« First « Previous Comments 143 - 146 of 146 Search these comments
True, I had not thought about it, but rents (and therefore property prices) would be lower without Section 8 type subsidies.
But you can't let families with young kids be homeless. We should take care of our fellow citizens at least that much. What's a better way to do it?
True, I had not thought about it, but rents (and therefore property prices) would be lower without Section 8 type subsidies.
But you can’t let families with young kids be homeless. We should take care of our fellow citizens at least that much. What’s a better way to do it?
No, of course not! People who can ill afford to have children should be subsidized by those who work for a living. 'Magically' squeezing out children should give you a free spot on the public trough. If welfare recipients want to have dozens of children (by god knows how many baby~daddys) they should be encouraged to do so because we 'can't let families with young kids be homeless'. 'We should take care of our fellow citizens at least by that much.' *rolly~eyes emoticon*
Peter P bought a house.
Almost as stunning as when surfer-x capitulated. Do you know the city where Peter P settled?
« First « Previous Comments 143 - 146 of 146 Search these comments
Judge Smales: "You'll get nothing and like it!"
Banks Lose to Deadbeat Homeowners as Loans Sold in Bonds Vanish
Some highlights:
"Lost-note Affidavits". Add that to "Bandos" as a nominee for best new bubble buzzword of the year.
HARM
#housing