patrick.net

Just ask me

APOCALYPSEFUCK_is_ADORABLE says

Wait until Friday. Or else you go to jail.

We should have known we were in trouble when Trumpligula's prompting monitors all had Russian subtitles.

"The way you try to explain why you LOST the election with all your delusional comments"

The post you quoted has NOTHING to do with why Clinton lost the election. I'm glad you took the time to look up the definition so hopefully you can use it correctly next time. You learn something new every day, right?

He kept us out of another disastrous Middle East invasion and he could actually speak. And so the bar is incredibly low to beat the apeman, George W. Bush, the reigning worst president of all time.

http://m.dailykos.com/story/2017/01/14/1620270/--Anonymous-squeals-on-Wikileaks-Julian-Assange?Salzillo

Same twitter account, saying Assange is racist sexist libertarian who LOVES THE CONSTITUTION AND RAND PAUL. And he also says that Assange met with Assad! As if those are bad things that make him deplorable. I think this Anonymous guy with the twitter account just outed himself as a globalist, and is not to be trusted. As if you could ever trust someone who is anonymous.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jan/16/president-obama-leaves-legacy-of-wider-racial-rift/

After eight years, Obama leaves a legacy of a wider racial rift

An undeniable part of President Obama’s legacy is that Americans believe race relations have worsened during an eight-year period, with the emergence of the Black Lives Matter movement, assassinations of police officers and several high-profile attempts by the nation’s first black president to bridge the racial divide.

Although Mr. Obama’s popularity is high for a second-term president, polls consistently show the public has a more negative view of race relations today than when he was inaugurated in 2009.

Oh boy, after inheriting George Bush's disaster, Obama did a good job despite Republicans trying to ruin America.
People seem to forget that Bush has squandered the government surplus and caused the economic melt down,
not to mention getting us into the middle eastern mess.

Now, Republicans are back, they will squander all the government surplus and give the rich more money.

I don't get it. There will be no more money to educate our kids. So the schools need to accept more Chinese students?

Remember, every dead male is a military-age male. Just like every stubborn Vietnamese Peasant who refuses to walk the 5 miles back from his 12-hour rice paddy farming routine to the "Strategic Hamlet" is a VC.

Mr. Obama embraced a disputed method for counting civilian casualties that did little to box him in. It in effect counts all military-age males in a strike zone as combatants, according to several administration officials, unless there is explicit intelligence posthumously proving them innocent…

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/29/world/obamas-leadership-in-war-on-al-qaeda.html

See also:
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/12/president-obamas-weak-defense-of-his-record-on-drone-strikes/511454/

The CIA and Military Intel has a long history of stupid, sloppy thinking because they hate HUMINT and love ELINT, the latter also guarantees them a double dip in a lucrative industry. "We saw three guys doing jumping jacks - terrorist training camp. Go in hot, baby!"
"Two guys loading a truck with sacks, must be fertilizer. Farmers, fuck that Russian Commie shit! They're bombmakers. Hellfire Away!"

What. The US does not have enough internal conflict to cover the bases?

If trump can't start a nuclear conflagration,he's just another Republican FAILURE.
We can always hope that there will be a lot of Republican civilian casualties.

Solid article, must read.

PS. Attaching "will he start a war" title to it was a mistake.

Will Trump start a war

Trump will go after ISIS, but other than that nothing major.

At least his password wasn't pizz@

Remember the 2008-2012 narrative of Dems winning because they are oh-so-internet-savvy.... LOL

Hell, in 2014-2015 Hillary's narrative was that she was this highly skilled technical expert, who knew all the tricks of the Chinks and Ruskies to spy on her. Talking about meeting under a tent to prevent Chinese with telescoping cameras from taking pictures of their phone screens.

I gotta find that clip.

They need to send in an IHL skank stealth pussy bomber, and make Trumpligula pull back a puddled, boiling mass of stinky Chlamydia and yeast pus on his hand.

Heze gud peples!

http://thepigmancometh.com/2017/01/18/hollywood-liberals-to-protest-trump-inauguration-by-committing-mass-suicide/

Hollywood Liberals To Protest Trump Inauguration By Committing Mass Suicide

zzyzzx says

Hollywood Liberals To Protest Trump Inauguration By Committing Mass Suicide

I can hardly wait.

A new merchandising opportunity. Trump branded "pucker up to suck my dick, America!" MAGA lip balm.

The only reason they announced is to hide the embarassment of not being invited...

Ironman says

More than 60 Democratic lawmakers now skipping Trump’s inauguration.

"The only reason they announced is to hide the embarassment of not being invited..."

Yes, I'm sure that's it. Because the tickets are so hard to get.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/scalpers-losing-money-tickets-trump-inauguration-article-1.2947620

"Some flippers, who acquired tickets to Trump's inauguration with the intent of reselling them on the secondary market, are striking out in their efforts to peddle them and are now looking at some relatively "yuge" losses."

http://mashable.com/2017/01/17/trump-inauguration-facebook-ad/#lyULqiuHvaq3

joeyjojojunior says

there are many more. Republicans blocked a great number of bills that had strong public support. You need to listen more, I guess.

You're still talking about republicans; you are still having reading comprehension problems. I was talking about these guys (democratic inauguration boycotters) facing shit storm moving forward, if they try to behave in an obstructionist manner.

joeyjojojunior says

wtf are you talking about? I was obviously referring to Republican Congressmen

Because you were changing the subject to fit some narrative that you are trying to push. Im saying that these democratic congressmen will face shit storm for any future attempt to behave in obstructionist manner. My writing is fine, your ability to read, on other hand, sucks.

joeyjojojunior says

"Where are links that these democrats standing in solidarity behaved in obstructionist manner during obama presidency. Links or you are talking out of anus"

wtf are you talking about? I was obviously referring to Republican Congressmen who did exactly that over the last 8 years during the Obama Presidency. Why would a Dem. obstruct a Democratic President? Are you an idiot?

Did any of these democrats boycotting the inauguration ever behave in a manner supportive of obstructionist republicans, how complicated is that to understand?

MMR says

Are you an idiot?

Youre still too much of pussy to admit that you are a limousine liberal who votes for welfare to keep coloreds on their side of tracks. Of course, you lie to yourself and say that you're doing it for the 'betterment of society'.

By the way, what kind of pussy changes their handle from tatupu70 to joeyjojojunior?......pathetic.joeyjojojunior says

Why would a Dem. obstruct a Democratic President? Are you an idiot?

Why would republicans vote against trump....what kind of retard are you?

"Did any of these democrats boycotting the inauguration ever behave in a manner supportive of obstructionist republicans, how complicated is that to understand?"

It's not complicated. It's just a stupid question.

joeyjojojunior says

I think you need a writing class. Your overuse of the pronoun "they"

You're the one who has overused the pronoun "they" as I was quoting you, dumbass

joeyjojojunior says

It's not complicated. It's just a stupid question

Why is it a stupid question, same thing happened between establishment GOP and trump?

why is it so hard to comprehend that these reps are digging a ditch for themselves that will be hard to overcome. No proposal of these guys will see light of day.

joeyjojojunior says

I think you need a writing class. Your overuse of the pronoun "they" makes it impossible to determine your point.

The point is that you changed the subject because you want to push a different narrative or because you lack reading comprehension skills

"You're still talking about republicans; you are still having reading comprehension problems. I was talking about these guys (democratic inauguration boycotters) facing shit storm moving forward, if they try to behave in an obstructionist manner."

Of course I'm talking about Republicans. Do you really not follow the point? Republicans were in this exact situation in 2008 and were obstructionist for the next 8 years with no consequences. It's called a parallel and serves to give a strong indication of what will happen to Dems if they do the same thing.

"Because you were changing the subject to fit some narrative that you are trying to push. Im saying that these democratic congressmen will face shit storm for any future attempt to behave in obstructionist manner. My writing is fine, your ability to read, on other hand, sucks."

Narrative? I'm showing you what happened in the past under almost the exactly same scenario.

"The point is that you changed the subject because you want to push a different narrative or because you lack reading comprehension skills"

wtf is wrong with you. I didn't change the subject. I used an example from recent history to show that Republicans, facing the same scenario, were strong obstructionists and suffered no consequences.

joeyjojojunior says

. It's called a parallel and serves to give a strong indication of what will happen to Dems if they do the same thing.

I think you are discounting the social media and 'fake news' factors; trump is a master of it and these guys will most likely face more negative publicity than any other times of their respective careers

"Youre still too much of pussy to admit that you are a limousine liberal who votes for welfare to keep coloreds on their side of tracks. Of course, you lie to yourself and say that you're doing it for the 'betterment of society'."

My lord. I give up with you. You make zero sense and cannot comprehend the simplest of discussions.

joeyjojojunior says

My lord. I give up with you. You make zero sense and cannot comprehend the simplest of discussions

You think that this publicity stunt won't face retaliation and you are using past precedent to predict future events.

I'm saying you are stupid because people like you totally thought trump couldn't win.

Also, republicans did everything in their power to obstruct trump, your past precedent couldn't predict that either.

boycotting the inauguration is a stupid political stunt that has no chance in hell of doing anything positive for the future of the democratic party, that's the real point.

People like tatty/joeyjojo, think it is either "no big deal" or actually a "good idea"

But otherwise joeyjojo makes a lot of sense and has the comprehension skills of an einstein.

"Hey Tatty, Where's the list I asked for?? I'm STILL waiting."

If you want to find the list, try www.google.com. I don't have time to do research for you.

"boycotting the inauguration is a stupid political stunt that has no chance in hell of doing anything positive for the future of the democratic party, that's the real point.

People like tatty/joeyjojo, think it is either "no big deal" or actually a "good idea""

Yep--I'd say no big deal. It will be forgotten in 1 month.