patrick.net

Astrid, actually it is--I don't remember [in recent history anyway] living someplace I liked less. Then again one gets spoiled living in places like La Jolla, Honolulu and Maui ;) Btw, there's not a thing wrong with Nevada--at least Vegas or more accurately Henderson [SE suburb of Las Vegas]. Henderson was NICE when I first lived there ('96-'00).

Sign me "The Lights Were Never On In Georgia" :) lol

"Then again one gets spoiled living in places like La Jolla, Honolulu and Maui"

Atlanta would definitely be the dog in that bunch :P I do find Nevada to be quite depressing. The landscape is just so arid and devoid of color.

"Atlanta would definitely be the dog in that bunch :P I do find Nevada to be quite depressing. The landscape is just so arid and devoid of color."

Most DEFINITELY the Dog....
==
Depressing? Henderson's nice (or at least it used to be).
Devoid of color? Red Rock/Valley of Fire are worth a look....

--How many days left in this shitbox known as "the A-T-L"? Don't know exactly but I know one thing for sure-- I'll miss it about as much as a field audit ;)

But Valley of Fire is virtually in AZ/UT! :)

It's just hard to imagine that ATL is so bad. It's just so bland. Miami or Houston has just got to be worse.

If all else US fails to live down to ATL, just remember it's 110 F + humidity in the Persian Gulf.

"But Valley of Fire is virtually in AZ/UT! :)

It’s just hard to imagine that ATL is so bad. It’s just so bland. Miami or Houston has just got to be worse.

If all else US fails to live down to ATL, just remember it’s 110 F + humidity in the Persian Gulf."

The Valley of Fire I'm referring to is definitely in Nevada [North of Vegas on I-15 as I recall]...were you thinking of Sedona?

I can't speak about Houston only having been at the airport...but Miami definitely has it's plusses!

Persian Gulf? Been there, done that! ['91] NEVER again!

I think I'm just going to go somewhere new--Capri or Venice should do nicely....

Then again one gets spoiled living in places like La Jolla, Honolulu and Maui.

Well now, that's hardly a fair comparison, is it? Almost anything compared to Hawaii looks like shit. La Jolla is one of the most beautiful (and most expensive) coastal cities in CA, so not even that's a fair comparison. Maybe La Jolla vs. Buckhead would be a little more fair, but then again, Buckhead doesn't have a beach. How about Buckhead vs. Savannah?

I still contend you can live far better on a middle-class salary in ATL than almost anywhere in CA.

"Maybe La Jolla vs. Buckhead..."

Buckhead [where I slum- I mean live now] doesn't hold a candle to La Jolla [living ON Prospect Street is DA BOMB!]....

"I still contend you can live far better on a middle-class salary in ATL than almost anywhere in CA."

Who said anything about middle-class salary?

Just kidding! ;)

Seriously, GA just don't cut it after living West--I'm goin back!

goober,

"“big-city” stuff. Smog, rudness, bad schools, strip clubs, a healthy crime rate and of course over priced real estate. Bland just doesn’t fit."

Those sound like pretty bland big city stuff to me:) I guess I'm looking for some culture or some sort of edginess that distinguish it from other cities. Strip clubs, congested roads, and a par share of social troubles doesn't really give me that.

I actually dislike all big city environments except for SF and Shanghai. The former because it's not that big and very pretty, the latter because of family and how far my restaurant going dollars can go there.

This is unreal:

http://atlanta.craigslist.org/rfs/191035894.html

goober,

Maybe that's so. But Golden Gate Park and surrounding recreational area is extremely pretty.

Having said that, I haven't been to SF proper in years. My boyfriend and I usually shop and eat in Berkeley, when we feel the need for that typical BA experience.

Glen,

You mean because the price seems so low?

The sq footage is rather low (since there's probably no basement) and I assume Lawrenceville is not an up and coming neighborhood, but it does seem like a nice, gracefully constructed home. I noticed that the new south is obsessed about new McMansion housing so they don't like older housing stock, even though the older ones have much nicer lots and more usable space.

I wouldn't mind if something like that came up in the BA. Except it would go for $2 million, just for the 1acre of land.

It takes time and possibly several moves to find the right fit for one's life. I agree with SHTF assessment that it takes decades possibly to accomplish what wouldn't anywhere else. California pretty much has stuck it's nose up at the middle income citizen. It's really sad no wonder many of us left or are leaving soon. With all of it's troubles (and there are many) the one that will be the most responcible for exodus is affordabilty or lack thereof. It's a hard pill to swallow after all your hard work and education you can barely eke out an existance. The anger stays with you for a long time and you stay longer than you should. Years go by you haven't made much gains and then we get a real spike of inflation. Everything goes up in a short amount of time housing, energy, health care ect. You feel so weary maybe a bit depressed and think to yourself you should be further along. You finally come to the conclusion maybe I can do better elsewhere. It takes time to muster up the courage you do it and you try another locale. Maybe it works maybe not. But you ke trying until you find your home at last. One you can afford

Hey Liz ,

The world as we knew it has changed dramatically! Upper middle class is now 200k a year at least in the west. Wages have been largely stagnant int that region but the cost of living tripled. There are areas of the country that pay the same as california but housing is half to a third as much. My big question is WHY? And why hasn't anybody looked into valid reasons for it?

I never thought I'd live to see an educated person not be able to earn enough for the basic home. If you look atr the majority of people in that region they are at most middle income