patrick.net

simcha Says:
February 19th, 2008 at 11:43 pm
Discusses his Oakland apartment

I believe your case illustrates how prop 13 benefits renters as well as owners, especially over time. Yes, you don't write the check for the taxes but all those costs you feel like you are avoiding are built into your rent. Renters ultimately pay property taxes just like owners living in their homes.

Oh, one extra note regarding San Diego, the current crisis wan't really caused by an economic slowdown, basically it was caused by pension fund mismanagement. I don't think it was bust from the subprime crisis but that sure isn't going to help.

Malcom,

San Diego has had problems for years. Didn't one of the auditors resign something like 3 years back? (Damn whistle blowers!)

DennisN,

Any on-site intel on Tamarack Resorts? I read over at MISH that their bridge loan collapsed when Soc. Gen. had their trading scandal. Just curious.

Here's the local paper's take on Tamarack. After reading the story I'm still not certain as to what the heck is going on.
www.idahostatesman.com/newsupdates/story/300667.html
I'd always heard that power couple Steffi Graf and Andre Aggasi were the backers of Tamarack but I don't see them named in the story.

Thanks Dennis!

It wasn't until the last line that you learn 76.3 mil. of their 93 mil. in revenue came from "real estate sales". Soc. Gen doesn't have the money and it would seem everyone else w/ the resources to write out a 118 mil. check suddenly can't find their wallet?

God I hate resorts!

I don't know - $17 million in revenue from golf and ski operations sounds pretty good to me. I thought ski resorts around Tahoe struggled to operate in the black.

But you're right - having a business plan dependent upon selling nothing but luxo-resort-condos isn't exactly wise at the present time.

DinOR Says:
February 20th, 2008 at 8:03 am
"Malcom,
San Diego has had problems for years. Didn’t one of the auditors resign something like 3 years back? (Damn whistle blowers!)"

Hi DinOR. I kind of thought you'd share some of your impressions from your shore patrol days here. Yes, you're right and I think that guy is running for office here and some people aren't happy. I'm in a suburb so I don't really follow the city politics too much.

My respect for Obama just went up a few more points:

I prefer to have Hillary Clinton as the Democratic nominee. Obama poses to much threat to McCain.

I don't think McCain has any chance of winning against Obama if he gets the nomination. McCain is nicknamed as Bush III for his stance on war and Mr Bush is the most hated President now.

Malcom,

Don't ever get me wrong (I'd love to spend more time in San Diego!) Our neighbor spends part of the year in Encinitas (sp?) and seldom seems half as aggravated as "I" am!

With escalating housing costs most of my retired buddies have been driven inland. Temecula, Murrieta etc. I lived in Imperial Beach and still check prices there from time to time. That aside it just seems SD has this legacy of corruption (Duke Cunningham and a number of mayors?)

"McCain is nicknamed...." (as?)

Yes by all means let's spread that around as much as possible! WHY... he and the Prez see eye-to-eye on virtually everything! (Especially water-boarding and torture of all kinds)

In fact, I'm ordering my "Let's not elect Bush III again this time either...?...!" bumper stickers as we speak!

Good Lord.

I don’t think McCain has any chance of winning against Obama if he gets the nomination. McCain is nicknamed as Bush III for his stance on war and Mr Bush is the most hated President now.

I think McCain will still win regardless. However, it is nice to see a landslide victory.

The Iraq war is horrible and I am certain McCain can make improvements. Other than Iraq, Bush isn't worse than any big-government Democrat. Also, Bush is NOT the populist politician type that we despise.

I prefer to have Hillary Clinton as the Democratic nominee. Obama poses to much threat to McCain.

McCain's not a bad guy, but between the two, I'll take Obama. Not perfect either, but at least he doesn't have to tow his party's disastrous foreign policy & war baggage with him.

In USA voters generally don't elect old candidates. McCain is 71, and will be 72 by the time he gets into the office early next year (if he gets elected). Regan was the oldest President to be elected at 69 and FDR was youngest at 42.

Regan was the oldest President to be elected at 69 and FDR was youngest at 42.

Many people agree that Reagan is the best President ever.

FDR stole gold from Americans and created the New Deal crap.

FDR stole gold from Americans and created the New Deal crap.

And instituted the SEC, Social Security, the FDIC and steered us (victoriously) through WWII. The New Deal you blithely dismiss as "crap" may also have prevented a Communist revolution during the depths of the Great Depression. Perfect? No. But let's give credit where credit is due.

FYI: my dad might have starved if it weren't for the CCC, so I indirectly owe my life to FDR.

Peter P

What do you mean by "The Iraq war is horrible and I am certain McCain can make improvements"?

Do you think we should continue to support one past mistake or try to improve on past mistakes? In medical terms when one of your body parts is rotten and it starts spreading into other parts of your body it is always suggested to chop off that part before it is too late. We should retreat from IRAQ ASAP. There is no alternative.

Obama's CHANGE campaign is working so well because he is proactive on his stance on IRAQ and other issues. Now, what he does after getting elected is another story.......but for now he saying things that is most obvious and I can agree to that.

Let's try to keep some perspective here: integrity and good ideas have no party affiliation.

DinOR,

Well put. I should get one of those bumper-stickers, too.

I think Bush and McCain both should be sent to the Iraqi desert, where they could wander around for 40years until they regain their senses, if that is possible.

HARM,

>>McCain’s not a bad guy,

Seriously, McCain is a VERY bad guy. He does not see anything wrong with occupying Iraq for 100 years. That would be a mistake of truly biblical proportions.

Here's a thought: You know how it is popular for right-wingers to say well-if-you-hate-America-so-much-then-why-dont you-go-back-to-where-you-came-from?

I propose a twist on that one: If you love occupying {Iraq, CountryX} so much, why don't you go over there and stay as long as the occupation lasts.

Perhaps we should make it a rule that any president that wages war should spend 4 years (or 2 terms) in any country they conquered after they leave office, whether that war is over or not.

We should retreat from IRAQ ASAP. There is no alternative.

Sure. I agree. That should be the goal.

HARM, we should agree to disagree.

It is also arguable that the New Deal worsened the Great Depression.

As an alternative, he could also have incentivized production and investment though targeted tax cuts and tax credits.

Cut and Run will definitely be the big issue this election cycle. The real question, though, is are we referring to housing or Iraq?

The real question, though, is are we referring to housing or Iraq?

People care A LOT more about housing than Iraq. Oops. Hillary may have a chance.

Remember Escaped From DC? He predicted that HRC will become the next FDR.

Something we can all agree on: the Clintons should not be allowed anywhere near the White House.

http://www.thecherokeean.com/news/2008/0220/Front_Page/004.html

“In a campaign swing through East Texas last Friday, former President Bill Clinton…predicted that another one million ‘of your fellow citizens’ are facing foreclosures on homes because of the current mortgage meltdown.”

“‘We’ll tell the mortgage companies: you eat 20 percent, we (the government) will eat 20 percent, you won’t foreclose on these people,’ he said. ‘When you’re in a hole, you quit digging.’”

Umm... what's this "we"? Oh, right: he means savers & responsible taxpayers.

At least McCain is closer to being a supply-sider.

Something we can all agree on: the Clintons should not be allowed anywhere near the White House.

Go watch Definitely, Maybe!

I think the reality is that if Obama were to be elected, Iraq would get worse. Much worse. But I just love the fact that we're already dismissing HC!

If we're basing our judgements on McCain's age the truth is that the man should have died several times over. Hollywood portrays ejecting out of a jet aircraft as some sort of "thrill ride". I'm here to tell you as a first hand witness (it's a 50-50 thing). Even just landing on an aircraft carrier is dicey. Add in the better part of a decade in the "Hilton" and I'd say this is a guy that'll die when he's good and ready.

I vastly prefer McCain to Osama. But I want to see Osama beat Hitlery for the Dumbocrat nomination first.

“‘We’ll tell the mortgage companies: you eat 20 percent, we (the government) will eat 20 percent, you won’t foreclose on these people,’ he said. ‘When you’re in a hole, you quit digging.’”

Umm… what’s this “we”? Oh, right: he means savers & responsible taxpayers.

I completely see your point BUT if any US government forces the banks to split the losses 50-50, I'll be ecstatic. So far there is every indication that they are forcing them to eat practically nothing (what with all the rate reductions and TAF). And the UK seem to be doing even worse (as in nationalizing).

However, as an undecided on the Nov. election, there's a larger issue here for me. Politicians will say whatever during a campaign. One can look at their past history and close allies to guesstimate what they'll actually try (no guarantee of success, see Pres. Bush) to do. On those grounds, where do Obama supporters get their confidence that he's a "good bet" for the US?

(no flames please - I am genuinely stunned by the level of support he is receiving from practically everyone and I'd love to figure it out)

McCain does not see anything wrong with occupying Iraq for 100 years, well, neither do 99% of Americans either.

Every day is the Day Of The Condor in the Empire. Never forget that.

McCain does not see anything wrong with occupying Iraq for 100 years, well, neither do 99% of Americans either.

Make that 60% or so.

BayAreaIdiot,

I think part of the sensation comes from what McCain describes as the "Holiday from History". Everyone is SO tired of the war (and Bush) they're willing to agree to (or jump on) any bandwagon they see as providing relief?

*See "BDS"

DinOR
a very good theory, thanks! There must surely be other dynamics at play too though...I'll keep looking :-)

On those grounds, where do Obama supporters get their confidence that he’s a “good bet” for the US?

I'm hardly an Obama groupie/fanatic, but I guess his modest appeal for me could be summed up as:
--not pro-quagmire
--not pro-bailout
--not Hillary

but HARM (with the exception of point 3!) those other two items are what he says. Any politician can and will say anything they deem useful in an election campaign. How do you know (or more accurately "guesstimate") what he'll actually try to do? Or is it just that you find the alternatives so unpalatable, you'd rather take a gamble than stay at home and not vote at all?

peeterPee - nope, 99% at least. You don't get my Day Of The Condor reference. 99% at least of Americans do NOT want to comprimise on their Way Of Life(tm) and that includes cheap-ish gas, and all the other fruits of Empire. Cheney is NOT stupid, and when he said our Way Of Life(tm) is not negotiable, he merely said what 99% of Americans feel, deeply, but don't have the guts to come out and say, themselves.

Cheney is NOT stupid, and when he said our Way Of Life(tm) is not negotiable, he merely said what 99% of Americans feel, deeply, but don’t have the guts to come out and say, themselves.

I see your point.