0
0

233 Bay View Dr, San Carlos, CA 94070


               
2010 Apr 2, 5:31am   11,494 views  42 comments

by pkowen   follow (0)  

And the overpriced winner of the day is:

http://www.redfin.com/CA/San-Carlos/233-Bay-View-Dr-94070/home/1919821

Look at those fancy closet doors, the nice sink, and the backkyard concrete paradise!  Classy!

« First        Comments 36 - 42 of 42        Search these comments

36   RogerD   2010 Apr 26, 3:10pm  

Yes it's overpriced by about
$450,000 but it will sell for near asking, unfortunately. Only after interest rates start to rise will San Carlos property prices start softening.

37   Quant HF Mgr   2010 May 4, 2:59pm  

Still no action on this house....tick, tick, tick

"New Aggressive Price"...lol

38   SFace   2010 Jun 19, 6:14pm  

just want to to give some conclusions to these old topics. everyone was right that the property was gonna be low-balled. sold for 970K.

39   Quant HF Mgr   2010 Jun 20, 9:26am  

My relatives paid $565 / sq ft at the peak of the bubble a stones throw away from 233 Bayview, which just sold for $366 / sq ft. That's a strong down trend and an ugly situation. Lots of people in the same situation up there who either won't fess up to it or don't understand how bad their situation actually is (my relatives are the latter). My calculations suggest their home will likely continue to depreciate until it is worth 31-39% off the peak price.

40   pkowen   2010 Jun 21, 9:47am  

Quant HF Mgr says

My relatives paid $565 / sq ft at the peak of the bubble a stones throw away from 233 Bayview, which just sold for $366 / sq ft. That’s a strong down trend and an ugly situation. Lots of people in the same situation up there who either won’t fess up to it or don’t understand how bad their situation actually is (my relatives are the latter). My calculations suggest their home will likely continue to depreciate until it is worth 31-39% off the peak price.

It's not ugly in my view at all, with regrets to your relatives. It's what needs to happen.

41   thomas.wong1986   2010 Jun 22, 5:18am  

E-man says

I like pkowen’s perpective “It’s not ugly in my view at all, with regrets to your relatives. It’s what needs to happen.”

Agreed. I would add it was just plain stupidity and arrogance of buyers as prices skyrocketed to become cheerturds.

42   thomas.wong1986   2010 Jun 22, 5:42am  

pkennedy says

Yes very informative, it basically debunks “fortress areas need to fall” that everyone talks about here. Many areas around here will never fall due to exactly what you stated. Places like palo alto, los gatos and others will remain high because they are very desirable.

http://www.paloaltoonline.com/news_features/real_estate/fall2000/2000_09_22.trends.php

"No one wants to recognize it, but between 1989 and 1992, prices dropped 30 to 40 percent. There's no question that could happen again. Everything has a cycle and real estate is no exception. It's foolish to think prices will go up forever. In the longer term they will, if you can weather the downturns in between. There's no way to know," Dancer said.

So what makes PA or LG imune to price declines? The majority of the price inflation comes form the free wheeling stock options of 1999. Take away IPOs and stock options what do you have left to support these prices. There is very little to support these prices. Desirabilty means very little.

« First        Comments 36 - 42 of 42        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste