Comments 1 - 16 of 63 Next » Last » Search these comments
Nothing wrong with probing questions to better understand what is going on to better educate yourself.
At this point, there is no requirement for any bank that holds "shadow inventory" to provide disclosure.
I have to head to work at the moment but Wells Fargo and their acquisitions of a few banks with heavy toxic loans on the book as an interesting start. It is an issue with resets and recasts and from what I remember Wells modified many of these loans to Interest Only for an extended time to let the loan owners and the market work things out but I'll check into the details later today. Sorry I can't recall the details at this moment.
I personally know two people who haven't made payments in about a year but the foreclosure process has not begun. Are the banks backlogged?
#1) RE pro's are liars. They suck. Do not bother asking them anything, they are scum.
#2) The people that contact the bank to try to adjust their payemts are foreclosed on faster than they ones that just stop making payments and stay off the radar.
#3) The entire REO problem would be fixed if the laws about public property (FANNY held houses are public property) were used and the assetts were liquidated in a true public auction. The fact that we are allowing the RE pro's to controll the REO market is absurd. These are public assetts and should be auctioned in public to the highest bidder ... not "marketed" by the REwhores, with a price "fixed" by the fraudsters known as BPO agents. THis system is Fed up -- FUBAR -- and the REwhores are laughing all the way to the bank.
#1) RE pro’s are liars. They suck. Do not bother asking them anything, they are scum.
Truer words never spoken. However:
Bap33 says
the REwhores are laughing all the way to the bank.
I don't think so. Realtors aren't selling much at the moment. At least in my area.
I hear tell of many people who haven't made a payment in over a year and still no foreclosed upon. wtf?
SeekingAlpha.com is where I read about Wells Fargo but I am having trouble getting the site to come up.
This page might clear things up.
http://money.cnn.com/news/storysupplement/economy/bailouttracker/index.html#TARP
Consumer and Business Lending Initiative
* TALF investment * $20 billion actually spent 20 billion
* Small business loan program * $15 billion actually spent 0
* TALF loss provisions * $35 billion actually spent 0
Programs to support private lending purchases of toxic assets and backing SBA loans. Also sets aside funds to backstop potential losses to government from purchases of mortgage-backed securities and other securities backed by consumer loans.
Well the SBA never got squat, but all of the TALF money earmarked for the investment, i.e. the myriad of investors in the worst hit markets got every cent they needed to buy up these houses for pennies on the dollar.
Since the Government, the same agency, and act, didn't actually spend one red cent of the funds designed to buy up the band loans, as that would have been counter productive for the investors.
Meaning if the Government was willing to give the banks the full nickle for those sour loans on the books, then why in the hell would they budge one damn penny and sell them at a greater loss to the investors?
These guys owns these houses out right now, and as long as there no hurry to pay it back, if they even have to. Then why would or should they sell. They are just waiting for Uncle Ben Bernakie to jump start this party now.
I just checked my old house which we sold 2.5 years ago on Property Shark and it is still listing me as the owner. I'll have to check their methodology. I suppose if I paid of an account I'd get mortgage info on potential rental properties?
I personally know two people who haven’t made payments in about a year but the foreclosure process has not begun. Are the banks backlogged?
No, its not a backlog problem. State legislatures are pushing extensions in foreclosure process.
And from this site:
http://financemymoney.com/option-arms-wells-fargo-convert-interest-only/
...Wells Fargo, the fourth-largest U.S. bank by assets, holds more than $107 billion in debt tied to option-adjustable rate mortgages...
...To solve that conundrum, Wells Fargo is taking a gamble: The bank is issuing thousands of interest-only loans that will defer borrowers’ balances for as long as six to 10 years. Wells Fargo is wagering that an eventual rise in housing prices in the country’s worst-hit regions, along with a rise in consumers’ income, will eventually combine to cover the bank’s billions in underwater Pick-A-Pay debt.
“We’re banking on the fact the economy will improve and recover over time,†Michael Heid, co-president of Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, said in an interview.â€
How's that for shadow inventory...
I personally know two people who haven’t made payments in about a year but the foreclosure process has not begun. Are the banks backlogged?
No, its not a backlog problem. State legislatures are pushing extensions in foreclosure process.
Pushing? Perhaps. But it's an ongoing problem, didn't just happen. I think banks aren't foreclosing so that they're not responsible for taxes, problems, etc. They're overwhelmed - but I haven't heard of one piece of legislation that supports the practice of just not foreclosing and leaving the homeowner in limbo.
And from this site:
http://financemymoney.com/option-arms-wells-fargo-convert-interest-only/
…Wells Fargo, the fourth-largest U.S. bank by assets, holds more than $107 billion in debt tied to option-adjustable rate mortgages…
…To solve that conundrum, Wells Fargo is taking a gamble: The bank is issuing thousands of interest-only loans that will defer borrowers’ balances for as long as six to 10 years. Wells Fargo is wagering that an eventual rise in housing prices in the country’s worst-hit regions, along with a rise in consumers’ income, will eventually combine to cover the bank’s billions in underwater Pick-A-Pay debt.
“We’re banking on the fact the economy will improve and recover over time,†Michael Heid, co-president of Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, said in an interview.â€
How’s that for shadow inventory…
So, get the borrowers to pay for 6-10 years and never get any equity. I.e., rent, but have a huge loan hanging over your head that you may never get out from under. I guess I see the bank's point of view, but why would an 'owner' want to do this? Given the size of some mortgages the interest alone could more than rent on a comp.
And from this site:
http://financemymoney.com/option-arms-wells-fargo-convert-interest-only/
…Wells Fargo, the fourth-largest U.S. bank by assets, holds more than $107 billion in debt tied to option-adjustable rate mortgages…
…To solve that conundrum, Wells Fargo is taking a gamble: The bank is issuing thousands of interest-only loans that will defer borrowers’ balances for as long as six to 10 years. Wells Fargo is wagering that an eventual rise in housing prices in the country’s worst-hit regions, along with a rise in consumers’ income, will eventually combine to cover the bank’s billions in underwater Pick-A-Pay debt.
“We’re banking on the fact the economy will improve and recover over time,†Michael Heid, co-president of Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, said in an interview.â€
How’s that for shadow inventory…
So, get the borrowers to pay for 6-10 years and never get any equity. I.e., rent, but have a huge loan hanging over your head that you may never get out from under. I guess I see the bank’s point of view, but why would an ‘owner’ want to do this? Given the size of some mortgages the interest alone could more than rent on a comp.
Why would the owner doe this, ie 'rent'? The excuse given was to stay in a particular school district for the kiddos.
And to delay the foreclosure process allows the banks to delay the write downs which don't look good on Wall Street.
1) Most realtors don't end up selling that much property. Apparently most of those people working out there only close on a couple of houses a year. A very small number actually make a killing at their jobs. So I'm guessing that the reason many don't know where these houses are going, is because they don't have enough contacts/influence to get answers, or simply don't understand what is going on. They're just pushing their companies lines, or what they've heard.
2) Home owners are probably hoping to get out of debt, keep their houses, and in doing so just paying off interest. In the end they're paying a 6 year gamble in hopes of being in a better position. eg the market takes off and they're way above water again. The banks probably realize this isn't going to happen, but by spreading the pain over 10+ years, they can spread their losses out and cover themselves. They might not get the best returns for these types of investments, but that is probably better than flooding the market with homes and selling for a huge loss today. 10 years of interest payments THEN selling is better than selling today, taking a huge loss and finding a better loan to invest into today. Laws might change in their favor over those next 10 years too.
And from this site:
http://financemymoney.com/option-arms-wells-fargo-convert-interest-only/
…Wells Fargo, the fourth-largest U.S. bank by assets, holds more than $107 billion in debt tied to option-adjustable rate mortgages…
…To solve that conundrum, Wells Fargo is taking a gamble: The bank is issuing thousands of interest-only loans that will defer borrowers’ balances for as long as six to 10 years. Wells Fargo is wagering that an eventual rise in housing prices in the country’s worst-hit regions, along with a rise in consumers’ income, will eventually combine to cover the bank’s billions in underwater Pick-A-Pay debt.
“We’re banking on the fact the economy will improve and recover over time,†Michael Heid, co-president of Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, said in an interview.â€
How’s that for shadow inventory…
Thanks for posting this. I'd say, it's all starting to make sense. Banks are paid (funded) by the government to delay the resets/recasts 5-10 years. Government generates inflation over the next few years to bring up the price of houses. People will no longer be underwater and will be able to sell their houses when it's time for the resets/recasts to occur. Will it work?
And from this site:
http://financemymoney.com/option-arms-wells-fargo-convert-interest-only/
…Wells Fargo, the fourth-largest U.S. bank by assets, holds more than $107 billion in debt tied to option-adjustable rate mortgages…
…To solve that conundrum, Wells Fargo is taking a gamble: The bank is issuing thousands of interest-only loans that will defer borrowers’ balances for as long as six to 10 years. Wells Fargo is wagering that an eventual rise in housing prices in the country’s worst-hit regions, along with a rise in consumers’ income, will eventually combine to cover the bank’s billions in underwater Pick-A-Pay debt.
“We’re banking on the fact the economy will improve and recover over time,†Michael Heid, co-president of Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, said in an interview.â€
How’s that for shadow inventory…
Thanks for posting this. I’d say, it’s all starting to make sense. Banks are paid (funded) by the government to delay the resets/recasts 5-10 years. Government generates inflation over the next few years to bring up the price of houses. People will no longer be underwater and will be able to sell their houses when it’s time for the resets/recasts to occur. Will it work?
But they are paying interest only, not making a dent in the principle and some of these folks have lost 40+% of their home's value. How long will it take in this environment (ie another JOBLESS recovery, stagnant wages, rising healthcare costs...) for homes to appreciate to these levels again. Then subtract those pesky 6% realtor fees (sorry, but always got remember the cost of selling.)
The gamble is looking rather risky. And I believe values will drop some more in many areas when the $8Kcredit expires.
I don't know, the government has a lot of money to throw around. If they want to create inflation, I think they can (especially with the banks' help). And if the banks aren't foreclosing on people, it doesn't matter if they make $0. They are better off actually than renting, they are living rent free.
Comments 1 - 16 of 63 Next » Last » Search these comments
My wife and I are looking to get into a larger home. We currently rent a very modest size cottage in the south SF Bay Area. While we think we will end up finding a new rental, we thought we would give buying a shot. You never know, right?
Well, over the last several weeks every single real estate professional we have talked with, including a mortgage broker, has commented that no one (i.e., real estate professionals) knows what the banks are doing with the growing "shadow inventory". Because four different real estate professionals have said that to us in the last week, it really hit home. If the people whose business is to sell real estate don't know what is going on, then what the hell is going on??? Does anyone have any thoughts? Are banks just holding properties or are they selling them to investors? Why aren't they being released for sale?
A colleague recently suggested that we start contacting banks directly and asking for a list of their REO properites for sale. Are banks receptive to being contacted directly? Has anyone had any luck with this?
Oh, BTW, don't worry that we are out there trying despartely to buy something. We are avid partrick.net readers!! We are simply trying to get a more sophisticated handle on what is going on with the growing inventory of REO properties (NOTE: Over 100 homes in Santa Clara County scheduled to be sold at foreclosure sale this week alone). Any insight is welcome. Thanks.
#housing