patrick.net

Transportation will continue to be a problem until we achieve teleportation.

Teleportation has severe philosophical issues.

I’m confident we’ll find a way around its philosophical ones too!

Oh really? The issue will be as fundamental as existence itself.

Is teleportation about the destruction and reconstruction of objects? Will the soul be "transported" safely? Many issues.

Is teleportation about the destruction and reconstruction of objects? Will the soul be “transported” safely? Many issues.

I sold my soul forward on the futures market years ago, so I'll volunteer to give it a try. Just keep house flies out of the portapod chamber.

By the way, didn't someone like Michio Kaku calculate that the amount of computing energy alone required to reassemble the human brain at a quantum level would be about equal to the total output of energy from a small galaxy? Maybe it was just a sun. I forget.

I'll worry about this in about 150,000 more years of progressive technological advancement.

Philosophical issues aside, teleportation may put UPS and FedEx out of business.

Plane had parachute.....it's a new safety feature being installed to allow pilots to break a stall if they aren't able to using piloting skills....not a bad thing and a pretty good example of one guy finding a cheap solution to a big problem. They don't work well when you fly into a building though......

The pilot had his ticket for just a few months and that qualifies him as the most dangerous person in the air. You get your license and think you can fly, do something stupid, and die.

In NYC, you screw up, crash, and they pick up the pieces. In the PacNW, you crash, you die, and they don't find the pieces because the animals eat them. Hey, DinOR, remember that idiot who went camping, got up to take a piss in the middle of the night, fell off a cliff, and is suing the Feds for not having warning signs in the wilderness?

Don't get me started on flying stories because I'll never shutup.

fyi: Turns out the pilot was probably Yankees pitcher Cory Lidle. Personally, my money was on Mark Foley (suicide/blaze-of-glory thing), so I lose.

Btw, there's now a pro-Casey poster named "astrid-hater".

Doug H,

You don't want to get me started either! I'm just now learning of the details so I don't want to go off but it doesn't surprise me it's a rookie pilot. Obviously the standards applied by the FAA to pilot an aircraft need to be reviewed.

BUT the FAA serves everyone up as the sacrificial lamb b/c they are NEVER wrong! It's always the air traffic guy, the pilot, the mechanic that's at fault. Never their policies and proceedures.

astrid,

You may now do your little "victory dance" around your chair!

Back to the topic, is there any official source documenting who the bagholders are for MBS? I heard it was China, but I highly doubt the claim, since I just discovered that about 10% of my PIMCO foreign bond fund (unhedged) seems to be in FNMA, FHLC and some MBS stuff.

I certainly hope that it is not the Americans who are holding this stinking bag, we already have a lot to hold at this point.

Robert Cote Says:

> The failure to understand Prop 13 is surely a
> growth industry.

Most people like me that think Prop. 13 is unfair understand it (I have read every word many times).

> Anyone here have a problem with State limits
> on maximum income tax rates or sales taxes?

I would like to not only limit income taxes and sales taxes I would like to “eliminate” them (and scale back the government so all it does is defend our borders and run our courts).

> Prop 13 applies equally to everyone regardless
> of age or denomination.

No it does not. Some people pay 20 times more year after year in property taxes for the same city services…

> Anyone here comfortable with changing the Sales tax
> such that you are expected to pay 8.25% of what the
> highest price anyone has or will have paid for equivalent
> items?

I don’t think many people would complain if the one time “transfer tax” was based on the sale price as long as everyone paid the same taxes going forward. Would it be fair if I bought a Honda 10 years ago and was paying $100 a year (increasing by 2% a year) to register it with the DMV and someone who just moves to the state and buys a similar 10 year old Honda has to pay $2,000 a year (increasing by 2% a year) to register it with the DMV and drive on the same roads?

@Jon,

Rent control --like so many other attempts by government to mitigate risk and/or inject "fairness" into the marketplace for certain select groups-- ends up creating at least a couple of huge moral hazards that are worse than the "problem" it was trying to solve (poor people being priced out of their existing rentals). I'd recommend re-reading Peter P's & FAB's takes on the matter, but to summarize:

1. It dis-incentivizes HBs & RE investors from building/funding new rental construction (because rent hikes cannot even keep pace with inflation, much less demographic changes in the marketplace, gentrification, etc.). Up until recently, Santa Monica had among the toughest iron-clad rent control laws in the country, and as a result, basically no new rental stock was built in nearly 30 years. And guess what happens when supply is strangled for over a generation?

2. Over time, artificial rent caps creates huge imbalances (see FAB's examples) where older renters pay almost zilch thanks to inflation, while new renters must pay market rate. Many old-timers will also arbitrage their indirect rent subsidy in illegal (but almost impossible to police) ways, such as informally sub-letting their rent controlled apartments. This is basically creating a black market, where actual rents eventually rise to the market rate anyhow.

You can apply the same government mis-pricing arguments against minimum wage, argricultural subsidies, Prop. 13, etc. Accurately pricing commodities or labor better than the free market can does not seem to be government's strong suit.

There's no need for rent control. If you want stability, pay a premium and sign a really really long lease.

HARM and DinOR,

I saw that. I didn't understand why I got singled out, since the comment had nothing to do with anything I said.

It must be my sparkling online personality.

The practical reason income taxation cannot likely ever be eliminated is Constitutional. I have been a pure use/sale tax advocate for many years. The unfortunate practical truth, however, is that any elimination or even dramatic flattening or reduction of income taxation will only result in states co-opting Federal taxation with more State taxation. And the Federal gov't cannot legally prevent this without an amendment to the US Constitution, which, by the way, 3/4 of States have to ratify, and very few of those by direct popular vote. So it ain't gonna happen, as much as it would be the right answer. Oh, and the Federal gov't will have lost any "encouragement power" they might have had once they no longer have Federal tax revenues to dribble back to the states in return for their obedience. So again, it won't happen.

allah,

That's exactly why I [very seriously] offerred to buy one ticket. He failed to respond, by the way.

There are some pretty distinct rules about conflict of interest participants in such raffles, when they are legal. You know, the "no employees or family" kind of stuff.

I know I'd lose my $50. But for another $15? (it used to be $15, not sure now) I can at least drag his ass into small claims court for entertainment value. We can all go have beers at the Marin Brewing Company afterwards.

Randy,

I hope your not seriously interested in buying a raffle from him! Whether it is legit or not, buying a raffle from him is going against all principles that us bubbleheads believe in! This kid needs to learn a lesson! Why should he get a bail-out, especially from people who have helped make this bubble and destroy alot of our plans all due to greed. Let this kid take his beating like a man! It's like he went to Vegas and lost his nest egg gambling and then went back to the casino and asked, "Please give the money back, I don't know what I was doing, this is all we have", sob story. He knew the risks, now he has to pay the price. Anyone buying a raffle from him is in my opinion, dumber than him!

I wouldn't buy a ticket if I knew I was going to win!

allah,

I have no intention of "winning". In fact, quite the contrary. I am calling his bluff. He won't sell me a ticket because, if he does, then I'll have standing to demand performance or sue for it. And if I could actually get myself directly harmed by his scam, even for a paltry $50, then I could forward that to his DA with a complaint that he's running illegal real estate drawings for properties he doesn't even really owned.

If I'm lucky, I can catch him trying to beat me up on camera and get it on Fox news. lol.

That's what I thought.....but don't give him $50 regardless, buy your Wife something nice instead, or your kid. He will probably be in jail around this time next year and I know he has alot of fans in jail (if you know what I mean).

astrid, is your food blog down?

Is his raffle legal? If not, is buying a ticket illegal per se?

If I’m lucky, I can catch him trying to beat me up on camera and get it on Fox news. lol.

LOL :lol:

If I’m lucky, I can catch him trying to beat me up on camera and get it on Fox news. lol.

I can tell he doesn't have any balls so this won't happen, but his Wife might! :lol:

(I think it is still overpriced, but it really seems like the asking is lower than other recent places)

Patience SFW, another year or so you will be saying "I can't believe a couple of years ago I thought the price (several hundred thousand more) wasn't too bad, good thing I didn't buy back the!".

btw - I bet that plasma you see in the picture was purchase with home equity!

RE: that house in Cow Hollow

It has power cables everywhere outside.

Peter P,

Yeah, the front page is down but I can still access the contents.

http://greencrabs.blogspot.com/2006/10/baking-books.html

I'm going to do some lateral thinking on this and hope something works.

You just think making people pay 1% if they buy now is unfair to the 1% people compared the people sometimes paying 1.8% on their purchases.

If they don't like having been screwed like that, and now paying $600 a year while the new neighbor pays $6000 a year, they could sell and buy again. :)

SQT,

Thanks, the front page is back on.

I didn't realize the moderation was on either. Oops!

I made both you and Peter P administrators, so please feel free to make changes, add people or do anything else you'd like.

For anyone else interested, my(our) new food blog is at http://greencrabs.blogspot.com/

If you like what you see (or don't like what you see and want to make changes) and would like to contribute (as much or as little as you like), please let me know and I'll email you an invite.

hey, they've already perfected teleportation:

CNN.com - Scientists teleport two different objects

i wonder if you could then use the same technology to photocopy people?

i've been working on a noiseless, rotorless anti-gravity machine in my spare time for a while now... it's working pretty well, it just takes a while to set the spring...

..what?
You're not using the ultra-new 'hamster in a wheel' technology?

That's what my PC runs on. Oh, and a backup using rubber bands.