by Patrick ➕follow (59) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 80,646 - 80,685 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
How is it you think it's real news this one time?
You can find examples reported across the spectrum, pick whatever channel you like. For example, ABC. On the left, even DN acknowledges, "There were two Iraqi men living in Bowling Green who were arrested in 2011 on charges of having attempted to send money and weapons to al-Qaeda in Iraq." Oddly though, DN continues to publish on its website Peter Bouckaert's false claim that "there has not been a single incident of a person turning out to be a terrorist." DN broadcast that at least twice. In contrast, on the right or alt-right, Breitbart reported on "‘Vetted’ Terrorist Refugees" months ago. On the subject of what Islam says and does, the left and center have seemed to blindfold themselves, losing credibility. Even where DN admitted refugees had been arrested for terrorism, it was only in the context of saying someone from the administration was wrong about something else. The litigation surrounding Executive Order 13769 may hopefully generate enough coverage to remove some blindfolds and wake up people, showing the President can be right sometimes.
Previously, each party loved its own lies and hated only the lies of the other side. That seems to have continued, but hope springs eternal.
Now see here, if we can have two major league felons as Treasury Secretary (Rubin and Paulson), certainly we can have Trump as president.
Do you have any verifiable facts? I'd love to see hillary be prosecuted if she's guilty... wheres the facts?
This passes Ironman's credibility standards.
Also, an alien craft has landed on the White House South Lawn, in preparation of interstellar territorial renegotiations with Donald Trump, who threatened the Ferengi with a border tax.
The Vulcans have agreed to mediate.
She and Hilalry -both are like chalk on walls. Any wonder billy finds his entertainment elsewhere?
Trump and Republicans are the party of FREE SPEECH!! Anyone can say what they want now and not worry about hurting the feelings of the special snowflakes, right!!??!!
Oops. I guess Sessions is a special kind of special snowflake and we can't hurt HIS feelings.
"Ahhh, the display of civil Liberal Tolerance never ends..."
And the Republican tolerance is ever BETTER. It's OK to take away free speech as long as you warn someone first, huh? Is that how it works?
Not sure what was said, and not defending her whatsoever, but as long as someone is stating facts, true quotes, and not lies they should be allowed to continue to speak. 1st limits gov control over the goverened.
1st limits gov control over the goverened.
It is per senate rules. She is free to be liawatha or any of the other 37 genders and claim she is a cross from a martian and 4 Gender native american and claim Trump is Hitler.
"Unfortunately, Lizzie girl just spews her own opinion, lies and delusional Libbie crap, that's why they finally put a muzzle on her."
She read a letter from Coretta Scott King for God's sake.
The thought of Hillary in jail is better than goat porn for piggy. Let's let him have this for his wife's sake.
In all fairness health insurance is not much on the radar of this cohort.
OTOH Hillary did have the majority of the popular vote...
"Is that the ONLY thing she said?"
It's what McConnell specifically mentioned when referring to taking away her ability to speak on the Senate floor.
Warren took issue with Daines' characterization and continued speaking, quoting from a letter from Coretta Scott King, Martin Luther King Jr.'s widow, before Sen. Mitch McConnell cut her off.
"The senator has impugned the motives and conduct of the senator from Alabama,†McConnell said. After that, Daines told Warren to "take her seat," he said.
"She was warned," McConnell said referring to Warren. "She was given an explanation. Nevertheless, she persisted."
Finally someone told her to chill out on insults. Her wanna be sjw act was getting old.
These same ASSHOLES will go into a business,that support political agendas that are against their best interest, the next day & spend money with the enemy. How many buy online from companies that donate to the enemy?
If they are not for you ,they are against you.
How STUPID!
And the straw that evidently broke the camel's back was a letter from Coretta Scott King
It's OK to take away free speech as long as you warn someone first, huh
Was it a constitutional violation or are they following procedure?
“The senator has impugned the motives and conduct of our colleague from Alabama,†McConnell said from the Senate floor.
“I call the senator to order under the provisions of Rule 19.â€
Under the Senate’s “Rule 19,†senators are not allowed to “directly or indirectly, by any form of words impute to another Senator or to other Senators any conduct or motive unworthy or unbecoming a Senator." -- A vote of 49-43 suggested that Warren had done just that or was darn close to it.
What else can you expect from a Democrat Obama crony who destroyed any semblance of peace in Chicago while mayor?
He needs to look up the definition of "winning" because presiding over the murder capital of the United States doesn't qualify.
Asshat!
As usual, Ironman misses the point by a country mile, and the miss is caused by partisan blindness. Allow me to quote:
US Senate Rule XIX ( Rule 19) paragraph 2: "No Senator in debate shall, directly or indirectly, by any form of words impute to another Senator or to other Senators any conduct or motive unworthy or unbecoming a Senator."
Oh, I see. The US Senate has created a rule that directly allows the majority of the Senate to curtail the free speech of Senators. NICE. That sounds unconstitutional, if you ask me.
If Free Speech cannot be exercised in the US Senate, then where in our country do we have freedom of expression? I ask rhetorically, of course. The obvious conclusion is that the 1st Amendment of the US constitution is violated every day in the US Senate, by the mere existence of Rule 19.
So all the lawyers and government workers stay home. And?
I'm convinced that lawyer college turns people into asshole Leftists. I reconnected with a college friend a year ago and (while he was an outgoing engineering student then) he had become a lawyer. And now he posts annoying Leftist crap all the time and has a big echo chamber of like minded individuals to agree. I'm just like, what happened to this guy? Law school seems like the culprit.
I read another somewhat sketchy article a few days ago that claimed the FBI was waiting for Jeff Sessions to be confirmed and then making 70 arrests in the pizzagate scandal of top politicians.
Source was "FBI informant."
I can hope it's true without flat out believing it. If they're both true, could they be related?
"Was it a constitutional violation or are they following procedure?"
Not sure if it's a Constitutional violation--courts would have to decide that. But it's for sure a chickenshit move. The Senate isn't worried about a potential Cabinet member having a racist past--they're just worried about someone mentioning that he has a racist past.
And all of you guys defending it are certainly huge hypocrites after spending countless threads talking about how free speech is so important. And how the special snowflakes can't handle it.
Everyday Democrats should read the letter in the Senate for the next four years.FortWayne says
Finally someone told her to chill out on insults. Her wanna be sjw act was getting old.
DIE McConnell,Sessions & Republicans from horrible,painful diseases or STUPIDITY. I'll visit you in the hospital & laugh at you.
How many Republicans,in D.C. and elsewhere,are just SOCIALIST GOVT. EMPLOYEES.
How many Republicans are sucking the SOCIALIST GOVT. TEAT & don't even have to leave home to go to a SOCIALIST GOVT. JOB?
Stupid Republicans may have opened a can of worms,will the Dems listen to every word out of slime mouths & use the rule against them.
They have no control over HEY YOU,FREE SPEECH LOVING PATRIOT.
OH! WAIT! They can click ignore. COWARDS!
Maybe this rule was enacted to avoid the kind of ad hominem attacks that used to lead to fist fights and brawls in Congress.
After all, calling the opposition a bunch of "poo-poo heads" is about the same as calling them "racists," and just as productive!
Limiting discourse like this is something that's done in every office and business circle.
Or do you wish we had duels still?
Do you have something against free speech? Or do you ONLY want it when it benefits YOUR team?
Republican know they are right.
WMD!
The right loves the taste of their foot in their mouth!
Tell her to shut the fuck up, she might be cucked by terrorists but we're not.
I'll morn for her daughter if she's such a chickenshit Marxist idiot that she can not.
« First « Previous Comments 80,646 - 80,685 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,230,722 comments by 14,713 users - AD, desertguy online now