patrick.net

Well, if she spits it out, she'll just have to crouch and lick it all up all over again, anyway.

See, it isn't rape, we are just selflessly attempting to improve mood and nutritional status!

"The Art of the Bribe"

Trump Alzheimers: you forget everything except the flattery.

From now on, the Russians will have to pay a hundred times the market value for Trump's Real estate instead of ten times.

Good. But not good enough. Only oil/gas embargo and SWIFT cut-off will make these fucks sit up and listen.

Find an electron beam that turns vodka into water. That'll get their attention.

My favorite part of these new sanctions, they stipulated the President cannot ease them without congressional approval.

:)

Do I sense a little middle finger showing there Congress? Nice.

Second favorite part, it was a bipartisan committee that put it together. AMERICA!

America wouldn't exist without embezzlement & fraud.
Where are the Trumpians? Awkwardly silent.

Rew says

bipartisan committee

No way! They are all the same ASSHOLES!

HEY YOU says

No way! They are all the same ASSHOLES!

Way ... GOP did it! :)

That's not a good way to build up a working relationship with another nation. Sooner or later that does come back, what goes around, comes around, and that's no good.

Trump should be allowed to piss on the Mona Lisa with impunity!

Why do they hate superiority?

200 suing for emoluments clause. The goal: get business dealings disclosed.
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/06/200-democrats-sue-donald-trump-benefits-170614081729018.html

Might have to put it on the back burner though Trumpey, because Russia, Russia, Russia.

FortWayne says

That's not a good way to build up a working relationship with another nation. Sooner or later that does come back, what goes around, comes around, and that's no good.

Please inform Russia that "what goes around, comes around" because it is coming their way soon. Russia is not our ally. They have returned from deep scorn and perceived humiliation by us, to reclaim satellite countries, expand influence in middle east, and capitalize on disruptions they have caused in western democracies.

Excuse me while I don't feel we need to rush to extend an olive branch to them. Not interested. I would be highly interested in fomenting a revolution to oust Putin though. Can we get on that?

Who gets to sort through all the pictures of Arabs picking their noses and blowing turds into the sand?

If there's no Russia, the Military Budget is in big danger!

Also, gotta keep off any pressure to reform the Democratic Party with the Russian boogeyman!

TwoScoopsMcGee says

Also, gotta keep off any pressure to reform the Democratic Party with the Russian boogeyman!

Democrats have learned from Republicans. Talk about Benghazi for 4 years and eventually everyone believes it. I don't think Democrats are letting this go. They will probably compromise on the rest of Trump's agenda though.

TwoScoopsMcGee says

If there's no Russia, the Military Budget is in big danger!

So you are against Trump's call for military build up and revitalization? Fascinating.

(Pssst: hint, current military budget is all towards IS, Middle East intervention, Chinese containment, and capability to fend off a missile shot from N. Korea.)

TwoScoopsMcGee says

any pressure to reform the Democratic Party with the Russian boogeyman!

There is nothing like losing the Presidency to cause a good look in the mirror. I don't think you need to worry about Dems working to re-define themselves here. Redfeined into something you like or agree with, probably not, but they are for sure working on it.

tr6 says

... Talk about Benghazi for 4 years and eventually everyone believes it.

Sadly true to a degree for Benghazi. I think the only difference here will be, unlike Birtherism and Benghazi, there will likely be many in Trump's admin (maybe even Trump himself) who are actually directly implicated for wrongdoing. This won't be a "failure of the system" type issue, or a conspiracy theory proven to be exactly that, a conspiracy.

This will be a "people broke the law" affair in the end.

Rew says

TwoScoopsMcGee says

If there's no Russia, the Military Budget is in big danger!

So you are against Trump's call for military build up and revitalization? Fascinating.

There are true loyalties, and then there are situational loyalties. It's pretty easy to see what's what in this particular case.

Rew says

There is nothing like losing the Presidency to cause a good look in the mirror. I don't think you need to worry about Dems working to re-define themselves here

There is a reason why Trump won. Democrats have not addressed that reason yet making his win in 2020 likely. If you think it's funny, try to get around the country and see the support that he is enjoying despite his stupid policy proposals.

Rew says

There is nothing like losing the Presidency to cause a good look in the mirror. I don't think you need to worry about Dems working to re-define themselves here. Redfeined into something you like or agree with, probably not, but they are for sure working on it.

Really? Because the Democrats have nothing but "MUH RUSSIA!" and have elected Clintonistas to every major party leadership position so far.

I see distraction, not dodging.

TwoScoopsMcGee says

have elected Clintonistas to every major party leadership position so fa

Bernie or Elizabeth have no clout in the Democratic party. Rew is an example of that.

tr6 says

Bernie or Elizabeth have no clout in the Democratic party. Rew is an example of that.

:) I voted for Bernie in the primaries, comrade tr6. I anxiously await Warren and Harris's moves. I have been pushed left of center when I used to vote Republican.

What you call "Deep State" and "globalist" I simply call "American interest".

Ok not a legal person, but if even 1 person voted not guilty-shouldn't that be not guilty? Hung means some people don't vote??

lostand confused says

Hung means some people don't vote??

Hung jury (in criminal cases) means no unanimity or majority (whichever is required), i.e. no verdict either way.

PS. I'm not a lawyer but I did stay in Holiday Inn couple of times.

god damn...he sure ain't lying about that being blind shit...

BlueSardine says

god damn...he sure ain't lying about that being blind shit...

The legal profession coined "Palimony" purely for the purpose of extorting and ripping off rich men with whining bitch vehicles. This is the next phase called "Rapeimony".

After all, wouldn't you expect a "hung jury" to be sympathetic to Cosby?

Bill got really lucky, usually feminists scream in outrage upon accusation that he's guilty even if proven innocent. I guess you have to be rich to earn justice, an average guy like most of us here would be in jail long ago. Especially in gay feminist liberal California which automatically assumes guilt.

This could be a nice setup if the timing is right. Raise the dividend after a nice run up and we could get a nice bump

FortWayne says

Bill got really lucky

He sure did. Now how could the loving Dr. Hugstable ever harm another person?

Yah he's far from innocent. Still, crime should be proven with evidence instead of hearsay.

Quigley says

Yah he's far from innocent. Still, crime should be proven with evidence instead of hearsay.

True, but the rich are better able to buy their innocence. That is not fair nor is it true justice.

Cosby gave her the pills and she consumed them knowingly. What is the rape scenario?? Now if he slipped something without her knowledge-absolutely-but I don't understand this whole Cosby thing. They all agreed and knew what they were doing-so what si the case? What is enxt, he gave me a drink and I drank it and so he raped me? Or he took me to dinenr and knew put out when I get a good meal-so rape??

sitting at the march low right now...who is buying more? :)

Strategist says

I believe Cosby is guilty, and should spend the rest of his miserable years in a cell.

He'll spend the rest of his years in hell of trials and re-trials. Will probably croak from stress-induced heart attack or stroke.

It is kind of tempting to buy more.

I don't know if this is morally wrong but whenever I see some unattractive, usually morbidly obese woman cry out about being raped, I always read that with a tinge of doubt.

I was watching on TV, so may not be the exact facts. But it appears the rape accuser claimed it was January of some year for the rape. Then they had telephone records of her calling Cosby 72 times after the alleged rape. When confronted with those-she conveniently changes the date of rape to after the phone conversations-this was back then and why she was not charged. She then got a nice financial settlement out of him.

I can't believe this went to trial and I can't believe this is a hung jury-it should be not guilty within the 1st hour.