patrick.net

just thought regarding theme a friend in high school was promiscuous, but she experienced sexual abuse and that is common. Also may want to touch a gay men? Women don't want men who are sluts. Disagree with this bit But women want to marry a man who has slept around, because it
proves his high value to women.

Sluts are simply hot women who are honest.

Ugly women or former hot women who are old with baby damage are threatened by younger hot women, so they get religion to condemn them.

Jesus of course didn’t agree with the prudes.

Women want a husband or simp partner to be able to monopolize his resources.

The majority of neither men nor women are that slutty. Most promiscuous and compulsive sexual behavior is relegated to less than ten percent of the population. They kind of make up for the rest. The truly promiscuous and sexually motivated woman goes through a lot of sexual partners, that's why they are 'natural resources'. Of course, they are also indifferent disease spreaders. Being on the extreme ends of the sexual bell curves may not be the best place to be, but might simply be Nature's insurance that somebody somewhere continues to reproduce.

The majority of men AND women have slept with five or fewer partners before pair bonding. If men are willing to pay, they can have as many different women in as many different ways as they want, as long as they are OK with the risks. If women are willing to pass it out, they can have lots of men, also at risk because sex is inherently dangerous both physically, emotionally, medically, and logistically.

The human bonobos, hookers, and porn stars get a lot of attention. However, porn stars are really just a small fractional group of the whole population, numbering in the several thousands worldwide. They also tend on average to have shorter lives than the general population due to drugs, diseases, suicide and interpersonal mayhem and murder.

This needs Rins input.

Have you ever had a chimpanzee turn down a blintz? 'Nuff said.

FIVE or fewer partners?
I guess I’m a human bonobo, as is almost everyone I know.
There are untold thousands of girls doing “sugar dating” and trying out porn for the thrill and cash.
There is no social stigma for either these days.
As I get older, wiser, lazier I’m less willing to spend my time or effort in the search for female company.
Ironically, the female response seems to be even better with this attitude, it’s odd.

clambo says

I guess I’m a human bonobo, as is almost everyone I know.

This.

I love sluts!

clambo says

I guess I’m a human bonobo, as is almost everyone I know.

My old hippie house mate from the day contacted me after a couple of decades through the internet. Never married and no kids, still doing the same thing of walking his dog to meet women.

He would screw the shit out of them as long as he could, until they started getting possessive and wanted commitments, upon which he would rather viciously kick them to the curb and start over. Given a few a year this way until they started the squeeze play on him, he must have gone through at least 60 girl friends since I last talked with him. He's the one who invited me to sex orgies with a nurse girl friend, but I was always too chicken to go, even though I wanted to.

I think the key is to 'pretend commit' for the sex part, and then be mean and nasty like him to get rid of them when they got clingy. i could never do that, so I guess I was born to be female road kill.

One has to remember that sex 'evolved' without antibiotics, modern medical care, or birth control, and child birth was often fatal to women.

When you read some of the historical accounts, men who had lots of sex were almost serial rapists by modern standards, and just went through bouts of disease as a given role of life and nature.

Up to five partners before pair bonding seems like a somewhat natural guide rail if you are going to have a reasonable chance of reproducing disease free with a chance of getting at least some healthy surviving offspring in the 'old world' sense.

Even the prep school girls I knew decades ago had 5 partners before they finished college.

They generally got married eventually.

I see them on Facebook and now they look like Mrs. Santa Claus.

Ceffer says

kick them to the curb and start over.

I just start turning on youtube fox news videos. Always works but sometimes requires multiple treatments.

clambo says

As I get older, wiser, lazier I’m less willing to spend my time or effort in the search for female company.
Ironically, the female response seems to be even better with this attitude, it’s odd.

@clambo That actually makes perfect sense. If you're not putting in a lot of time or effort, that "demonstrates high value" as various pickup sites would say.

Women are attracted to high-value men, not needy clingy men.

clambo says

Even the prep school girls I knew decades ago had 5 partners before they finished college.

Prep school girls practice 'executive privilege slut sex' with agenda. They will have at least one professor, one athlete, one black guy, and groupie style sex with one or two rock stars or celebrities, or they are dead to their status groupie preppie female friends. Sex with a boyfriend either tends towards status/money capture, or with a boyfriend who is a low status thug to enrage their parents to the max. (Oh, and also selective lesbian liaisons to show their liberation).

There has been no asbestos in brake liners for at least 3 decades now.

Thanks, I'm getting old.

Patrick says

the elderly
and ill would have difficulty getting around

The most logical customers for electric cars.

Nomograph says

TrumpingTits says

Stop mastirbating in front of children, Nomo. It makes them cry.

Please don't make personal attacks on my threads. I'd love to hear your legitimate ideas though, if you have any.

He’s not wrong though.

8. Surrender to China accelerates under new admin.

*IF* Trump loses, I think he will declassify everything about the Russia Hoax and Biden's manifest corruption shaking down countries for political gain.

Biden will be the lamest and most wounded President in modern history. Harris will be hated by everyone like she is hated in California.

Trump won a higher percentage of minority votes of any Republican going back to 1960. Trump successfully transformed the GOP to a working class, multi-racial, populist party and single handedly blew up the Democrat's race grievance "demography is destiny" strategy. You can be strong on the border (and crime) and still pick up a big chunk of the Hispanic and Black vote.

Democrats gained some SJW white Karen's.

Nomograph says

So where is all the evidence? Surely such a grand conspiracy would be impossible to conceal and SOMEONE would come forward as a whistleblower.

We have hard-drives, emails and direct testimony from Biden's business partners fully proving out that Biden made millions selling political access to Communist China and other dirt-bag countries, yet the "Media" and Tech Oligarchs have told us the last 2 weeks that there is no evidence at all!

Democrats barely even have to hide their cheating knowing that they have the Garbage Media covering for them.

www.youtube.com/embed/MA8a2g6tTp0

Nomograph says

Trump-generated YouTube videos,

Trump generated this? How about Biden admits to voter fraud? Or is Joe having another dementia moment? Which is it?

Freudian slip?

Sooo, sudden jumps in 100s of thousands of votes for one candidate only with numbers for the other 3 standing still look normal to you? How is it fucking possible to have an uninterrupted batch of ballots cast for one candidate sized in hundreds, let alone thousands? If you have a natural, non-fraud explanation, I'm all ears.

Nomograph says

Interesting, but off-topic. Let's focus on the widespread voter fraud that may or may not be occurring. Where is the direct evidence for voter fraud?

A single thumb drive in Michigan added 128,000 votes to Biden at 4:30AM without a single Republican vote.

That is the kind of shit we see in Baghdad with Saddam Hussein winning re-election with 100% of the vote. How is that statistically possible?

The stock market is up because it likes divided power so nothing gets done to interfere with Wall Street. I can live with that. The problem with this is that they should have set the rules before the election started, even postponing it if necessary. Fraud is difficult to prove but that run up from last night after counting simultaneously stopped in every state that matter where Trump had a big lead is statistically close to impossible. But again, they should have agreed on hard rules first, not complain later, both sides.

It depends on who does the counting.
There are numerous articles on the PA legislature changing the balloting rules to make it easier to simply dump ballots. These have all gone to court. Trump has mostly lost.
The issue is what constitutes a legally admissible ballot.

More importantly were the MI rule changes that prevented counting of mail in ballots prior to election day. Why? Because you need to know how much you want to make up.
Most of the DEM legislatures made changes in the last few months to prevent a quick and clear outcome. Not saying that is "illegal" but don't pretend that Dems care about a liberal democracy. This is simply about winning no matter what.

Once again, the "pollsters" and "media" were basically DEM operatives. Once again, the Trafalgar group had it right.

Whatever - REP party needs to learn how to play the game as well. I still don't understand why Trump did not immediately get an injunction in MI. Makes no sense.

Nomograph says

Orchestrated voter fraud is a myth. It would be essentially impossible to conduct voter fraud on the scale required to influence a US election.

Accept the reality, people.

https://www.brennancenter.org/issues/ensure-every-american-can-vote/vote-suppression/myth-voter-fraud

Not true, it depends on the margin, if 10s of thousands or less than 10000 votes matter, it's actually rather easy, on both sides. Generally though elections have been won by wider margins before 2016 (with the exception of boosh v. gore) so it didn't matter.

Nomograph says

Where is the evidence for this?

Dude - it has barely been a few hours since the vote.

It took nearly 30 days to settle Bush V Gore in 2000.

Nomograph says

I see Biden making a statement about putting measures in place to PREVENT voter and election fraud. These measures are verifiable:

https://apnews.com/article/9308770212

So a statement is somehow proof but a video admitting to fraud isn't?

Who is this turd?^^^^^

I recognize the screen name but no posts in nearly a decade on this account and now a flood of troll posts.

mell says

Not true, it depends on the margin, if 10s of thousands or lss than 10s of thousands of votes matter, it's actually rather easy, on both sides. Generally though elections have been won by wider margins before 2016 (with the exception of boosh v. gore) so it didn't matter.

Exactly. Fraud of a few thousand votes can easily change the course of a nation. What is fraud? It also includes counting ballots that should be ineligible to be counted as well as direct fraud. Fraud is actually easy and DEM state legislatures made it easier: no signature verification, no post mark needed to determine ballot submission, etc...

This is another reason why it is important to have party control of the state legislatures as well.

But this could be good news long term. Just as democrats lead the way in subverting the electoral process, republicans can and should do the same.

Nomograph says

Orchestrated voter fraud is a myth.

Yep. We even have a thread denouncing that very myth: https://patrick.net/post/1335847/2020-10-30-voter-fraud-is-myth

Seriously does this even seem possible all new votes and all of them for Biden only:

Nomograph says

That would be interesting indeed. Unfortunately, these grand conspiracy theories turn out to be false almost 100% of the time.

Conspiracy theories tend to collapse under the weight of their own complexity.

Yet the majority of Democrats still think Trump is a Russian agent despite 3 years of investigations and impeachment totally absolving him.

Perception is hard to shake.

Everyone will know that Biden and his crack-head son are corrupt beyond all measure.

My friend voted by mail.
His signature will be determined by a person in the County building to be his, or it’s thrown out.
WHO works in our County building?
Democrats exclusively, and Mexicans generally.
What could possibly go wrong?

Nomograph says

The evidence for widespread election or voter fraud in this election is summarized below:

Here it is:


Not even San Francisco is 100% Biden.

krc says

More importantly were the MI rule changes that prevented counting of mail in ballots prior to election day. Why? Because you need to know how much you want to make up.

Exactly, it's not coincidence that the states the Dems knew might be close didn't do what every other state did, which was to count the ballots when they came in and recount them all on election day and put them in the moment the polls closed, officially.

Shit, Florida had a running tally.

Nomograph says

Interesting. What is the source of that graphic? Is if from the Wisconsin election officials? I'm not able to independently verify that.

538, it says right on the bottom. 538 takes the results direct from the state.

It will be a lame duck presidency either way with the powers so divided.

Nomograph says

Conspiracy theories tend to collapse under the weight of their own complexity.

Kind of like WTC7.

Looks like Biden will win with at least 270.