0
0

Why some market regulation is necessary and good for the economy


               
2007 Jul 30, 4:16am   16,145 views  125 comments

by HARM   follow (0)  

We've had many posts on Laissez-Faire, anarchic capitalism vs. regulated markets here before, and I'm sure we'll have more in the future. Just saw this gem today (nod to Ben Jones) and wanted to share it with you. Here is a succinct real-world example of why I believe that some government regulation of credit/capital markets is necessary and good for the economy, and why private firms cannot always be trusted to "self-regulate" all the time.

Fund manager's fun sailing away

John Devaney, the CEO of United Capital Markets, a fund that specializes in buying and selling bonds that are backed by the mortgage payments, particularly adjustable rate subprime mortgages, has put his 142-foot yacht "Positive Carry" up for sale, according to a yacht broker's Web site.

Devaney's fund has run into trouble lately. A spokesman for the firm told Reuters on July 3 that it had stopped honoring request from some of its investors for redemptions, or withdrawal, of investments

"The consumer has to be an idiot to take on those loans," he said. "But it has been one of our best-performing investments."

Discuss, enjoy...
HARM

#housing

Comments 1 - 12 of 125       Last »     Search these comments

1   Bork   2007 Jul 30, 5:36am  

Not so sure who is an idiot in this case. The very fact that Mr. Devaney cannot afford his yacht clearly indicates that he was hoping that the subprime loan music will last forever which is obviously defies the common sense. On the other hand subprime borrowers have a good chance that their distressed baaah-ing will be heard by the government. No mercy for the private fund manager though (predatory lending anyone?).

2   HARM   2007 Jul 30, 5:42am  

@Bork,

No kidding. I wonder, did Mr. Devaney recognize the irony of his "idiot" comment after the fact? (I doubt it)

3   HeadSet   2007 Jul 30, 5:44am  

Maybe Devaney himself paid for the yacht with a no-doc home equity extraction.

4   DinOR   2007 Jul 30, 5:56am  

HARM,

I swear it was like just a year ago someone was doing an article on what a genius this guy was and look at his pretty new yacht! I'll try to google this @$$clown and see what I come up with.

My how things change.

5   Steveoh   2007 Jul 30, 5:58am  

Interesting. So is the contrast between today and this 2004 profile.

http://tinyurl.com/33gvj8

A few quotes:

(In early 2004) “…this man was running his business out of a three-bedroom residential house in Florida.”
“…UCM moved out of the residential house and into a Key Biscayne’s largest office building; the company owns a 142-foot corporate yacht with a crew of nine, a Gulf Stream G400 helicopter and a corporate jet.”

“So it seems that, against all the odds, a firm that started life as a one-man outfit only five years ago has become one of the fastest-growing broker-dealers in a market plagued by headline risk and a conspicuous lack of liquidity”

“The broker-dealer has 18 employees, including professionals poached from Wall Street—Devaney’s cohort on the trading desk is a former ABS trader at Bear Stearns, Sean Kirk.”

“…as a move to add diversity to the firm and balance the risks in UCM’s other markets, UCM also launched a collateralized mortgage obligation (CMO) trading desk based in California run by Dan Steuer, formerly of Countrywide Securities.”

6   DinOR   2007 Jul 30, 6:06am  

Steveoh,

Thanks, nice find. I'm positive they ran the exact same photograph when running the "genius" article a few short months back! I never forget a smug face. Not so smug NOW are ya!

(What is the market for ridiculous yachts these days anyway?)

7   HARM   2007 Jul 30, 6:07am  

Amazing how interconnected the housing bubble-blog world is. It looks like Aaron Krowne (of ML-Implode-O-Meter fame) has bought and taken possession of Casey's site:

http://iamfacingforeclosure.com/history.html

8   Steveoh   2007 Jul 30, 6:16am  

"...I believe that some government regulation of credit/capital markets is necessary and good for the economy, and why private firms cannot always be trusted to “self-regulate” all the time.
"

Absolutely!

But who is in a position to regulate the (private) Fed? They are the definitive *puppet masters* of this whole mess IMHO, and in no danger of being labeled philanthropists

DinOR,

I had that same deja vu feeling. And yes, that is the same (not sure what to do with my hands) picture.

9   DennisN   2007 Jul 30, 6:36am  

"Devaney’s cohort on the trading desk is a former ABS trader at Bear Stearns, Sean Kirk"

Now there's a really good recommendation for you! A Bear Stearns whiz kid!

10   Steveoh   2007 Jul 30, 7:09am  

Sorry of the slightly OT post, but I’m a recovering boat-nut and wondered what this yacht, “Positive Carry” looked like inside. Nice!

http://tinyurl.com/32t9ah

11   Bruce   2007 Jul 30, 7:38am  

Interiors and other pictures of 'Positive Carry' at

http://www.trinityyachts.com/141positivecarry.asp

12   HARM   2007 Jul 30, 7:49am  

But who is in a position to regulate the (private) Fed?

Good question. The President appoints the Fed Chief and the Senate confirms and (in theory) oversees him/her. However, as you pointed out, the Fed isn't a true state "Central Bank" under direct public control, as is the case in most other countries. Personally, I would like to see the private Fed abolished, it's policy of interest rate manipulation (mainly for Wall Street insiders' gain) ended, and its (mostly neglected) "policing" powers passed over to the Treasury Dept --a real government agency. See this previous thread for more details if you're curious.

Comments 1 - 12 of 125       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste