme ends of the sexual bell curves may not be the best place to be, but might simply be Nature's insurance that somebody somewhere continues to reproduce.

The majority of men AND women have slept with five or fewer partners before pair bonding. If men are willing to pay, they can have as many different women in as many different ways as they want, as long as they are OK with the risks. If women are willing to pass it out, they can have lots of men, also at risk because sex is inherently dangerous both physically, emotionally, medically, and logistically.

The human bonobos, hookers, and porn stars get a lot of attention. However, porn stars are really just a small fractional group of the whole population, numbering in the several thousands worldwide. They also tend on average to have shorter lives than the general population due to drugs, diseases, suicide and interpersonal mayhem and murder.

This needs Rins input.

Have you ever had a chimpanzee turn down a blintz? 'Nuff said.

FIVE or fewer partners?
I guess I’m a human bonobo, as is almost everyone I know.
There are untold thousands of girls doing “sugar dating” and trying out porn for the thrill and cash.
There is no social stigma for either these days.
As I get older, wiser, lazier I’m less willing to spend my time or effort in the search for female company.
Ironically, the female response seems to be even better with this attitude, it’s odd.

clambo says

I guess I’m a human bonobo, as is almost everyone I know.

This.

I love sluts!

clambo says

I guess I’m a human bonobo, as is almost everyone I know.

My old hippie house mate from the day contacted me after a couple of decades through the internet. Never married and no kids, still doing the same thing of walking his dog to meet women.

He would screw the shit out of them as long as he could, until they started getting possessive and wanted commitments, upon which he would rather viciously kick them to the curb and start over. Given a few a year this way until they started the squeeze play on him, he must have gone through at least 60 girl friends since I last talked with him. He's the one who invited me to sex orgies with a nurse girl friend, but I was always too chicken to go, even though I wanted to.

I think the key is to 'pretend commit' for the sex part, and then be mean and nasty like him to get rid of them when they got clingy. i could never do that, so I guess I was born to be female road kill.

One has to remember that sex 'evolved' without antibiotics, modern medical care, or birth control, and child birth was often fatal to women.

When you read some of the historical accounts, men who had lots of sex were almost serial rapists by modern standards, and just went through bouts of disease as a given role of life and nature.

Up to five partners before pair bonding seems like a somewhat natural guide rail if you are going to have a reasonable chance of reproducing disease free with a chance of getting at least some healthy surviving offspring in the 'old world' sense.

Even the prep school girls I knew decades ago had 5 partners before they finished college.

They generally got married eventually.

I see them on Facebook and now they look like Mrs. Santa Claus.

Ceffer says

kick them to the curb and start over.

I just start turning on youtube fox news videos. Always works but sometimes requires multiple treatments.

clambo says

As I get older, wiser, lazier I’m less willing to spend my time or effort in the search for female company.
Ironically, the female response seems to be even better with this attitude, it’s odd.

@clambo That actually makes perfect sense. If you're not putting in a lot of time or effort, that "demonstrates high value" as various pickup sites would say.

Women are attracted to high-value men, not needy clingy men.